A Fitting “Social Model”: Culturally Locating Telemadre.Com

REFERENCES

• Anonymous. 2002a. “Nati Garcia: Ser ‘Telemadre’ es una terapia contra la soledad.” Los Domingos de ABC June 6: 5; available at: http://www.telemadre.com/img/abc_2jun02.pdf (accessed October 31, 2005).
   Google Scholar
• Anonymous. 2002b. Capital, July: 98; available at http://www.telemadre.com/img/capital_jul02.pdf (accessed October 31, 2005).
   Google Scholar
• A Buen Común 2000. Mujeres Invisibles. Documentary video.
   Google Scholar
• Alberdi, I. 1999. La Nueva Familia Espanola. Madrid: Taurus.
   Google Scholar
• Alborch, C. 1999. Solas: gozos y sombras de una manera de vivir. Madrid: Ediciones Temas de Hoy.
   Google Scholar
• Brandes, S. 1981. “Like Wounded Stags: Male Sexual Ideology in an Andalusian Town.” In S. Ortner and H. Whitehead (eds) Sexual Meanings: The Cultural Construction of Gender and Sexuality, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge; 216–39.
   Google Scholar
• Brooksbank Jones, A. 1997. Women in Contemporary Spain Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• BBC. 2002 “Spain's Cyber-Mums Dish It Up” BBC News Online, November 12, available at: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/2416413.stm (accessed October 27, 2005).
   Google Scholar
• Cook, S. 2004. “Between the Book and the Cinema: Late Victorian New Media.” Visual Studies 19(1): 60–71.
   Google Scholar
• Corbin, J. and M. Corbin. 1984. Compromising Relations: Kith, Kin and Class in Andalusia. Hampshire: Gower Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Fishburne Collier, J. 1997. From Duty to Desire: Remaking Families in a Spanish Village, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gilmore, D. 1985. “Introduction.” Anthropology IX: Special Issue 3: Sex and Gender in Southern Europe: Problems and Prospects: 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Grasseni, C. 2004. “Skilled Visions: an Apprenticeship in Breeding Aesthetics.” Social Anthropology, 12(1): 41–56.
   Google Scholar
• Hochschild, A. 1983. The Managed Heart: Commercialization of Human Feeling. Berkeley, CA: University of California.
   Google Scholar
• Lupton, D. 1994. The Emotional Self: a Sociocultural Exploration. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• MacClancy, J. 1996. “Female Bullfighting, Gender Stereotyping and the State.” In J. MacClancey (ed.) Sport, Identity and Ethnicity. Oxford: Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Martínez Pérez, A. 2000. (ed.) Taller de las Cuatro Estaciones: Viaje en torno al Deseo y la Mujer en la Identidad del Sur de Europa. Una Aproximación Socioantropológica, Madrid: Urgel.
   Google Scholar
• McLuhan, M. 1964. Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. New York: Signet Books.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, D. and D. Slater. 2000. The Internet: an Ethnographic Approach. Oxford: Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Moreno, S. 2002. El Pais, May 12: 6.
   Google Scholar
• Petridou, E. 2001. “The Taste of Home.” In D. Miller (ed.) Home Possessions. Oxford: Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Pink, S. 1997. Women and Bullfighting: Gender, Sex and the Consumption of Tradition. Oxford: Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Pink, S. 2001. Doing Visual Ethnography: Images, Media and Representation in Research. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Pink, S. 2003. “'A bit of dust on the floor': in the absence of the Spanish housewife?” The Journal of Gender Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Pink, S. 2004. Home Truths: Gender, Domestic Objects and Everyday Life. Oxford: Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Sanchíz, P. (ed.) 1992. Mujer Andaluza: la Caida de un Mito? Seville: Munoz Moya y Montraveta Editores. Biblioteca Andaluza.
   Google Scholar
• Schweitzer, P. 2000a. “Introduction.” In P. Schweitzer (ed.) Dividends of Kinship: Meanings and Uses of Social Relatedness. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schweitzer, P. 2000b. “Concluding Remarks.” In P. Schweitzer (ed.) Dividends of Kinship: Meanings and Uses of Social Relatedness. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Seremetakis, N. 1994. “The Memory of the Senses: Historical Perception, Commensal Exchange, and Modernity.” In L. Taylor (ed.) Visualizing Theory. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma, U. and P. Black 2001. “Look Good, Feel Better: Beauty Therapy as Emotional Labour.” In Sociology 35(9): 913–31.
   Google Scholar
• Silva, E. 2000. “The Politics of Consumption @ Home” PAVIS Papers in Social and Cultural Research, Number 1. Milton Keynes: Faculty of Social Sciences, The Open University.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, P. J. 2003. Contemporary Spanish Culture: TV, Fashion, Art and Film. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stoller, P. 1989. The Taste of Ethnographic Things: The Senses in Ethnography. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Strathern, M. 2002. “Abstraction and Decontextualization: An Anthropological Comment.” In S. Woolgar (ed.) Virtual Society?: Technology, Cyberbole, Reality. Oxford: Oxford University Press; pp. 302–13.
   Google Scholar
• Urdangarin, A. 2002. “Madre si hay más que una” Al Dia June 16: 5.
   Google Scholar
• Wellman, B. and C. Haythornwaite 2002. The Internet in Everyday Life. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• White, J. 2000. “Kinship, Reciprocity and the World Market.” In P. Schweitzer (ed.) Dividends of Kinship: Meanings and Uses of Social Relatedness. London: Routledge; pp. 124–50.
   Google Scholar
• Woolgar, S. 2002. “Five Rules of Virtuality.” In S. Woolgar (ed.) Virtual Society?: Technology, Cyberbole, Reality. Oxford: Oxford University Press; pp. 1–22.
   Google Scholar