Teenagers' Multisensory Routes for Learning in the Museum

References

• Anderson, G. (ed.). 2004. Reinventing the Museum: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives on the Pardigm Shift. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.
   Google Scholar
• Appadurai, A. 1996. Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minneapolis Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, T. 1995. The Birth of the Museum: History, Theory, Politics. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bitgood, S. 2000. “The Role of Attention in Designing Effective Interpretive Labels.” Journal of Interpretation Research 5(2), 31–45.
   Google Scholar
• Bitgood, S. 2009. “Museum Fatigue: A Critical Review.” Visitor Studies 12(2): 93–111.
   Google Scholar
• Brächler, B. and Postill, J. 2010. Theorising Media and Practice. New York: Berghan Books.
   Google Scholar
• Bäckström, Å. 2012 (e-pub ahead of print). “Knowing and Teaching Kinaesthetic Experience in Skateboarding: An Example of Sensory Emplacement.” Sport, Education and Society. Available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13573322.2012.713861#.UbZVtPbkXaw (accessed June 11, 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Classen, C. 2005. “Touch in the Early Museum.” In C. Classen (ed.), The Book of Touch, pp. 275–86. Oxford: Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Crossley, N. 2001. The Social Body: Habit, Identity and Desire. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Dall'Alba, G. and Barnacle, R. 2005. “Embodied Knowing in Online Environments.” Educational Philosphy and Theory 37(5): 719–44.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, E., Gosden, C. and Philips, R.B. 2006. “Introduction.” In E. Edwards, C. Gosden and R.B. Philips (eds), Sensible Objects: Colonialism, Museums and Material Culture, pp. 1–30. Oxford: Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Ellsworth, E. 2005. Places of Learning. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Falk, J. and Dierking, L. 2002. Lessons without Limits: How Free-Choice Learning is transforming Education. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fors, V. Submitted. The empty-meeting-place. Museum metaphors and their implications for learning. Special issue on museum learning in Designs for Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Fors, V., Bäckström, Å. and Pink, S. 2013. “Multisensory Emplaced Learning: Resituating Situated Learning in a Moving World.” Mind, Culture and Activity 20(2): 170–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, J. 1979. The Ecological Approach to Visual Peception. New York: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Green, B. 1998. “Teaching for Difference: Learning Theory and Postcritical Pedagogy.” In D. Buckingham (ed.), Teaching Popular Culture: Beyond Radical Pedagogy, pp. 177–97. London: University College London Press.
   Google Scholar
• Greeno, J.G., Collins, A. and Resnick, L.B. 1996. “Cognition and Learning.” In D.D. Berliner and R.C. Calfe (eds), Handbook of Educational Psychology, pp. 15–46. London: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Hein, G. 1998. Learning in the Museum. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hodkinson, P., Biesta, G. and James, D. 2008. “Understanding Learning Culturally: Overcoming the Dualism Between Social and Individual Views of Learning.” Vocations and Learning 1: 27–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooper-Greenhill, E. 2007. “Education, Postmodernity and the Museum.” In S.J. Knell, S. MacLeod and S. Watson (eds), Museum Revolutions: How Museums Change and Are Changed, pp. 367–77. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Howes, D. 2003. Sensual Relations: Engaging the Senses in Culture and Social Theory. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Howes, D. (ed.). 2005. Empire of the Senses: The Sensual Culture Reader. Oxford: Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Hwang, H. 2013. “Why Museums Suck.” LAYouth blog, February 28. Available online: http://www.layouth.com/why-museums-suck/(accessed June 10, 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Ihde, D. 2002. Bodies in Technology. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ingold, T. 2000. The Perception of the Environment. London: Routledge
   Google Scholar
• Introna, L. and Ilharco, F.M. 2004. “The Ontological Screening of Contemporary Life: A Phenomenological Analysis of Screens.” European Journal of Information Systems 13: 221–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, L. 2010. “How Web 2.0 is Changing the Nature of Museum Work.” Curator: The Museum Journal 53(4): 405–10.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, L. and Fitzgerald, P. 2011. “Cooperation, Collaboration, Challenge: How to Work with the Changing Nature of Educational Audiences in Museums.” In N. Mockler and J. Sachs (eds), Rethinking Educational Practice Through Reflexive Inquiry, pp. 77–88. London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, L. and Russo, A. 2008. “From Ladders of Participation to Networks of Participation: Social Media and the Museum Audiences.” Paper presented at the Museum and the Web conference, April 9–12, Montreal, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Larsen, J. 2008. “Practices and Flows of Digital Photographing: An Ethnographic Framework.” Mobilities 3(1): 141–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lave, J. and Wenger, E. 1991. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leinhardt, G., Crowley, K. and Knutson, K. (eds). 2011. Learning Conversations in Museums. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, A. 2011. “Young People's Museum Learning Experience with Multi-sensory Hands-on Technology.” Paper presented at the British Educational Research Association annual conference, London, September 6–8, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• MacDougall, D. 2005. The Corporeal Image: Film, Ethnography, and the Senses. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mason, L. 2007. “Introduction: Bridging the Cognitive and Sociocultural Approaches in Research on Conceptual Change: Is It Feasible?” Educational Psychologist 42(1): 1–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massey, D. 2005. For Space. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Moll, L., Amanti, C., Neffe, C. and Gonzalez, N. 1992. “Funds of Knowledge for Teaching: Using a Qualitative Approach to Connect Homes and Classrooms.” Theory in Practice 32(2): 132–41.
   Google Scholar
• Moores, S. 2012. Media, Practice & Mobility. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Nunes, M. 2006. Cyberspace of Everyday Life. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pink, S. 2007. Doing Visual Ethnography, 2nd edn. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Pink, S. 2009. Doing Sensory Ethnography. London: Sage
   Google Scholar
• Pink, S. 2012. “Visual Ethnography and the Internet: Visuality, Virtuality and the Spatial Turn.” In S. Pink (ed.), Advances in Visual Methodology, pp. 113–30. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Resnick, M. 1994. “Learning about Life.” Artificial Life 1: 229–41.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, I. 2007. “Pocket Technospaces: The Bodily Incorporation of Mobile Media.” Continuum: Journal of Media & Culture Studies 21(2): 205–15.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, I. 2011. “The Hybrid Ontology of Mobile Gaming.” Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies 17(4): 419–30.
   Google Scholar
• Russo, A., Watkins, J. and Groundwater-Smith, S. 2007. “The Impact of Social Media on Informal Learning in Museums.” Educational Media International 46(2): 153–66.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sfard, A. 1998. “On Two Metaphors for Learning and the Dangers of Choosing Just One.” Educational Researcher 27(2): 4–13.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, N. 2010. The Participatory Museum. Santa Cruz, CA: Museum 2.0.
   Google Scholar
• Säljö, R. 2003. “From Transfer to Boundary-Crossing.” In T. Tuomi-Gröhn and Y. Engeström (eds), Between School and Work: New Perspectives on Transfer and Boundary-Crossing, pp. 311–21. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Tallon, L. and Walker, K. (eds). 2008. Digital Technologies and the Museum Experience. Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thrift, N. 2007. Non-representational Theory: Space/Politics/Affect. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tomlinson, J. 2007. The Culture of Speed: The Coming of Immediacy. London: Sage
   Google Scholar
• Villi, M. 2010. “Visual Mobile Communication: Camera Phone Photo Messages as Ritual Communication and Mediated Presence.” Doctoral dissertation, Alto University, Finland: School of Art and Design.
   Google Scholar
• Wenger, E. 1998. Communities of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zipin, L. 2009. “Dark Funds of Knowledge, Deep Funds of Pedagogy: Exploring Boundaries between Lifeworlds and Schools.” Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education 30(3Engaging the Senses in Ethnographic Practice): 317–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar