Exhausting Discipline: Undisciplined and Irresponsible Design

References

• - Appiah, K.A. 2006. “The Case for Contamination.”New York Times Sunday Magazine (January 1).
   Google Scholar
• - Barrett, E., and Bolt, B. (eds). 2007. Practice as Research: Approaches to Creative Arts Enquiry. London: I.B. Tauris.
   Google Scholar
• - Berardi, F. (”Bifo”). 2010. “Exhaustion and the Senile Utopia of the Coming European Insurrection.” e-flux, 21: 4.
   Google Scholar
• - Blevis, E., and Stolterman, E. 2008. “The Confluence of Interaction Design and Design: From Disciplinary to Transdisciplinary Perspectives.” In Undisciplined! Proceedings of the Design Research Society Conference. Sheffield, UK: Sheffield Hallam University.
   Google Scholar
• - Borer, A. 1997. The Essential Joseph Beuys. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• - Bourriaud, N. 2009. Altermodern. London: Tate Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• - Brewer, J. 2010. “Microhistory and the Histories of Everyday Life.“ Cultural and Social History, 7, no. 1: 87–109.
   Google Scholar
• - Brown, B. 2009. “Counting (Art and Discipline).“ Critical Inquiry, 35, no. 4: 1032–53.
   Google Scholar
• - Buckley, B., and Conomos, J. (eds). 2009. Rethinking the Contemporary Art School: The Artist, the PhD and the Academy. Nova Scotia College of Art & Design University Press.
   Google Scholar
• - Chandler, J. 2009. “Introduction: Doctrines, Disciplines, Discourses, Departments.“ Critical Inquiry, 35, no. 4: 729–46.
   Google Scholar
• - de Duve, T. 1994. “When Form Has Become Attitude – And Beyond.” In The Artist and the Academy: Issues in Fine Art Education and the Wider Cultural Context, edited by S. Foster and N. de Ville, 19–31. Southampton: John Hansard Gallery.
   Google Scholar
• - de Duve, T. 2009. Faire école (ou la refaire?). Geneva and Dijon: Collection Mamco/Les presses du réel. Cited in J. Peeters, “School-Ridden Bodies,” Corpus: Internet Magazine for Dance Choreography Performance, http://www.corpusweb.net/school-ridden-bodies.html (accessed July 26, 2012).
   Google Scholar
• - Dykes, T., Rodgers, P.A., and Smyth, M. 2009. “Towards a New Disciplinary Framework for Contemporary Creative Design Practice.“ CoDesign, 5, no. 2: 99–116.
   Google Scholar
• - Elkins, J. (ed.). 2009. Artists with PhDs: On the New Doctoral Degree in Studio Art. Washington, DC: New Academia Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• - Feyerabend, P. 2010. Against Method. 4th edition. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• - Fish, S. 1989. “Being Interdisciplinary Is So Very Hard to Do.“ Profession, 89: 15–22.
   Google Scholar
• - Foster, H. 2002. “The ABCs of Contemporary Design.“ October, 100: 191–9.
   Google Scholar
• - Foster, H. 2011. The Art-Architecture Complex. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• - Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzmann, S., Scott, P., and Trow, M. 1994. The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• - Heppell, S. 2006. RSA Lectures: Stephen Heppell – Learning 2016. Available online: http://www.teachers.tv/video/4957 (accessed December 22, 2010).
   Google Scholar
• - Ibrahim, R., Fruchter, R., and Sharif, R. 2007. “Framework for a Cross-border Transdisciplinary Design Studio Education.“ ArchNet, 1, no. 3: 88–100.
   Google Scholar
• - Jantsh, E. 1972. “Towards Interdisciplinarity and Transdisciplinarity in Education and Innovation.” In Interdisciplinarity: Problems of Teaching and Research: Proceedings of Seminar on Interdisciplinarity in Universities, edited by G. Berger, A. Briggs and G. Michaud, 97–121. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
   Google Scholar
• - Klein, J.T. 1998. “Notes Toward a Social Epistemology of Transdisciplinarity.” Interactive Bulletin of the International Center for Research and Studies Transdisciplinary, 12.
   Google Scholar
• - Klein, J.T. 2000. “Integration, Evaluation, and Disciplinarity.” In Transdisciplinarity: Recreating Integrated Knowledge, edited by M.A. Sommerville and D.J. Rapport, 49–59. Oxford: EOLSS Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• - Kötter, R., and Balsiger, P.W. 1999. “Interdisciplinarity and Transdisciplinarity: A Constant Challenge To The Sciences.“ Issues in Integrative Studies, 17: 87–120.
   Google Scholar
• - Latour, B. 2004. “Why Has Critique Run out of Steam? From Matters of Fact to Matters of Concern.” Critical Inquiry, 30: 236.
   Google Scholar
• - Law, J., and Urry, J. 2004. “Enacting the Social,” Economy and Society, 33, no. 3: 390–410.
   Google Scholar
• - Leinss, M. 2007. “The Role of Designers in Multidisciplinary Teams.” In Cumulus Working Papers: Schwäbisch Gmünd, edited by E. Salmi. Helsinki: University of Art and Design, Helsinki.
   Google Scholar
• - Madoff, S.H. (ed.). 2009. Art School (Propositions for the 21st Century). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• - Marshall, J., and Bleecker, J. 2010. “Undisciplinarity.” In P.A. Rodgers and M. Smyth, Digital Blur: Creative Practice at the Boundaries of Architecture, Design and Art, 216–23. Oxon: Libri Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• - Miller, J. 1988. “The Mnemonic Book: Ed Ruscha's Fugitive Publications.“ Parkett, 18: 66–79.
   Google Scholar
• - Mitchell, W.J.T. 2009. “Art, Fate, and the Disciplines: Some Indicators.“ Critical Inquiry, 35, no. 4: 1023–31.
   Google Scholar
• - Nicolescu, B. 2005. “Towards Transdisciplinary Education.“ The Journal for Transdisciplinary Research in Southern Africa, 1, no. 1: 5–16.
   Google Scholar
• - Ostwald, Michael J., and Williams, Anthony. 2008. Understanding Architectural Education In Australasia. Volume 1: An Analysis of Architecture Schools, Programs, Academics and Students. Sydney: Australian Learning and Teaching Council and Carrick Institute for Learning and Teaching in Higher Education.
   Google Scholar
• - Ostwald, Michael J., and Williams, Anthony. 2008. Understanding Architectural Education In Australasia. Volume 2: Results and Recommendations. Sydney: Australian Learning and Teaching Council and Carrick Institute for Learning and Teaching in Higher Education.
   Google Scholar
• - Post, R. 2009. “Debating Disciplinarity.“ Critical Inquiry, 35, no. 4: 749–70.
   Google Scholar
• - Reinhold, M. 2011. “Financial Imaginaries: Toward a Philosophy of a City.” Grey Room, 42: 76.
   Google Scholar
• - Rendell, J. 2004. “Architectural Research and Disciplinarity.“ Architectural Research Quarterly, 8(4): 141–7.
   Google Scholar
• - Rodgers, P., and Bremner, C. 2011. “Alterplinarity: ‘Alternative Disciplinarity’ in Future Art and Design Research Pursuits.“ Studies in Material Thinking, 6 (December).
   Google Scholar
• - Rodgers, P.A., and Smyth, M. 2010. Digital Blur: Creative Practice at the Boundaries of Architecture, Design and Art. Oxon: Libri Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• - Schwab, M. 2011. “Editorial.” Journal for Artistic Research (JAR), 0. Available online: http://www.jar-online.net/index.php/issues/editorial/480 (accessed July 26, 2012)
   Google Scholar
• - Singer, S. et al. (eds). 2011. The Energy Report: 100% Renewable Energy by 2050. Switzerland: WWF International.
   Google Scholar
• - Sottsass, E. 2002. “Conferenza al Metropolitan Museum 1987.” In Ettore Sottsass: Scritti 1946–2001, edited by M. Carboni and B. Radice, 327–45. Milan: Neri Pozzi Editore.
   Google Scholar
• - Smith, H., and Dean, R.T. (eds). 2009. Practice-Led Research, Research-Led Practice in the Creative Arts. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• - Stein, Z. 2007. “Modeling the Demands of Interdisciplinarity: Toward a Framework for Evaluating Interdisciplinary Endeavors.” Integral Review, 4.
   Google Scholar
• - Tomiyama, T., D'amelio, V., Urbanic, J., and Elmaraghy, W. 2007. “Complexity of Multi-Disciplinary Design.“ CIRP Annals – Manufacturing Technology, 56, no. 1: 185–8.
   Google Scholar