Separation, Connection, and the Ambiguous Nature of Émigré Houses in Rural Highland Madagascar

REFERENCES

• Appadurai, A. (ed.). 1986. The Social Life of Things: Commodities in Cultural Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Astuti, R. 1995. People of the Sea: Identity and Descent amongst the Vezo of Madagascar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blier, S. 1987. The Anatomy of Architecture: Ontology and Metaphor in Batammaliba Architectural Expression. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bloch, M. 1971. Placing the Dead. London: Seminar Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bloch, M. 1975. “Introduction.” In M. Bloch (ed.) Political Language and Oratory in Traditional Societies, pp. 1–28. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bloch, M. 1989. “The Symbolism of Money in Imerina.” In J. Parry and M. Bloch (eds) Money and the Morality of Exchange, pp. 165–90. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bloch, M. 1995. “The Resurrection of the House amongst the Zafimaniry of Madagascar.” In J. Carsten and S. Hugh-Jones (eds) About the House: Levi-Strauss and Beyond, pp. 69–83. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bonnemaison, J. 1981. “Voyage autour du territoire.” Espace Geographique 4: 249–62.
   Google Scholar
• Carsten, J. 1995. “The Substance of Kinship and the Heat of the Hearth: Feeding, Personhood, and Relatedness among Malays in Pulau Langkawi.” American Ethnologist 22(2): 223–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carsten, J. and S. Hugh-Jones. 1995. “Introduction.” In J. Carsten and S. Hugh-Jones (eds) About the House: Levi-Strauss and Beyond, pp. 1–46. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cunningham, C. 1973. “Order in the Atoni House.” In R. Needham (ed.) Right & Left: Essays on Dual Symbolic Classification, pp. 204–38. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Danbolt, E. 1948. Det norske misjonsselskaps misjonærer 1842–1948. Stavanger: Det Norske Misjonsselskap.
   Google Scholar
• Ellen, R. 1986. “Microcosm, Macrocosm and the Nuaulu house: Concerning the Reductionist Fallacy as Applied to Metaphorical Levels.” Bijdragen tot de Taal-, Land-en Volkenkunde 142(1): 1–30.
   Google Scholar
• Feeley-Harnik, G. 1980. “The Sakalava House (Madagascar).” Anthropos 75: 559–85.
   Google Scholar
• Fortes, M. 1966. “Totem and Taboo.” Proceedings of the Royal Anthro-pological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland 1966: 5–22
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, L. 2004. “Voleurs de foies, voleurs de creurs. Europeenset Malgaches occidentalises vus par les Betsileos (Madagascar).” Terrain 43: 85–106.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. 1971. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Harmonds-worth: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Hirsch, J. 2003. A Courtship after Marriage: Sexuality and Love in Mexican Transnational Families. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hoskins, J. 1998. Biographical Objects: How Things Tell the Stories of People's Lives. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Joyce, R.A. and S.D. Gillespie (eds) 2000. Beyond Kinship: Social and Material Reproduction in House Societies. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Keenan, E. 1974. “Norm-Makers, Norm-Breakers: Uses of Speech by Men and Women in a Malagasy Community.” In R. Bauman and J. Sherzer (eds) Explorations in the Ethnography of Speaking, pp. 125–43. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Keller, E. 2008. “The Banana Plant and the Moon: Conservation and the Malagasy Ethos of Life in Masoala, Madagascar.” American Ethnologist 35(4): 650–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kopytoff, I. 1986. “The Cultural Biography of Things: Commoditization as Process.” In A. Appadurai (ed.) The Social Life of Things, pp. 64–91. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leinaweaver, J. 2009. “Raising the Roof in the Transnational Andes: Building Houses, Forging Kinship.” Journal of the Royal Anthro-pological Institute (N.S.) 15(4): 777–96.
   Google Scholar
• Leonardi, C. 2003. “Laying the First Course of Stones: Building the London Missionary Society Church in Madagascar, 1862–1895.” The International Journal of African Historical Studies 36(3): 607–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levi-Strauss, C. 1979. La Voie des Masques. Paris: Plon.
   Google Scholar
• Levi-Strauss, C. 1987. Anthropology and Myth: Lectures, 1951–1982. Trans. R. Willis. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, L. 1965[1885]. Houses and House Life of the American Aborigines. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Myers, F. 1988. “The Logic and Meaning of Anger among Pintupi Aborigines.” Man (N.S.) 23(4): 589–610.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, P. 1987. Dwellings: The House across the World. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pauli, J. 2008. “A House of One's Own: Gender, Migration, and Residence in Rural Mexico.” American Ethnologist 35(1): 171–87.
   Google Scholar
• Raison, J.-P. 1984. Les hautes terres de Madagascar et leurs confinsoccidentaux: enracinement et mobilite des societes rurales. Paris: Karthala.
   Google Scholar
• Sparkes, S. and S. Howell. 2003. The House in Southeast Asia: A Changing Social, Economic and Political Domain. London: Routledge Curzon.
   Google Scholar
• Stafford, C. 2003. “Introduction: The Separation Constraint in China.” In C. Stafford (ed.) Living with Separation in China, pp. 1–26. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, P. 1998. “Conspicuous Construction: Houses, Consumption and ‘Relocalization’ in Manambondro, Southeast Madagascar.” Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 4(3): 425–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varaine, P. 1960. Fandriana: monographie du district, Vol. 2. Antan-anarivo: Archive Nationale.
   Google Scholar
• Waterson, R. 1990. The Living House: An Anthropology of Architecture in South East Asia. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilk, R.R. 1989. “Houses as Consumer Goods: Social Processes and Allocation Decisions.” In B. Orlove and H. Rutz (eds) The Social Economy of Consumption, pp. 373–406. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
   Google Scholar