References
- Alfrey, P. (1999). Petrarch's Apes: Originality, Plagiarism and Copyright Principles within Visual Culture [internet]. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts lnstitute of Technology (Media in Transition Conference, 8–10 October 1999). Available at web.mit.edu/comm-forum/papers/alfrey.html [accessed 11 April 2006].
- Bayley, S. (1979). In Good Shape: Style in Industrial Products 1900 to 1960. London: Design Council.
- Buchanan, R. (2001). ‘Design research and the new learning'. Design Issues, 17(4), 3–23.
- Cross, N. (1999). ‘Design research: A disciplined conversation'. Design Issues, 15(2), 5–10.
- Cross, N. (2001). ‘Designerly ways of knowing: design discipline versus design science'. Design Issues, 17(3), 49–56.
- Cross, N. (2002). Design as a discipline [internet]. Leicester: De Montfort University (Designing Design Research 3 Conference, 13 February 2002). Available at: http://nelly.dmu.ac.uk/4dd/ZDDR3Cross.html [accessed 15 January 2006].
- Durling, D. (2000). ‘Reliable knowledge in design’. Working Papers in Art & Design, 1 [internet]. Available at: http://sitem.herts.ac.uk/artdes_research/papers/wpades/vol1/durling2.html [accessed 28 June 2005].
- Frayling, C. (1993). ‘Research into art & design’. Royal College of Art Research Papers, 1(1). London: Royal College of Art.
- Friedman, K. (2003). ‘Theory construction in design research: Criteria, approaches and methods'. Design Studies, 24, 507–522.
- Glanville, R. (1998). Keeping Faith with the Design in Design Research [internet]. Leicester: De Montfort University (Designing Design Research 2 Conference, 26 February 1998). Available at: http://nelly.dmu.ac.Uk/4dd//drs9.html [accessed 6 June 2005].
- Harvard, A. (2004). ‘Prototyping spoken here: artifacts and knowledge production in design'. Working Papers in Art & Design, 3 [internet]. Available at: http://sitem.herts.ac.uk/artdes_research/papers/wpades/vol3/ahfull.html [accessed 28 June 2005].
- Illich, I. (1973). Tools for Conviviality. New York: Harper & Row.
- Knowledge Transfer Partnerships (2006). Knowledge Transfer Partnerships [internet]. Available at: http://www.ktponline.org.uk [accessed 16 April 2006].
- Krippendorff, K. (2000). JISC PhD-Design Forum, mail sent 23 October 2000. Available at: http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/archives/phd-design.html [accessed 19 May 2005].
- Lambert Review (2003). Lambert Review of Business-University Collaboration. Available at: http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/consultations_and_legislation/lambert/consult_lambert_index.cfm [accessed 29 April 2006].
- Loh, M. H. (2004). ‘New and improved: Repetition as originality in Italian Baroque practice and theory'. Art Bulletin, 86(3), 477–504.
- Love, T. (2002). ‘Constructing a coherent cross-disciplinary body of theory about designing and designs: Some philosophical issues'. Design Studies, 23(3), 345–361.
- Margolin, V. (2002). The Politics of the Artificial: Essays on Design and Design Studies. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
- Office of Science and Technology (2006). Definition of Knowledge Transfer. Available at: http://www.ost.gov.uk/enterprise/knowledge/index.htm#What%20do%20you%20mean%20by%20Knowledge%20Transfer? [accessed 24 April 2006].
- RAE Team (1999). RAE Circular 5/99 [internet]. Available at: http://195.194.167.103/pubs/5_99/section1.htm [accessed 9 April 2005].
- Reilly, L. (2002). ‘An alternative model of “knowledge” for the arts'. Working Papers in Art & Design, 2 [internet]. Available at: http://sitem.herts.ac.uk/artdes_research/papers/wpades/vol2/reillyfull.html [accessed 28 June 2005].
- Royal College of Art (2006). The Teaching Experience. Available at: http://www.rca.ac.uk/pages/study/the_teaching_experience_2064.html [accessed 7 April 2006].
- Rust, C. (2001). JISC PhD-Design Forum, mail sent 5 February 2001. Available at: http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/archives/phd-design.html [accessed 19 May 2005].
- Rust, C. (2004). ‘Design enquiry: Tacit knowledge and invention in science'. Design Issues, 20(4), 76–85.
- Sample, l. (2006). ‘Drug firms accused of turning healthy people into patients'. The Guardian, 11 April 2006.
- Scientists for Global Responsibility (2006). Scientists for Global Responsibility [internet]. Available at: http://www.sgr.org.uk/ [accessed 12 April 2006].
- Scrivener, S.A.R. (2002). ‘The art object does not embody a form of knowledge'. Working Papers in Art & Design, 2 [internet]. Available at: http://sitem.herts.ac.uk/artdes_research/papers/wpades/vol2/scrivener.html [accessed 24 May 2005].
- Stanford University (2006). Mission Statement for Center for Design Research at Stanford University [internet]. Available at: http://corporate.stanford.edu/research/programs/cdr.html [accessed 24 April 2006].
- Wikipedia (2006). Knowledge Transfer [internet]. Available at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knowledge_transfer [accessed 24 April 2006].
- Wood, J. (2003). ‘The culture of academic rigour: Does design research really need it?’ The Design Journal, 3(1), 44–57.