Empathy through Accumulating Techné: Designing an Accessible Metro

References

• Antonakos, C. L. (2004). ‘Compensatory wayfinding behavior in topographical disorientation from brain injury'. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24(4), 495–502.
   Google Scholar
• Battarbee, K. (2003). ‘Making inclusive design work: design empathy'. Cumulus Working Papers Tallinn, Publication series G, University of Art and Design Helsinki, 58–61.
   Google Scholar
• Bernard, R. H. (1995). Research Methods in Anthropology: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches, 2nd edn. USA and London: Altamira Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bowen, S. J. (2009). A Critical Artefact Methodology: Using Provocative Conceptual Designs to Foster Human-centred Innovation. PhD Thesis: Sheffield Hallam University, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Cabrera, A. B., Kommonen, K., Oilinki, I. and Koskijoki, M. (2003). ‘Co-designing visions, uses, and applications'. Proceedings of the 5^th European Academy of Design (EAD) Conference, Barcelona, Spain, 28–30 April 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Callon, M. and Rabeharisoa, V. (2003). ‘Research “in the wild” and the shaping of new social identities'. Technology in Society, 25, 193–204.
   Google Scholar
• Clemensen, J., Larsen, S. B., Kyng, M. and Kirkevold, M. (2007). ‘Participatory design in health sciences: Using cooperative experimental methods in developing health services and computer technology'. Qualitative Health Research, 17(1), 122–130.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Clifford, J. and Marcus, G. E. (1986). Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography. California and London: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, R. (1994). ‘The case for inclusive design: an overview'. Proceedings of the 12^th Triennial Congress, 1994. International Ergonomics Association and the Human Factors Association, Toronto, Canada: HFAC Vol. 6.
   Google Scholar
• Cross, N. (ed). (1971). Design Participation. Proceedings of the Design Research Society's Conference. Manchester, UK: Academy Editions.
   Google Scholar
• De Certeau, M. (1984). The Practice of Everyday Life. London: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. K. and Lincoln, Y. S. (eds) (2003). Collecting and Interpreting Qualitative Materials, 2nd edn. California: Sage publications.
   Google Scholar
• Devlieger, P., Renders, F., Froyen, H. and Wildiers, K. (eds). (2006). Blindness and the Multi-Sensorial City. Antwerp: Garant.
   Google Scholar
• Emerson, R. M., Fretz, R. I. and Shaw, L. L. (1995). Writing Ethnographic Fieldnotes. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frascara, J. (1997). User-centred Graphic Design: Mass Communication and Social Change. London: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B. (2001). Making Social Science Matter: Why Social Inquiry Fails and How it Can Succeed Again. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fulton Suri, J. (2000). ‘Communicating with designers: The role of empathy, evidence and inspiration.’ In Brown Jr., O. (ed.), Proceedings of IEA 2000/HFES 2000 Congress, July 30-Aug 4, 2000 Volume 4, San Diego, CA: Human Factors & Ergonomie Society (HFES), pp. 795–798.
   Google Scholar
• Fulton Suri, J. (2003). ‘The experience evolution: Developments in design practice'. The Design Journal, 6(2), 39–48.
   Google Scholar
• Gaver, B., Dunne, T. and Pacenti, E. (1999). ‘Design: Cultural probes'. Interactions, 6(1), 21–29.
   Google Scholar
• Gieser, T. (2008). ‘Embodiment, emotion and empathy: A phenomenological approach to apprenticeship learning'. Anthropological Theory, 8, 299–318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golledge, R. G. (1993). ‘Geography and the disabled: A survey with special reference to vision impaired and blind populations'. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 18(1), 63–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keilsman, M., Vlakenburg, R. and Buijs, J. (2007). ‘Why do(n't) actors in collaborative design understand each other? An empirical study towards a better understanding of collaborative design.’ CoDesign, 3(1), 59–73.
   Google Scholar
• Kirsh, D. (1996). ‘Adapting the environment instead of oneself'. Adaptive Behaviors, 4(3/4), 415–452.
   Google Scholar
• Lifchez, R. (1987). Rethinking Architecture: Design Students and Physically Disabled People. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mattelmäki, T. and Battarbee, K. (2002). ‘Empathy probes'. In Binder, T., Gregory, J. and Wagner, I. (eds),Proceedings of Participatory Design Conference. Palo Alto, CA: CPSR, 266–271.
   Google Scholar
• McDonagh, D., Thomas, J., Chen, S., He, J. J., Hong, Y. S., Kim, Y., Shang, Z. and Pena-Mora, F. (2009). ‘Empathic design research: Disability and relevant design'. In Malins, J. (ed.),8^th European Academy of Design Conference [online]. The Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen, Scotland, 1–3 April 2009. Available at: http://www.ead09.org.uk/papers.html [accessed 1 December 2010].
   Google Scholar
• McDonnell, J. (2009). ‘Collaborative negotiation in design: A study of design conversations between architect and building users'. CoDesign, 5(1), 35–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raijmakers, B., van Dijk, G., Lee, Y. and Williams, S. (2009). ‘Designing empathic conversations for inclusive design facilitation'. Include 2009, Helen Hamlyn Centre, Royal College of Art, London, 5–8 April 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Ringaert, L. (2001). ‘User/Expert involvement in universal design'. In Preisser, W. F. E. and Ostroff, E. (eds),Universal Design Handbook. USA: McGraw Hill Professional.
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, E. B. and Stappers, P. J. (2008). ‘Co-creation and the new landscape of design'. CoDesign, 4(1), 5–18.
   Google Scholar
• Squires, S. and Byrne, B. (eds) (2002). Creating Breakthrough Ideas: The Collaboration of Anthropologists and Designers in the Product Development Industry. London: Bergin & Garvey.
   Google Scholar
• Strickfaden, M., Devlieger, P. and Heylighen, A. (2009). ‘Building empathy through dialogue’. In Malins, J. (ed.),8^th European Academy of Design Conference [online]. The Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen, Scotland, 1–3 April 2009. Available at: http://www.ead09.org.uk/papers.html [accessed 1 December 2010].
   Google Scholar
• Strickfaden, M. and Devlieger, P. (2011). ‘The Brussels metro: Accessibility through co-creation.’International Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness (in print).
   Google Scholar
• Strickfaden, M. and Vildieu, A. (2011). ‘Questioning communication in tactile representation.’Include 2011. Helen Hamlyn Centre, Royal College of Art, London, 18–20 April 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, S. (2007). ‘Design back-story: Empathy, witnessing, reflection and the inclusive response.’Include 2007, Helen Hamlyn Centre, Royal College of Art, London, 1–4 April 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Uslan, M. M., Peck, A. F., Wiener, W. R. and Stern, A. (1990). Access to Mass Transit for Blind and Visually Impaired Travelers. New York: American Foundation for the Blind.
   Google Scholar
• Vermeersch, P. W., Strickfaden, M., Herssens, J. and Heylighen, A. (2009). ‘Architects and visually impaired people: Analysing two ways of talking'. 17^th International Conference on Engineering Design, Stanford University, USA, 24–27 August 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Wolcott, H. F. (1999). Ethnography: A Way of Seeing. California: AltaMira Press.
   Google Scholar