Exploring Design Patterns for Sustainable Behaviour

References

• Akrich, M (1992). ‘The de-scription of technicai objects'. In Bijker, W. and Law, J. (eds), Shaping Technology/Building Society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 205–224.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, C., Ishikawa, S., Silverstein, M., Jacobson, M., Fiksdahi King, I. and Angei, S. (1977). A Pattern Language. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Arroyo, E., Bonanni, L. and Seiker, T. (2005). ‘WaterBot: Expioring feedback and persuasive techniques at the sink'. In Proceedings of the 2005 SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York: ACM, pp. 631–639.
   Google Scholar
• Bhamra, T., Lilley, D. and Tang, T. (2011). ‘Design for sustainable behaviour: Using products to change consumer behaviour'. The Design Journal, 14(4): 427–445
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bisset, F. and Lockton, D. (2010). ‘Designing motivation or motivating design? Expioring service design, motivation and behaviourai change'. Touchpoint: The Journal of Service Design, 2(1): 14–21.
   Google Scholar
• Blevis, E. (2007). ‘Sustainable interaction design: Invention & disposal, renewai & reuse'. In Proceedings of the 2007 SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Design Theory. New York: ACM, pp. 503–512.
   Google Scholar
• Borchers, J. (2002). ‘Teaching HCI design patterns: Experience from two university courses'. In Proceedings of the 2002 SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems: Workshop Position Papers. New York: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Casakin, H. P. (2006). ‘Metaphors as an unconventionai reflective approach in architecturai design'. The Design Journal, 9(1): 37–50.
   Google Scholar
• Chak, A. (2003). Submit Now: Designing Persuasive Web Sites. Indianapoiis, IN: New Riders.
   Google Scholar
• Chapman, J. (2009). ‘Design for (emotionai) durabiiity'. Design Issues, 25(4): 29–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, R. (2005). ‘Ethics and altruism: What constitutes socially responsibie design?’ Design Management Review, 16(3): 10–18.
   Google Scholar
• Crowe, T. D. (2000). Crime Prevention through Environmental Design, 2nd edn. Boston, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann
   Google Scholar
• Crumlish, C. and Malone, E. (2009). Designing Social Interfaces. Sebastopol, CA: O'Reilly.
   Google Scholar
• Darby, S. (2006). The Effectiveness of Feedback on Energy Consumption: A Review for Defra of the Literature on Metering, Billing and Direct Displays. Oxford: Environmental Change Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, J. (2010). ‘Generating directions for persuasive technoiogy design with the Inspiration Card Workshop'. In Pioug, T., Hasie, P. and Oinas-Kukkonen, H. (eds), Proceedings of Persuasive 2010, 5^th International Conference on Persuasive Technology, Copenhagen. Berlin: Springer, pp. 262–273.
   Google Scholar
• de Bono, E. (1972). Po: Beyond Yes and No. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• de Bono, E. (1987). Six Thinking Hats, 2nd edn. Harmondsworth: Pelican.
   Google Scholar
• Delbecq, A. L. and van de Ven, A. H. (1971). ‘A group process model for problem identification and program planning'. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 7: 466–492.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dietz, T., Gardner, G. T., Gilligan, J., Stern, P. C. and Vandenberghe, M. P. (2009). ‘Household actions can provide a behavioral wedge to rapidly reduce US carbon emissions'. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(44): 18452–18456.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dong, H. and Vanns, N. (2009). ‘Designing an innovative pill dispenser: An undergraduate level case study of inclusive design'. The Design Journal, 12(1), 95–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorst, K. and Cross, N. (2001). ‘Creativity in the design process: Co-evolution of problem-solution'. Design Studies, 22(5): 425–437.
   Google Scholar
• Eckert, C. and Stacey, M. (2000). ‘Sources of inspiration: A language of design'. Design Studies, 21: 523–538.
   Google Scholar
• Elias, E. W., Dekoninck, E. A. and Culley, S. J. (2009). ‘Designing for “use phase” energy losses of domestic products'. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part B - Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 223(1): 115–120
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Energy Saving Trust (2003). ‘Don't let your home get away with it - Media facts'. Energy Saving Trust. Available at: http://www.energysavingtrust.org.uk/uploads/documents/aboutest/homegetawaywithit.pdf [accessed 17 September 2010].
   Google Scholar
• Eno, B. and Schmidt, P. (1975). Oblique Strategies: Over 100 Worthwhile Dilemmas. London: Apollo.
   Google Scholar
• Fabricant, R. (2009). ‘Behaving badly in Vancouver’. Design Mind, 11 February. San Francisco: Frog Design. Available at: http://designmind.frogdesign.com/blog/behaving-badly-in-vancouver.html [accessed 17 September 2010].
   Google Scholar
• Fincher, S. (1999). ‘Analysis of design: An exploration of patterns and pattern languages for pedagogy'. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 18(3): 331–348.
   Google Scholar
• Fogg, B. J. (2003). Persuasive Technology: Using Computers to Change What We Think and Do. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
   Google Scholar
• Froehlich, J., Findlater, L. and Landay, J. (2010). ‘The design eco-feedback technology’. In Proceedings of the 2010 SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York: ACM, pp. 1999-2008.
   Google Scholar
• Gadd, K. (2011). TRIZ for Engineers: Enabling Inventive Problem Solving. Chichester: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Gargiulo, D (2008). ‘Active objects, passive dramas'. MDes thesis, Auckland: Unitec. Available at: http://unitec.researchbank.ac.nz/handle/10652/1291 [accessed 17 September 2010].
   Google Scholar
• Gill, S. (2009). ‘Six challenges facing user-orientated industrial design'. The Design Journal, 12(1): 41–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golembewski, M. (2010). ‘Ideation decks: A card-based tool designed to help creative practitioners develop project ideas'. Horizon DTC report, University of Nottingham.
   Google Scholar
• Grout, J. (2007). Mistake-Proofing the Design of Health Care Processes. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.
   Google Scholar
• Hewitt-Gleeson, M. (2008). ‘Dispute with Edward de Bono’. School of Thinking. Available at: http://www.schoolofthinking.org/about/training/10-dfq/the-hats-the-origin-of-the-thinking-hats-idea [accessed 17 September 2010].
   Google Scholar
• IDEO (2003). IDEO Method Cards: 51 Ways to Inspire Design. Palo Alto, CA: IDEO.
   Google Scholar
• Jelsma, J. and Knot, M. (2002). ‘Designing environmentally efficient services: A “script” approach'. Journal of Sustainable Product Design, 2(3-4): 119–130.
   Google Scholar
• Kanis, H (1998). ‘Usage centred research for everyday product design'. Applied Ergonomics, 29(1): 75–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotzé, P., Renaud, K., Koukouletsos, K., Khazaei, B. and Dearden, A. (2006). ‘Patterns, anti-patterns and guidelines - Effective aids to teaching HCI principles?’ In Hvannberg, E. T., Read, J. C., Bannon, L., Kotzé, P. and Wong, W. (eds), Proceedings of HCIEd2006-1: First Joint BCS/IFIP WG 13.1/ICS/EU CONVIVIO HCI Educators' Workshop, Limerick, Ireland. Limerick: University of Limerick, pp. 115–120.
   Google Scholar
• Lawson, B. (2004). ‘Schemata, gambits and precedent: some factors in design expertise'. Design Studies, 25: 443–457.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leclercq, P. and Heylighen, A. (2002). ‘5,8 analogies per hour: A designer's view on analogical reasoning'. In Proceedings of AID ‘02: Artificial Intelligence in Design 2002. Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 285–304.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, C. and Rieman, J. (1994). Task-Centered User Interface Design: A Practical Introduction. Boulder, CO: University of Colorado.
   Google Scholar
• Lexmark (2009). 2009 Government Printing Report: A Closer Look at Costs, Habits, Policies & Opportunities for Savings. Available at: http://www.governmentprintingreport.com [accessed 17 September 2010].
   Google Scholar
• Lilley, D. (2009). ‘Design for sustainable behaviour: Strategies and perceptions'. Design Studies, 30: 704–720.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lilley, D. and Lofthouse, V. (2009). ‘Sustainable design education: Considering design for behavioural change'. Engineering Education: Journal of the Higher Education Academy Engineering Subject Centre, 4(1): 29–41.
   Google Scholar
• Lockton, D., Harrison, D. and Stanton, N. A. (2008). ‘Making the user more efficient: Design for sustainable behaviour'. International Journal of Sustainable Engineering, 1(1): 3–8.
   Google Scholar
• Lockton, D., Harrison, D., Holley, T. and Stanton N. A. (2009a). ‘Influencing interaction: Development of the Design with Intent method'. In Proceedings of Persuasive 2009, 4^th International Conference on Persuasive Technology, Claremont, CA. New York: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Lockton, D., Harrison, D. and Stanton, N. A. (2009b). Design for Behaviour Change: The Design with Intent Toolkit v.0.9. Uxbridge: Brunel University.
   Google Scholar
• Lockton, D., Harrison, D. and Stanton, N. A. (2010a). ‘The Design with Intent method: A design tool for influencing user behaviour'. Applied Ergonomics, 41(3): 382–392.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lockton, D., Harrison, D. and Stanton, N. A. (2010b). Design with Intent: 101 Patterns for Influencing Behaviour through Design v.1.0. Windsor: Equifine.
   Google Scholar
• Lockton, D., Harrison, D. and Stanton, N. A. (2012). ‘Models of the user: Designers' perspectives on influencing sustainable behaviour'. Journal of Design Research, 10(1/2): 7–27.
   Google Scholar
• Mager, B. (2010). ‘Editorial: Isn't life always centred around influencing the behaviour of other people?’ Touchpoint: The Journal of Service Design, 2(1): 6–7.
   Google Scholar
• Matsuhashi, N., Kuijer, L. and de Jong, A. (2009). ‘A culture-inspired approach to gaining insights for designing sustainable practices'. In Proceedings of EcoDesign 2009: Sixth International Symposium on Environmentally Conscious Design and Inverse Manufacturing. Tokyo: Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers.
   Google Scholar
• McCalley, L. T. and Midden, C. J. H. (2002). ‘Energy conservation through product-integrated feedback: The roles of goal-setting and social orientation'. Journal of Economic Psychology, 23(5): 589–603.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michl, J. (2002). ‘On seeing design as redesign: An exploration of a neglected problem in design education'. Scandinavian Journal of Design History, 12: 7–23.
   Google Scholar
• Niedderer, K. (2007). ‘Designing mindful interaction: The category of performative object'. Design Issues, 23(1): 3–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborn, A. F. (1953). Applied Imagination. Oxford: Scribner's.
   Google Scholar
• Pei, E., Campbell, I. and Evans, M. (2011). ‘A taxonomic classification of visual design representations used by industrial designers and engineering designers'. The Design Journal, 14(1): 64–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettersen, I. N. and Boks, C. (2008). ‘The ethics in balancing control and freedom when engineering solutions for sustainable behaviour'. International Journal of Sustainable Engineering, 1(4): 287–297.]
   Google Scholar
• Pólya, G. (1945). How to Solve It. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Product Creation (n.d.). ‘Eco kettle’. Product Creation. Available at: http://www.ecokettle.com/aftersales.htm [accessed 17 September 2010].
   Google Scholar
• Redström, J. (2005). ‘Towards user design? On the shift from object to user as the subject of design'. Design Studies, 27: 123–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodriguez, E. and Boks, C. (2005). ‘How design of products affects user behaviour and vice versa: The environmental implications'. In Proceedings of EcoDesign 2005: Fourth International Symposium on Environmentally Conscious Design and Inverse Manufacturing. Tokyo: Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers.
   Google Scholar
• Schön, D. (1983). The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. London: Temple Smith.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, H. A. (1981). The Sciences of the Artificial, 2nd edn. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stacey, M., Eckert, C. and Earl, C. (2009). ‘From Ronchamp by sledge: On the pragmatics of object references'. In McDonnell, J. and Lloyd, P. (eds), About: Designing: Analysing Design Meetings. Leiden: CRC Press, pp. 361–379.
   Google Scholar
• Stanton, N. A. and Baber, C. (2002). ‘Error by design: methods for predicting device usability'. Design Studies, 23: 363–384.
   Google Scholar
• Sutton, R. I. and Hargadon, A. (1996). ‘Brainstorming groups in context: Effectiveness in a product design firm'. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(4): 685–718.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorpe, A. (2010). ‘Design's role in sustainable consumption’. Design Issues, 26(2): 3–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tidwell, J. (2005). Designing Interfaces. Sebastopol, CA: O'Reilly.
   Google Scholar
• Tromp, N., Hekkert, P. and Verbeek, P.-P. (2011). ‘Design for socially responsible behavior: A classification of influence based on intended user experience'. Design Issues, 27(3): 3–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tseng, I., Moss, J., Cagan, J. and Kotovsky, K. (2008). ‘The role of timing and analogical similarity in the stimulation of idea generation in design'. Design Studies, 29: 203–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Dam, S. S., Bakker, C. A. and van Hal, J. D. M. (2010). ‘Home energy monitors: impact over the medium-term'. Building Research & Information, 38(5): 458–469.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinreich, N. K. (2010). Hands-on Social Marketing, 2nd edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage publications.
   Google Scholar
• Wever, R., van Kuijk, J. and Boks, C. (2008). ‘User-centred Design for Sustainable Behaviour’. International Journal of Sustainable Engineering, 1(1): 9–20.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, G. and Newborough, M. (2003). ‘Dynamic energy- consumption indicators for domestic appliances: Environment, behaviour and design'. Energy & Buildings, 35: 821–841.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, J. (2010). ‘RSA design & behaviour - Missing links', 11 January. Available at: http://designandbehaviour.rsablogs.org.uk/2010/01/11/missing-links [accessed 17 September 2010].
   Google Scholar
• Zachrisson, J., Støma, G. and Boks, C. (2011). ‘Using a guide to select design strategies for behaviour change: Theory vs. practice'. In Proceedings of EcoDesign 2011 - 7^th International Symposium on Environmentally Conscious Design and Inverse Manufacturing, Kyoto, Japan. Tokyo: Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers.
   Google Scholar