Challenging Technicism

References

• Agranoff, R., & McGuire, M. (2001). American federalism and the search for models of management. Public Administration Review, 61, 671-681.
   Google Scholar
• Box, R.C. (2004). Public administration and society: Critical issues in American governance (2nd Ed.). Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, T.L. (2006). The responsible administrator: An approach to ethics for the administrative role (5th Ed.). San Francisco: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Farmer, D.J. (2005). To kill the king: Post-traditional governance and bureaucracy. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Fesler, J.W., & Kettl, D.F. (1991). The politics of the administrative process. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
   Google Scholar
• Frederickson, H.G., & Smith, K.B. (2003). Public administration theory primer. Boulder: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Green, R.T., Wamsley, G.L., & Keller, L.F. (1993). Reconstituting a profession for American public administration. Public Administration Review, 53, 516-524.
   Google Scholar
• Gulick, L. (1937). Notes on the theory of organization. In L. Gulick & L. Urwick (Eds.), Papers on the science of administration. New York: Institute of Public Administration.
   Google Scholar
• Hatch, M.J., & Cunliffe, A.L. (2006). Organization theory: Modern, symbolic, and postmodern perspectives (2nd Ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, C.J., & Lynn, L.E., Jr. (2005). Is hierarchical governance in decline? Evidence from empirical research. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15, 173-195.
   Google Scholar
• Kettl, D.F. (2006). Managing boundaries in American administration: The collaboration imperative. Public Administration Review, 66, 10-19.
   Google Scholar
• Lynn, L.E., Jr. (2001). The myth of the bureaucratic paradigm: What traditional public administration really stood for. Public Administration Review, 61, 144-160.
   Google Scholar
• Lynn, L.E., Jr., Heinrich, C.J., & Hill, C.J. (2000). Studying governance and public management: Challenges and prospects. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 10, 233-262.
   Google Scholar
• Meier, K.J. (1997). Bureaucracy and democracy: The case for more bureaucracy and less democracy. Public Administration Review, 57, 193-199.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, H.T., & Fox, C. (2007). Postmodern public administration (Rev. Ed.). Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• O'Leary, R. (2005). The ethics of dissent: Managing guerrilla government. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
   Google Scholar
• Olsen, J.P. (2005). Maybe it is time to rediscover bureaucracy. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16, 1-24.
   Google Scholar
• Page, S. (2006). The web of managerial accountability: The impact of reinventing government. Administration & Society, 38, 166-197.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenbloom, D.H. (1983). Public administrative theory and the separation of powers. Public Administration Review, 43, 219-227.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, H.A. (1946). The proverbs of administration. Public Administration Review, 6, 53-67.
   Google Scholar
• Shafritz, J.M., & Hyde, A.C. (1997). Classics of public administration (4th Ed.). Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace College.
   Google Scholar
• Spicer, M.W. (2010). In defense of politics in public administration: A value pluralist perspective. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, M. (1946). Essays in sociology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, W. (1887). The study of administration. Political Science Quarterly, 2, 197-222.
   Google Scholar