2,307
Views
221
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Helpfulness of Online Product Reviews as Seen by Consumers: Source and Content Features

, , &
Pages 101-136 | Published online: 08 Dec 2014

References

  • Amblee, N., and Bui, T. Freeware downloads: An empirical investigation into the impact of expert and user review on demand for digital goods. In J. A. Hoxmeier and S. Hayne (eds.), Proceedings of the 13th Americas Conference on Information Systems. Atlanta: Association for Information Systems, 2007.
  • Bach, G. R. Marathon group dynamics: II. Dimensions of helpfulness: Therapeutic aggression. Psychological Reports, 20 (June 1967), 1147-1158.
  • Baek, H.; Ahn, J., and Choi, Y. Helpfulness of online consumer reviews: Readers' objectives and review cues. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 17, 2 (winter 2012-13), 99-126.
  • Bailey, A. A. Consumer awareness and use of product review websites. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 6, 1 (2005), 90-108.
  • Benlian, A.; Titah, R.; and Hess, T. Differential effects of provider recommendations and consumer reviews in e-commerce transactions: An experimental study. Journal of Management Information Systems, 29, 1 (summer 2012), 237-272.
  • Borgida, E., and Nisbett, R. E. The differential impact of abstract vs. concrete information on decisions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 7, 3 (1977), 258-271.
  • Buda, R., and Zhang, Y. Consumer product evaluation: The interactive effect of message framing, presentation order, and source credibility. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 9, 4 (2000), 229-242.
  • Callero, P. L.; Howard, J. A.; and Piliavin, J. A. Helping behavior as role behavior: Disclosing social structure and history in the analysis of prosocial action. Social Psychology Quarterly, 50, 3 (1987), 247-256.
  • Cao, Q.; Duan, W.; and Gan, Q. Exploring determinants of voting for the "helpfulness" of online user reviews: A text mining approach. Decision Support Systems, 50, 2 (2011), 511-521.
  • Cenfetelli, R. T., and Bassellier, G. Interpretation of formative measurement in information systems research. MIS Quarterly, 33, 4 (2009), 689-707.
  • Chaiken, S. Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 5 (1980), 752-766.
  • Chaiken, S., and Maheswaran, D. Heuristic processing can bias systematic processing: Effects of source credibility, argument ambiguity, and task importance on attitude judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 3 (1994), 460-473.
  • Chakravarti, A.; Janiszewski, C.; and Ulkumen, G. The neglect of prescreening information. Journal of Marketing Research, 43, 4 (2006), 642-653.
  • Cheema, A., and Papatla, P. Relative importance of online versus offline information for internet purchases: Product category and Internet experience effects. Journal of Business Research, 63, 9/10 (2010), 979-985.
  • Chen, S.; Duckworth, K.; and Chaiken, S. Motivated heuristic and systematic processing. Psychological Inquiry, 10, 1 (1999), 44-49.
  • Cheung, M. Y.; Luo, C.; Sia, C. L.; and Chen, H. Credibility of electronic word-of-mouth: Informational and normative determinants of on-line consumer recommendations. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 13, 4 (summer 2009), 9-38.
  • Clemons, E. K.; Gao, G. G.; and Hitt, L. M. When online reviews meet hyperdifferentiation: A study of the craft beer industry. Journal of Management Information Systems, 23, 2 (fall 2006), 149-171.
  • CNNIC (China Internet Network Information Center). Annual research report of China's online shopping market. Beijing, 2012 (available at www.51report.com
  • Connors, L.; Mudambi, S. M.; and Schuff, D. Is it the review or the reviewer? A multi-method approach to determine the antecedents of online review helpfulness. In R. H. Sprague (ed.), Proceedings of the 44th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society Press, 2011.
  • Cooper, D. R., and Schindler, P. S. Business Research Methods, 11th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill/Irwin, 2010.
  • Cui, G.; Lui, H.-K.; and Guo, X. The effect of online consumer reviews on new product sales. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 17, 1 (fall 2012), 39-58.
  • Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil, C.; Kossinets, G.; Kleinberg, J.; and Lee, L. How opinions are received by online communities: A case study on Amazon.com helpfulness votes. In J. Quemada, G. Leon, Y. Maarek, and W. Nejdl (eds.), Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on World Wide Web. New York: ACM Press, 2009, pp. 141-150.
  • DeBono, K. G., and Harnish, R. J. Source expertise, source attractiveness, and the processing of persuasive information: A functional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 4 (1988), 541-546.
  • Dellarocas, C.; Gao, G. G.; and Narayan, R. Are consumers more likely to contribute online reviews for hit or niche products? Journal of Management Information Systems, 27, 2 (fall 2010), 127-158.
  • Dholakia, R. R., and Sternthal, B. Highly credible sources: Persuasive facilitators or persuasive liabilities? Journal of Consumer Research, 3, 4 (1977), 223-232.
  • Duan, W.; Gu, B.; and Whinston, A. B. Do online reviews matter? An empirical investigation of panel data. Decision Support Systems, 45, 4 (2008), 1007-1016.
  • Eagly, A. H., and Chaiken, S. Cognitive theories of persuasion. In L. Berkowitz (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 17. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1984, pp. 267-359.
  • eMarketer. The role of customer product reviews. November 2, 2010 (available at www.emarketer.com/Article/Role-of-Customer-Product-Reviews/1008019/
  • Forman, C.; Ghose, A.; and Wiesenfeld, B. Examining the relationship between reviews and sales: The role of reviewer identity disclosure in electronic markets. Information Systems Research, 19, 3 (2008), 291-313.
  • Ghose, A., and Ipeirotis, P. G. Estimating the helpfulness and economic impact of product reviews: Mining text and reviewer characteristics. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 23, 10 (2010), 1498-1512.
  • Gist, M. E. Self-efficacy: Implications for organizational behavior and human resource management. Academy of Management Review, 12, 3 (1987), 472-485.
  • Hart-Davidson, W.; McLeod, M.; Klerkx, C.; and Wojcik, M. A method for measuring helpfulness in online peer review. In R. Fortes, J. Anacleto, and C. Costa (eds.), Proceedings of the 28th ACM International Conference on Design of Communication. New York: ACM Press, 2010, pp. 115-121.
  • Haubl, G., and Trifts, V. Consumer decision making in online shopping environments: The effects of interactive decision aids. Marketing Science, 19, 1 (2000), 4-21.
  • Herr, P. M.; Kardes, F. R.; and Kim, J. Effects of word-of-mouth and product-attribute information on persuasion: An accessibility-diagnosticity perspective. Journal of Consumer Research, 17, 4 (1991), 454-462.
  • Hoch, S. J., and Deighton, J. Managing what consumers learn from experience. Journal of Marketing, 53, 2 (1989), 1-20.
  • Hu, N.; Liu, L.; and Zhang, J. J. Do online reviews affect product sales? The role of reviewer characteristics and temporal effects. Information Technology & Management, 9, 3 (2008), 201-214.
  • Jain, S. P., and Posavac, S. S. Prepurchase attribute verifiability, source credibility, and persuasion. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 11, 3 (2001), 169-180.
  • Jiang, Y., and Punj, G. N. The effects of attribute concreteness and prominence on selective processing, choice, and search experience. Journal of Academy of Marketing Science, 38 (2010), 471-489.
  • Jiang, Z., and Benbasat, I. The effects of presentation methods and task complexity on online consumers' product understanding. MIS Quarterly, 31, 3 (2007), 475-500.
  • Jiang, Z. and Benbasat, I. Investigating the influence of the functional mechanisms of online product presentations. Information Systems Research, 18, 4 (2007), 454-470.
  • Jin, J., and Liu, Y. How to interpret the helpfulness of online product reviews: Bridging the needs between customers and designers. In J. C. Cortizo, F. M. Carrero, I. Cantador, J. A. Troyano, and P. Rosso (eds.), Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Search and Mining User-Generated Contents. New York: ACM Press, 2010, pp. 87-94.
  • Kleinmuntz, D. N., and Schkade, D. A. Information displays and decision processes. Psychological Science, 4, 4 (1993), 221-229.
  • Kumar, N., and Benbasat, I. The influence of recommendations and consumer reviews on evaluations of websites. Information Systems Research, 17, 4 (2006), 425-439.
  • Kwon, O., and Sung, Y. Shifting selves and product reviews: How the effects of product reviews vary depending on the self-views and self-regulatory goals of consumers. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 17, 1 (fall 2012), 59-82.
  • Li, M.; Tan, C.-H.; Wei, K.-K.; and Wang, K. Where to place product review? An information search process perspective. In M. Lacity, S. March, and F. Niederman (eds.), Proceedings of the 31st Annual International Conference on Information Systems. Atlanta: Association for Information Systems, 2010.
  • Li, X., and Hitt, L. M. Self-selection and information role of online product reviews. Information Systems Research, 19, 4 (2008), 456-474.
  • Li, X.; Hitt, L. M.; and Zhang, Z. J. Product reviews and competition in markets for repeat purchase products. Journal of Management Information Systems, 27, 4 (spring 2011), 9-42.
  • Lim, K. H., and Benbasat, I. The effect of multimedia on perceived equivocality and perceived usefulness of information systems. MIS Quarterly, 24, 3 (2000), 449-471.
  • Manz, C. C., and Sims, H. P. J. Vicarious learning: The influence of modeling on organizational behavior. Academy of Management Review, 6, 1 (1981), 105-113.
  • Meyers-Levy, J., and Maheswaran, D. Exploring message framing outcomes when systematic, heuristic, or both types of processing occur. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14, 1 & 2 (2004), 159-167.
  • Mudambi, S. M., and Schuff, D. What makes a helpful online review? A study of customer reviews on amazon.com. MIS Quarterly, 34, 1 (2010), 185-200.
  • Otterbacher, J. "Helpfulness" in online communities: A measure of message quality. In D. R. Olsen Jr., K. Hinckley, and M. R. Morris (eds.), Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York: ACM Press, 2009, pp. 955-964.
  • Pan, Y., and Zhang, J. Q. Born unequal: A study of the helpfulness of user-generated product reviews. Journal of Retailing, 87, 4 (2011), 598-612.
  • Park, D.-H.; Lee, J.; and Han, I. The effect of on-line consumer reviews on consumer purchasing intention: The moderating role of involvement. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 11, 4 (summer 2007), 125-148.
  • Pavlou, P., and Fygenson, M. Understanding and predicting electronic commerce adoption: An extension of the theory of planned behavior. MIS Quarterly, 30, 1 (2006), 115-143.
  • Pavlou, P.; Liang, H.; and Xue, Y. Uncertainty and mitigating uncertainty in online exchange relationships: A principal-agent perspective. MIS Quarterly, 31, 1 (2007), 105-131.
  • Pavlou, P. A., and Sawy, O. A. E. From IT leveraging competence to competitive advantage in turbulent environments: The case of new product development. Information Systems Research, 17, 3 (2006), 198-227.
  • Petter, S.; Straub, D.; and Rai, A. Specifying formative constructs in information systems research. MIS Quarterly, 31, 4 (2007), 623-656.
  • Petty, R. E., and Cacioppo, J. T. The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 1 (1986), 123-205.
  • Riegner, C. Word of mouth on the Web: The impact of Web 2.0 on consumer purchase decisions. Journal of Advertising Research, 47, 4 (2007), 436-449.
  • Sasaki, T.; Becker, D. V.; Janssen, M. A.; and Neel, R. Does greater product information actually inform consumer decisions? The relationship between product information quantity and diversity of consumer decisions. Journal of Economic Psychology, 32, 3 (2011), 391-398.
  • Schindler, R. M., and Bickart, B. Perceived helpfulness of online consumer reviews: The role of message content and style. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 11, 3 (2012), 234-243.
  • Semin, G. R. Language puzzles: A prospective retrospective on the linguistic category model. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 27, 2 (2008), 197-209.
  • Semin, G. R., and Fiedler, K. The cognitive functions of linguistic categories in describing persons: Social cognition and language. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 4 (1988), 558-568.
  • Sen, S., and Lerman, D. Why are you telling me this? An examination into negative consumer reviews on the Web. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 21, 4 (2007), 76-96.
  • Shafir, E.; Simonson, I.; and Tversky, A. Reason-based choice. Special issue: Reasoning and decision making. Cognition, 49, 2 (1993), 11-36.
  • Shin, B., and Kim, G. Investigating the reliability of second-order formative measurement in information systems research. European Journal of Information Systems, 20 (2011), 608-623.
  • Smith, S. P.; Johnston, R. B.; and Howard, S. Vicarious experience in retail e-commerce: An inductive taxonomy of product evaluation support features. Information Systems and e-Business Management, 3 (2005), 21-46.
  • Stern, B. A revised communication model for advertising: Multiple dimensions of the source, message, and the recipient. Journal of Advertising, 23, 2 (1994), 5-15.
  • Tan, C. H.; Teo, H. H.; and Benbasat, I. Assessing screening and evaluation decision support systems: A resource-matching approach. Information Systems Research, 21, 2 (2010), 305-326.
  • Tsur, O., and Rappoport, A. Revrank: A fully unsupervised algorithm for selecting the most helpful book reviews. In E. Adar, M. Hurst, T. Finin, N. Glance, N. Nicolov, and B. Tseng (eds.), Proceedings of the 3rd International ICWSM Conference. Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press, 2009, pp. 154-161.
  • Wasko, M. M., and Faraj, S. Why should I share? Examining social capital and knowledge contribution in electronic networks of practice. MIS Quarterly, 29, 1 (2005), 35-57.
  • Wilson, E. J., and Sherrell, D. L. Source effects in communication and persuasion research: A meta-analysis of effect size. Journal of Academy of Marketing Science, 21, 2 (1993), 101-112.
  • Wood, S. L., and Lynch, J. G. Prior knowledge and complacency in new product learning. Journal of Consumer Research, 29, 3 (2002), 416-426.
  • Xiong, W., and Litman, D. Understanding differences in perceived peer-review helpfulness using natural language processing. Paper presented at the Sixth Workshop on Innovative Use of NLP for Building Educational Applications, Portland, OR, 2011.
  • Zhu, L.; Benbasat, I., and Jiang, Z. Let's shop online together: An empirical investigation of collaborative online shopping support. Information Systems Research, 21, 4 (2010), 872-891.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.