Marketing Debates: In the Classroom and Online

References

• Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business (AACSB) International (2003), Eligibility Procedures and Accreditation Standards for Business Accreditation, St. Louis, MO: AACSB.
   Google Scholar
• Baglione, Stephen L., and Michael Nastanski (2007), "The Superiority of Online Discussion," Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 8 (2), 139-150.
   Google Scholar
• Baruch, Yehuda (2006), "Role-Play Teaching: Acting in the Classroom," Management Learning, 37 (1), 43-61.
   Google Scholar
• Bonwell, Charles C., and James A. Eison (1991), "Active Learning: Creating Excitement in the Classroom," ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report, George Washington University, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Greenberg, Ellen, and Paddy Miller (1991), "The Player and the Professor: Theatrical Techniques in Teaching," Journal of Management Education, 15 (4), 428-446.
   Google Scholar
• Infante, Dominic A., and Andrew S. Rancer (1996), "Argumentativeness and Verbal Aggressiveness: A Review of Recent Theory and Research," in Communication Yearbook, vol. 19, Brant R. Burleson, ed., Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 319-351.
   Google Scholar
• King, Alison (1993), "From Sage on the Stage to Guide on the Side," College Teaching, 41 (1), 30-35.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, Deanna (1992), "Thinking as Argument," Harvard Educational Review, 62 (Summer), 155-178.
   Google Scholar
• Lantis, Jeffrey S. (2004), "Ethics and Foreign Policy: Structured Debates for the International Studies Classroom," International Studies Perspectives, 5 (2), 117-133.
   Google Scholar
• Leidner, Dorothy E., and Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa (1995), "The Use of Information Technology to Enhance Management School Education: A Theoretical View," MIS Quarterly, 19 (3), 265-292.
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy, J. Patrick, and Liam Anderson (2000), "Active Learning Techniques Versus Traditional Teaching Styles: Two Experiments from History and Political Science," Innovative Higher Education, 24 (4), 279-294.
   Google Scholar
• McKeachie, Wilbert J. (1999), Teaching Tips: Strategies, Research, and Theory for College and University Teachers, Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Moeller, Thomas G. (1985), "Using Classroom Debates in Teaching Developmental Psychology," Teaching of Psychology, 12 (4), 207-209.
   Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, E. Michael (2005), "The Effect of Goal Instructions and Need for Cognition on Interactive Argument," Contemporary Educational Psychology, 30 (3), 286-313.
   Google Scholar
• Proserpio, Luigi, and Dennis A. Gioia (2007), "Teaching the Virtual Generation," Academy of Management Learning and Education, 6 (1), 69-80.
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, Judith A., Richard L. Wiseman, and Robert H. Gass (1994), "Does Teaching Argumentation Facilitate Critical Thinking?" Communication Reports, 7 (1), 27-35.
   Google Scholar
• Schommer-Aikins, Marlene, and Marilyn Easter (2009), "Ways of Knowing and Willingness to Argue," Journal of Psychology, 143 (2), 117-132.
   Google Scholar
• Sutherland, Tracey E., and Charles C. Bonwell (1996), "The Active Learning Continuum: Choosing Activities to Engage Students in the Classroom," in Using Active Learning in College Classes: A Range of Options for Faculty, Tracy E. Sutherland and Charles C. Bonwell, eds., San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 3-17.
   Google Scholar
• Sweeney, Jillian C., and Deborah Ingram (2001), "A Comparison of Traditional and Web-Based Tutorials in Marketing Education: An Exploratory Study," Journal of Marketing Education, 23 (1), 55-62.
   Google Scholar
• Tessier, Jack T. (2009), "Classroom Debate Format: Effect on Student Learning and Revelations About Student Tendencies," College Teaching, 57 (3), 144-152.
   Google Scholar
• Wolfe, Joseph, and Denise J. Luethge (2003), "The Impact of Involvement on Performance in Business Simulations: An Examination of Goosen's ‘Know Little’ Decision-Making Thesis," Journal of Education for Business, 79, 2 (November-December), 69-74.
   Google Scholar
• Zygmont, Zenon X. (2006), "Debating the Socialist Calculation Debate: A Classroom Exercise," Journal of Economic Education, 37, 2 (Spring), 229-235.
   Google Scholar