Summarize, Synthesize, and Space: The Relative Effects of Organization, Repetition, and Spacing on Student Performance

References

• Bacon, Donald, and Kim Stewart (2006), "How Fast Do Students Forget What They Learn in Consumer Behavior? A Longitudinal Study," Journal of Marketing Education, 28 (3), 181-192.
   Google Scholar
• Bianco, Linda, and Sandra McCormick (1989), "Analysis of Effects of a Reading Study Skill Program for High School Learning-Disabled Students," Journal of Educational Research, 82 (5), 282-288.
   Google Scholar
• Biehal, Gabriel, and Dipankar Chakravarti (1982), "Information Presentation Format and Learning Goals as Determinants of Consumers' Memory Retrieval and Choice Processes," Journal of Consumer Research, 8 (March), 431-444.
   Google Scholar
• Catterall, Miriam, Pauline Maclaran, and Lorna Stevens (2002), "Critical Reflection in the Marketing Curriculum," Journal of Marketing Education, 24 (December), 184-192.
   Google Scholar
• Craik, Fergus, and Robert Lockhart (1972), "Levels of Processing: A Framework for Memory Research," Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11 (6), 671-684.
   Google Scholar
• Dickinson, Donald, and Debra O'Connell (1990), "Effect of Quality and Quantity of Study on Student Grades," Journal of Educational Research, 83 (4), 227-231.
   Google Scholar
• Donovan, John, and David Radosevich (1999), "A Meta-Analytic Review of the Distribution of Practice Effect: Now You See It, Now You Don't," Journal of Applied Psychology, 84 (5), 795-805.
   Google Scholar
• Ebbinghaus, Hermann (1913), Memory, New York: Teachers College at Columbia University.
   Google Scholar
• Goby, Valerie, and Justus Lewis (2000), "Using Experiential Learning Theory and the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator in Teaching Business Communication," Business Communications Quarterly, 63 (3), 39-48.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, Robert (1989), "Spacing Effects in Memory: Evidence for a Two Process Account," Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 15 (May), 77-99.
   Google Scholar
• Gurung, Regan, and Denise Bord (2008), "Enhancing Learning and Exam Preparation: The Review Session," Association for the Psychological Science Observer, 21 (1), 1-5.
   Google Scholar
• Gurung, Regan, and David Daniel (2005), "Evidence-Based Pedagogy: Do Pedagogical Features Enhance Student Learning?" In Best Practices for Teaching Introductory Psychology, Dana Dunn and Stephen Chew, eds., Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 41-56.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, David (2003), "Using the Voeks Method to Improve Student Learning in Principles of Marketing Classes," Journal of Marketing Education, 25 (2), 108-117.
   Google Scholar
• Hay, Amanda, James Peltier, and William Drago (2004), "Reflective Learning and On-Line Management Education: A Comparison of Traditional and On-Line MBA Students," Strategic Change, 13 (4), 169-182.
   Google Scholar
• Hintzman, Douglas (2004), "Judgment of Frequency Versus Recognition Confidence: Repetition and Recursive Reminding," Memory & Cognition, 32, 336-350.
   Google Scholar
• Janiszewski, Chris, Hayden Noel, and Alan Sawyer (2003), "A Meta-Analysis of the Spacing Effect in Verbal Learning: Implications for Research on Advertising Repetition and Consumer Memory," Journal of Consumer Research, 30 (1), 138-151.
   Google Scholar
• Krugman, Harold (1972), "Why Three Exposures May Be Enough," Journal of Advertising Research, 12 (6), 11-14.
   Google Scholar
• McIntyre, Shelby, and Michael Munson (2008), "Exploring Cramming: Student Behaviors, Beliefs and Learning Retention in the Principles of Marketing Course," Journal of Marketing Education, 30 (3), 226-237.
   Google Scholar
• Reigeluth, Carl, and Aaron Darwazeh (1982), "The Elaboration Theory's Procedure for Designing Instruction: A Conceptual Approach," Journal of Instructional Development, 5 (3), 22-32.
   Google Scholar
• Revek, Michael (1997), "Distributed Practice: More Bang for Your Homework Buck," Florida Journal of Educational Research, 37, 1 (Fall), 37-45.
   Google Scholar
• Rohrer, Doug (2009), "The Effects of Spacing and Mixing Practice Problems," Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 40 (1), 4-17.
   Google Scholar
• Rohrer, Doug, and Harold Pashler (2007), "Increasing Retention Without Increasing Study Time," Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16 (4), 183-186.
   Google Scholar
• Saber, Jane, and Richard Johnson (2008), "Don't Throw Out the Baby with the Bathwater: Verbal Repetition, Mnemonics and Active Learning," Journal of Marketing Education, 30 (3), 207-216.
   Google Scholar
• Sawyer, Alan, Hayden Noel, and Chris Janiszewski (2009), "The Spacing Effects of Multiple Exposures on Memory: Implications for Advertising Scheduling," Journal of Advertising Research, 49 (2), 193-197.
   Google Scholar
• Semb, George, and John A. Ellis (1994), "Knowledge Taught in School: What Is Remembered?" Review of Educational Research, 64 (2), 253-286.
   Google Scholar
• Sloman, Steven, Gordon Bower, and Doug Rohrer (1991), "Congruency Effects in Part-List Cuing Inhibition," Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17 (5), 974-982.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, John W., and William D. Rohwer (1986), "Academic Studying: The Role of Learning Strategies," Educational Psychologist, 21 (1), 19-41.
   Google Scholar
• Warburton, Kevin (2003), "Deep Learning and Education for Sustainability," International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 4 (1), 44-56.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, Brent, and Peggy Cole (1992), "A Critical Review of Elaboration Theory," Educational Technology Research and Development, 40 (3), 63-79.
   Google Scholar
• Woodward, Addison, Robert Bjork, and Robert Jongeward (1973), "Recall and Recognition as a Function of Primary Rehearsal," Journal of Verbal Learning and Behavior, 12 (6), 608-617.
   Google Scholar
• Yonelinas, Andrew (2002), "The Nature of Recollection and Familiarity: A Review of 30 Years of Research," Journal of Memory and Language, 46 (3), 441-517.
   Google Scholar