Productivity and Performance Effects of Business Process Reengineering: A Firm-Level Analysis

References

• Aaker, D. Managing Brand Equity: Capitalizing on the Value of a Brand Name. New York: Free Press, 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Abdolvand, N.; Albadvi, A.; and Ferdowsi, Z. Assessing readiness for business process reengineering. Business Process Management Journal, 14, 4 (2008), 497-511.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Mashari, M. Editorial: Business process reengineering is very much well and alive! Business Process Management Journal, 7, 5 (2001), 370-372.
   Google Scholar
• Alter, A. CIOs rank their top priorities for 2008. CIO Insight (December 20, 2007) (available at www.cioinsight.com/c/a/Research/CIOs-Rank-Their-Top-Priorities-for-2008/
   Google Scholar
• Alter, A. In management, old trends never die. CIO Insight (March 5, 2008) (available at www.cioinsight.com/c/a/Foreward/Old-Trends-Never-Die/
   Google Scholar
• Aral, S.; Brynjolfsson, E.; and Wu, D. J. Which came first, IT or productivity? The virtuous cycle of investment and use in enterprise systems. In D. Straub, S. Klein, W. Haseman, and C. Washburn (eds.), Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Information Systems. Atlanta: Association for Information Systems, 2006, pp. 1819-1839.
   Google Scholar
• Banker, R. D., and Kauffman, R. J. The evolution of research on information systems: A fiftieth-year survey of the literature in management science. Management Science, 50, 3 (2004), 281-298.
   Google Scholar
• Barua, A., and Whinston, A. B. Complementarity based decision support for managing organizational design dynamics. Decision Support Systems, 22, 1 (1998), 45-58.
   Google Scholar
• Barua, A.; Kriebel, C.; and Mukhopadhyay, T. Information technologies and business value: An analytic and empirical investigation. Information Systems Research, 6, 1 (1995), 3-23.
   Google Scholar
• Barua, A.; Lee, B.; and Whinston, A. The calculus of reengineering. Information Systems Research, 7, 4 (1996), 409-428.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, J.; Kugeler, M.; and Rosemann, M. Process Management: A Guide for the Design of Business Processes. Berlin: Springer, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Berry, D.; Evans, G. N.; Jones, R. M.; and Towill, D. R. The BPR scope concept in leveraging improved supply chain performance. Business Process Management Journal, 5, 3 (1999), 254-275.
   Google Scholar
• Bertschek, I., and Kaiser, U. Productivity effects of organizational change: Microeconometric evidence. Management Science, 50, 3 (2004), 394-404.
   Google Scholar
• Bharadwaj, A. S.; Bharadwaj, S. G.; and Konsynski, B. R. Information technology effects on firm performance as measured by Tobin's q. Management Science, 45, 6 (1999), 1008-1024.
   Google Scholar
• Brancheau, J.; Janz, B.; and Wetherbe, J. Key issues in information systems management: 1994-1995 SIM Delphi results. MIS Quarterly, 20, 2 (1996), 225-242.
   Google Scholar
• Bresnahan, T. F.; Brynjolfsson, E.; and Hitt, L. M. Information technology, workplace reorganization, and the demand for skilled labor: Firm-level evidence. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117, 1 (2002), 339-376.
   Google Scholar
• Broadbent, M.; Weill, P.; and St. Clair, D. The implications of information technology infrastructure for business process redesign. MIS Quarterly, 23, 2 (1999), 159-182.
   Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson, E., and Hitt, L. M. Paradox lost? Firm-level evidence on the returns to information systems spending. Management Science, 42, 4 (1996), 541-558.
   Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson, E., and Hitt, L. M. Beyond computation: Information technology, organizational transformation and business performance. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14, 4 (2000), 23-48.
   Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson, E., and Hitt, L. M. Computing productivity: Firm-level evidence. Review of Economics and Statistics, 85, 4 (2003), 793-808.
   Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson, E.; Malone, T. W.; Gurbaxani, V.; and Kambil, A. Does information technology lead to smaller firms? Management Science, 40, 12 (1994), 1628-1644.
   Google Scholar
• Buzacott, J. A. Commonalities in reengineered business processes: Models and issues. Management Science, 42, 5 (May 1996), 768-782.
   Google Scholar
• Buzzell, R. D., and Gale, B. T. The PIMS Principles: Linking Strategy to Performance. New York: Free Press, 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Candler, J. W.; Palvia, P. C.; Thompson, J. D.; and Zeltmann, S. M. The ORION project: Staged business process reengineering at FedEx. Communications of the ACM, 39, 2 (1996), 99-107.
   Google Scholar
• Capon, N.; Farley, J. U.; and Hoenig, S. Determinants of financial performance: A meta analysis. Management Science, 36, 10 (1990), 1143-1159.
   Google Scholar
• Caron, J. R.; Jarvenpaa, S. L.; and Stoddard, D. B. Business reengineering at Cigna Corporation: Experiences and lessons learned from the first five years. MIS Quarterly, 18, 3 (1994), 233-250.
   Google Scholar
• Champy, J. A. Reengineering Management: The Mandate for New Leadership. New York: HarperBusiness, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Chatfield, A. T., and Bjørn-Andersen, N. The impact of IOS-enabled business process change on business outcomes: Transformation of the value chain of Japan Airlines. Journal of Management Information Systems, 14, 1 (Summer 1997), 13-40.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, T. H., and Stoddard, D. B. Interorganizational business process redesign: Merging technological and process innovation. Journal of Management Information Systems, 13, 2 (Fall 1996), 9-28.
   Google Scholar
• Clemons, E. K., and Row, M. C. Sustaining IT advantage: The role of structural differences. MIS Quarterly, 15, 3 (1991), 275-292.
   Google Scholar
• Clemons, E. K.; Thatcher, M. E.; and Row, M. C. Identifying sources of reengineering failures: A study of the behavioral factors contributing to reengineering risks. Journal of Management Information Systems, 12, 2 (Fall 1995), 9-36.
   Google Scholar
• Comanor, W. S., and Wilson, T. A. Advertising and Market Power. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1974.
   Google Scholar
• Computer Sciences Corporation. State of reengineering report. Cambridge, MA, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Cummings, J. Reengineering is high on list, but little understood. Network World (July 27, 1992), 27.
   Google Scholar
• Datta, A. Automating the discovery of AS-IS business process models: Probabilistic and algorithmic approaches. Information Systems Research, 9, 3 (1998), 275-301.
   Google Scholar
• Davenport, T. H. Process Innovation: Reengineering Work Through Information Technology. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Davenport, T. H. The fad that forgot people. Fast Company (October 31, 1995), 70-74.
   Google Scholar
• Davenport, T. H., and Beers, M. C. Managing information about processes. Journal of Management Information Systems, 12, 1 (Summer 1995), 57-80.
   Google Scholar
• Davenport, T. H., and Short, J. E. The new industrial engineering: Information technology and business process redesign. Sloan Management Review, 31, 4 (Summer 1990), 11-27.
   Google Scholar
• Davenport, T. H.; Prusak, L.; and Wilson, H. What's the Big Idea? Creating and Capitalizing on the Best New Management Thinking. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Day, G. S., and Montgomery, D. B. Diagnosing the experience curve. Journal of Marketing, 47, 2 (1983), 44-58.
   Google Scholar
• Dean, A. M. Managing change initiatives: JIT delivers but BPR fails. Knowledge and Process Management, 7, 1 (2000), 11-19.
   Google Scholar
• Dehning, B.; Richardson, V. J.; and Zmud, R. W. The value relevance of announcements of transformational information technology investments. MIS Quarterly, 27, 4 (2003), 637-665.
   Google Scholar
• Dennis, A. R.; Hayes, G.; and Daniels, R. M., Jr. Business process modeling with group support systems. Journal of Management Information Systems, 15, 4 (Spring 1999), 115-142.
   Google Scholar
• Dennis, A. R.; Daniels, R. M., Jr.; Hayes, G.; and Nunamaker, J. F., Jr. Methodology-driven use of automated support in business process re-engineering. Journal of Management Information Systems, 10, 3 (Winter 1993-94), 117-138.
   Google Scholar
• Dess, G. G.; Ireland, R. D.; and Hitt, M. A. Industry effects and strategic management research. Journal of Management, 16, 1 (1990), 7-27.
   Google Scholar
• Devaraj, S., and Kohli, R. Information technology payoff in the health-care industry: A longitudinal study. Journal of Management Information Systems, 16, 4 (Spring 2000), 41-67.
   Google Scholar
• Devaraj, S., and Kohli, R. The IT Payoff—Measuring the Business Value of Information Technology Investments. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Dixon, J. R.; Arnold, P.; Heineke, J.; Kim, J. S.; and Mulligan, P. Business process reengineering: Improving in new strategic directions. California Management Review, 36, 4 (1994), 93-108.
   Google Scholar
• Earl, M. J., and Khan, B. How new is business process redesign? European Management Journal, 12, 1 (1994), 20-30.
   Google Scholar
• Earl, M. J.; Sampler, J. L.; and Short, J. E. Strategies for business process reengineering: Evidence from field studies. Journal of Management Information Systems, 12, 1 (Summer 1995), 31-56.
   Google Scholar
• Edgeworth, F. Y. Mathematical Psychics. London: Kegan Paul, 1881.
   Google Scholar
• El Sawy, O. A. Redesigning Enterprise Processes for E-Business. Boston: McGraw-Hill, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• El Sawy, O. A., and Bowles, G. Redesigning the customer support process for the electronic economy: Insights from Storage Dimensions. MIS Quarterly, 21, 4 (1997), 457-483.
   Google Scholar
• Fadel, K. J., and Tanniru, M. A knowledge-centric framework for process redesign. Paper presented at the ACM SIGMIS CPR Conference on Computer Personnel Research, Atlanta, GA, 2005, 49-58.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald, B., and Murphy, C. Business process reengineering: Putting theory into practice. INFOR, 34, 1 (1996), 3-14.
   Google Scholar
• Grover, V., and Kettinger, W. Process Think: Winning Perspectives for Business Change in the Information Age. Harrisburg, PA: Idea Group, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Grover, V.; Teng, J. T. C.; and Fiedler, K. D. Information technology enabled business process redesign: An integrated planning framework. OMEGA, 21, 4 (1993), 433-447.
   Google Scholar
• Grover, V.; Jeong, S. R.; Kettinger, W. J.; and Teng, J. T. C. The implementation of business process reengineering. Journal of Management Information Systems, 12, 1 (Summer 1995), 109-144.
   Google Scholar
• Guha, S.; Grover, V.; Kettinger, W. J.; and Teng, J. T. C. Business process change and organizational performance: Exploring an antecedent model. Journal of Management Information Systems, 14, 1 (Summer 1997), 119-154.
   Google Scholar
• Guimaraes, T. Field testing of the proposed predictors of BPR success in manufacturing firms. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 18, 1 (1999), 53-65.
   Google Scholar
• Hammer, M. Reengineering work: Don't automate, obliterate. Harvard Business Review 68, 4 (July-August 1990), 104-112.
   Google Scholar
• Hammer, M. Beyond Reengineering: How the Process Centered Organization Is Changing Our Work and Our Lives. New York: HarperCollins, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Hammer, M. The Agenda: What Every Business Must Do to Dominate the Decade. London: Random House, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Hammer, M. Process management and the future of Six Sigma. Sloan Management Review, 43, 2 (2002), 26-32.
   Google Scholar
• Hammer, M. Deep change: How operational innovation can transform your company. Harvard Business Review, 82, 4 (April 2004), 84-93.
   Google Scholar
• Hammer, M., and Champy, J. Reengineering the Corporation: A Manifesto for Business Revolution. New York: HarperBusiness, 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Harrington, H. Business Process Improvement. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Hauser, K., and Paper, D. Simulation of business re-engineering processes: Case study of a United States motor manufacturing company. International Journal of Management, 24, 4 (2007), 676-687.
   Google Scholar
• Hengst, M. D., and de Vreede, G. J. Collaborative business engineering: A decade of lessons from the field. Journal of Management Information Systems, 20, 4 (Spring 2004), 85-113.
   Google Scholar
• Hertzberg, R. Top 10 technology projects in '07. Baseline, supplement (March 7, 2007) (available at www.baselinemag.com/c/a/Projects-Management/Top-10-Technology-Projectsin-07/
   Google Scholar
• Hitt, L. M. Information technology and firm boundaries: Evidence from panel data. Information Systems Research, 10, 2 (1999), 134-149.
   Google Scholar
• Hitt, L. M.; Wu, D. J.; and Zhou, X. Investment in enterprise resource planning: Business impact and productivity measures. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19, 1 (Summer 2002), 71-98.
   Google Scholar
• Holden, T., and Wilhelmij, P. Improved decision making through better integration of human resources and business process factors in a hospital situation. Journal of Management Information Systems, 12, 3 (Winter 1995-96), 21-41.
   Google Scholar
• Holland, D., and Kumar, S. Getting past the obstacles to successful reengineering. Business Horizons, 38, 3 (1995), 79-85.
   Google Scholar
• Hunter, L. W.; Bernhardt, A.; Hughes, K. L.; and Skuratowicz, E. It's not just the ATMs: Firm strategies, work restructuring and workers' earnings in retail banking. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 54, 2A (March 2001), 402-424.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobson, R. Unobservable effects and business performance. Marketing Science, 9, 1 (1990), 74-85.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobson, R., and Aaker, D. A. Is market share all that it's cracked up to be? Journal of Marketing, 49, 4 (1985), 11-22.
   Google Scholar
• Johansson, H.; McHugh, P.; Pendlebury, J. A.; and Wheeler, W. Business Process Reengineering: Breakpoint Strategies for Market Dominance. West Sussex, UK: Wiley, 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Kalakota, R., and Robinson, M. Services Blueprint: Roadmap for Execution. Boston: Addison-Wesley, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Kettinger, W. J.; Teng, J. T. C.; and Guha, S. Business process change: A study of methodologies, techniques, and tools. MIS Quarterly, 21, 1 (1997), 55-80.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, M. M. IE's fill facilitator role in benchmarking operations to improve performance. Industrial Engineering, 25, 9 (1993), 40-43.
   Google Scholar
• Kohli, R., and Devaraj, S. Measuring information technology payoff: A meta-analysis of structural variables in firm-level empirical research. Information Systems Research, 14, 2 (2003), 127-145.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, H. G., and Clark, T. H. Market process reengineering through electronic market systems: Opportunities and challenges. Journal of Management Information Systems, 13, 3 (Winter 1996-97), 113-136.
   Google Scholar
• Lehmann D. R.; Gupta, S.; and Steckel, J. Marketing Research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, F.-R.; Yang, M.-C.; and Pai, Y.-H. A generic structure for business process modeling. Business Process Management Journal, 8, 1 (2002), 19-41.
   Google Scholar
• Lucas, H. C., Jr.; Berndt, D. J.; and Truman, G. A reengineering framework for evaluating a financial imaging system. Communications of the ACM, 39, 5 (1996), 86-96.
   Google Scholar
• Manganelli, R. L., and Klein, M. M. The Re-engineering Handbook: A Step-by-Step Guide to Business Transformation. New York: AMACOM, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, S. Market power and/or efficiency? Review of Economics and Statistics, 70, 2 (1988), 331-335.
   Google Scholar
• Martinez, E. V. Successful reengineering demands IS/business partnerships. Sloan Management Review, 36, 4 (1995), 51-60.
   Google Scholar
• McKee, D. An organizational learning approach to product innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 9, 3 (1992), 232-245.
   Google Scholar
• McPartlin, J. P. Seeing eye to eye on reengineering. Information Week (June 15, 1992), 74.
   Google Scholar
• Megna, P., and Mueller, D. C. Profit rates and intangible capital. Review of Economics and Statistics, 73, 4 (1991), 632-642.
   Google Scholar
• Melao, N., and Pidd, M. Business processes: Four perspectives. In V. Grover and M. L. Markus (eds.), Business Process Transformation—Advances in Management Information Systems. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe, 2008, pp. 41-67.
   Google Scholar
• Melville, N.; Gurbaxani, V.; and Kraemer, K. The productivity impact of information technology across competitive regimes: The role of industry concentration and dynamism. Decision Support Systems, 43, 1 (2007), 229-242.
   Google Scholar
• Murnane, R. J.; Levy, F.; and Autor, D. Technological change, computers and skill demands: Evidence from the back office operations of a large bank. Working paper, Harvard University Graduate School of Education, July 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, E. Cultural values, workplace democracy and organisational change: Emerging issues in European businesses. In C. Coulson-Thomas (ed.), Business Process Reengineering: Myth & Reality. London: Kogan Page, 1994, pp. 201-210.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, P. B. Advertising as information. Journal of Political Economy, 82, 4 (1974), 729-754.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, J., and Kozar, K. A. A multimedia solution to productivity gridlock: A re-engineered jewelry appraisal system at Zale Corporation. MIS Quarterly, 18, 1 (1994), 21-30.
   Google Scholar
• Nissen, M. E. Redesigning reengineering through measurement-driven inference. MIS Quarterly, 22, 4 (1998), 509-534.
   Google Scholar
• Nissen, M. E. An experiment to assess the performance of a redesign knowledge system. Journal of Management Information Systems, 17, 3 (Winter 2000-2001), 25-43.
   Google Scholar
• Orman, L. V. A model management approach to business process reengineering. Journal of Management Information Systems, 15, 1 (Summer 1998), 187-212.
   Google Scholar
• Ovans, A. Should you take the re-engineering risk? Datamation, 41, 17 (1995), 38-42.
   Google Scholar
• Ozcelik, Y. Essays on the effects of information technology and the Internet on business environments. Ph.D dissertation, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Peppard, J. Broadening visions of business process re-engineering. OMEGA, 24, 3 (1996), 255-270.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, M. Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors. New York: Free Press, 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Ranganathan, C., and Dhaliwal, J. S. A survey of business process reengineering practices in Singapore. Information & Management, 39, 2 (2001), 125-134.
   Google Scholar
• Riggins, F. J., and Mukhopadhyay, T. Interdependent benefits from interorganizational systems: Opportunities for business partner reengineering. Journal of Management Information Systems, 11, 2 (Fall 1994), 37-57.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, E. M. Diffusion of Innovations. New York: Free Press, 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, H. W. Managing change. Information Systems Management, 9, 3 (1992), 60-62.
   Google Scholar
• Sarker, S.; Sarker, S.; and Sidorova, A. Understanding business process change failure: An actor-network perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems, 23, 1 (Summer 2006), 51-86.
   Google Scholar
• Seidmann, A., and Sundararajan, A. Competing in information-intensive services: Analyzing the impact of task consolidation and employee empowerment. Journal of Management Information Systems, 14, 2 (Fall 1997), 33-56.
   Google Scholar
• Sethi, V., and King, W. R. Organizational Transformation Through Business Process Reengineering. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Silver, E. Process management instead of operations management. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 6, 4 (2004), 273-279.
   Google Scholar
• Smirlock, M.; Gilligan, T.; and Marshall, W. Tobin's q and the structure-performance relationship. American Economic Review, 80, 3 (1984), 618-623.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, H., and Fingar, P. Business Process Management: The Third Wave. Tampa, FL: Meghan-Kiffer Press, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Stoddard, D. B., and Jarvenpaa, S. L. Business process redesign: Tactics for managing radical change. Journal of Management Information Systems, 12, 1 (Summer 1995), 81-107.
   Google Scholar
• Stratopoulos, T., and Dehning, B. Does successful investment in information technology solve the productivity paradox? Information & Management, 38, 2 (2000) 103-117.
   Google Scholar
• Subramani, M. R., and Walden, E. The impact of e-commerce announcements on the market value of firms. Information Systems Research, 12, 2 (2001), 135-154.
   Google Scholar
• Syzmanski, D. M.; Bharadwaj, S. G.; and Varadarajan, P. An analysis of the market share-profitability relationship. Journal of Marketing, 57, 3 (1993), 1-18.
   Google Scholar
• Thong, J. Y. L.; Yap, C.-S.; and Seah, K.-L. Business process reengineering in the public sector: The case of the housing development board in Singapore. Journal of Management Information Systems, 17, 1 (Summer 2000), 245-270.
   Google Scholar
• Tobin, J. A general equilibrium approach to monetary theory. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 1, 1 (1969), 15-29.
   Google Scholar
• Tobin, J. Monetary policies and the economy: The transmission mechanism. Southern Economic Journal, 44, 3 (1978), 421-431.
   Google Scholar
• Tornatzky, L. G., and Klein, K. J. Innovation characteristics and innovation adoptionimplementation: A meta analysis of findings. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 29, 1 (1982), 28-43.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, P. Whatever happened to business process reengineering? In V. Grover and M. L. Markus (eds.), Business Process Transformation—Advances in Management Information Systems. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe, 2008, pp. 23-40.
   Google Scholar
• White, J. B. The next big thing. Wall Street Journal (November 26, 1996), A1.
   Google Scholar
• Wooldridge, J. M. Econometric Analysis of Cross-Section and Panel Data. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2002.
   Google Scholar