1,462
Views
124
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

User Acceptance of Agile Information Systems: A Model and Empirical Test

, , &
Pages 235-272 | Published online: 08 Dec 2014

References

  • Agarwal, R., and Prasad, J. A conceptual and operational definition of personal innovativeness in the domain of information technology. Information Systems Research, 9, 2 (1998), 204-215.
  • Ågerfalk, P.J.; Fitzgerald, B.; and Slaughter, S.A. Introduction to the special issue—Flexible and distributed information systems development: State of the art and research challenges. Information Systems Research, 20, 3 (2009), 317-328.
  • Ajzen, I. Nature and operation of attitudes. Annual Review of Psychology, 52 (2001), 27-58.
  • Ajzen, I., and Fishbein, M. Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1980.
  • Bandura, A. Social Learning Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1977.
  • Baskerville, R.; Ramesh, B.; Levine, L.; and Pries-Jeje, J. High-speed software development practices: What works, what doesn't. IT Professional, 8, 4 (2006), 29-36.
  • Beck, K. Embracing change with extreme programming. Computer, 32, 10 (1999), 70-77.
  • Beck, K.; Cockburn, A.; Jeffries, R.; and Highsmith, J. Manifesto for agile software development. 2001 (available at http://www.agilemanifesto.org
  • Bem, D.J. Self-perception theory. In L. Berkowitz (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 6. New York: Academic Press, 1972, pp. 1-62.
  • Bhattacherjee, A. Understanding information systems continuance: An expectation-confirmation model. MIS Quarterly, 25, 3 (2001), 351-370.
  • Bizer, G.Y.; Barden, J.C.; and Petty, R.E. Attitudes. In L. Nadel (ed.), Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science, vol. 1. Hampshire, UK: Macmillan, 2003, pp. 247-253.
  • Bowlby, J. A Secure Base. New York: Basic Books, 1988.
  • Breckler, S.J. Empirical validation of affect, behavior, and cognition as distinct components of attitude. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 6 (1984), 1191-1205.
  • Breckler, S.J., and Wiggins, E.C. Affect versus evaluation in the structure of attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 3 (1989), 253-271.
  • Capiluppi, A.; Fernandez-Ramil, J.; Higman, J.; Sharp, H.C.; and Smith, N. An empirical study of the evolution of an agile-developed software system. In Proceedings of the 29th International Conference on Software Engineering, ICSE '07. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society, 2007, pp. 511-518.
  • Chaiken, S., and Trope, Y. Dual-Process Theories in Social Psychology. New York: Guilford, 1999.
  • Chan, F.K.Y., and Thong, J.Y.L. Acceptance of agile methodologies: A critical review and conceptual framework. Decision Support Systems, 46, 4 (2009), 803-814.
  • Chan, F.K.Y.; Thong, J.Y.L.; Venkatesh, V.; Brown, S.A.; Hu, P.J.H.; and Tam, K.Y. Modeling citizen satisfaction with mandatory adoption of an e-government technology. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 11, 10 (2010), 519-549.
  • Cohen, D.; Lindvall, M.; and Costa, P. An introduction to agile methods. In M. Zelkowitz (ed.), Advances in Computers, vol. 62. Oxford: Elsevier, 2004, pp. 1-66.
  • Conboy, K., and Fitzgerald, B. Agile drivers, capabilities, and value: An over-arching assessment framework for systems development. In K.C. Desouza (ed.), Agile Information Systems: Conceptualization, Construction, and Management. Oxford: Elsevier, 2007, pp. 207-222.
  • Daniels, K. Measures of five aspects of affective well-being at work. Human Relations, 53, 2 (2000), 275-294.
  • Davis, F.D. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13, 3 (1989), 319-340.
  • Davis, F.D.; Bagozzi, R.P.; and Warshaw, P.R. User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35, 8 (1989), 982-1003.
  • Dunn, J. Distress and Comfort. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1977.
  • Eagly, A.H., and Chaiken, S. The Psychology of Attitudes. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1993.
  • Edwards, K. The interplay of affect and cognition in attitude formation and change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 2 (1990), 202-216.
  • Elizur, D., and Guttman, L. The structure of attitudes toward work and technological change within an organization. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21, 4 (1976), 611-622.
  • Feather, N.T. Expectations and Actions: Expectancy-Value Models in Psychology. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1982.
  • Fishbein, M., and Ajzen I. Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1975.
  • Fornell, C., and Larcker, D.F. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 1 (1981), 39-50.
  • Fruhling, A., and Vreede, G.-J. de. Field experiences with extreme programming: Developing an emergency response system. Journal of Management Information Systems, 22, 4 (Spring 2006), 39-68.
  • Gherardi, S., and Silli, A. Agile information systems as a double dream. In K.C. Desouza (ed.), Agile Information Systems: Conceptualization, Construction, and Management. Oxford, UK: Elsevier, 2007, pp. 110-121.
  • Hair, J.F.; Anderson, R.E.; Tatham, R.L.; and Black, W.C. Multivariate Data Analysis with Readings, 3d ed. New York: Macmillan, 1992.
  • Harris, M.L.; Collins, R.B.; and Hevner, A.R. Control of flexible software development under uncertainty. Information Systems Research, 20, 3 (2009), 400-419.
  • Hong, S.J.; Thong, J.Y.L.; and Tam, K.Y. Understanding continued IT usage behavior: A comparison of three models in the context of mobile Internet. Decision Support Systems, 42, 3 (2006), 1819-1834.
  • Hong, W.; Thong, J.Y.L.; Wong, W.M.; and Tam, K.Y. Determinants of user acceptance of digital libraries: An empirical examination of individual differences and system characteristics. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18, 3 (Winter 2001-2), 97-124.
  • Hurt, H.T.; Joseph, K.; and Cook, C.D. Scales for the measurement of innovativeness. Human Communication Research, 4, 1 (1977), 58-65.
  • Johnston, V.S. Why We Feel: The Science of Emotions. Reading, MA: Helix Books, 1999.
  • Kanter, R.M. Managing the human side of change. Management Review, 74, 1 (1985), 52-56.
  • Keizer, G. Microsoft retreats on Hotmail interface changes. Computerworld (December 19, 2008) (available at http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9124092/Microsoft_retreats_on_Hotmail_interface_changes/
  • Kim, H.W.; Chan, H.C.; and Chan, Y.P. A balanced thinking-feelings model of information systems continuance. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 65, 6 (2007), 511-525.
  • Limayem, M.; Hirt, S.G.; and Cheung, C.M.K. How habit limits the predictive power of intention: The case of information systems continuance. MIS Quarterly, 31, 4 (2007), 705-737.
  • Lindstrom, L., and Jeffries, R. Extreme programming and agile software development methodologies. Information Systems Management, 21, 3 (2004), 41-52.
  • Maruping, L.M.; Venkatesh, V.; and Agarwal, R. A control theory perspective on agile methodology use and changing user requirements. Information Systems Research, 20, 3 (2009), 377-399.
  • McGuire, W.J. The nature of attitudes and attitude change. In G. Lindzey and E. Aronson (eds.), The Handbook of Social Psychology, vol. 3, 2d ed. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1969, pp. 136-314.
  • Midgley, D., and Dowling, G. Innovativeness: The concept and its measurement. Journal of Consumer Research, 4, 4 (1978), 229-242.
  • Millar, M.G., and Tesser, A. Effects of affective and cognitive focus on the attitude-behavior relation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 2 (1986), 270-276.
  • Miniard, P.W., and Barone, M.J. The case for noncognitive determinants of attitude: A critique of Fishbein and Middlestadt. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 6, 1 (1997), 77-91.
  • Mossberg, W.S. Bold redesign improves Office 2007, but learning curve may be too steep for some users, ribbon replaces menus. Wall Street Journal (January 4, 2007) (available at http://ptech.allthingsd.com/20070104/redesign-improves-office-2007/
  • Nielsen, J. Coordinating user interfaces for consistency. ACM SIGCHI Bulletin, 20, 3 (1989), 63-65.
  • Noer, D.M. Breaking Free: A Prescription for Personal and Organizational Change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1997.
  • Oliver, R.L. A cognitive model of the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction decisions. Journal of Marketing Research, 17, 4 (1980), 460-469.
  • Orlikowski, W.J., and Iacono, C.S. Desperately seeking the "IT" in IT research—A call to theorizing the IT artifact. Information Systems Research, 12, 2 (2001), 121-134.
  • Ortiz de Guinea, A., and Marcus, M.L. Why break the habit of a lifetime? Rethinking the roles of intention, habit, and emotion in continuing information technology use. MIS Quarterly, 33, 3 (2009), 433-444.
  • Ouellette, J.A., and Wood, W. Habit and intention in everyday life: The multiple processes by which past behavior predicts future behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 1 (1998), 54-74.
  • Ozok, A.A., and Salvendy, G. How consistent is your web design? Behaviour & Information Technology, 20, 6 (2001), 433-447.
  • Piderit, S.K. Rethinking resistance and recognizing ambivalence: A multidimensional view of attitudes toward an organizational change. Academy of Management Review, 25, 4 (2000), 783-794.
  • Ritov, I., and Baron, J. Status quo and omission biases. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5, 1 (1992), 49-61.
  • Rogers, E.M. Diffusion of Innovations, 4th ed. New York: Free Press, 1995.
  • Rosenberg, M.J., and Hovland, C.I. Cognitive, affective, and behavioral components of attitude. In M.J. Rosenberg, C.I. Hovland, W.J. McGuire, R.P. Abelson, and J.W. Brehm (eds.), Attitude Organization and Change: An Analysis of Consistency Among Attitude Components. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1960, pp. 1-14.
  • Rumpe, B., and Schröder, A. Quantitative survey on extreme programming projects. Paper presented at the Third International Conference on Extreme Programming and Flexible Processes in Software Engineering, Alghero, Italy, May 26-30, 2002.
  • Sable, P. Pets, attachment, and well-being across the life cycle. Social Work, 40, 3 (1995), 334-341.
  • Samuelson, W., and Zeckhauser, R. Status quo bias in decision making. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1, 1 (1988), 7-59.
  • Schneider, W., and Shiffrin, R.M. Controlled and automatic human information processing: I. Detection, search, and attention. Psychological Review, 84, 1 (1997), 1-66.
  • Schneider, W.; Dumais, S.T.; and Shiffrin, R.M. Automatic and control processing and attention. In R. Parasuraman, R. Davies, and R.J. Beatty (eds.), Varieties of Attention. New York: Academic Press, 1984, pp. 1-27.
  • Shelton, B.E.; Turns, J.; and Wagner, T.S. Technology adoption as process: A case of integrating an information-intensive Website into a patient education helpline. Behaviour & Information Technology, 21, 3 (2002), 209-222.
  • Sherman, S.J., and Corty, E. Cognitive heuristics. In R.S. Wyer and T.K. Srull (eds.), Handbook of Social Cognition, vol. 1. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1984, pp. 189-286.
  • Simmons, R. Comfort with the self. In T.J. Owens, S. Stryker, and N. Goodman (eds.), Extending Self-Esteem Theory and Research: Sociological and Psychological Currents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001, pp. 198-222.
  • Sliwa, C. Users not rushing on Vista, Office 2007. Computerworld (January 29, 2007) (available at http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/280981/Users_Not_Rushing_on_Vista_Office_2007/
  • Sloman, S.A. The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 1 (1996), 3-22.
  • Spreng, R.A.; MacKenzie, S.B.; and Olshavsky, R.W. A reexamination of the determinants of consumer satisfaction. Journal of Marketing, 60, 3 (1996), 15-32.
  • Swanson, E.B. The dimensions of maintenance. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Software Engineering. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society, 1976, pp. 492-497.
  • Swanson, E.B., and Dans, E. System life expectancy and the maintenance effort: Exploring their equilibrium. MIS Quarterly, 24, 2 (2000), 277-297.
  • Tanaka, T.; Eberts, R.E.; and Salvendy, G. Consistency of human-computer interface design: Quantification and validation. Human Factors, 33, 6 (1991), 653-676.
  • Thomas, D. Agile programming: Design to accommodate change. IEEE Software, 22, 3 (2005), 14-16.
  • Thong, J.Y.L. An integrated model of information systems adoption in small businesses. Journal of Management Information Systems, 15, 4 (Spring 1999), 187-214.
  • Thong, J.Y.L.; Hong, S.J.; and Tam, K.Y. The effects of post-adoption beliefs on the expectation-confirmation model for information technology continuance. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 64, 9 (2006), 799-810.
  • Thong, J.Y.L.; Hong, W.; and Tam, K.Y. Understanding user acceptance of digital libraries: What are the roles of interface characteristics, organizational context, and individual differences? International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 57, 3 (2002), 215-242.
  • Thurstone, L.L., and Chave, E.J. The Measurement of Attitude. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1929.
  • Trafimov, D.; Sheeran, P.; Lombardo, B.; Finlay, K.A.; Brown, J.; and Armitage, C.J. Affective and cognitive control of persons and behaviors. British Journal of Social Psychology, 43, 2 (2004), 207-224.
  • Triandis, H.C. Attitude and Attitude Change. New York: Wiley, 1971.
  • Trocchia, P.J., and Janda, S. A phenomenological investigation of Internet usage among older individuals. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 17, 7 (2000), 605-616.
  • Tversky, A., and Kahneman, D. Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, and A. Tversky (eds.), Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1982, pp. 3-20.
  • Van der Heijden, H. User acceptance of hedonic information systems. MIS Quarterly, 28, 4 (2004), 695-704.
  • Venkatesh, V. Determinants of perceived ease of use: Integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model. Information Systems Research, 11, 4 (2000), 342-365.
  • Venkatesh, V., and Bala, H. Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decision Sciences, 39, 2 (2008), 273-315.
  • Venkatesh, V.; Davis, F.D.; and Morris, M.G. Dead or alive? The development, trajectory and future of technology adoption research. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 8, 4 (2007), 267-286.
  • Venkatesh, V.; Morris, M.G.; Davis, G.B.; and Davis, F.D. User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27, 3 (2003), 425-478.
  • Verplanken, B.; Hofstee, G.; and Janssen, H.J.W. Accessibility of affective versus cognitive components of attitudes. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 1 (1998), 23-35.
  • Vidgen, R., and Wang, X. Coevolving systems and the organization of agile software development. Information Systems Research, 20, 3 (2009), 355-376.
  • Wyer, R.S., and Srull, T.K. Memory and Cognition in Its Social Context. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1989.
  • Zanna, M.P., and Rempel, J.K. Attitudes: A new look at an old concept. In D. Bar-Tal and A.W. Kruglanski (eds.), The Social Psychology of Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988, pp. 315-334.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.