Co-opetition Between Differentiated Platforms in Two-Sided Markets

References

• Anderson, E. G., Jr.; Parker, G. G.; and Tan, B. Platform performance investment in the presence of network externalities. Paper presented at the 22nd Workshop on Information Systems and Economics, Shanghai, China, December 7-9, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong, M. Network interconnection in telecommunications. Economic Journal, 108, 448 (1998), 545-564.
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong, M. Competition in two-sided markets. RAND Journal of Economics, 37, 3 (Autumn 2006), 668-691.
   Google Scholar
• Au, Y. A., and Kauffman, R. J. Should we wait? Network externalities, compatibility, and electronic billing adoption. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18, 2 (Fall 2001), 47-63.
   Google Scholar
• Bhargava, H. K., and Choudhary, V. Information goods and vertical differentiation. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18, 2 (Fall 2001), 89-106.
   Google Scholar
• Brandenburger, A. M., and Nalebuff, B. J. Co-Opetition: A Revolutionary Mindset That Combines Competition and Cooperation: The Game Theory Strategy That's Changing the Game of Business. New York: Currency Doubleday, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Ceccagnoli, M.; Forman, C.; Huang, P.; and Wu, D. J. Co-creation of value in a platform ecosystem: The case of enterprise software. MIS Quarterly, 36, 1 (2012), 263-290.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, H. K.; Liu, Y.; and Tang, Q. C. The impact of network externalities on the competition between open source and proprietary software. Journal of Management Information Systems, 27, 4 (Spring 2011), 201-230.
   Google Scholar
• Clemons, E. MAC—Philadelphia National Bank's strategic venture in shared ATM networks. Journal of Management Information Systems, 7, 1 (Summer 1990), 5-25.
   Google Scholar
• Clemons, E., and Madhani, N. Regulation of digital businesses with natural monopolies or third-party payment business models: Antitrust lessons from the analysis of Google. Journal of Management Information Systems, 27, 3 (Winter 2010), 43-80.
   Google Scholar
• Doganoglu, T., and Wright, J. Multihoming and compatibility. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 24, 1 (2006), 45-67.
   Google Scholar
• Economides, N. The economics of networks. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 14, 6 (1996), 673-699.
   Google Scholar
• Economides, N., and Flyer, F. Compatibility and market structure for network goods. Business discussion paper no. 98-02, Stern School of Business, New York University, New York, November 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Economides, N., and Katsamakas, E. Two-sided competition of proprietary vs. open source technology platforms and the implications for the software industry. Management Science, 52, 7 (2006), 1057-1071.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenmann, T. R.; Parker, G. G.; and Van Alstyne, M. W. Strategies for two-sided markets. Harvard Business Review, 84, 10 (2006), 92-101.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenmann, T. R.; Parker, G. G.; and Van Alstyne, M. Opening platforms: When, how and why? In A. Gawer (ed.), Platforms, Markets and Innovation. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 2009, pp. 131-162.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, D. S., and Schmalensee, R. The industrial organization of markets with two-sided platforms. Competition Policy International, 3, 1 (Spring 2007), 151-179.
   Google Scholar
• Facts about the Yahoo-Google advertising agreement. Google, June 2008 (available at www.google.com/yahoogooglefacts/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Farrell, J., and Saloner, G. Converters, compatibility, and the control of interfaces. Journal of Industrial Economics, 40, 1 (1992), 9-35.
   Google Scholar
• Foros, O., and Hansen, B. Competition and compatibility among Internet service providers. Information Economics and Policy, 13, 4 (2001), 411-425.
   Google Scholar
• Frew, J. R. Multiple listing service participation in the real estate brokerage industry: Cooperation or competition? Journal of Urban Economics, 21, 3 (1987), 272-286.
   Google Scholar
• Gabszewicz, J. J., and Wauthy, X. Two-sided markets and price competition with multihoming. Discussion paper no. 2004/30, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics, Catholic University of Louvain, France, May 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Gandal, N. Compatibility, standardization, and network effects: Some policy implications. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 18, 1 (Spring 2002), 80-91.
   Google Scholar
• Granados, N.; Gupta, A.; and Kauffman, R. J. Online and offline demand and price elasticities: Evidence from the air travel industry. Information Systems Research, 23, 1 (2012), 164-181.
   Google Scholar
• Granados, N.; Kauffman, R. J.; and King, B. How has electronic travel distribution been transformed? A test of the theory of newly vulnerable markets. Journal of Management Information Systems, 25, 2 (Fall 2008), 73-95.
   Google Scholar
• Hermalin, B. E., and Katz, M. L. Network interconnection with two-sided user benefits. Working paper, Walter A. Haas School of Business, University of California, Berkeley, July 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Hossain, T.; Minor, D.; and Morgan, J. Competing matchmakers: An experimental analysis. Management Science, 57, 11 (2011), 1913-1925.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, R., and Mendelson, H. Information goods vs. industrial goods: Cost structure and competition. Management Science, 57, 1 (2011), 164-176.
   Google Scholar
• Jullien, B. Two-sided markets and electronic intermediaries. CESifo Economic Studies, 51, 2-3 (2005), 233-260.
   Google Scholar
• Katsamakas, E., and Bakos, Y. Design and ownership of two-sided networks: Implications for Internet intermediaries. Journal of Management Information Systems, 25, 2 (Fall 2008), 171-202.
   Google Scholar
• Katz, M. L., and Shapiro, C. Network externalities, competition, and compatibility. American Economic Review, 75, 3 (1985), 424-440.
   Google Scholar
• McAndrews, J. J. The evolution of shared ATM networks. Business Review of the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia (May-June 1991), 3-16.
   Google Scholar
• Noia, C. D. Competition and integration among stock exchanges in Europe: Network effects, implicit mergers and remote access. European Financial Management, 7, 1 (2001), 39-72.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, G. G., and Van Alstyne, M. W. Two-sided network effects: A theory of information product design. Management Science, 51, 10 (2005), 1494-1504.
   Google Scholar
• Rochet, J. C., and Tirole, J. Cooperation among competitors: Some economics of payment card associations. RAND Journal of Economics, 33, 4 (Winter 2002), 549-570.
   Google Scholar
• Rochet, J. C., and Tirole, J. Two-sided markets: A progress report. RAND Journal of Economics, 37, 3 (Autumn 2006), 645-667.
   Google Scholar
• Roson, R. Two-sided markets: A tentative survey. Review of Network Economics, 4, 2 (2005), 142-160.
   Google Scholar
• Schiff, A. Open and closed systems of two-sided networks. Information Economics and Policy, 15, 4 (2003), 425-442.
   Google Scholar
• Stein, A. Apple: Real Networks hacked iPod. CNN Money, July 29, 2004 (available at http://money.cnn.com/2004/07/29/technology/apple_real/
   Google Scholar
• Wright, J. One-sided logic in two-sided markets. Review of Network Economics, 3, 1 (2004), 44-64.
   Google Scholar