477
Views
25
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Forming Interoperability Through Interorganizational Systems Standards

&

References

  • Armstrong, J., and Overton, T. Estimating non-response bias in mail surveys. Journal of Marketing Research, 14, 3 (1977), 396-402.
  • Baron, R.M., and Kenny, D.A. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 6 (1986), 1173-1182.
  • Basu, A.; Mazumdar, T.; and Paj, S.P. Indirect network externality effects on product attributes. Marketing Science, 22, 2 (2003), 209-221.
  • Benlian, A., and Hess, T. IT standard implementation and business process outcomes: An empirical analysis of XML in the publishing industry. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems. Atlanta: Association for Information Systems, 2010, paper 50.
  • Bhatt, G., and Grover, V. Types of information technology capabilities and their role in competitive advantage: An empirical study. Journal of Management Information Systems, 22, 2 (Fall 2005), 253-278.
  • Bollen, K., and Lennox, R. Conventional wisdom on measurement: A structural equation perspective. Psychological Bulletin, 110, 2 (1991), 305-314.
  • Brown, S.L., and Eisenhardt, K.M. The art of continuous change: Linking complexity theory and time-spaced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 1 (1997), 1-34.
  • Chen, M. Factors affecting the adoption and diffusion of XML and Web services standards for e-business systems. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 58, 3 (2003), 259-279.
  • Chen, R.; Sharman, R.; Chakravarti, N.; Rao, H.R.; and Upadhyaya, S.J. Emergency response information system interoperability: Development of chemical incident response data model. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 9, 3 (2008), article 7.
  • Chin, W.W. Issues and opinions on structural equation modeling. MIS Quarterly, 22, 1 (1998), 1-11.
  • Choi, S.Y.; Lee, H.; and Yoo, Y. The impact of information technology and transactive memory systems on knowledge sharing, application, and team performance: A field study. MIS Quarterly, 34, 4 (2010), 855-870.
  • Ciavolino, E., and Nitti, M. Using the hybrid two-step estimation approach for the identification of second-order latent variable models. Journal of Applied Statistics, 40, 3 (2013), 508-526.
  • Dedrick, J.; Xu, S.; and Zhu, K. How does information technology shape supply chain structure? Evidence on the number of suppliers. Journal of Management Information Systems, 25, 2 (Fall 2008), 41-72.
  • Dutta, P.K.; Lach, S.; and Core, A.R. Better late than early: Vertical differentiation in the adoption of a new technology. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 4, 4 (1995), 563-589.
  • Fichman, R.G., and Kemerer, C.F. Adoption of software engineering process innovations: The case of object orientation. Sloan Management Review (Winter 1993), 7-22.
  • Fisher, M.L.; Raman, A.; and McClelland, A.S. Rocket science retailing is almost here: Are you ready? Harvard Business Review, 78, 4 (2000), 115-124.
  • Freeze, R.D., and Raschke, R.L. An assessment of formative and reflective constructs in IS research. In Proceedings of the 15th European Conference on Information Systems. Atlanta: Association for Information Systems, 2007, paper 171.
  • Grant, R. Prospering in dynamically-competitive environments: Organizational capability as knowledge integration. Organization Science, 7, 4 (1996), 375-387.
  • Hagedoorn, J. Understanding the rationale of strategic technology partnering: Interorganizational modes of cooperation and sectoral differences. Strategic Management Journal, 14, 5 (1993), 371-385.
  • Hanseth, O.; Jacucci, E.; Grisot, M.; and Aanestad, M. Reflexive standardization: Side effects and complexity in standard marking. MIS Quarterly, 30, special issue (2006), 563-581.
  • Hart, P.J., and Saunders, C.S. Emerging electronic partnerships: Antecedents and dimensions of EDI use from the suppliers' perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems, 14, 4 (Spring 1998), 87-111.
  • Hitt, L.M.; Wu, D.J.; and Zhou, X.G. Investment in enterprise resource planning: Business impact and productivity measures. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19, 1 (Summer 2002), 71-98.
  • Hovav, A.; Patnayakuni, R.; and Schuff, D. A model of Internet standards adoption: The case of IPv6. Information Systems Journal, 14, 3 (2004), 265-294.
  • Howell, R.D.; Breivik, E.; and Wilcox, J.B. Reconsidering formative measurement. Psychological Methods, 12, 2 (2007), 205-218.
  • Kale, P.; Dyer, J.H.; and Singh, H. Alliance capability, stock market response, and long-term alliance success: The role of the alliance function. Strategic Management Journal, 23 (2002), 747-767.
  • Katz, M., and Shapiro, C. Network externalities, competition, and compatibility. American Economic Review, 75, 3 (1985), 424-440.
  • Kauffman, R.J.; McAndrews, J.; and Wang, Y.M. Opening the "black box" of network externalities in network adoption. Information Systems Research, 11, 1 (2000), 61-82.
  • Klein, R., and Rai, A. Interfirm strategic information flows in logistics supply chain relationships. MIS Quarterly, 33, 4 (2009), 735-762.
  • Lee, H.G.; Clark, T.; and Tam, K.Y. Research report: Can EDI benefit adopters? Information Systems Research, 10, 2 (1999), 186-195.
  • Lewis, B.R.; Templeton, G.F.; and Byrd, T.A. A methodology for construct development in MIS research. European Journal of Information Systems, 14, 4 (2005), 388-400.
  • MacKenzie, S.B.; Podsakoff, P.M.; and Podsakoff, N.P. Construct measurement and validation procedures in MIS and behavioral research: Integrating new and existing techniques. MIS Quarterly, 35, 2 (2011), 293-334.
  • Malhotra, A.; Gosain, S.; and El Sawy, O.A. Absorptive capacity configurations in supply chains: Gearing for partner-enabled market knowledge creation. MIS Quarterly, 29, 1 (2005), 145-187.
  • Malhotra, N.K.; Kim, S.S.; and Patil, A. Common method variance in IS research: A comparison of alternative approaches and a reanalysis of past research. Management Science, 52, 12 (2006), 1865-1883.
  • Markus, M.L., and Robey, D. Information technology and organizational change: Causal structure in theory and research. Management Science, 34, 5 (1988), 583-598.
  • Markus, M.L.; Steinfield, C.W.; Wigand, R.T.; and Minton, G. Industry-wide information systems standardization as collective action: The case of the U.S. residential mortgage industry. MIS Quarterly, 30, special issue (2006), 439-465.
  • Massetti, B., and Zmud, R.W. Measuring the extent of EDI usage in complex organizations: Strategic and illustrative examples. MIS Quarterly, 20, 3 (1996), 331-345.
  • Mata, F.J.; Fuerst, W.L.; and Barney, J.B. Information technology and sustained competitive advantage: A resource-based analysis. MIS Quarterly, 19, 4 (1995), 487-505.
  • Mithas, S.; Ramasubbu, N.; and Sambamurthy, V. How information management capability influences firm performance. MIS Quarterly, 35, 1 (2011), 237-256.
  • Mukhopadhyay, T., and Kekre, S. Strategic and operational benefits of electronic integration in B2B procurement processes. Management Science, 48, 10 (2002), 1301-1313.
  • Nelson, M.; Shaw, M.J.; and Qualls, W. Interorganizational system standards development in vertical industries. Electronic Markets, 15, 4 (2005), 378-389.
  • Nickerson, J.V., and zur Muehlen, M. The ecology of standards processes: Insights from Internet standard making. MIS Quarterly, 30, special issue (2006), 467-488.
  • Open Geospatial Consortium. Domains that use and develop OGC standards. Wayland, MA, 2013 (available at www.opengeospatial.org/domain/
  • Open Geospatial Consortium. The OGC's emerging role in geospatial business intelligence—GeoBI. Wayland, MA, 2013 (available at www.opengeospatial.org/domain/geobi/
  • Open Geospatial Consortium. OGC® standards and supporting documents. Wayland, MA, 2013 (available at www.opengeospatial.org/standards/
  • Petter, S.; Straub, D.; and Rai, A. Specifying formative constructs in information systems research. MIS Quarterly, 31, 4 (2007), 623-656.
  • Podsakoff, P.M.; MacKenzie, S.B.; Lee, J.Y.; and Podsakoff, N. Common method biases in behavior research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 5 (2003), 879-903.
  • Rai, A., and Tang, X. Leveraging IT capabilities and competitive process capabilities for the management of interorganizational relationship portfolios. Information Systems Research, 21, 3 (2010), 516-542.
  • Rai, A.; Brown, P.; and Tang, X. Organizational assimilation of electronic procurement innovations. Journal of Management Information Systems, 26, 1 (Summer 2009), 257-296.
  • Rai, A.; Patnayakuni, R.; and Seth, N. Firm performance impacts of digitally enabled supply chain integration capabilities. MIS Quarterly, 30, 2 (2006), 225-246.
  • Rai, A.; Pavlou, P.A.; Im, G.; and Du, S. Interfirm IT capability profiles and communications for cocreating relational value: Evidence from the logistics industry. MIS Quarterly, 36, 1 (2012), 233-262.
  • Rayport, J.F., and Sviokla, J.J. Exploiting the virtual value chain. Harvard Business Review, 73, 6 (1995), 75-85.
  • Seddon, P.B., and Scheepers, R. Towards the improved treatment of generalization of knowledge claims in IS research: Drawing general conclusions from samples. European Journal of Information Systems, 21, 1 (2012), 6-21.
  • Shapiro, C., and Varian, H.R. Information Rules: A Strategic Guide to the Network Economy. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 1998.
  • Shin, B., and Kim, G. Investigating the reliability of second-order formative measurement in information systems research. European Journal of Information Systems, 20, 5 (2011), 608-623.
  • Simon, H.A. The architecture of complexity. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 106 (1972), 467-482.
  • Sobel, M.E. Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. In S. Leinhart (ed.), Sociological Methodology. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1982, pp. 290-312.
  • Son, J.Y.; Narasimhan, S.; and Riggins, F.J. Effects of relational factors and channel climate on EDI usage in the customer-supplier relationship. Journal of Management Information Systems, 22, 1 (Summer 2005), 321-353.
  • Straub, D. Validating instruments in MIS research. MIS Quarterly, 13, 2 (1989), 147-169.
  • Subramani, M.R. How do suppliers benefit from information technology use in supply chain relationships? MIS Quarterly, 28, 1 (2004), 45-73.
  • Sundararajan, A. Local network effects and complex network structure. The B.E. Journal of Theoretical Economics, 7, 1 (2008), article 46.
  • Sythoff, J., and Morrison, J. Location-based services market forecast 2011-2015. Pyramid Research, Boston, 2011.
  • Tanriverdi, H. Information technology relatedness, knowledge management capability, and performance of multibusiness firms. MIS Quarterly, 29, 2 (2005), 311-334.
  • Teece, D.J.; Pisano, G.; and Shuen, A. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18, 7 (1997), 509-533.
  • Venkatesh, V., and Bala, H. Adoption and impacts of interorganizational business process standards: Role of partnering synergy. Information Systems Research, 23, 4 (2012), 1131-1157.
  • Walsham, G., and Sahay, S. GIS for district-level administration in India: Problems and opportunities. MIS Quarterly, 23, 1 (1999), 39-66.
  • Wilcox, J.B.; Howell, R.D.; and Breivik, E. Questions about formative measurement. Journal of Business Research, 61, 12 (2008), 1219-1228.
  • Williams, L.J.; Cote, J.A.; and Buckley, M.R. Lack of method variance in self-reported affect and perceptions at work: Reality or artifact? Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 3 (1989), 462-468.
  • Zhao, K.; Khan, S.; and Xia, M. Sustainability of vertical standards consortia as communities of practice: A multi-level framework. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 16, 1 (2011), 11-40.
  • Zhao, K.; Xia, M.; and Shaw, M. Vertical e-business standards and standards developing organizations: A conceptual framework. Electronic Markets, 15, 4 (2005), 289-300.
  • Zhao, K.; Xia, M.; and Shaw, M. An integrated model of consortia-based e-business standardization: Collaborative development and adoption with network externalities. Journal of Management Information Systems, 23, 4 (Spring 2007), 247-271.
  • Zhao, K.; Xia, M.; and Shaw, M. What motivates firms to contribute to consortium-based e-business standardization? Journal of Management Information Systems, 28, 2 (Fall 2011), 305-334.
  • Zhu, K., and Kraemer, K.L. Post-adoption variations in usage and value of e-business by organizations: Cross-country evidence from the retail industry. Information Systems Research, 16, 1 (2005), 61-84.
  • Zhu, K.; Kraemer, K.L.; Gurbaxani, V.; and Xu, S.X. Migration to open-standards interorganizational systems: Network effects, switching costs, and path dependency. MIS Quarterly, 30, special issue (2006), 515-539.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.