User Roles and Contributions in Innovation-Contest Communities

References

• Adamczyk, S.; Bullinger, A.C.; and Möslein, K.M. Innovation contests: A review, classification and outlook. Creativity and Innovation Management, 21, 4 (2012), 335-360.
   Google Scholar
• Albert, R., and Barabasi, A. Statistical mechanics of complex networks. Reviews of Modern Physics, 74, 1 (2002), 47-97.
   Google Scholar
• Aldenderfer, M.S., and Blashdield, R.K. Cluster Analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Alexy, O.; Criscuolo, P.; and Salter, A. Managing unsolicited ideas for R&D. California Management Review, 54, 3 (2012), 116-139.
   Google Scholar
• Arakji, R.Y., and Lang, K.R. Digital consumer networks and producer-consumer collaboration: Innovation and product development in the video game industry. Journal of Management Information Systems, 24, 2 (Fall 2007), 195-219.
   Google Scholar
• Arazy, O., and Nov, O. Determinants of Wikipedia quality: The roles of global and local contribution inequality. In Proceedings of the 2010 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. New York: ACM Press, 2010, pp. 233-236.
   Google Scholar
• Arazy, O.; Nov, O.; Patterson, R.; and Yeo, L. Information quality in Wikipedia: The effects of group composition and task conflict. Journal of Management Information Systems, 27, 4 (2011), 71-98.
   Google Scholar
• Beersma, B.; Hollenbeck, J.R.; Humphrey, S.E.; Moon, H.; Conlon, D.E.; and Ilgen, D.R. Cooperation, competition, and team performance: Toward a contingency approach. Academy of Management Journal, 46, 5 (2003), 572-590.
   Google Scholar
• Berg-Jensen, M.; Hienerth, C.; and Lettl, C. Forecasting the attractiveness of user-generated designs via online data. In Best Paper Proceedings of the 2010 Academy of Management Annual Meeting, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Bieber, M.; Engelbart, D.; Furuta, R.; Hiltz, S.R.; Noll, J.; Preece, J.; Stohr, E.A.; Turoff, M., and Van de Walle, B. Toward virtual community knowledge evolution. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18, 4 (Spring 2002), 11-35.
   Google Scholar
• Bilgram, V.; Füller, J.; and Rieder, B. How to be successful in co-creation research? The Swarovski innovation research community. Paper presented at the ESOMAR Online Research 2009 Conference, Chicago, October 26-28, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Björk, J., and Magnusson, M. Where do good innovation ideas come from? Exploring the influence of network connectivity on innovation idea quality. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 26, 6 (2009), 662-670.
   Google Scholar
• Borgatti, S.P.; Everett, M.G.; and Freeman, L.C. UCINET for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis. Lexington, KY: Analytic Technologies, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Boudreau, K.J.; Lacetera, N.; and Lakhani, K.R. Incentives and problem uncertainty in innovation contests: An empirical analysis. Management Science, 57, 5 (2011), 843-863.
   Google Scholar
• Brandenburger, A., and Nalebuff, B. Co-opetition. New York: Doubleday/Currency, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Bullinger, A.C.; Neyer, A.-K.; Rass, M.; and Moeslein, K.M. Community-based innovation contests: Where competition meets cooperation. Creativity and Innovation Management, 19, 3 (2010), 290-303.
   Google Scholar
• Burnett, S., and Illingworth, L. Anonymous knowledge sharing in a virtual environment: A preliminary investigation. Knowledge and Process Management, 15, 1 (2008), 1-11.
   Google Scholar
• Burt, R.S. Brokerage and Closure: An Introduction to Social Capital. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Calinski, R.B., and Harabasz, J. A dendrite method for cluster analysis. Communications in Statistics, 3, 1 (1974), 1-27.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, J.; Xu, H.; and Whinston, A.B. Moderated online communities and quality of user-generated content. Journal of Management Information Systems, 28, 2 (Fall 2011), 237-268.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, L.; Marsden, J.R.; and Zhang, Z. Theory and analysis of company-sponsored value co-creation. Journal of Management Information Systems, 29, 2 (Fall 2012), 141-172.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 1 (1960), 37-46.
   Google Scholar
• Contractor, N.S.; Wasserman, S.; and Faust, K. Testing multitheoretical, multilevel hypotheses about organizational networks: An analytical framework and empirical example. Academy of Management Review, 31, 3 (2006), 681-703.
   Google Scholar
• Crawford, C.M., and DiBenedetto, A.C. New Product Management. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Cross, R.; Laseter, T.; Parker, A.; and Velasquez, G. Using social network analysis to improve communities of practice. California Management Review, 49, 1 (2006), 32-60.
   Google Scholar
• Dahlander, L., and Frederiksen, L. The core and cosmopolitans: A relational view of innovation in user communities. Organization Science, 23, 4 (2012), 988-1007.
   Google Scholar
• Dahlander, L., and O'Mahoney, S. Progressing to the center: Coordinating project work. Organization Science, 22, 4 (2011), 961-979.
   Google Scholar
• David, P.A., and Shapiro, J.S. Community-based production of open-source software: What do we know about the developers who participate? Information Economics and Policy, 20, 4 (2008), 364-398.
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, N.K., and Lincoln, Y.S. Entering the field of qualitative research. In N.K. Denzin and Y.S. Lincoln (eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1994, pp. 1-17.
   Google Scholar
• Deutsch, M. A theory of cooperation and competition. Human Relations, 2, 2 (1949), 129-152.
   Google Scholar
• Dorogovtsev, S., and Mendes, J. Evolution of Networks: From Biological Nets to the Internet and WWW. New York: Oxford University Press, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Duda, R.O., and Hart, P.E. Pattern Classification and Scene Analysis. New York: Wiley, 1973.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K.M. Building theories from case-study research. Academy of Management Review, 14, 4 (1989), 532-550.
   Google Scholar
• Faraj, S.; Jarvenpaa, S.L.; and Majchzak, A. Knowledge collaboration in online communities. Organization Science, 22, 5 (2011), 1224-1239.
   Google Scholar
• Faust, K., and Wasserman, S. Centrality and prestige: A review and synthesis. Journal of Quantitative Anthropology, 4, 1 (1992), 23-78.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrin, D.L., and Dirks, K.T. The use of rewards to increase and decrease trust: Mediating processes and differential effects. Organization Science, 14, 1 (2003), 18-31.
   Google Scholar
• Fiori, L.K.; Smith, J.; and Antonucci, T.C. Social network types among older adults: A multidimensional approach. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Science, 62, 6 (2007), 322-330.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, L.C. Centrality in social networks: Conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1, 3 (1979), 215-239.
   Google Scholar
• Frey, B.S., and Stutzer, A. Beyond outcomes: Measuring procedural utility. Oxford Economic Papers, 57, 1 (2005), 90-111.
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, C. Why participation in direct democratic initiatives renders procedural utility: Experimental evidence from a market context. Paper presented at the 8th Annual International Open and User Innovation Workshop, MIT Sloan School of Business, Cambridge, August 2-4, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Füller, J. Refining virtual co-creation from a consumer perspective. California Management Review, 52, 2 (2010), 98-122.
   Google Scholar
• Füller, J.; Jawecki, G.; and Mühlbacher, H. Innovation creation by online basketball communities. Journal of Business Research, 60, 1 (2007), 60-71.
   Google Scholar
• Füller, J.; Mühlbacher, H.; Matzler, K.; and Jawecki, G. Consumer empowerment through Internet-based co-creation. Journal of Management Information Systems, 26, 3 (Winter 2009-10), 71-102.
   Google Scholar
• Fullerton, R.; Linster, B.G.; McKee, M.; and Slate, S. An experimental investigation of research tournaments. Economic Inquiry, 37, 4 (1999), 624-636.
   Google Scholar
• Ghobadi, S., and D'ambra, J. Coopetitive knowledge sharing: An analytical review of literature. Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management, 9, 4 (2011), 307-317.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B.G., and Strauss, A.L. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. New York: De Gruyter, 1967.
   Google Scholar
• Gleave, E.; Welser, T.; Lento, T.; and Smith, M. A conceptual and operation definition of "social role" in online community. In R.H. Sprague (ed.), Proceedings of the 42nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Greenhalgh, C., and Rogers, M. The value of innovation: The interaction of competition, R&D and IP. Research Policy, 35, 4 (2006), 562-580.
   Google Scholar
• Hanneman, R.A., and Riddle, M. Introduction to Social Network Methods. Riverside, CA: University of California, 2005 (available at http://faculty.ucr.edu/~hanneman/
   Google Scholar
• Hars, A., and Qu, S. Working for free? Motivations for participating in open-source projects. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 6, 3 (2002), 25-39.
   Google Scholar
• Hemetsberger, A., and Reinhardt, C. Learning and knowledge-building in open-source communities—A social-experiential approach. Management Learning, 37, 2 (2006), 187-214.
   Google Scholar
• Hemetsberger, A., and Reinhardt, C. Collective development in open-source communities: An activity theoretical perspective on successful online collaboration. Organization Studies, 30, 9 (2009), 987-1008.
   Google Scholar
• Howe, J. Crowdsourcing: Why the Power of the Crowd Is Driving the Future of Business. New York: Crown, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Hutter, K.; Hautz, J.; Füller, J.; Mueller, J.; and Matzler, K. Communitition: The tension between competition and collaboration in community-based design contests. Creativity & Innovation Management, 20, 1 (2011), 3-21.
   Google Scholar
• Ibarra, H. Network centrality, power, and innovation involvement: Determinants of technical and administrative roles. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 3 (1993), 471-501.
   Google Scholar
• Jang, H.; Lorne, O.; Ko, I.; Koh, J.; and Kim, K. The influence of online brand community characteristics on community commitment and brand loyalty. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 12, 3 (2008), 57-80.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, D.W., and Johnson, R.T. New developments in social interdependence theory. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 131, 4 (2005), 285-358.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, A.J. Community Building on the Web: Secret Strategies for Successful Online Communities. Berkeley: Peachpit Press, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Koch, S.G., and Schneider, G. Effort, cooperation, and coordination in an open source software project. Information Systems Journal, 12, 1 (2002), 27-42.
   Google Scholar
• Kozinets, R.V. E-tribalized marketing? The strategic implications of virtual communities of consumption. European Management Journal, 17, 3 (1999), 252-264.
   Google Scholar
• Kriplean, T.; Beschstnikh, I.; and McDonald, D.W. Articulations of WikiWork: Uncovering value work in Wikipedia through barnstars. In Proceedings of the 2008 ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work. New York: ACM Press, 2008, pp. 47-56.
   Google Scholar
• Krippendorff, K. Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Lakhani, K.R., and Jeppesen, L.B. Getting unusual suspects to solve R&D puzzles. Harvard Business Review, 85, 5 (2007), 30-32.
   Google Scholar
• Lakhani, K.R., and von Hippel, E. How open source software works: "Free" user-to-user assistance. Research Policy, 32, 6 (2003), 923-942.
   Google Scholar
• Leimeister, J.M.; Huber, M.; Bretschneider, U.; and Krcmar, H. Leveraging crowdsourcing: Activation-supporting components for IT-based ideas competition. Journal of Management Information Systems, 26, 1 (Summer 2009), 197-224.
   Google Scholar
• Li, Y., and Vanhaverbeke, W. The relationship between foreign competition, absorptive capacity and pioneering innovation: An empirical investigation in Canada. International Journal of Innovation Management, 13, 1 (2009), 105-137.
   Google Scholar
• Magee, J.C., and Galinsky, A.D. Social hierarchy: The self-reinforcing nature of power and status. Academy of Management Annals, 2, 1 (2009), 351-398.
   Google Scholar
• Maxwell, J.A. Designing a qualitative study. In L. Bickman and D.J. Rog (eds.), The Sage Handbook of Applied Social Research Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2008, pp. 214-253.
   Google Scholar
• Milligan, G.W. A two-stage clustering algorithm with robust recovery characteristics. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 40, 3 (1980), 755-759.
   Google Scholar
• Milligan, G.W., and Cooper, C. An examination of procedures for determining the number of clusters in a data set. Psychometrica, 50, 2 (1985), 159-179.
   Google Scholar
• Milligan, G.W., and Cooper, C. Methodology review: Clustering methods. Applied Psychological Measurement, 11, 4 (1987), 329-354.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, J., and Wang, R. Tournaments for ideas. California Management Review, 52, 2 (2010), 77-97.
   Google Scholar
• Nicholas, D.; Huntington, P.; Lievesley, N.; and Withey, R. Cracking the code: Web log analysis. Online & CD-ROM Review, 23, 5 (1999), 263-269.
   Google Scholar
• Nolker, R., and Zhou, L. Social computing and weighting to identify member roles in online communities. In Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence. Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society, 2005, pp. 87-93.
   Google Scholar
• Nonnecke, B., and Preece, J. Lurker demographics: Counting the silent. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '00). New York: ACM Press, 2000, pp. 73-80.
   Google Scholar
• Osborn, A.F. Applied Imagination. Oxford: Charles Scribner's Sons, 1953.
   Google Scholar
• Panzarasa, P.; Opsahl, T.; and Carley, K.M. Patterns and dynamics of users' behavior and interaction: Network analysis of an online community. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60, 5 (2009), 911-932.
   Google Scholar
• Pfeil, U.; Svangstu, K.; Ang, C.S.; and Zaphiris, P. Social roles in an online support community for older people. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 27, 4 (2011), 323-347.
   Google Scholar
• Preece, J., and Maloney-Krichmar, D. Online communities: Focusing on sociability and usability. In J. Jacko and A. Sears (eds.), Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 2003, pp. 596-620.
   Google Scholar
• Preece, J.; Nonnecke, B.; and Andrews, D. The top 5 reasons for lurking: Improving community experiences for everyone. Computers in Human Behavior, 20, 2 (2004), 201-223.
   Google Scholar
• Punj, G., and Stewart, D.W. Cluster analysis in marketing research: Review and suggestions for application. Journal of Marketing Research, 20, 2 (1983), 134-148.
   Google Scholar
• Qin, Z.; Johnson, D.W.; and Johnson, R.T. Cooperative versus competitive efforts and problem solving. Review of Educational Research, 65, 2 (1995), 129-143.
   Google Scholar
• Quintana-García, C., and Benavides-Velasco, C.A. Cooperation, competition, and innovative capability: A panel data of European dedicated biotechnology firms. Technovation, 24, 12 (2004), 927-938.
   Google Scholar
• Rheingold, H. The Virtual Community: Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Sawhney, M., and Prandelli, E. Communities of creation: Managing distributed innovation in turbulent markets. California Management Review, 42, 4 (2000), 24-54.
   Google Scholar
• Sawhney, M.; Verona, G.; and Prandelli, E. Collaborating to create: The Internet as a platform for customer engagement in product innovation. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 19, 4 (2005), 4-17.
   Google Scholar
• Terwisch, C., and Ulrich, K.T. Innovation Tournaments: Creating and Selecting Exceptional Opportunities. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Terwiesch, C., and Xu, Y. Innovation contests, open innovation, and multiagent problem solving. Management Science, 54, 9 (2008), 1529-1543.
   Google Scholar
• Toral, S.L.; Martinez-Torres, M.R.; and Barrero, F. Analysis of virtual communities supporting OSS projects using social network analysis. Information and Software Technology, 52, 3 (2010), 296-303.
   Google Scholar
• Tsai, W. Social structure of "coopetition" within a multiunit organization: Coordination, competition, and intraorganizational knowledge sharing. Organization Science, 13, 2 (2002), 179-190.
   Google Scholar
• Viegas, F.B., and Smith, M. Newsgroups crowds and authorlines: Visualizing the activity of individuals in conversational cyberspace. In R.H. Sprague (ed.), Proceedings of the 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• von Hippel, E. Horizontal innovation networks—by and for users. Industrial & Corporate Change, 16, 2 (2007), 293-316.
   Google Scholar
• von Krogh, G., and von Hippel, E. The promise of research on open source software. Management Science, 52, 7 (2006), 975-983.
   Google Scholar
• von Krogh, G.; Spaeth, S.; and Lakhani, K.R. Community, joining, and specialization in open source software innovation: A case study. Research Policy, 32, 7 (2003), 1217-1241.
   Google Scholar
• von Krogh, G.; Spaeth, S.; Haeflinger, S.; and Wallin, M.W. Open source software: What we know (and do not know) about motives to contribute. Working Paper no. 38, Dynamics of Institutions and Markets in Europe, April 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Ward, J.H. Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 58, 301 (1963), 236-244.
   Google Scholar
• Wasserman, S., and Faust, K. Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Welser, H.T.; Gleave, E.; Fisher, D.; and Smith, M. Visualizing the signatures of social roles in online discussion groups. Journal of Social Structure, 8, 2 (2007) (available at www.cmu.edu/joss/content/articles/volume8/Welser/
   Google Scholar
• Welser, H.T.; Cosley, D.; Kossinets, G.; Lin, A.; Dokshin, F.; Gay, G.; and Smith, M. Finding social roles in Wikipedia. In Proceedings of the 2011 iConference. New York: ACM Press, 2011, pp. 122-129.
   Google Scholar
• Wheelwright, S.C., and Clark, K.B. Revolutionizing Product Development: Quantum Leaps in Speed, Efficiency, and Quality. New York: Free Press, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Wiertz, C., and de Ruyter, K. Beyond the call of duty: Why customers contribute to firm hosted commercial online communities. Organization Studies, 28, 3 (2007), 347-376.
   Google Scholar
• Wooten, J.O., and Ulrich, K.T. Idea generation and the role of feedback: Evidence from field experiments with innovation tournaments. Working paper, Department of Management Science, University of South Carolina, May 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Ye, Y., and Kishida, K. Toward an understanding of the motivation of open source software developers. In Proceedings of the 2003 International Conference on Software Engineering. Portland, OR: ICSE, 2003, pp. 419-429.
   Google Scholar
• Zemljic, B., and Hlebec, V. Reliability of measures of centrality and prominence. Social Networks, 27, 1 (2005), 73-88.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, X., and Wang, C. Network positions and contributions to online public goods: The case of Chinese Wikipedia. Journal of Management Information Systems, 29, 2 (Fall 2012), 11-40.
   Google Scholar
• Zheng, H.; Li, D.; and Hou, W. Task design, motivation, and participation in crowdsourcing contests. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 15, 4 (2011), 57-88.
   Google Scholar
• Zwass, V. Electronic commerce and organizational innovation: Aspects and opportunities. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 7, 3 (2003), 7-37.
   Google Scholar
• Zwass, V. Co-creation: Toward a taxonomy and an integrated research perspective. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 15, 1 (2010), 11-48.
   Google Scholar