Self-Determination, Accountability Mechanisms, and Quasi-Governmental Status of Busines Improvement Districts in the United States

References

• Arrow, K. (1951). A difficulty in the concept of social welfare. Journal of Political Economy, 58(4), 328-346.
   Google Scholar
• Black, D. (1948). On the rationale of group decision-making. Journal of Political Economy, 56(1), 23-34.
   Google Scholar
• Bozeman, B. (2002). Public value failure: When efficient markets may not do. Public Administration Review, 62(2), 145-161.
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan, J., & Tullock, G. (1962). The calculus of consent: Logical foundations of constitutional democracy. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.
   Google Scholar
• Caruso, G., & Weber, R. (2006). Getting the max for the tax: An examination of BID performance measures. International Journal of Public Administration, 29(1), 187-219.
   Google Scholar
• Chapman, J. (1998). Proposition 13: Some unintended consequences. San Francisco: Public Policy Institute of California.
   Google Scholar
• Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. New York: Harper.
   Google Scholar
• Dye, T. (2007). Politics in America. New York: Pearson Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Frank, T. (2004). What's the matter with Kansas? How conservatives won the heart of America. New York: Metropolitan Books.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, M. (1982). Capitalism and freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, E. T. (1976). Beyond culture. New York: Anchor.
   Google Scholar
• Hinkley, B. (1971). The seniority system in Congress. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krugman, P. W. (2006). Economics. New York: Worth.
   Google Scholar
• Lueck, T. (1994, November 20). Public needs, private answers—A special report: Business districts grow, at price of accountability. New York Times, p. 1.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, D. (1994, March 25). Districts to improve business proliferate. New York Times, p. B3.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, J. (1999). Business improvement districts and innovative service delivery. Arlington, VA: PricewaterhouseCoopers Endowment for the Business of Government.
   Google Scholar
• Morçöl, G. (2006). Business improvement districts: A new organizational form in metropolitan governance. International Journal of Public Administration, 29(1-3), 1-4.
   Google Scholar
• Morçöl, G., & Patrick, P. A. (2006). Business improvement districts in Pennsylvania: Implications for democratic metropolitan governance. International Journal of Public Administration, 29(1-3), 137-171.
   Google Scholar
• Morçöl, G., & Zimmermann, U. (2006). Community improvement districts in Metropolitan Atlanta. International Journal of Public Administration, 29(1-3), 77-105.
   Google Scholar
• Olson, M. (1965). The logic of collective action. New York City: Schocken.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, K. (2003). Wealth and democracy: A political history of the American rich. New York: Broadway.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, K. (2007). American theocracy: The peril and politics of radical religion, oil, and borrowed money in the 21st century. New York: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, M. (1997, July 20). Poor management, federal rule undermine services. Washington Post, p. A1.
   Google Scholar
• Rauch, J. (1994). Government's end: Why Washington stopped working. New York: Perseus.
   Google Scholar