Performance Management Systems of Congestion Management Networks

References

• Ackoff, R.L. (1980). The systems revolution. In M. Lockett and R. Spear (Eds.), Organizations as systems (pp. 26-33). Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Agranoff, R. (2005). Enhancing performance through public sector networks: Mobilizing human capital in communities of practice. Public Performance & Management Review, 31(3), 320-347.
   Google Scholar
• Agranoff, R. (2007). Managing within networks: Adding value to public organizations. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Agranoff, R., & McGuire, M. (2003). Collaborative public management: New strategies for local governments. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Banks, J. (1998). Performance measurement for traffic management systems. Transportation Research Record, 1634, 39-45.
   Google Scholar
• Baumgartner, F.R., & Jones, B.D. (1993). Agendas and instability in American politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boarnet, M., Kim, E.J., & Parkany, E. (1995). Measuring traffic congestion. Transportation Research Record, 1634, 93-99.
   Google Scholar
• Boland, T., & Fowler, A. (2000). A systems perspective of performance management in public sector organizations. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 13(5), 417-446.
   Google Scholar
• Bureau of Transportation Statistics. (2009). Metropolitan planning organizations. http://www.bts.gov/external_links/government/metropolitan_planning_organizations.html
   Google Scholar
• Cambridge Systematics. (1996). Quantifying air quality and other benefits and costs of transportation control measures. Task 1 Report. Project 8-33. Washington, DC: National Cooperative Highway Research, Transportation Research Board.
   Google Scholar
• Cambridge Systematics. (2010). Measuring transportation network performance. National Cooperative Highway Research Report 664 http://www.trb.org/publications/public/
   Google Scholar
• Colvile, R.N., Warren, R., Mindell, J., & Hutchinson, E. (2001) The transport sector as a source of air pollution. Atmospheric Environment, 35(9), 1537-1565.
   Google Scholar
• Comfort, L. (2007). Crisis management in hindsight: Cognition, communication, coordination, and control. Public Administration Review, 67(Supplement), 189-197.
   Google Scholar
• De Bruijn, H. (2001). Managing performance in the public sector. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Delucchi, M.A. (2000). Environmental externalities of motor-vehicle use in the U.S. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 34(2), 135-168.
   Google Scholar
• Dolly, S. (2002). Commute partnerships. Electronic Hallway. https://hallway.org/cases/display_PDF.php?pdfFile=commu_a/
   Google Scholar
• Domencich, T. A., & McFadden, D. (1975). Urban travel demand: A behavioral analysis. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). (2004). Mitigating traffic congestion with demand-side strategies. http://ops.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/mitig_traf_cong/mitig_traf_cong.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Frederickson, D., & Frederickson, H.G. (2006). Measuring the performance of the hollow state. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goetz, A.R., Dempsey, P.S., and Larson, C. (2002). Metropolitan planning organizations: Findings and recommendations for improving transportation planning. Publius, 32(1), 87-105.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, P.B., & Hensher D.A. (1978). The transport determinants of travel choices: An overview. In D. Hensher and Q. Dalvi (Eds.), Determinants of travel choice (pp. 1-65). Westmead, UK: Saxon House.
   Google Scholar
• Government Accountability Office (GAO). (2009). Metropolitan transportation planning organizations: Options exist to enhance transportation planning capacity and federal Oversight. GAO-09-868. Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Holloway, J. (1999). Managing performance. In A. Rose and A. Lawton (Eds.), Public services management (pp. 238-259). Harlow, UK: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Koliba, C., & Gajda, R. (2009). Communities of practice as an analytical construct: Implications for theory and practice. International Journal of Public Administration, 32(2), 97-135.
   Google Scholar
• Koliba, C., Meek, J., & Zia, A. (2010). Governance networks: Public administration and policy in the midst of complexity. New York: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• McNally, M. (2000). The four-step model and the activity-based approach. In D. Hensher and K. Button (Eds.), Handbook of transport modeling (pp. 35-52; 53-69). Amsterdam: Pergamon.
   Google Scholar
• Meier, K., O'Toole, J., & Lu, Y. (2006). All that glitters is not gold: Disaggregating networks and the impact on performance. In G. Boyne, K. Meier, L. O'Toole, and R. Walker (Eds.), Public service performance: Perspectives on measurement and management (pp. 152-170). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, M. (1994). Alternative methods for measuring congestion levels. In Curbing gridlock: Peak-period fees to relieve traffic congestion. Special Report 242 (pp. 32-61). Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board, National Research Council.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, M. (1999). Demand management as an element of transportation policy: Using carrots and sticks to influence travel behavior. Transportation Research Part A, 33(7-8), 575-599.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M.B., & Huberman, A.M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Milward, H., & Provan, K. (1998). Principles for controlling agents: The political economy of network structure. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 8(2), 203-222.
   Google Scholar
• Milward, H., & Provan, K. (2006). A manager's guide to choosing and using collaborative networks. IBM Center for the Business of Government, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Mintzberg, H. (1983). Power in and around organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Moynihan, D.P. (2008). The dynamics of performance management: Constructing information and reform. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) and European Confer ence of Ministers of Transport (ECMT). (2007). Managing urban traffic congestion: Summary document. http://www.sourceoecd.org
   Google Scholar
• Poister, T. (2003). Measuring performance in public and nonprofit organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, C., Suhrbier, J., Plumeau, P., & Campbell, E. (2008). Effective practices for congestion management: Final report. Prepared for the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. NCHRP 20-24A, Task 63.
   Google Scholar
• Provan, K.G., & Kenis, P. (2007). Modes of network governance: Structure, management, and effectives. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(2), 229-252.
   Google Scholar
• Radin, B. (2006). Challenging the performance movement: Accountability, complexity and democratic values. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reinke, D., & Malarkey, D. (1996). Implementing integrated transportation planning in metropolitan planning organization: Procedural and analytical issues. Transportation Research Record, 1552: 71-78.
   Google Scholar
• Rhodes, R.A.W. (1997). Understanding governance: Policy networks, governance, reflexivity and accountability. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Savas, E.S. (2005). Privatization in the city: Successes, failures, lessons. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly.
   Google Scholar
• Snyder, W.M., Wenger, E., & de Sousa Briggs, X. (2003). Communities of practice in government: Leveraging knowledge for performance. Learn how this evolving tool for cross-organizational collaboration currently is being used in a variety of public sector settings and how it can help you cultivate improved performance outcomes in your backyard. Public Manager, 32(4), 17-22.
   Google Scholar
• Sorensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2005). The democratic anchorage of governance networks. Scandinavian Political Studies, 28(3), 195-218.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, D. (2002). Policy paradox: The art of political decision making. New York: Norton.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT). (1993). Management and monitoring systems: Interim final rule. 23 CFR Parts 500 and 626. Federal Register, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT). (2009). Planning for operation: Performance measurement. http://plan40perations.dot.gov/performance.htm
   Google Scholar
• Vogel, R.K., & Nezelkewicz, N. (2002). Metropolitan planning organizations and the new regionalism: The case of Louisville. Publius, 32(1), 107-129.
   Google Scholar
• Weisbrod, G., Vary, D. & Treyz, G. (2001). Economic implications of congestion. National Cooperation Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Report 463, Transportation Research Board.
   Google Scholar
• Woodrum, E. (1984). "Mainstreaming" content analysis in social science: Methodological advantages, obstacles, and solutions. Social Science Research, 13(1), 1-19.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R.K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods. Los Angeles: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Zia, A., Koliba, C., Meek, J., Campbell, E., Lee, B.H.Y., & Colangelo, D. (under review). Performance management of inter-organizational governance networks: Understanding the effects of contextual complexity and collaborative capacity on the prioritization of performance measures for MPOs.
   Google Scholar