Bridging Theory and Practice

References

• Barzelay, M. (2001). The New Public Management. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bird, J. J., & Wang, C. (2010). Role interdependency between superintendents and school business officials in budget building leadership practices and strategies. Journal of School Business Management, 22(1), 11-16.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdeaux, C. (2008). The problem with programs: Multiple perspectives on program structures in program-based performance oriented budgets. Public Budgeting and Finance, 28(2), 20-47.
   Google Scholar
• Chubb, J. E., & Moe, T. M. (1990). Politics, markets, and America's schools. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clover, M. W.; Jones, E. B.; Bailey, W.; & Griffin, B. (2004). Budget priorities of selected principals: Reallocation of state funds. NASSP Bulletin, 88(640), 69-82.
   Google Scholar
• Coase, R. H. (1937). The nature of the firm. Economica, 4(16), 386-405.
   Google Scholar
• Denhardt, J. V., & Denhardt, R. B. (2003). The New Public Service: Serving, not steering. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Denhardt, R. B. (2004). Theories of public organization (4th ed.). Belmont, CA: Thomson-Wadsworth.
   Google Scholar
• Denhardt, R. B., & Denhardt, J. V. (2000). The New Public Service: Serving rather than steering. Public Administration Review, 60(6), 549-559.
   Google Scholar
• Eagle, K. S. (2005). New Public Management in Charlotte, N. C. Ph.D. dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Richmond, VA.
   Google Scholar
• Fusarelli, L. D., & Johnson, B. (2004). Educational governance and the New Public Management. Public Administration and Management: An Interactive Journal, 9(2), 118-127.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, M. A.; Denhardt, J. V.; & Hamilton, L. K. (2002). Community v. self-interest: Citizen perceptions of schools as civic investments. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 12(1), 103-127.
   Google Scholar
• Goertz, M. E., & Hess, A. G. (1998). Processes and power in school budgeting across four large urban school districts. Journal of Education Finance, 23(4), 490-506.
   Google Scholar
• Gold, E.; Cucchiara, M.; Simon, E.; & Riffer, M. (2005). Time to engage? Civic participation in Philadelphia's school reform. Philadelphia: Research for Action.
   Google Scholar
• Gore, A., & Office of the Vice President. (1993). From red tape to results: Creating a government that works better and costs less. Report of the National Performance Review. Washington, DC: GPO.
   Google Scholar
• Governmental Accounting Standards Board. (1994). Concepts Statement No. 2, Service Efforts and Accomplishments Reporting. Norwalk, CT.
   Google Scholar
• Gruening, G. (2001). Origin and theoretical basis of New Public Management. International Public Management Journal, 4, 1-25.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, J. S., & Roza, M. (2005). Decentralized decisionmaking for schools: New promise for an old idea? Santa Monica, CA: Rand.
   Google Scholar
• Hood, C. (1991). A public management for all seasons? Public Administration, 69(1), 3-19.
   Google Scholar
• Horton, S. (2006). New Public Management: Its impact on public servant's identity: An introduction to this symposium. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 19(6), 533-542.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, L. R., & Kettl, D. F. (2004). Assessing public management reform strategy in an international context. In L. R. Jones, K. Schedler, & R. Mussari (Eds.), Strategies for public management reform (pp. 453-473). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group.
   Google Scholar
• Kamensky, J. M. (1996). Role of the "Reinventing Government" movement in federal management reform. Public Administration Review, 56(3), 263-270.
   Google Scholar
• Kaufman, H. (1969). Administrative decentralization and political power. Public Administration Review, 29(1), 3-15.
   Google Scholar
• Leighninger, M. (2005). Marrying citizens and educators in decision-making. School Administrator, 62(10), 48-49.
   Google Scholar
• Light, P. C. (1997). The tides of reform: Making government work, 1945-1995. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lynn, L. E. (2001). The myth of the bureaucratic paradigm: What traditional public administration really stood for. Public Administration Review, 61(2), 144-165.
   Google Scholar
• Marlowe, J., & Portillo, S. (2006). Citizen engagement in local budgeting: Does diversity pay dividends? Public Performance and Management Review, 30(2), 179-202.
   Google Scholar
• Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. (1995-2013). School Councils.
   Google Scholar
• Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. (2009). Massachusetts charter schools fact sheet. Available at www.doe.mass.edu/charter/factsheet.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Maxcy, B. (2009). New Public Management and district reform: Managerialism and deflection of local leadership in a Texas school district. Urban Education, 44(5), 489-521.
   Google Scholar
• May, J. J. (2007). The market-driven age of education: Challenges of urban school leadership. Mid-Western Educational Researcher, 20(4), 28-34.
   Google Scholar
• Mintrom, M. (2003). Market organizations and deliberative democracy: Choice and voice in public service delivery. Administration and Society, 35(1), 52-81.
   Google Scholar
• Mulford, B. (2003). School leaders: Changing roles and impact on teacher and school effectiveness. Paris: OECD. Available at www.oecd.org/education/school/2635399.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Nitta, K. A.; Wrobel, S. L.; Howard, J. Y.; & Jimmerson-Eddings, E. (2009). Leading change of a school district reorganization. Public Performance & Management Review, 32(3), 463-488.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, D., & Gaebler, T. (1992). Reinventing government: How the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming the public sector. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, V., & Ostrom, E. (1971). Public choice: A different approach to the study of public administration. Public Administration Review, 31(2), 203-216.
   Google Scholar
• O'Toole, L. J., Jr., & Meier, K. J. (2004). Parkinson's law and the New Public Management? Contracting determinants and service-quality consequences in public education. Public Administration Review, 64(3), 342-352.
   Google Scholar
• Patrick, B. A., & French, P. E. (2011). Assessing New Public Management's focus on performance measurement in the public sector: A look at No Child Left Behind. Public Performance & Management Review, 35(2), 340-369.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. (1995). Bowling alone. Journal of Democracy, 6(1), 65-78.
   Google Scholar
• Raffel, J. A. (2007). Why has public administration ignored public education, and does it matter? Public Administration Review, 67(1), 135-151.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, G. D., & Waste, R. J. (1998). The limits of reinventing government. American Review of Public Administration, 28(4), 325-346.
   Google Scholar
• Schick, A. (1966). The road to PPB: The stages of budget reform. Public Administration Review, 26(4), 243-258.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, M. (2007). Do attributes of innovative administrative practices influence their adoption? An exploratory study of U. S. local government. Public Performance & Management Review, 30(4), 598-622.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, R. (2002). New Public Management education reform: Politics, policy image and political-administrative systems. International Public Management Journal, 5(3), 277-295.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, M., & Robbins, G. (2010). Understanding e-government implementation from an NPM strategic reform perspective. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 27, 493-516.
   Google Scholar
• Shatkin, G. & Gershberg, A. I. (2007). Empowering parents and building communities: The role of school-based councils in educational governance and accountability. Urban Education, 42(6), 582-615.
   Google Scholar
• Schedler, K.; Jones, L. R.; & Mussari, R. (2004). Assessment of public management strategy. In L. R. Jones, K. Schedler, & R. Mussari (Eds.), Strategies for public management reform (pp. 1-15). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group.
   Google Scholar
• Simonet, D. (2011). The New Public Management theory and the reform of European health care systems: An international comparative perspective. International Journal of Public Administration, 34(12), 815-826.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, J. R. (2000). Reinvention as reform: Assessing the National Performance Review. Public Administration Review, 60(6), 508-521.
   Google Scholar
• Tiebout, C. (1956). A pure theory of local expenditures. Journal of Political Economy, 64(5), 416-424.
   Google Scholar
• Vigoda, E. (2002). From responsiveness to collaboration: Governance, citizens, and the next generation of public administration. Public Administration Review, 62(5), 527-540.
   Google Scholar
• Weikart, L. (2003). Allocation patterns among the New Public Management mayors. Public Performance & Management Review, 27(1), 37-52.
   Google Scholar
• Willis, J. (2010). Seeing public engagement differently. School Business Affairs, 76(10), 16-18.
   Google Scholar
• Wohlstetter, P., & Van Kirk, A. (1995, April). School-based budgeting: Organizing for high performance. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco. Available at www.eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED384953.pdf
   Google Scholar