Improving Transparency in the Financial Sector

References

• Agranoff, R. (2007). Managing within networks: Adding value to public organizations. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Andersen, K.V., & Henriksen, H.Z. (2006). E-government maturity models: Extension of the Layne and Lee model. Government Information Quarterly, 23, 236-248.
   Google Scholar
• Booth, R.C. (2007). FY 2007 E-Government Act report for the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Washington, DC: U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, M.M., & Brudney, J.L. (1998). A "smarter, better, faster, and cheaper" government: Contracting and geographic information systems. Public Administration Review, 58(4), 335-345.
   Google Scholar
• Cacas, M. (2010, April 1). Legislation could spur XBRL use in government. Federal News Radio.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, Y.-C. (2010). Realizing the full potential of XBRL in government: Case studies of XBRL implementation. Washington, DC: IBM Center for the Business of Government.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, Y.-C., & Perry, J. (2003). Outsourcing for e-government: Managing for success. Public Performance & Management Review, 26(4), 404-421.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, M.E.; LaVigne, M.F.; Pagano, C.M.; Dawes, S.S.; & Pardo, T.A. (2002). Making a case for local e-government. Albany, NY: Center for Technology in Government.
   Google Scholar
• Datz, G. (2009). State of change: Global turmoil and government reinvention. Public Administration Review, 69(4), 660-667.
   Google Scholar
• Dawes, S.S. (2009). Governance in the digital age: A research and action framework for an uncertain future. Government Information Quarterly, 26(2), 257-264.
   Google Scholar
• Dawes, S.S.; Cresswell, A.; & Pardo, T. (2009). From "need to know" to "need to share": Tangled problems, information boundaries, and the building of public sector knowledge networks. Public Administration Review, 69(3), 392-402.
   Google Scholar
• Debreceny, R.S.; Chandra, A.; Cheh, J.J.; Guithues-Amrhein, D.; Hannon, N.J.; Hutchison, P.D.; et al. (2005). Financial reporting in XBRL on the SEC's EDGAR system: A critique and evaluation. Journal of Information Systems, 19(2), 191-210.
   Google Scholar
• DeLone, W.H., & McLean, E.R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean model of information system success: A ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 9-30.
   Google Scholar
• Efendi, J.; Smith, M.; & Wong, J. (2011). Longitudinal analysis of voluntary adoption of XBRL on financial reporting. International Journal of Economics and Accounting, 2(2), 173-189.
   Google Scholar
• Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council. (2006). Improved business process through XBRL: A use case for business reporting. Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Fung, A.; Graham, M.; & Weil, D. (2007). Full disclosure: The perils and promise of transparency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gattiker, T.F., & Goodhue, D.L. (2005). What happens after ERP implementation: Understanding the impact of inter-dependence and differentiation on plant-level outcomes. MIS Quarterly, 29(3), 559-585.
   Google Scholar
• Haseqawa, M.; Sakata, T.; Sambuichi, N.; & Hannon, N. (2004, March 1). Breathing new life into old systems with XBRL-GL. Strategic Finance, 85(9), 46-51.
   Google Scholar
• Interactive Data to Improve Financial Reporting (2009, February 10). Final Rule, 17 Code of Federal Regulations, CFR, pts. 229, 230 et al.
   Google Scholar
• Kerimoglu, O.; Basoglu, N.; & Daim, T. (2008). Organizational adoption of information technologies: Case of enterprise resource planning systems. Journal of High Technology Management Research, 19(1), 21-35.
   Google Scholar
• Kernan, K. (2008). XBRL around the world: A look beyond U.S. shores to put the SEC's interactive data initiative in a global context. Journal of Accountancy, October, 62-66.
   Google Scholar
• Khademian, A. (2009). A public administration moment: Forging an agenda for financial regulatory reform. Public Administration Review, 69(4), 595-602.
   Google Scholar
• Kudo, H. (2008). Does e-government guarantee accountability in public sector? Experiences in Italy and Japan. Public Administration Quarterly, 32(1), 93-120.
   Google Scholar
• Liou, K. (2007). Changes and challenges in regulatory reform. International Journal of Public Administration, 30(3), 271-288.
   Google Scholar
• Luk, S.C.Y. (2009). The impact of leadership and stakeholders on the success/failure of e-government service: Using the case study of e-stamping service in Hong Kong. Government Information Quarterly, 26(4), 594-604.
   Google Scholar
• McDaniel, E.A. (2005). Facilitating cross-boundary leadership in emerging e-government leaders. Electronic Government: An International Journal, 2(1), 1-10.
   Google Scholar
• McGuire, M. (2002). Managing networks: Propositions on what managers do and why they do it. Public Administration Review, 62(5), 599-609.
   Google Scholar
• McGuire, M., & Silvia, C. (2010). The effect of problem severity, managerial and organizational capacity, and agency structure on intergovernmental collaboration: Evidence from local emergency management. Public Administration Review, 70(2), 279-288.
   Google Scholar
• Melitski, J. (2003). Capacity and e-government performance: An analysis based on early adopters of Internet technologies in New Jersey. Public Performance and Management Review, 26(4), 376-390.
   Google Scholar
• Mullen, P.R. (2005). U.S. performance-based laws: Information technology and e-government reporting requirements. International Journal of Public Administration, 28(7/8), 581-598.
   Google Scholar
• Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (2003). Checklist for e-government leaders. Available at www.oecd.org/governance/public-innovation/11923037.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Orszag, P.R. (2008). The effects of recent turmoil in the financial markets on retirement security. Testimony before the U.S. House Committee on Education and Labor, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Papazafeiropoulou, A.; Pouloudi, A.; & Poulymenakou, A. (2002). Electronic commerce competitiveness in the public sector: The importance of stakeholder involvement. International Journal of Services Technology and Management, 3(1), 82-95.
   Google Scholar
• Pardo, T.A., & Scholl, H.J. (2002). Walking atop the cliffs: Avoiding failure and reducing risk in large scale e-government projects. Paper presented at the 35th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), Big Island, HI.
   Google Scholar
• Peretz, P., & Schroedel, J.R. (2009). Financial regulation in the United States: Lessons from history. Public Administration Review, 69(4), 603-612.
   Google Scholar
• Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. (2003). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Provan, K., & Kenis, P. (2008). Modes of network governance: Structure, management, and effectiveness. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(2), 229-252.
   Google Scholar
• Rethemeyer, K., & Hatmaker, D. (2008). Network management reconsidered: An inquiry into management of network structures in public sector service provision. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 617-646.
   Google Scholar
• Rom, M.C. (2009). The credit rating agencies and the subprime mess: Greedy, ignorant, and stressed? Public Administration Review, 69(4), 640-650.
   Google Scholar
• Stantial, J. (2007, June). ROI on XBRL: Interactive data cuts reporting costs today. Journal of Accountancy www.journalofaccountancy.com/Issues/2007/Jun/RoiOnXbrl.htm
   Google Scholar
• Stanton, T. (2009). Government-sponsored enterprises: Reality catches up to public administration theory. Public Administration Review, 69(4), 632.
   Google Scholar
• Stojanovic, L.; Stojanovic, N.; & Apostolou, D. (2006). Change management in e-government: OntoGov case study. Electronic Government, an International Journal, 3(1), 74-92.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2010). Labor force statistics from the current population survey. Available at http://data.bls.gov/cgi-bin/surveymost?ln/
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of the Treasury. (2009, February). Financial stability plan: Fact sheet. Available at www.treasury.gov/initiatives/financial-stability/about/Documents/fact-sheet.pdf
   Google Scholar