The effect of spatial scale on plant associational defences against mammalian herbivores

Literature cited

• Alm, U., B. Birgersson & O. Leimar, 2002. The effect of food quality and relative abundance on food choice in fallow deer. Animal Behaviour, 64: 439–445.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atsatt. P. R. & D. J. O'Dowd, 1976. Plant defense guilds. Science, 193: 24–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergvall, U. A. & O. Leimar, 2005. Plant secondary compounds and the frequency of food types affect food choice by mammalian herbivores. Ecology, 86: 2450–2460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergvall, U. A., P. Rautio, K. Kesti, J. Tuomi & O. Leimar, 2006. Associational effects of plant defences in relation to within and between-patch food choice by a mammalian herbivore: Neighbour contrast susceptibility and defence. Oecologia, 147: 253–260.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergvall, U. A., P. Rautio, T. Loutola & O. Leimar, 2007. A test of simultaneous and successive negative contrast in fallow deer foraging behaviour. Animal Behaviour, 74: 395–402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brenes-Arguedas, T. & P. D. Coley, 2005. Phenotypic variation and spatial structure of secondary chemistry in a natural population of a tropical tree species. Oikos, 108: 410–420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, J. S. & R. A. Morgan, 1995. Effects of foraging behavior and spatial scale on diet selectivity: A test with fox squirrels. Oikos, 74: 122–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapman, D. & N. Chapman, 1997. Fallow Deer: Their History, Distribution and Biology. Coch-y-bonddu-Books, Machynlleth.
   Google Scholar
• Dumont, B., P. Carrère & P. D'Hour, 2002. Foraging in patchy grasslands: Diet selection by sheep and cattle is affected by the abundance and spatial distribution of preferred species. Animal Research, 51: 367–381.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, G. R., J. A. Newman, A. J. Parsons & J. R. Krebs, 1994. Effects of the scale and spatial distribution of the food resource, and animal state on diet selection: An example with sheep. Journal of Animal Ecology, 63: 816–826.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farentinos, R. C., P. J. Capretta, R. E. Kepner & V. M. Littlefield, 1981. Selective herbivory in tassel-eared squirrels: Role of monoterpenes in ponderosa pines chosen as feeding trees. Science, 213: 1273–1275.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrar, J. L., 1995. Trees of the Northern United States and Canada. Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa.
   Google Scholar
• Flaherty, C. F., 1996. Incentive Relativity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Foley, W. J. & B. D. Moore, 2005. Plant secondary metabolites and vertebrate herbivores: From physiological regulation to ecosystem function. Current Opinion in Plant Science, 8: 430–435.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hjältén, J., K. Danell & P. Lundberg, 1993. Herbivore avoidance by association: Vole and hare utilization of woody plants. Oikos, 68: 125–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofmann, R. R., 1989. Evolutionary steps of ecophysiological adaptation and diversification of ruminants: A comparative view of their digestive system. Oecologia, 78: 443–457.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Illius, A. W. & I. J. Gordon, 1993. Diet selection in mammalian herbivores: Constraints and tactics. Pages 157–181 in R. N. Hughes (ed.). Diet Selection. Blackwell, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Laitinen, M.- J., R. Julkunen-Tiitto, J. Tahvanainen, J. Heinonen & M. Rousi, 2005. Variation in birch (Betula pendula) shoot secondary chemistry due to genotype, environment, and ontogeny. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 31: 697–717.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawler, I. R., W. J. Foley & B. M. Eschler, 2000. Foliar concentration of a single toxin creates habitat patchiness for a marsupial folivore. Ecology, 81: 1327–1338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macdonald, D. (ed.), 1999. The Encyclopaedia of Mammals. Greenwich Editions, London.
   Google Scholar
• Mali, S. & R. M. Borges, 2003. Phenolics, fibre, alkaloids, saponins, and cyanogenic glycosides in a seasonal cloud forest in India. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology, 31: 1221–1246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNaughton, S. J., 1978. Serengeti ungulates: Feeding selectivity influences the effectiveness of plant defense guilds. Science, 199: 806–807.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milchunas, D. G. & I. Noy-Meir, 2002. Grazing refuges, external avoidance of herbivory and plant diversity. Oikos, 99: 113–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, B. D. & W. J. Foley, 2005. Tree use of koalas in a chemically complex landscape. Nature, 435: 488–490.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parsons, A. J. & B. Dumont, 2003. Spatial heterogeneity and grazing processes. Animal Research, 52: 161–179.
   Google Scholar
• Pfister, C. A. & M. E. Hay, 1988. Associational plant refuges: Convergent patterns in marine and terrestrial communities result from differing mechanisms. Oecologia, 77: 118–129.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, J. D. & R. K. Pfieffer, 1958. In Proceedings of the 4th British Weed Control Conference, Brighton, UK, 4–6 November 1958. Society of Chemical Industry, London.
   Google Scholar
• Pietrzykowski, E., C. McArthur, H. Fitzgerald & A. N. Goodwin, 2003. Influence of patch characteristics on browsing of tree seedlings by mammalian herbivores. Journal of Applied Ecology, 40: 458–469.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Provenza, F. D., J. J. Villalba, L. E. Dziba, S. B. Atwood & R. E. Banner, 2003. Linking herbivore experience, varied diets, and biochemical diversity. Small Ruminant Research, 49: 257–274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quinn, G. P. & M. J. Keough, 2002. Experimental Design and Data Analysis for Biologists. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Rook, A. J., A. Harvey, A. J. Parsons, R. J. Orr & S. M. Rutter, 2004. Bite dimensions and grazing movements by sheep and cattle grazing homogenous perennial ryegrass swards. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 88: 227–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senft, R. L., M. B. Coughenour, D. W. Bailey, L. R. Rittenhouse, O. E. Sala & D. M. Swift, 1987. Large herbivore foraging and ecological hierarchies: Landscape ecology can enhance traditional foraging theory. BioScience, 37: 789–799.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tahvanainen, J. O. & R. B. Root, 1972. The influence of vegetational diversity on the population ecology and a specialized herbivore, Phyllotreta cruciferae (Coleoptera: Crysomelidae). Oecologia, 10: 321–346.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuomi, J., M. Augner & P. Nilsson, 1994. A dilemma of plant defenses: Is it really worth killing the herbivore? Journal of Theoretical Biology, 170: 427–430.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Soest, P. J., 1996. Allometry and ecology of feeding behaviour and digestive capacity in herbivores: A review. Zoo Biology, 15: 455–479.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vourc'h, G., J. L. Martin, P. Duncan, J. Escarre & T. P. Clausen, 2001. Defensive adaptations of Thuja plicata to ungulate browsing: A comparative study between mainland and island populations. Oecologia, 126: 84–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WallisDeVries, M. F., E. A. Laca & M. W. Demment, 1999. The importance of scale of patchiness for selectivity in grazing herbivores. Oecologia, 121: 335–363.
   Google Scholar