Site-specific features affect pollination success of a gynodioecious understory shrub in a gender-specific mode

Literature cited

• Alonso, C., 2004. Early blooming challenges: Extended flowering season, diverse pollinator assemblage, and the reproductive success of gynodioecious Daphne laureola. Annals of Botany, 93: 61–66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alonso, C., 2005. Pollination success across an elevation and sex ratio gradient in gynodioecious Daphne laureola. American Journal of Botany, 92: 1264–1269.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alonso, C. & C. M. Herrera, 2001. Neither vegetative nor reproductive advantages account for high frequency of male-steriles in southern Spanish gynodioecious Daphne laureola. American Journal of Botany, 88: 1016–1024.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alonso, C., P. Mutikainen & C. M. Herrera, 2007. Ecological context of breeding system variation: Sex, size and pollination in a (predominantly) gynodioecious shrub. Annals of Botany, 100: 1547–1556.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashman, T. L., 2006. The evolution of separate sexes: A focus on the ecological context. Pages 204–222 in L. D. Harder & S. C. H. Barrett (eds.). Ecology and Evolution of Flowers. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Barr, C. M., 2004. Soil moisture and sex ratio in a plant with nuclear-cytoplasmic sex inheritance. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, B, 271: 1935–1939.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beattie, A. J., 1971. Itinerant pollinators in a forest. Madroño, 21: 120–124.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, P., D. W. Erhart & A. P. Smith, 1989. Analysis of forest light environments. Part I. Computerized estimation of solar radiation from hemispherical canopy photographs. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 44: 217–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellow, J. G. & P. K. R. Nair, 2003. Comparing common methods for assessing understory light availability in shaded-perennial agroforestry systems. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 114: 197–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bierzychudek, P. & V. Eckhart, 1988. Spatial segregation of the sexes of dioecious plants. American Naturalist, 132: 34–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canham, C. D., 1988. An index for understory light levels in and around canopy gaps. Ecology, 69: 1634–1638.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castroviejo, S., C. Aedo, M. Laínz, P. Montserrat, R. Morales, F. Muñoz Garmendia, G. Nieto Felinier, J. Paiva (eds.), 1997. Flora Iberica. Real Jardin Botánica, CSIC, Madrid, Spain.
   Google Scholar
• Caruso, C. M., S. B. Peterson & C. E. Ridley, 2003. Natural selection of floral traits of Lobelia (Lobeliaceae): Spatial and temporal variation. American Journal of Botany, 90: 1333–1340.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chazdon, R. L. & C. B. Field, 1987. Photographic estimation of photosynthetically active radiation: Evaluation of a computerized technique. Oecologia, 73: 525–532.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, S. M., D. A. Murray & I. H. Williams, 2004. Do pollen beetles need pollen? The effect of pollen on oviposition, survival, and development of a flower-feeding herbivore. Ecological Entomology, 29: 164–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, S. M., E. Bartlet, D. A. Murray & I. H. Williams, 2002. The role of pollen odour in the attraction of pollen beetles to oilseed rape flowers. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 104: 43–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawson, T. E. & M. A. Geber, 1999. Sexual dimorphism in physiology and morphology. Pages 175–215 in M. A. Geber, T. E. Dawson & L. F. Delph (eds.). Gender and Sexual Dimorphism in Flowering Plants. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
   Google Scholar
• De Jong, T. J., J. C. Batenburg & P. G. L. Klinkhamer, 2005. Distance-dependent pollen limitation of seed set in some insect-pollinated dioecious plants. Acta Oecologica, 28: 331–335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eckert, C. G., 2002. Effect of geographical variation in pollinator fauna on the mating system of Decodon verticillatus (Lythraceae). International Journal of Plant Sciences, 163: 123–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eckhart, V. M., 1992. Spatio-temporal variation in abundance and variation in foraging behavior of the pollinators of gynodioecious Phacelia linearis (Hydrophyllaceae). Oikos, 64: 573–586.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Keblawy, A. & D. C. Freeman, 1999. Spatial segregation by gender of the subdioecious shrub Thymelaea hirsuta in the Egyptian desert. International Journal of Plant Sciences, 160: 341–350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldman, T. S., 2006. Pollinator aggregative and functional responses to flower density: Does pollinator response to patches of plants accelerate at low densities? Oikos, 115: 128–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, D. C., J. Lovett Doust, A. El-Keblawy, K. J. Miglia & E. D. McArthur, 1997. Sexual specialization and inbreeding avoidance in the evolution of dioecy. Botanical Review, 63: 65–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galen, C., 1999. Why do flowers vary? The functional ecology of variation in flower size and form within natural plant populations. BioScience, 49: 631–640.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galen, C. & M. L. Stanton, 2003. Sunny-side up: Flower heliot-ropism as a source of parental environmental effects on pollen quality and performance in the snow buttercup, Ranunculus adoneus (Ranunculaceae). American Journal of Botany, 90: 724–729.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García, C., J. M. Arroyo, J. A. Godoy & P. Jordano, 2005. Mating patterns, pollen dispersal, and the ecological maternal neighbourhood in a Prunus mahaleb L. population. Molecular Ecology, 14: 1821–1830.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graff, A., 1999. Population sex structure and reproductive fitness in gynodioecious Sidalcea malviflora malviflora (Malvaceae). Evolution, 53: 1714–1722.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedhly, A., J. I. Hormaza & M. Herrero, 2005. The effect of temperature on pollen germination, pollen tube growth, and stigmatic receptivity in peach. Plant Biology, 7: 476–483.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrera, C. M., 1995. Microclimate and individual variation in pollinators: Flowering plants are more than their flowers. Ecology, 76: 1516–1524.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrera, C. M., 1996. Floral traits and plant adaptation to insect pollinators: A devil's advocate approach. Pages 65–87 in D. G. Lloyd & S. C. H. Barrett (eds.). Floral Biology: Studies on Floral Evolution in Animal-Pollinated Plants. Chapman & Hall, New York, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Herrera, C. M., 1997. Thermal biology and foraging responses of insect pollinators to the forest floor irradiance mosaic. Oikos, 78: 601–611.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrera, C. M., M. C. Castellanos & M. Medrano, 2006. Geographical context of floral evolution: Towards an improved research programme in floral diversification. Pages 278–294 in L. D. Harder & S. C. H. Barrett (eds.). Ecology and Evolution of Flowers. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Herrera, J., 2005. Flower size variation in Rosmarinus officinalis: Individuals, populations and habitats. Annals of Botany, 95: 431–437.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karban, R., 1997. Neighbourhood affects a plant's risk of herbivory and subsequent success. Ecological Entomology, 22: 433–439.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunin, W. E., 1992. Density and reproductive success in wild populations of Diplotaxis erucoides (Brassicaceae). Oecologia, 91: 129–133.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laska, G., 2001. The disturbance and vegetation dynamics: A review and an alternative framework. Plant Ecology, 157: 77–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laverty, T. M., 1992. Plant interactions for pollinator visits: A test of the magnet species effect. Oecologia, 89: 502–508.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lhotka, J. M. & E. F. Loewenstein, 2006. Indirect measures for characterizing light along a gradient of mixed-hardwood riparian forest canopy structures. Forest Ecology and Management, 226: 310–318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Littell, R. C., G. A. Milliken, W. W. Stroup & R. D. Wolfinger, 1996. SAS System for Mixed Models. SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina.
   Google Scholar
• Medrano, M., C. Alonso & C. M. Herrera, 2005. Mating system, sex ratio, and persistence of females in the gynodioecious shrub Daphne laureola L. (Thymelaeaceae). Heredity, 94: 37–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metcalfe, D. B. & W. E. Kunin, 2006. The effects of plant density upon pollination success, reproductive effort and fruit parasitism in Cistus ladanifer L. (Cistaceae). Plant Ecology, 185: 41–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murcia, C., 1990. Effect of floral morphology and temperature on pollen receipt and removal in Ipomoea trichocarpa. Ecology, 71: 1098–1109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orueta, D., 2002. Thermal relationships between Calendula arvensis inflorescences and Usia aurata bombyliid flies. Ecology, 83: 3073–3085.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pellmyr, O., 2002. Pollination by animals. Pages 157–184 in C. M. Herrera & O. Pellmyr (eds.). Plant—Animal Interactions. An Evolutionary Approach. Blackwell, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Petanidou, T. & E. Smets, 1996. Does temperature stress induce nectar secretion in Mediterranean plants? New Phytologist, 133: 513–518.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, M. A., 1997. Host plant phenology and butterfly dispersal: Causes and consequences of uphill movement. Ecology, 78: 167–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettersson, M. W., 1997. Solitary plants do as well as clumped ones in Silene uniflora (Caryophyllaceae). Ecography, 20: 375–382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price, M. V., N. M. Waser, R. E. Irwin, D. R. Campbell & A. K. Brody, 2005. Temporal and spatial variation in pollination of a montane herb: A seven-year study. Ecology, 86: 2106–2116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salonen, V., 1994. Growth and reproduction of Rubus saxatilis in relation to light availability. Acta Oecologica, 15: 485–493.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sánchez-Lafuente, A. M., J. Guitián, M. Medrano, C. M. Herrera, P. J. Rey & X. Cerdá, 2005. Plant traits, environmental factors, and pollinator visitation in winter-flowering Helleborus foetidus (Ranunculaceae). Annals of Botany, 96: 845–852.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sapir, Y., A. Shmida & G. Neeman, 2006. Morning floral heat as a reward to the pollinators of the Oncocyclus irises. Oecologia, 147: 53–59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SAS Institute, 2002. SAS for Windows (version 9.1.3). SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina.
   Google Scholar
• Schemske, D. W. & P. Bierzychudek, 2001. Evolution of flower color in desert annual Linanthus parryae: Wright revisited. Evolution, 55: 1269–1282.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schultz, S. T., 2003. Sexual dimorphism in gynodioecious Sidalcea hirtipes (Malvaceae). I. Seed, fruit and ecophysiology. International Journal of Plant Sciences, 164: 165–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seymour, R. S., C. R. White & M. Gibernau, 2003. Heat reward for insect pollinators. Nature, 426: 243–244.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steege, H. T., 1996. WinPhot 5: A Programme to Analyze Vegetation Indices, Light and Light Quality from Hemispherical Photographs. Tropenbos Guyana Reports 95–2, Tropenbos Guyana Programme, Georgetown, Guyana [Online] URL: http://www.bio.uu.nl/~herba/Guyana/winphot/wp_index.htm
   Google Scholar
• Totland, O., 2001. Environment-dependent pollen limitation and selection on floral traits in an alpine species. Ecology, 82: 2233–2244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Utelli, A.-B. & B. A. Roy, 2001. Causes and consequences of floral damage in Aconitum lycoctonum at high and low elevations in Switzerland. Oecologia, 127: 266–273.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Treuren, R., R. Bijlsma, N. J. Ouborg & W. Van Delden, 1993. The effects of population size and plant density on outcrossing rates in locally endangered Salvia pratensis. Evolution, 47: 1094–1104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warren, S. D., K. T. Harper & G. M. Booth, 1988. Elevational distribution of insect pollinators. American Midland Naturalist, 120: 325–330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Widén, B. & M. Widén, 1990. Pollen limitation and distance-dependent fecundity in females of the clonal gynodioecious herb Glechoma hederacea (Lamiaceae). Oecologia, 83: 191–196.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoshida, T., Y. Yanagisawa & T. Kamitani, 1998. An empirical model for predicting the gap light index in an even-aged oak stand. Forest Ecology and Management, 109: 85–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar