Assessing landscape relationships for habitat generalists

Literature cited

• AltaLIS, 2007. AltaLIS: Digital Mapping for Alberta. [Online] URL: http://altalis.com/ (accessed 2007).
   Google Scholar
• Andrén, H., A. Delin & A. Seiler, 1997. Population response to landscape changes depends on specialization to different landscape elements. Oikos, 80: 193–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arthur, S. M., B. F. J. Manly, L. L. McDonald & G. W. Garner, 1996. Assessing habitat selection when availability changes. Ecology, 77: 215–227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ASRD, 2007. Fishing, Hunting and Trapping. Big Game Harvest Summary. [Online] URL: http://srd.alberta.ca/fishinghunting-trapping (accessed 25 February 2010).
   Google Scholar
• Augustine, D. J. & L. E. Frelich, 1998. Effects of white-tailed deer on populations of an understory forb in fragmented deciduous forests. Conservation Biology, 12: 995–1004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beckingham, J. D., I. G. W. Corns & J. H. Archibald, 1996. Field Guide to Ecosites of West-Central Alberta. Special Report 9. Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Northwest Region, Northern Forestry Centre, Edmonton, Alberta.
   Google Scholar
• Bender, D. J., T. A. Contreras & L. Fahrig, 1998. Habitat loss and population decline: A meta-analysis of the patch size effect. Ecology, 79: 517–533.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bender, D. J. & L. Fahrig, 2005. Matrix structure obscures the relationship between interpatch movement and patch size and isolation. Ecology, 86: 1023–1033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brotons, L., A. Wolff, G. Paulus & J. L. Martin, 2005. Effect of adjacent agricultural habitat on the distribution of passerines in natural grasslands. Biological Conservation, 124: 407–414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cairns, A. L. & E. S. Telfer, 1980. Habitat use by 4 sympatric ungulates in boreal mixedwood forest. Journal of Wildlife Management, 44: 849–857.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choquenot, D. & W. A. Ruscoe, 2003. Landscape complementation and food limitation of large herbivores: Habitat-related constraints on the foraging efficiency of wild pigs. Journal of Animal Ecology, 72: 14–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Debinski, D. M. & R. D. Holt, 2000. A survey and overview of habitat fragmentation experiments. Conservation Biology, 14: 342–355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunning, J. B., B. J. Danielson & H. R. Pulliam, 1992. Ecological processes that affect populations in complex landscapes. Oikos, 65: 169–175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Environmental Systems Research Institute, 1992. Arc View. Version 3.1. Redlands, California.
   Google Scholar
• Environmental Systems Research Institute, 2004. ArcGIS/ArcInfo. Version 9. Redlands, California.
   Google Scholar
• Estades, C. F. & S. A. Temple, 1999. Deciduous-forest bird communities in a fragmented landscape dominated by exotic pine plantations. Ecological Applications, 9: 573–585.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fahrig, L., 2001. How much habitat is enough? Biological Conservation, 100: 65–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foothills Model Forest, 2007. Foothills Research Institute. [Online] URL: http://foothillsresearchinstitute.ca (accessed 25 February 2010).
   Google Scholar
• Franklin, A. B., B. R. Noon & T. L. George, 2002. What is habitat fragmentation? Studies in Avian Biology, 25: 20–29.
   Google Scholar
• Franzman, A. W., J. L. Oldemeyer, P. D. Arneson & R. K. Seemel, 1976. Pellet-group count evaluation for census and habitat use of Alaskan moose. Proceedings of the North American Moose Conference and Workshop, 12: 127–142.
   Google Scholar
• Glantz, S. A., 2005. Primer of Biostatistics, McGraw-Hill Professional, New York, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, B. J. & L. Fahrig, 2002. Effect of landscape structure on the movement behaviour of a specialized goldenrod beetle, Trirhabda borealis. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 80: 24–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haila, Y., 2002. A conceptual genealogy of fragmentation research: From island biogeography to landscape ecology. Ecological Applications, 12: 321–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harkonen, S. & R. Heikkila, 1999. Use of pellet group counts in determining density and habitat of moose Alces alces in Finland. Wildlife Biology, 5: 233–239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoerl, A. E. & R. W. Kennard, 1970a. Ridge regression: Applications to nonorthogonal problems. Technometrics, 12: 69–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoerl, A. E. & R. W. Kennard, 1970b. Ridge regression: Biased estimation for nonorthogonal problems. Technometrics, 12: 55–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holm, S., 1979. A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 6: 65–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kays, R. W. & D. E. Wilson, 2002. Mammals of North America. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.
   Google Scholar
• Kidwell, J. S. & L. H. Brown, 1982. Ridge regression as a technique for analyzing models with multicollinearity. Journal of Marriage and Family, 44: 287–299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamberson, R. H., R. McKelvey, B. R. Noon & C. Voss, 1992. A dynamic analysis of northern spotted owl viability in a fragmented forest landscape. Conservation Biology, 6: 505–512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laurian, C., J. P. Ouellet, R. Courtois, L. Breton & S. St Onge, 2000. Effects of intensive harvesting on moose reproduction. Journal of Applied Ecology, 37: 515–532.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law, B. S. & C. R. Dickman, 1998. The use of habitat mosaics by terrestrial vertebrate fauna: Implications for conservation and management. Biodiversity and Conservation, 7: 323–333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marquardt, D. W. & R. D. Snee, 1975. Ridge regression in practice. American Statistician, 29: 3–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGarigal, K. & S. A. Cushman, 2002. Comparative evaluation of experimental approaches to the study of habitat fragmentation. Ecological Applications, 12: 335–345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McIntyre, S. & R. Hobbs, 1999. A framework for conceptualizing human effects on landscapes and its relevance to management and research models. Conservation Biology, 13: 1282–1292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrison, M. L., B. G. Marcot & R. W. Mannan, 1998. Wildlife Habitat Relationships: Concepts and Applications. 2nd Edition. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, Wisconsin.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, P. J., R. Bott, R. Udell & R. E. Stevenson, 2002. The Hinton Forest 1955–2000: A Case Study in Adaptive Forest Management, The Weldwood-Hinton Story. [Online] URL: http://foothillsresearchinstitute.ca/pages/publications (accessed 25 February 2010).
   Google Scholar
• Mytton, W. R. & L. B. Keith, 1981. Dynamics of moose populations near Rochester, Alberta, 1975–1978. Canadian Field Naturalist, 95: 39–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Natural Regions Committee, 2006. Natural Regions and Subregions of Alberta. Government of Alberta Publication No. T/852, Edmonton, Alberta.
   Google Scholar
• Neff, D. J., 1968. The pellet-group count technique for big game trend, census, and distribution: A review. Journal of Wildlife Management, 32: 597–614.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neter, J., M. H. Kutner, C. J. Nachtsheim & W. Wasserman, 1996. Applied Linear Statistical Models. 4th Edition. WCB McGraw-Hill, Boston, Massachusetts.
   Google Scholar
• Neu, C. W., C. R. Byers & J. M. Peek, 1974. A technique for analysis of utilization-availability data. Journal of Wildlife Management, 38: 541–545.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen, S. E., R. H. M. Munro & M. S. Boyce, 2006. Modeling grizzly bear activity by time of day and habitat in west-central Alberta. Pages 9–15 in G. Stenhouse & K. Graham (eds). Foothills Model Forest Grizzly Bear Research Program 2005 Annual Report. Hinton, Alberta.
   Google Scholar
• Norton, M. R., S. J. Hannon & F. K. A. Schmiegelow, 2000. Fragments are not islands: Patch vs landscape perspectives on songbird presence and abundance in a harvested boreal forest. Ecography, 23: 209–223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peek, J. M., 1997. Habitat relationships. Pages 1–733 in A. W. Franzmann, C. C. Schwartz & R. E. McCabe (eds). Ecology and Management of the North American Moose. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Quinn, G. P. & M. J. Keough, 2002. Experimental Design and Data Analysis for Biologists. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• SAS Institute, 2001. The SAS System Software. Version release 8.02. Cary, North Carolina.
   Google Scholar
• Strong, L. L. & D. J. Freddy, 1979. Number of pellets per mule deer defecation. Journal of Wildlife Management, 43: 563–564.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strong, W. L., 1992. Ecoregions and Ecodistricts of Alberta. Alberta Forestry, Lands and Wildlife, Edmonton, Alberta.
   Google Scholar
• Suorsa, P., E. Huhta, A. Jantti, A. Nikula, H. Helle, M. Kuitunen, V Koivunen & H. Hakkarainen, 2005. Thresholds in selection of breeding habitat by the Eurasian treecreeper (Certhia familiaris). Biological Conservation, 121: 443–452.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Telfer, E. S., 1970. Winter habitat selection by moose and white-tailed deer. Journal of Wildlife Management, 34: 553–559.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Telfer, E. S., 1984. Circumpolar distribution and habitat requirements of moose (Alces alces). Pages 145–182 in R. Olson, R. Hastings & F. Geddes (eds). Northern Ecology and Resource Management. University of Alberta Press, Edmonton, Alberta.
   Google Scholar
• Van Dyke, F., B. L. Probert & G. M. Van Beek, 1995. Moose home range fidelity and core area characteristics in south-central Montana. Alces, 31: 91–104.
   Google Scholar
• Virgos, E., 2002. Are habitat generalists affected by forest fragmentation? A test with Eurasian badgers (Meles meles) in coarse-grained fragmented landscapes of central Spain. Journal of Zoology, 258: 313–318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wampold, B. E. & R. D. Freund, 1987. Use of multiple regression in counseling psychology research: A flexible data-analytic strategy. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 34: 372–382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weckerly, F. W. & M. A. Ricca, 2000. Using presence of sign to measure habitats used by Roosevelt elk. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 28: 146–153.
   Google Scholar
• Wiens, J. A., 1994. Habitat fragmentation: Island v landscape perspectives on bird conservation. Ibis, 137: S97–S104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiens, J. A., 1995. Landscape mosaics and ecological theory. Pages 1–26 in L. Hansson, L. Fahrig & G. Merriam (eds). Mosaic Landscapes and Ecological Processes. Chapman & Hall, London.
   Google Scholar
• Wiens, J. A., B. Van Horne & B. R. Noon, 2002. Integrating landscape structure and scale into natural resource management. Pages 21–67 in J. Liu & W. W. Taylor (eds). Integrating Landscape Ecology into Natural Resource Management. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• With, K. A., R. H. Gardner & M. G. Turner, 1997. Landscape connectivity and population distributions in heterogeneous environments. Oikos, 78: 151–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar