Evaluating oat cultivars for dairy forage production in the central Kenyan highlands

References

• Abeyasekere A. 2001. Analysis approaches in participatory work involving ranks and scores. Reading: Statistical Services Centre, University of Reading. Available at http://www.reading.ac.uk/ssc/ [accessed 23 June 2016].
   Google Scholar
• Ahmad M, Zaffar G, Mir SD, Dar ZA, Dar SH, Iqbal S, Bukhari SA, Khan GH, Gazal A. 2013. Estimation of correlation coefficient in oats (Avena sativa L.) for forage yield, grain yield and their contributing traits. International Journal of Plant Breeding and Genetics 7: 188–191. doi: 10.3923/ijpbg.2013.188.191
   Google Scholar
• Alemu T, Amare B. 2016. Adaptation trial of oat (Avena sativa) varieties in Dehana District, northern Ethiopia. Journal of Animal Research 6: 15–20. doi: 10.5958/2277-940X.2016.00003.6
   Google Scholar
• AOAC (Association of Official Agricultural Chemists). 1975. Official methods of analysis (12th edn). Washington, DC: AOAC.
   Google Scholar
• Assefa G, Ledin I. 2001. Effect of variety, soil type and fertiliser on the establishment, growth, forage yield, quality and voluntary intake by cattle of oats and vetches cultivated in pure stands and mixtures. Animal Feed Science and Technology 92: 95–111. doi: 10.1016/S0377-8401(01)00242-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beratto E, Rivas R. 2003a. Areco INIA, cultivar chileno de avena para producción de forraje en Argentina. Agricultura Técnica 63: 212–215.
   Google Scholar
• Beratto E, Rivas R. 2003b. Coral INIA, cultivar de avena para producción de forraje en Argentina. Agricultura Técnica 63: 216–219.
   Google Scholar
• Beyene G, Araya A, Gebremedhn H. 2015. Evaluation of different oat varieties for fodder yield and yield related traits in Debre Berhan Area, Central Highlands of Ethiopia. Livestock Research for Rural Development 27: Art. #170.
   Google Scholar
• Bilal M, Ayub M, Tariq M, Tahir M, Nadeem MA. 2017. Dry matter yield and forage quality traits of oat (Avena sativa L.) under integrative use of microbial and synthetic source of nitrogen. Journal of the Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences 16: 236–241. doi: 10.1016/j.jssas.2015.08.002
   Google Scholar
• Boonman JG. 1993. East Africa’s grasses and fodders, their ecology and husbandry. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Casler MD, van Santen E. 2010. Breeding objectives in forages. In: Boller B, Posselt UK, Veronesi F (eds), Fodder crops and amenity grasses. Handbook of Plant Breeding vol. 5. New York: Springer. pp 115–136.
   Google Scholar
• FAOSTAT. 2013. Agricultural production statistics on oats. Available at http://faostat.fao.org/site/567/DesktopDefault.aspx?PageID=567#ancor [accessed 24 May 2016].
   Google Scholar
• Feyissa F, Tolera A, Melaku S. 2007. Nutritive value of different varieties and morphological fractions of oats harvested at the soft dough stage. Tropical Science 47: 188–196. doi: 10.1002/ts.213
   Google Scholar
• HGCA (Home-Grown Cereals Authority). 2014. HGCA Recommended List® spring oats 2014. [accessed May 04, 2017] https://cereals.ahdb.org.uk/media/6249/Spring%20oats%20hgca%20Recommended%20List%202014-15.pdf
   Google Scholar
• HGCA. 2014/15. Recommended List® winter oats 2014/15. Available at https://cereals.ahdb.org.uk/media/6257/Winter%20oats%20hgca%20Recommended%20List%202014-15.pdf [accessed 4 May 2017].
   Google Scholar
• ILRI (International Livestock Research Institute). 2006. The collective power of smallholder farmers. ILRI News, 18 April. Available at http://www.ilri.org/ilrinews/index.php/archives/393 [accessed 4 May 2017].
   Google Scholar
• Jaetzold R, Schimidt H, Hornetz B, Shisanya C. 2006. Farm management handbook of Kenya, vol. 2: Natural conditions and farm management information (2nd edn). Nairobi: Ministry of Agriculture.
   Google Scholar
• Jeranyama P, Garcia AD. 2004. Understanding relative feed value (RFV) and relative forage quality (RFQ). Extension Extra. Paper 352. Brookings: College of Agriculture and Biological Sciences, South Dakota State University. Available at http://openprairie.sdstate.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1351&context=extension_extra [accessed 9 April 2016].
   Google Scholar
• Kim JD, Kim SG, Abuel, SJ, Kwon CH, Shin CN, Ko KH, Park BG. 2006. Effect of location, season, and variety on yield and quality of forage oat. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences 19: 970–977. doi: 10.5713/ajas.2006.970
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lukuyu B, Franzel S, Ongadi PM, Duncan AJ. 2011. Livestock feed resources: current production and management practices in central and northern rift valley provinces of Kenya. Livestock Research for Rural Development 23: Art. #112.
   Google Scholar
• Madubuike FN. 1993. Increasing animal protein supply in Nigeria under changing economic situations. In: Anyanwu AV, Nwoke BEB (eds), Development strategies for Nigeria. Okigwe: Avan Global Publishers. pp 211–218.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall A, Cowan S, Edwards S, Griffiths I, Howarth C, Langdon T, White E. 2013. Crops that feed the world 9. Oatsa cereal crop for human and livestock feed with industrial applications. Food Security 5: 13–33. doi: 10.1007/s12571-012-0232-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMaster, GS, Wilhem, WW 1997. Growing degree days: one equation, two interpretations. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 87: 291–300. doi: 10.1016/S0168-1923(97)00027-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mpairwe DR, Sabiiti EN, Ummuna NN, Tegegne A, Osuji P. 2003. Integration of forage legumes with cereal crops. I. Effects of supplementation with graded levels of lablab hay on voluntary food intake, digestibility, milk yield and milk composition of crossbred cows fed maize–lablab stover or oats–vetch hay ad libitum. Livestock Production Science 79: 193–212. doi: 10.1016/S0301-6226(02)00176-8
   Google Scholar
• Muia JMK, Kariuki JN, Mbugua PN, Gachuiri CK, Lukibisi LB, Ayako WO, Ngunjiri WV. 2011. Smallholder dairy production in high altitude Nyandarua milk-shed in Kenya: Status, challenges and opportunities. Livestock Research for Rural Development 23: Art. #108.
   Google Scholar
• Mwendia SW, Njenga DG, Maass BL. 2015. From grazing to stall-feeding: livestock feeds assessment in Nyandarua highlands in central Kenya. In: Tielkes E (ed.), Management of land use systems for enhanced food security: conflicts, controversies and resolutions, Tropentag 2015, 16‒18 September 2015, Berlin, Germany. Göttingen: Cuvillier Verlag. p 431. Available at http://www.tropentag.de/2015/abstracts/full/1027.pdf [accessed 26 July 2016].
   Google Scholar
• Mwendia SW, Yunusa IAM, Sindel BM, Whalley RDB, Kariuki IW. 2016. Assessment of Napier grass accessions in lowland and highland tropical environments in East Africa: productivity and forage quality. Experimental Agriculture 53: 27–43. doi: 10.1017/S001447971600003X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Odero-Waitituh JA. 2017. Smallholder dairy production in Kenya; a review. Livestock Research for Rural Development 29: Art. #139.
   Google Scholar
• Rahetlah VB, Randrianaivoarivony JM, Razafimpamoa LH, Ramalanjaona VL. 2010. Effects of seeding rates on forage yield and quality of oat (Avena sativa L.) vetch (Vicia sativa L.) mixtures under irrigated conditions of Madagascar. African Journal of Food, Agriculture, Nutrition and Development 10: 4254–4267. doi: 10.4314/ajfand.v10i10.62905
   Google Scholar
• Salgado P, Thang VQ, Thu TV, Trach NX, Cuong VC, Lecomte P, Richard D. 2013. Oats (Avena strigosa) as winter forage for dairy cows in Vietnam: an on-farm study. Tropical Animal Health and Production 45: 561–568. doi: 10.1007/s11250-012-0260-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sattari SZ, Bouwman AF, Martinez Rodríguez R, Beusen AHW, van Ittersum MK. 2016. Negative global phosphorus budgets challenge sustainable intensification of grasslands. Nature Communications 7: 10696. doi: 10.1038/ncomms10696
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah SAS, Akhtar LH, Minhas R, Bukhari MS, Ghani A, Hussain M. 2015. Evaluation of different oat (Avena sativa L.) varieties for forage yield and related characteristics. Science Letters 3: 13–16.
   Google Scholar
• Staal SJ, Chege L, Kenyanjui M, Kimari A, Lukuyu B, Njubi D, Owango M, Tanner J, Thorpe W, Wambugu M. 1998. Characterisation of dairy systems supplying the Nairobi milk market: a pilot survey in Kiambu District for the identification of target groups of producers. KARI/MoA/ILRI Collaborative Research Project Report. Nairobi: International Livestock Research Institute. Available at http://www.reading.ac.uk/ssc/resource-packs/ILRI_2006-Nov/Publication/Full%20Text/Staal.pdf [accessed 12 September 2015].
   Google Scholar
• Stevens EJ, Armstrong KW, Bezar HJ, Griffin WB, Hampton JG. 2004. Fodder oats: an overview. In: Suttie JM, Reynolds SG (eds), Fodder oats: a world overview. Plant Production and Protection Series no. 33. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. pp 11–18.
   Google Scholar
• Suttie JM, Reynolds SG (eds). 2004. Fodder oats: a world overview. Plant Production and Protection Series no. 33. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• Wheeler B. 1996. Guidelines for feeding dairy cows. Ontario Ministry of Agriculture and Food, Agriculture and Rural Division. Available at https://en.engormix.com/dairy-cattle/articles/feeding-dairy-cows-t33333.htm [accessed 16 June 2016].
   Google Scholar