84
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Note

The diversity of epigeal insects after the application of the brush packing restoration method following bush-encroachment control in South Africa

ORCID Icon, & ORCID Icon
Pages 310-315 | Received 01 Nov 2021, Accepted 08 Mar 2022, Published online: 25 Apr 2022

References

  • Blaum N, Seymour C, Rossmanith E, Schwager M, Jeltsch F. 2009. Changes in arthropod diversity along a land use driven gradient of shrub cover in savanna rangelands: identification of suitable indicators. Biodiversity and Conservation 18: 1187–1199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-008-9498-x.
  • Coetzee K. 2005. Caring for natural rangelands. Scottsville: University of KwaZulu-Natal Press.
  • Davis CA, Utrup, JS. 2010. Response of terrestrial invertebrates to high- and low-diversity grassland restorations in South-Central Nebraska. Restoration Ecology 18: 479–488. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-100X.2009.00561.x.
  • Franklin E, Magnusson WE, Luizão FJ. 2005. Relative effects of biotic and abiotic factors on the composition of soil invertebrate communities in an Amazonian savanna. Applied Soil Ecology 29: 259–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2004.12.004.
  • Gardner SM, Cabido MR, Valladares GR, Diaz S. 1995. The influence of habitat structure on arthropod diversity in Argentine semi-arid Chaco forest. Journal of Vegetation Science 6: 349–356. https://doi.org/10.2307/3236234.
  • Hering R, Hauptfleisch M, Geißler K, Marquart A, Schoenen M, Blaum N. 2019. Shrub encroachment is not always land degradation: insights from ground-dwelling beetle species niches along a shrub cover gradient in a semi-arid Namibian savanna. Land Degradation & Development 30: 14–24. https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.3197.
  • Jordaan F, Van Rooyen J. 2020. The effect of land-use on herbaceous production and grazing capacity in the Molopo district of the North West province, South Africa. International Journal of Sustainable Agricultural Research 7: 275–286. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.70.2020.74.275.286.
  • Kemp JE, Ellis AG. 2017. Significant local-scale plant-insect species richness relationship independent of abiotic effects in the temperate Cape Floristic Region biodiversity hotspot. PLoS ONE 12: e0168033. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168033.
  • Kgosikoma OE, Harvie BA, Mojeremane W. 2012. Bush encroachment in relation to rangeland management systems and environmental conditions in Kalahari ecosystem of Botswana. African Journal of Agricultural Research 7: 2312–2319. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJAR11.2374.
  • Lesoli MS, Gxasheka M, Solomon TB, Moyo B. 2013. Integrated plant invasion and bush encroachment management on Southern African Rangelands. In: Price A (Ed.), Herbicides – current research and case studies in use. London: IntechOpen. pp 259–313.
  • Longcore T, 2003. Terrestrial arthropods as indicators of ecological restoration success in coastal sage scrub (California, USA). Restoration Ecology 11: 397–409. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1526-100X.2003.rec0221.x.
  • Marquart A, Eldridge DJ, Geissler K, Lobas C, Blaum N. 2020a. Interconnected effects of shrubs, invertebrate-derived macropores and soil texture on water infiltration in a semi-arid savanna rangeland. Land Degradation & Development 31: 2307–2318. https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.3598.
  • Marquart A, Geissler K, Heblack J, Lobas C, Münch E, Blaum N. 2020b. Individual shrubs, large scale grass cover and seasonal rainfall explain invertebrate-derived macropore density in a semi-arid Namibian savanna. Journal of Arid Environments 176: 104101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2020.104101.
  • Modungwa RT. 2017. The effect of brush packing on soil surface conditions that influence grass emergence and establishment on denuded soils. MSc thesis, University of Pretoria, South Africa.
  • Naudé JP. 2019. Brush packing as a restoration technology to restore grazing capacity after bush control in the North West province. PhD thesis, North-West University, South Africa.
  • Noriega JA, Hortal J, Azcárate FM, Berg MP, Bonada N, Briones MJ, Del Toro I, Goulson D, Ibanez S, Landis DA, et al. 2018. Research trends in ecosystem services provided by insects. Basic and Applied Ecology 26: 8–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.baae.2017.09.006.
  • O’Connor TG, Puttick JR, Hoffman MT. 2014. Bush encroachment in southern Africa: changes and causes. African Journal of Range & Forage Science 31: 67–88. https://doi.org/10.2989/10220119.2014.939996.
  • Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Friendly M, Kindt R, Legendre P, McGlinn D, Minchin PR, O’Hara RB, Simpson GL, Solymos P, et al. 2020. vegan: Community Ecology Package. R package version 2.5-7. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan [Accessed 21 January 2021].
  • Pelser JJ. 2017. Evaluation of selected restoration technologies in degraded areas of the Mokala National Park, South Africa. PhD thesis, North-West University, South Africa.
  • Picker M, Griffiths C, Weaving A. 2004. Field guide to insects of South Africa. Cape Town: Struik.
  • R Core Team. 2020. R A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria. R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
  • Sabine SN, Schultheiss P, Rowe RC, Facy SL, Cook JM. 2019. Habitat complexity affects functional traits and diversity of ant assemblages in urban green spaces (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Myrmecological News 29: 67–77.
  • Samways MJ. 1993. Insects in biodiversity conservation: some perspectives and directives. Biodiversity and Conservation 2: 258–282. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00056672.
  • Shelef O, Groner E. 2011. Linking landscape and species: effect of shrubs on patch preference of beetles in arid and semi-arid ecosystems. Journal of Arid Environments 75: 960–967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2011.04.016.
  • Timpane-Padgham BL, Beechie T, Klinger T. 2017. A systematic review of ecological attributes that confer resilience to climate change in environmental restoration. PLoS ONE 12: e0173812. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0173812.
  • Visser N, Morris C, Hardy M, Botha J. 2007. Restoring bare patches in the Nama-Karoo of South Africa. African Journal of Range & Forage Science 24: 87–96. https://doi.org/10.2989/AJRFS.2007.24.2.5.159.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.