Biostimulant effects on the herbage yield and nutritive composition of a mixed ryegrass–clover pasture

References

• Abrahamse S. 2009. Feeding and grazing management for dairy cattle: opportunities for improved yield. PhD thesis, Wageningen University, Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Aminifard MH, Aroiee H, Nemati H, Azizi M, Jaafar E, Hawa Z. 2012. Fulvic acid affects pepper antioxidant activity and fruit quality. African Journal of Biotechnology 11: 13179–13185. https://doi.org/10.5897/ajb12.1507
   Google Scholar
• Anjum SA, Wang LC, Farooq M, Xue L, Ali S. 2011. Fulvic acid application improves the maize performance under well-watered and drought conditions. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 197: 409–417. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-037X.2011.00483.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AOAC (Association of Official Analytical Chemists International). 2002. Official metods of analysis (17th edn). Arlington: Association of Official Analytic Chemists International.
   Google Scholar
• Bargo F, Muller LD, Kolver ES, Delahoy JE. 2003. Invited review: yield and digestion of supplemented dairy cows on pasture. Journal of Dairy Science 86: 1–42. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(03)73581-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berbara R, Garcia A. 2014. Humic substances and plant defense metabolism. In: Ahmad P, Wani MR (eds), Physiological mechanisms and adaptation strategies in plants under changing environment (Vol.1). New York: Springer, pp. 1–376. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8591-9_11
   Google Scholar
• Bocanegra MP, Lobartini JC, Orioli GA. 2006. Plant uptake of iron chelated by humic acids of different molecular weights. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 37: 239–248. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103620500408779
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boué SM, Carter CH, Ehrlich KC, Cleveland TE. 2000. Induction of the soybean phytoalexins coumestrol and glyceollin by aspergillus. Journal of Agriculture and Food Chemistry 48: 2167–2172. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf9912809
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calvo P, Nelson L, Kloepper JW. 2014. Agricultural uses of plant biostimulants. Plant and Soil 383: 3–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-014-2131-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canellas, LP, Olivares FL, Aguiar NO, Jones DL, Nebbioso A, Mazzei P, Piccolo A. 2015. Humic and fulvic acids as biostimulants in horticulture. Scientia Horticulturae 196: 15–27. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2015.09.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castle ME. 1976. A simple disc instrument for estimating herbage yield. Grass Forage Science 31(1): 37-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2494.1976.tb01113.x
   Google Scholar
• Chin S, Behm CA, and Mathesius U. 2018. Functions of flavonoids in plant–Nematode interactions. Plants 7: 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants704008
   Google Scholar
• Doyle PT, Ho C, Armstrong DP, and Malcolm LR. 2004. Modelling feeding system efficiency and profitability of an irrigated dairy farm. Science Access 25: 45–48. https://doi.org/10.1071/SA0401012
   Google Scholar
• Dunstone RL, Richards RA, and Rawson HM. 1988. Variable responses of stomatal conductance, growth, and yield to fulvic acid applications to wheat. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 39: 547–553. https://doi.org/10.1071/AR9880547
   Google Scholar
• Du Jardin, P. 2015. Plant biostimulants: Definition, concept, main categories and regulation. Scientia Horticulturae 196: 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2015.09.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FERTASA (Fertilizer Association of Southern Africa). 2016. Fertilizer Handbook. 7th ed. Pretoria, South Africa: FERTASA.
   Google Scholar
• Fulkerson WJ and Donaghy DJ. 2001. Plant soulble carbohydrate reserves and senescence – key criteria for developing an effective grazing management system for ryegrass-based pastures: a review. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 41: 261-275 doi: 10.1071/EA00062
   Google Scholar
• Goering HK, Van Soest PJ (eds). 1970. Forage fibre analyses (apparatus, reagents, procedures, and some applications). Washington DC: USDA Agriculture Research Service.
   Google Scholar
• Hall MB. 2009. Determination of starch, including maltooligosaccharides, in animal feeds: Comparison of methods and a method recommended for AOAC collaborative study. Journal of AOAC International: 92(1), 42-49. doi: 10.1093/jaoac/92.1.42
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heard JW, Hannah MC, Ho CKM, Wales WJ. 2021. Predicting immediate marginal milk responses and evaluating the economics of two-variable input tactical feeding decisions in grazing dairy cows. Animals 11:1920. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11071920
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs JL, McKenzie FR, Ryan MJ, Kearney G. 1999. Effect of rate and time of nitrogen application from autumn to midwinter on perennial ryegrass/white clover dairy pastures in western Victoria: 1. Growth and composition. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 50: 1059–1066. https://doi.org/10.1071/AR98196
   Google Scholar
• Labuschagne J, Gerber H. 2006. Strategic N fertilisation of perennial ryegrass–white clover pastures. Elsenburg Journal 3: 10–11. https://doi.org/10.10520/AJA18109799_288
   Google Scholar
• Labuschagne J, Hardy MB, Agenbag GA. 2009. Nitrogen uptake of a perennial ryegrass–white clover pasture following strategic nitrogen fertiliser application during the cool seasons in the Western Cape province, South Africa. African Journal of Range and Forage Science 26: 37–42. https://doi.org/10.2989/AJRFS.2009.26.1.5.700
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lüscher A, Mueller-Harvey I, Soussana JF, Rees RM, Peyraud JL. 2014. Potential of legume-based grassland-livestock systems in Europe: a review. Grass and Forage Science 69: 206–228. https://doi.org/10.1111/gfs.1212
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marzouk NM, El-Tohamy W. 2020. Foliar application of fulvic acid for increasing the productivity and fruit quality of snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) in sandy soil. Plant Archives 20(2): 9175–9182.
   Google Scholar
• Meeske R, Rothauge A, Van Der Merwe GD, Greyling JF. 2006. The effect of concentrate supplementation on the productivity of grazing Jersey cows on a pasture-based system. South African Journal of Animal Science 36: 105–110. https://doi.org/10.4314/sajas.v36i2.3992
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mrazova J, Faggian R, Johson M, Sposito V. 2017. Land Capability Assessment of Glenelg Hopkins Catchment.Technical Report. pBroadacre cropping.
   Google Scholar
• Nardi S, Ertani A, Francioso O. 2017. Soil– root cross-talking: The role of humic substances. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science 180: 5–13. https://doi.org/10.1002/jpln.201600348
   Google Scholar
• Palma-Tenango M, Soto-Hernández M, Aguirre-Hernández E. 2017. Flavonoids in agriculture. In: Justino GC (ed.), Flavonoids: from biosynthesis to human health. pp189–201. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.68626
   Google Scholar
• Peng A, Xu Y, Wang ZJ. 2001. The effect of fulvic acid on the dose effect of selenite on the growth of wheat. Biological trace element research 83: 275–279. https://doi.org/10.1385/BTER:83:3:275
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pratt D. 2018. How long should a pasture recovery period be? – Part 2. On Pasture Library. https://onpasture.com/2018/06/25/figuring-out-how-long-pasture-recovery-takes-part-2 (Accessed 24 August 24 2022).
   Google Scholar
• Quiroz A, Mendez L, Mutis A, Hormazabal E, Ortega F, Birkett MA, Parra L. 2017. Antifeedant activity of red clover root isoflavonoids on Hylastinus obscurus. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition 17: 231–239. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-95162017005000018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rauthan BS, Schnitzer M. 1981. Effects of a soil fulvic acid on the growth and nutrient content of cucumber (Cucumis sativus) plants. Plant and Soil Science 63: 491–495. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02370049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robaina AC, Grainger C, Moate P, Taylor J, Stewart J. 1998. Responses to grain feeding by grazing dairy cows. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 38: 541–549. https://doi.org/10.1071/EA97087
   Google Scholar
• Rodrigues M, Baptistella JLC, Horz DC, Bortolato LM, Mazzafera P. 2020. Organic plant biostimulants and fruit quality-a review. Agronomy 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10070988
   Google Scholar
• Rose MT, Patti AF, Little KR, Brown AL, Jackson WR, Cavagnaro TR. 2014. A meta-analysis and review of plant-growth response to humic substances: practical implications for agriculture. In: Sparks DL (ED.), Advances in Agronomy (Vol.124). New York: Elsevier, pp. 37-89.
   Google Scholar
• Schofield P, Watt N, Schofield M. 2013. Using Humic compounds to improve efficiency of fertiliser nitrogen. Unpublished work. pp. 1–7. Accesed 10 September 2022. https://www.massey.ac.nz/~flrc/workshops/13/Manuscripts/Paper_Schofield_2013.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Shah A, Smith DL. 2020. Flavonoids in agriculture: chemistry and roles in biotic and abiotic stress responses, and microbial associations. Agronomy 10:1209. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10081209
   Google Scholar
• Stojanovic B. 2018. Supplementary feeding of grazing dairy cows. Paper presented at Optimization of technological procedures and zootechnical resources on farms in order to improve the sustainability of milk production. International Symposium on Animal Science 2014, Belgrade. https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_agrospace_5543
   Google Scholar
• Suh HY, Yoo KS, Suh SG. 2014. Effect of foliar application of fulvic acid on plant growth and fruit quality of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.). Horticulutre and Enviromental Biotechnology 55: 455–461. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13580-014-0004-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanaka H, Sato M, Oh-Uchi T, Yamaguchi R, Etoh H, Shimizu H, Sako M, Takeuchi H. 2004. Antibacterial properties of a new isoflavonoid from Erythrina poeppigiana against methicillinresistant Staphylococcus aureus. Phytomedicine 11: 331–33. https://doi.org/10.1078/0944711041495137
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TIBCO Software Inc. 2018. Statistica (data analysis software system), version 13. http://tibco.com.
   Google Scholar
• Trevisan S, Francioso O, Quaggiotti S, Nardi S. 2010. Humic substances biological activity at the plant–soil interface: from environmental aspects to molecular factors. Plant Signaling and Behaviour 5: 635–643. https://doi.org/10.4161/psb.5.6.11211
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viljoen C, van der Colf J, Swanepoel PA. 2020. Benefits are limited with high nitrogen fertiliser rates in Kikuyu-ryegrass pasture systems. Land 9: 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/LAND9060173
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Widdup KH, Purves RG, Black AD, Jarvis P, Lucas RJ. 2001. Nitrogen fixation by caucasian clover and white clover in irrigated ryegrass pastures. Proceedings of the New Zealand Grassland Association 171–175. https://doi.org/10.33584/jnzg.2001.63.2423
   Google Scholar
• Xudan X. 1986. The effect of foliar application of fulvic acid on water use, nutrient uptake and yield in wheat. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 37: 343–350. https://doi.org/10.1071/AR9860343
   Google Scholar
• Yang F, Tang C, Antonietti M. 2021. Natural and artificial humic substances to manage minerals, ions, water, and soil microorganisms. Chemical Society Reviews 50: 6221–6239. https://doi.org/10.1039/d0cs01363c
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar