Diet preference of black rhinoceros Diceros bicornis at Welgevonden Game Reserve, South Africa, across seasons

References

• Acocks JPH. 1988. Veld types of South Africa (3rd edn). Memoirs of the Botanical Survey of South Africa 57. Pretoria, South Africa: Botanical Research Institute, Department of Agriculture and Water Supply, South Africa.
   Google Scholar
• Adcock K. 2006. Visual assessment of black rhino browse availability, Version 3. Harare, Zimbabwe: Darwin Initiative. Available at https://www.rhinoresourcecenter.com/pdf_files/140/1405818825.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson TM, Ngoti PM, Nzunda ML, Griffith DM, Speed JDM, Fossøy F et al. 2020. The burning question: does fire affect habitat selection and forage preference of the black rhinoceros Diceros bicornis in East African savannahs? Oryx 54: 234–243. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605318000388
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkinson S. 1995. Maintenance of captive black rhinoceros (Diceros bicornis) on indigenous browse in Zimbabwe: energetics, nutrition, and implications for conservation. MSc thesis, University of Zimbabwe, Zimbabwe. Available at https://www.researchgate.net/publication/269409079
   Google Scholar
• Brown DH, van der Westhuizen E. 2005. The woody diet of the black rhino (Diceros bicornis minor) in a sanctuary in the North Luangwa National Park, Zambia. Unpublished report for the Frankfurt Zoological Society and the Zambian Wildlife Authority.
   Google Scholar
• Bryant JP, Provenza FD, Pastor J, Reichardt PB, Clausen TP, du Toit JT. 1991. Interactions between woody plants and browsing mammals mediated by secondary metabolites. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 22: 431–446. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.22.110191.002243
   Google Scholar
• Buk KG, Knight MH. 2010. Seasonal diet preferences of black rhinoceros in three arid South African national parks. African Journal of Ecology 48: 1064–1075. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2028.2010.01213.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buk KG, Knight MH. 2012. Habitat suitability model for black rhinoceros in Augrabies Falls National Park, South Africa. South African Journal of Wildlife Research 42: 82–93. https://doi.org/10.10520/EJC128268
   Google Scholar
• Callaghan CC. 1987. The geology of the Waterberg Group in the southern portion of the Waterberg Basin. Pretoria, South Africa: Department of Mineral and Energy Affairs, Geological Survey.
   Google Scholar
• Champagne E, Royo AA, Tremblay JP, Raymond P. 2020. Phytochemicals involved in plant resistance to leporids and cervids: a systematic review. Journal of Chemical Ecology 46: 84–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-019-01130-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapuis JL, Boussés P, Pisanu B, Réale D. 2001. Comparative rumen and faecal diet microhistological determinations of European mouflon. Journal of Range Management 54: 239–242. doi: 10.2307/4003240
   Google Scholar
• Cooper SM, Owen-Smith N. 1985. Condensed tannins deter feeding by browsing ruminants. Oecologia 67 142–146. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00378466
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper SM, Owen-Smith N, Bryant JP. 1988. Foliage acceptability to browsing ruminants in relation to seasonal changes in the leaf chemistry of woody plants in a South African savanna. Oecologia 75: 336–342. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00376934
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dusi JL. 1949. Methods for the determination of food habits by plant microtechniques and histology and their application to cottontail rabbit food habits. The Journal of Wildlife Management 13: 295–298. https://doi.org/10.2307/3795871
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eamus D. 1999. Ecophysiological traits of deciduous and evergreen woody species in the seasonally dry tropics. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 14: 11–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(98)01532-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emslie R. 2020. Diceros bicornis. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2020: e.T6557A16980917. e.T6557A152728945. https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2020-1.RLTS.T6557A152728945.en
   Google Scholar
• Emslie RH, Adcock K. 1995. Feeding ecology of black rhinos. In: Penzhorn BL, Kriek NPJ (eds), Proceedings of a Symposium on Rhinos as Game Ranch Animals, 9–10 September 1994, Onderstepoort, South Africa. Pretoria, South Africa: Wildlife Group, South African Veterinary Association. pp 65–81.
   Google Scholar
• Ganqa NM, Scogings PF, Raats JG. 2005. Diet selection and forage quality factors affecting woody plant selection by black rhinoceros in the Great Fish River Reserve, South Africa. South African Journal of Wildlife Research 35: 77–83. https://journals.co.za/doi/10.10520/EJC117203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goddard J. 1967. Home range, behaviour, and recruitment rates of two black rhinoceros populations. African Journal of Ecology 5: 133–150. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2028.1967.tb00768.x
   Google Scholar
• Goddard J. 1970. Food preferences of black rhinoceros in the Tsavo National Park. African Journal of Ecology 8: 145–161. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2028.1970.tb00837.x
   Google Scholar
• Gyöngyi K, Elmeros M. 2017. Forage choice of the reintroduced black rhino and the availability of selected browse species at Majete Wildlife Reserve, Malawi. Pachydermy 58: 40–50.
   Google Scholar
• Grange S, Duncan P, Gaillard JM, Sinclair ARE, Gogan PJP, et al. 2004. What limits the Serengeti zebra population? Oecologia, 140(3): 523–532. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-004-1567-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall-Martin AJ, Erasmus T, Botha BP. 1982. Seasonal variation of diet and faeces composition of Black rhinoceros (Diceros bicornis) in the Addo Elephant National Park. Koedoe 25: 63–82. https://doi.org/10.4102/koedoe.v25i1.605
   Google Scholar
• Jarman PJ. 1974. The social organisation of antelope in relation to their ecology. Behaviour 48: 215–267. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853974X00345
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joubert E, Eloff FC. 1971. Notes on the ecology and behaviour of the black rhinoceros Diceros bicornis Linn.1758 in South West Africa. Madoqua 1971: 5–53. https://journals.co.za/doi/10.10520/AJA10115498_31
   Google Scholar
• Kigozi F, Kerley GIH, Lessing JS. 2008. The diet of Cape grysbok (Rhaphicerus melanotis) in Algoa Dune strandveld, Port Elizabeth, South Africa. South African Journal of Wildlife Research 38: 79–81. https://doi.org/10.3957/0379-4369-38.1.79
   Google Scholar
• Kipchumba AJ. 2002. Applying foraging theory to diet choice and habitat selection in black rhinoceros. PhD thesis, University of Illinois, United States.
   Google Scholar
• Kotze DC, Zacharias PJK. 1993. Utilization of woody browse and habitat by the black rhino (Diceros bicornis) in western Itala Game Reserve. African Journal of Range and Forage Science 10: 36–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/10220119.1993.9638319
   Google Scholar
• Lechowicz MJ. 1982. The sampling characteristics of electivity indices. Oecologia 52: 22–30. doi: 10.1007/BF00349007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• le Roex N, Dreyer C, Viljoen P, Hofmeyr M, Ferreira SM. 2019. Seasonal space-use and resource limitation in free-ranging black rhino. Mammalian Biology 99: 81–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mambio.2019.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loutit BD, Louw GN, Seely MK. 1987. First approximation of food preferences and the chemical composition of the diet of the desert-dwelling black rhinoceros, Diceros bicornis L. Madoqua 15: 35–54. https://journals.co.za/doi/pdf/10.10520/AJA10115498_538
   Google Scholar
• Morgan S, Mackey RL, Slotow R. 2009. A priori valuation of land use for the conservation of black rhinoceros (Diceros bicornis). Biological Conservation 142: 384–393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2008.10.033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mucina L, Rutherford MC (eds). 2010. The vegetation of South Africa, Lesotho and Swaziland. Strelitzia 19. Pretoria, South Africa: South African National Botanical Institute (SANBI).
   Google Scholar
• Mukinya JG. 1977. Feeding and drinking habits of the black rhinoceros in Masai Mara Game Reserve. African Journal of Ecology 15: 125–138. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2028.1977.tb00386.x
   Google Scholar
• Muya SM, Oguge NO. 2000. Effects of browse availability and quality on black rhino (Diceros bicornis michaeli Groves 1967) diet in Nairobi National Park, Kenya. African Journal of Ecology 38: 62–71. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2028.2000.00213.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ndlovu M, Mundy P. 2009. Browse preference of captive black rhinos at Chipangali Wildlife Orphanage, Zimbabwe. Pachyderm 45: 41–46.
   Google Scholar
• Oloo TW, Brett R, Young TP. 1994. Seasonal variation in the feeding ecology of black rhinoceros (Diceros bicornis L.) in Laikipia, Kenya. African Journal of Ecology 32: 142–157. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2028.1994.tb00565.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owen-Smith RN. 1988. Megaherbivores: the influence of very large body size on ecology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Owen-Smith N. 2002. A metaphysiological modelling approach to stability in herbivore vegetation systems. Ecological Modelling 149(1–2): 153–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3800(01)00521-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owen-Smith N, Novellie P. 1982. What should a clever ungulate eat? The American Naturalist 119(2): 151–178. https://doi.org/10.1086/283902
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrides GA. 1975. Principal foods versus preferred foods and their relations to stocking rate and range condition. Biological Conservation 7: 161–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-3207(75)90012-9
   Google Scholar
• Shaw JA. 2011. Adaptive resource use in a reintroduced black rhinoceros population. PhD thesis, University of Witwatersrand, South Africa.
   Google Scholar
• Shipley LA. 1999. Grazers and browsers: how digestive morphology affects diet selection. Proceedings of Grazing Behavior of Livestock and Wildlife 70: 20–27.
   Google Scholar
• Sparks DR, Malechek JC. 1968. Estimating percentage dry weight in diets using a microscopic technique. Journal of Range Management 21: 264–265. https://doi.org/10.2307/3895829
   Google Scholar
• Storr GM. 1961. Microscopic analysis of faeces, a technique for ascertaining the diet of herbivorous mammals. Australian Journal of Biological Sciences 14: 157–164. https://doi.org/10.1071/BI9610157
   Google Scholar
• Swart J. 2014. Protected Area Management Plan. Unpublished report for Welgevonden Game Reserve, Vaalwater, South Africa.
   Google Scholar
• van Lieverloo RJ, Schuiling BF, de Boer WF, Lent PC, de Jong CB, Brown D, Prins HHT. 2009. A comparison of faecal analysis with backtracking to determine the diet composition and species preference of the black rhinoceros (Diceros bicornis minor). European Journal of Wildlife Research 55: 505–515. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-009-0264-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venter JA, Vermeulen MM, Brooke CF. 2019. Feeding ecology of large browsing and grazing herbivores. In: Gordon I, Prins H (eds), The Ecology of Browsing and Grazing. II. Ecological studies (analysis and synthesis), vol. 239. Cham, Switzerland: Springer. pp 127–153. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25865-8_5
   Google Scholar
• Winkel F. 2004. Diet choice of the black rhinoceros (Diceros bicornis) in the Double Drift Game Reserve, Eastern Cape Province, South Africa. MSc thesis, Wageningen University, The Netherlands.
   Google Scholar