Nutritional improvement of cactus fruit scraps with addition of alfalfa or Atriplex halimus, and comparison of two animal feed preservation methods (silage and solar drying)

References

• Ait-Oubahou A, Bartali H. 2015. Causes et importances des pertes en post-récolte de fruits et légumes au Maroc. In: Cosimo L (eds), Terre et mer, ressource vitale pour la méditerranée. Paris: L’Harmattan. pp 115–131.
   Google Scholar
• APHA. 1989. Standard methods for examination of water and waste water. Analytical Biochemistry 1: 183.
   Google Scholar
• Baumont R. 1996. Palatability and feeding behaviour in ruminants: a review. Annales de Zootechnie 45: 385–400. https://hal.archivesouvertes.fr/hal-00889572/document doi: 10.1051/animres:19960501
   Google Scholar
• Baumont R, Aufrere J, Meschy F. 2009. La valeur alimentaire des fourrages: rôle pratiques de culture, de récolte et de conservation. Fourrages 198: 153–173. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01173473/file/2009_Baumont_Fourrages_1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bellumori M, Innocenti M, Andrenelli L, Melani F, Cecchi L, Pandino G, Mauromicale G, La Malfa S, Mulinacci N. 2023. Composition of discarded Sicilian fruits of Opuntia ficus indica L.: phenolic content, mineral profile and antioxidant activity in peel, seeds and whole fruit. Food Chemistry 428: 136756. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2023.136756
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bendaou M. 2013. Method for producing silage containing cactus and argan-tree product (INRA, WO 2013/105844Al). Geneva: World Intellectual Property Organization. https://patents.google.com/patent/WO2013105841A1/en
   Google Scholar
• Bertrand G. 1906. Dosage of reducing sugars. Bulletin de la Société Chimique 35: 1285–1299.
   Google Scholar
• Bilal MQ. 2009. Effect of molasses and corn silage additives on the characteristics of mott dwarf elephant grass silage at different fermentation periods. Pakistan Veterinary Journal 29: 19–23. https://pvj.com.pk/pdf-files/29_1/19-23.pdf
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang TS, Dorn D, Zindel HC. 1974. Stability of poultry anaphage. Poultry Science 53: 2221–2224. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0532221
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coulibaly I, Dubois-Dauphin R, Danthine S, Majad L, Mejoub T, Destain J, Béra F, Wathelet JP, Thonart P. 2011. Techniques de séchage des starters lactiques et mécanismes affectant la viabilité cellulaire suite à la lyophilisation. Biotechnology Agronomy and Society Environment 15: 287–299. https://popups.uliege.be/1780-4507/index.php?id=17038&file=1&pid=7551
   Google Scholar
• Cürek M, Özen N. 2004. Feed value of cactus and cactus silage. Turkish Journal of Veterinary & Animal Sciences 28: 633-–639. https://journals.tubitak.gov.tr/veterinary/vol28/iss4/1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cutter CN. 2002. Microbial control by packaging: a review. Critical Review Food Science Nutrition 2: 151–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408690290825493
   Google Scholar
• Demarquilly C, Dulphy JP, Andrieu JP. 1998. Valeurs nutritive et alimentaire des fourrages selon les techniques de conservation : foin, ensilage, enrubannage. Fourrages 155: 349–369. https://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=1645959
   Google Scholar
• De Oliveira Moraes GS, Guim A, Tabosa JN, Chagas JCC, De Paula Almeida M, De Andrade Ferreira M. 2019. Cactus(Opuntia stricta haw. Cladodes and corn silage: how do we maximize the performance of lactating dairy cows reared in semi-arid region. Livestock Science 221: 133–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2019.01.026 <Please indicate where to cite this reference in the text or delete here.>
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubois M, Gilles K, Hamilton JK, Rebers PA, Smith F. 1951. Colorimetric method for determination of sugar. Nature 168: 167. https://doi.org/10.1038/168167a0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El Hajji L, Azzouzi H, Achchoub M, Elfazazi K, Salmaoui S. 2022. Ensiling characteristics of prickly pear (Opuntia-ficus indica) rejects with and without molasses for animal feed. International Journal of Recycling Organic Waste in Agriculture 11: 541–552. https://doi.org/10.30486/ijrowa.2022.1933535.1279
   Google Scholar
• El Hajji L, Salmaoui S. 2020. Biochemical and microbiological characterization of prickly pear rejects. International Journal of Innovative Science, Engineering & Technology 5: 608–615. https://ijisrt.com/assets/upload/files/IJISRT20JUL470.pdf
   Google Scholar
• El Kossori RL, Villaume C, El Boustani E, Sauvaire Y, Méjean L. 1998. Composition of pulp, skin and seeds of prickly pears fruit (Opuntia ficus indica sp.). Plant Foods for Human Nutrition 52: 263–270. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008000232406
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fehrmann E, Müller T. 1990. Seasonal changes of epiphytic microorganisms on a grassland plot. Wirtschaftseigene Futter 36: 66–78.
   Google Scholar
• Garcia AH. 2011. Anhydrobiosis in bacteria: from physiology to applications. Journal of Biosciences 36: 939–950. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12038-011-9107-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habibi Y. 2004. Contribution to the morphological, ultrastructural and chemical study of prickly pear. PhD thesis, Kadi Ayyad University, Morocco. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-00006273
   Google Scholar
• Hristov AN, Harper MT, Roth G, Canale C, Huhtanen P, Richard TL, DiMarco K. 2020. Effects of ensiling time on corn silage neutral detergent fiber degradability nad relationship between laboratory fiber analyses and in vivo digestibility. Journal of Dairy Science 103: 233–2346. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2019-16917
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaurena G, Pichard G. 2001. Contribution of storage and structural polysaccharides to the fermentation process and nutritive value of lucerne ensiled alone or mixed with cereal grains. Animal Feed Science and Technology 92: 159–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-8401(01)00257-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khorvash M, Colombatto D, Beauchemin KA, Ghorbani GR, Samei A. 2006. Use of absorbants and inoculants to enhance the quality of corn silage. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 86: 97–107. https://doi.org/10.4141/A05-029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Labuza TP. 1968. Sorption phenomena in foods. Food Technology 22: 15–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Labuza TP. 1975. Sorption phenomena in foods: theoretical and practical aspects. In: Chokayn R (eds), Theory, determination and control of physical properties of food materials, Boston: D.Reidel, pp 197–219.
   Google Scholar
• Leininger HV. 1976. Equipment, media, regent routine tests and strains. In: Compendium for the microbial examination of foods. Washington DC: American Public Health Association. pp 11–94.
   Google Scholar
• Li P, Ji SR, Hou C, Tang HY, Wang Q, Shen YX. 2016. Effects of chemical additives on the fermentation quality and N distribution of alfalfa silage in south of China. Animal Science Journal 87: 1472–1479. doi: 10.1111/asj.12600
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mabrouk A, Abbas Y, Fakiri M, Benchekroun M, El Kharrassi Y, El Antry-Tazi S, El Mzouri E. 2016. Caractérisation phénologique de différentes écotypes de cactus (Opuntia spp.) Marocaines dans les conditions édapho-climatiques de la région de Chaouia-Ourdigha. Journal of Materials and Environnemental Science 7: 1396–1405. https://webagris.inra.org.ma/doc/elmzouri0316.pdf
   Google Scholar
• McDonald P, Edwards RA, Greenhalgh JFD, Morgan CA. 2002. Animal nutrition. London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Méndez L P, Flores FT, Martín JD, Rodríguez R, Elena M, Díaz RC. 2015. Physicochemical characterization of cactus pads from Opuntia dillenii and Opuntia ficus indica. Food Chemistry 188: 393–398. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.05.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meschy F, Baumont R, Dulphy JP, Nozières MO. 2005. Effet du mode de conservation sur la composition en éléments minéraux majeurs des fourrages. Rencontres autour des Recherches sur les Ruminants 12: 116. https://www.journees3r.fr/IMG/pdf/2005_qualite_aliments_ruminants_12_meschy.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Minson DJ. 1990. Forage in ruminant nutrition. San Diego: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moon NJ, Ely LO, Sudweeks EM. 1981. Fermentation of wheat, corn, and alfalfa silages inoculated with Lactobacillus acidophilus and Candida sp. at ensiling. International Journal Dairy Science 64: 807–813. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(81)82651-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore CA, Kennedy SJ. 1994. The effect of sugar beet pulp-based silage additives on effluent production, fermentation, in-silo losses, silage intake and animal performance. Grass Forage Science 49: 54–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2494.1994.tb01976.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mordenti AL, Giaretta E, Campidonico L, Parazza P, Formigoni A. 2021. A review regarding the use of molasses in animal nutrition. Animals 11: 115. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11010115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muck RE. 2010. Silage microbiology and its control through additives. Revista Brasileira de Zootenia 39: 183–191. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1516-35982010001300021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nardone A, Zervas G, Ronchi B. 2004. Sustainability of small ruminant organic systems of production. Livestock Production Science 90: 27–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livprodsci.2004.07.004
   Google Scholar
• Nefzaoui A, Ben Salem H, Ben Salem L. 1996. La complémentation azotée du cactus inerme pour les ovins, effet de la source d’azote. Annales de Zootechnie 45: 120. https://hal.science/hal-00889604 doi: 10.1051/animres:19960624
   Google Scholar
• Ni K, Wang F, Zhu B, Yang J, Zhou G, Pan YI, Tao Y, Zhong J. 2017. Effects of lactic acid bacteria and molasses additives on the microbial community and fermentation quality of soybean silage. Bioresource Technology 238: 706–715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.04.055
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pahlow G. 1991. Role of microflora in forage conservation. Landbauforschung Volkenrode Sonderheft 123: 26–36.
   Google Scholar
• Pahlow G, Muck RE, Driehuis F, Elferink SJO, Spoelstra SF. 2003. Microbiology of ensiling. In: Buxston DR, Muck RE, Harrison JH (eds), Silage science and technology. Madison: American Society of Agronomy, pp 31–93.
   Google Scholar
• Pastorelli G, Serra V, Vannuccini C, Attard E. 2022. Opuntia spp. as alternative fodder for sustainable livestock production. Animals 12: 1597. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12131597
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purser D B. 1981. Nutritional value of Mediterranean pastures. In: Morley FHW (eds), World Animal Science. New York: Elsevier Science. pp 159–180.
   Google Scholar
• Ravari FN, Tahmasbi R, Dayani O, Khezri A. 2022. Cactus-alfalfa blend silage as an alternative feedstuff for Saanen dairy goats: effect on feed intake, milk yield and components, blood and rumen parameters. Small Ruminant Research 216:106811. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2022.106811
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Retamal N, Durán JM, Fernández J. 1987. Seasonal variations of chemical composition in prickly pear (Opuntia ficus indica (L.) miller). Journal of the Science Food and Agriculture 38: 303–311. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.2740380403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rook JA, Hatfield RD. 2003. Biochemistry of silage. In: Buxston DR, Muck RE, Harrison JH (eds), Silage science and technology. Madison: American Society of Agronomy. pp 95–135. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronmonogr42.c3
   Google Scholar
• Salem HB, Atti N, Priolo A, Nefzaoui A. 2002. Polyethylene glycol in concentrate or feedblocks to deactivate condensed tannins in Acacia cyanophylla Lindl. foliage 1. Effects on intake, digestion and growth by Barbarine lambs. Animal Science 75: 127–135. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1357729800052905
   Google Scholar
• Salem HB, Abdouli H, Nefzaoui A, El-Mastouri A, Salem L. 2005. Nutritive value, behaviour, and growth of Barbarine lambs fed on oldman saltbush (Atriplex nummularia L.) and supplemented or not with barley grains or spineless cactus (Opuntia ficus-indica f. inermis) pads. Small Ruminant Research 59: 229–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2005.05.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salem HB, Norman HC, Nefzaoui A, Mayberry DE, Pearce KL, Revell DK. 2010. Potential use of oldman saltbush (Atriplex nummularia Lindl.) in sheep and goat feeding. Small Ruminant Research 91: 13–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2009.10.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seale DR, Henderson AR, Pettersson KO, Lowe JF. 1986. The effect of addition of sugar and inoculation with two commercial inoculants on the fermentation of lucerne silage in laboratory silos. Grass and Forage Science 41: 61–70. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2494.1986.tb01793.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snow A, Ghaly AE. 2007. A comparative assessment of the characteristics of saturated wetland soil and a well drained forest soil. American Journal of Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2: 159–167. https://doi.org/10.3844/ajabssp.2007.159.167
   Google Scholar
• Strasser S, Neureiter M, Geppl M, Braun R, Danner H. 2009. Influence of lyophilization, fluidized bed drying, addition of protectants, and storage on the viability of lactic acid bacteria. Journal of Applied Microbiology 107: 167–177. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2009.04192.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Soest PJ, Robertson JB, Lewis BA. 1991. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and non starch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science 74: 3583–3597. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78551-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar