Teachability of collocations: The role of word frequency counts

References

• Alderson JC. 2000. Technology in testing: The present and the future. System 2000(28): 593–603.
   Google Scholar
• Babbie ER. 1990. Survey Research Methods. California and Belmont: Wordsworth Company.
   Google Scholar
• Barfield A. 2009. Following individual L2 collocation development over time. In: Barfield A, Gyllstad H (eds), Researching Collocations in Another Language. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. pp 208–223.
   Google Scholar
• Barfield A, Gyllstad H (eds). 2009. Researching Collocations in Another Language. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Benson M, Benson E, Ilson R. 2010. The BBI Combinatory Dictionary of English: Your Guide to Collocations and Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Company.
   Google Scholar
• Boers F, Eyckmans J, Kappel J, Stengers S, Demecheleer M. 2006. Formulaic sequences and perceived oral proficiency: Putting the Lexical Approach to the test. Language Teaching Research 10(3): 245–261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonk WJ. 2001. Testing ESL learners’ knowledge of collocations. In: Hudson T, Brown JD (eds), A Focus on Language Test Development: Expanding the Language Proficiency Construct across a Variety of Tests. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center. pp 113–142.
   Google Scholar
• Cowie AP. (ed.). 1998. Phraseology: Theory, Analysis and Applications. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coxhead A. 2000. A new academic word list. TESOL Quarterly 34(2): 213–239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebel RL. 1979. Essentials of Education Measurement. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Eyckmans J. 2009. Toward an assessment of learners’ receptive and productive syntagmatic knowledge. In: Barfield A, Gyllstad H (eds), Researching Collocations in Another Language. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. pp 139–152.
   Google Scholar
• Gitsaki C. 1999. Second Language Lexical Acquisition: A Study of the Development of Collocational Knowledge. San Francisco: International Scholars Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Granger S. 1998. Prefabricated patterns in advanced EFL writing: Collocations and formulae. In: Cowie AP (ed.), Phraseology: Theory, Analysis and Applications. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp 145–160.
   Google Scholar
• Granger S.( in press). From phraseology to pedagogy: Challenges and prospects. In: Uhrig P, Schüller S (eds), The Phraseological View of Language: A Tribute to John Sinclair. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Granger S, Meunier F (eds). 2008. Phraseology. An Interdisciplinary Perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Granger S, Paquot M. 2008. Disentangling the phraseological web. In: Granger S, Meunier F (eds), Phraseology. An Interdisciplinary Perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. pp 27–49.
   Google Scholar
• Gyllstad H. 2007. Testing English collocations. Unpublished PhD Dissertation, Lund University.
   Google Scholar
• Gyllstad H. 2009. Designing and evaluating tests of receptive collocation knowledge: COLLEX and COLLMATCH. In: Barfield A, Gyllstad H (eds), Researching Collocations in Another Language. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. pp 153–170.
   Google Scholar
• Handl S. 2009. Towards collocational webs for presenting collocations in learners’ dictionaries. In: Barfield A, Gyllstad H (eds), Researching Collocations in Another Language. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. pp 69–85.
   Google Scholar
• Howarth P. 1998. Phraseology of second language proficiency. Applied Linguistics 19(1): 24–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang J. 2009. Designing pedagogic materials to improve awareness and productive use of L2 collocations. In: Barfield A, Gyllstad H (eds), Researching Collocations in Another Language. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. pp 99–113.
   Google Scholar
• Keshavarz MH, Salimi H. 2007. Collocational competence and cloze test performance: A study of Iranian EFL learners. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 17(1): 81–92.
   Google Scholar
• Laufer B. 1998. The development of passive and active vocabulary in a second language: Same or different?. Applied Linguistics 19(2): 255–271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laufer B, Nation P. 1999. A vocabulary size test of controlled productive ability. Language Testing 16(1): 33–51.
   Google Scholar
• Laufer B, Paribakht TS. 1998. The relationship between passive and active vocabularies: Effects of language learning contexts. Language Learning 48(3): 365–391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laufer B, Ravenhorst-Kalovski GC. 2010. Lexical threshold revisited: Lexical text coverage, learners’ vocabulary size and reading comprehension. Reading in a Foreign Language 22(1): 15–30.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis M. 1993. The Lexical Approach: The State of ELT and the Way Forward. Hove: Language Teaching Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis M. 1997. Implementing the Lexical Approach: Putting Theory into Practice. Hove: Language Teaching Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis M. 2000. Teaching Collocations: Further Development in the Lexical Approach. Hove: Language Teaching Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Martynska M. 2004. Do English language learners know collocations?. Investigationes Linguisticae 11: 2–12.
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy M, O'Dell F. 2005. English Collocations in Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Milton J. 2007. Lexical profiles, learning styles and the construct validity of lexical size tests. In: Daller H, Milton J, Treffers-Daller J (eds), Modelling and Assessing Vocabulary Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp 47–58.
   Google Scholar
• Milton J. 2009. Measuring Second Language Vocabulary Acquisition. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Nation P. 1990. Teaching and Learning Vocabulary. New York: Heinle and Heinle.
   Google Scholar
• Nation P. 2001. Learning Vocabulary in Another Language. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nation P. 2006. How large a vocabulary is needed for reading and listening?. Canadian Modern Language Review 63(1): 59–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nation P, Beglar D. 2007. A vocabulary size test. The Language Teacher 31(7): 9–13.
   Google Scholar
• Nation P & Chung T. 2009. Teaching and testing vocabulary. In: Long MH, Doughty C (eds), The Handbook of Language Teaching. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell. pp 543–559.
   Google Scholar
• Nattinger JR, DeCarrico JS. 1992. Lexical Phrases and Language Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nesselhauf N. 2005. Collocations in a Learner Corpus. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Nizonkiza D. 2011. The relationship between controlled productive collocational competence and L2 proficiency. TTWiA 84/85: 29–37.
   Google Scholar
• Ozaki S. 2011. Teaching collocations effectively with the aid of L1. The Language Teacher35(3). Available at www.jalt-publications.org/tlt [accessed 5 June 2012].
   Google Scholar
• Pallant J. 2007. SPSS Survival Manual. Buckingham and Philadelphia: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pawley A, Syder FH. 1983. Two puzzles for linguistic theory: Native like selection and native like fluency. In: Richards JC, Schmidt RW (eds), Language and Communication. London: Longman. pp 191–226.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitt N. 1998. Measuring collocational knowledge: Key issues and an experimental assessment procedure. ITL 119–120: 27–47.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitt N. 2010. Researching Vocabulary: A Vocabulary Research Manual. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitt N, Schmitt D, Clapham C. 2001. Developing and exploring the behaviour of two new versions of the vocabulary levels test. Language Testing 18(1): 55–88.
   Google Scholar
• Wei Y. 1999. Teaching collocations for productive vocabulary development. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages, New York, 9–13 March 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Wible D, Kuo CH, Chen MC, Tsao NL, Hung TF. 2006. A computational approach to the discovery and representation of lexical chunks. In: Mertens P, Fairon C, Dister A, Watrin P (eds), Verbum ex machina. Actes de la 13e Conférence sur le Traitement Automatique des Langues Naturelles. Louvain-la-Neuve: Presses universitaires de Louvain. pp 868–875.
   Google Scholar
• Wray A. 2002. Formulaic Language and the Lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wray A, Fitzpatrick T. 2008. Why can't you just leave it alone? Deviations from memorized language as a gauge of nativelike competence. In: Granger S, Meunier F (eds), Phraseology. An Interdisciplinary Perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. pp 123–147.
   Google Scholar
• Xing P, Fulcher G. 2007. Reliability assessment for two versions of Vocabulary Levels Tests. System 35(2007): 182–191.
   Google Scholar
• Ying Y, O'Neill M. 2009. Collocation learning through an ‘AWARE’ approach: Learner perspectives and learning process. In: Barfield A, Gyllstad H (eds), Researching Collocations in Another Language. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. pp 181–193.
   Google Scholar