48
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Verb stem influence on object marking in Chiyao1

Pages 351-365 | Received 14 Aug 2020, Accepted 01 Dec 2020, Published online: 15 Dec 2020

References

  • Allan K. 1983. Anaphora, cataphora, and topic focusing: functions of the object prefix in Swahili. In: Dihoff I (ed.), Current Approaches to African Linguistics. Foris: Dordrecht. pp. 323–335.
  • Andrason A, Visser M. 2017. Cognate objects of weather verbs in African languages of South Africa – from synchronic variation to a grammaticalization path. Stellenbosch Papers in Linguistics 48: 151–160.
  • Bentley M. 1998. The marking of grammatical relations in Swahili. Studies in African Linguistics 27: 177–197.
  • Bresnan J, Moshi L. 1990. Object asymmetries in comparative Bantu syntax. Linguistic Inquiry 21: 147–185.
  • Creissels D. 2005. A typology of subject and object markers in African languages. In: Voeltz FKE. (ed.), Studies in African Linguistic Typology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. pp. 445–459.
  • Duranti A. 1979. Object clitic pronouns in Bantu and the topicality hierarchy. Studies in African Linguistics 10: 31–46.
  • Horita Y. 1996. English cognate object constructions and the transitivity. English Linguistics 13: 221–247. https://doi.org/10.9793/elsj1984.13.221
  • Hyman L, Duranti A. 1982. On the object relation in Bantu. Syntax and Semantics 15: 217–239.
  • Kari E. 2017. Cognate object constructions in Degema. Linguistique et Langues Africaines 3: 29–53.
  • Keach CN. 1995. Subject and object markers as agreement and pronoun incorporation in Swahili. In: Akinlabi A (ed.), Papers Presented at the 25th Annual Conference on African Linguistics, 25–27 March, Rutgers University. pp. 109–116.
  • Kimambo G. 2018. Object marking in Swahili: Definiteness, specificity, or both? South African Journal of African Languages 38: 27–35.
  • Lusekelo A. 2012. Inflectional and derivational morphology in optimality theory: Multiple object nouns and co-occurrence of verbal extensions in Kinyakyusa. PhD thesis, University of Botswana.
  • Marten L, Kula N. 2012. Object marking and morphosyntactic variation in Bantu. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Languages Studies 30(2): 237–253. https://doi.org/10.2989/16073614.2012.737603
  • Marten L, Ramadhani D. 2001. An overview of object marking in Kiluguru. SOAS Working Papers in Linguistics 11: 259–275.
  • Mchunu S. 1996. Weather verbs in IsiZulu. MA dissertation, Stellenbosch University, South Africa.
  • Riedel K. 2009. The syntax of object marking in Sambaa: A comparative Bantu perspective. PhD thesis, Leiden University, Netherlands.
  • Riedel K, Marten L. 2012. Locative object marking and the argument-adjunct distinction. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Languages Studies 30(2): 277–292. https://doi.org/10.2989/16073614.2012.737606
  • Rugemalira J. 1991. What is a symmetrical language? Multiple object constructions in Bantu. In: Sutton LA (ed.), Proceedings of the Seventeenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 15–18 February, Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society. pp. 200–209. https://doi.org/10.3765/bls.v17i2.1663
  • Saeed JI. 1995. The semantics of middle voice in Somali. African Languages and Cultures 8(1): 61–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/09544169508717787
  • Ström E. 2012. The increasing importance of animacy in the agreement systems of Ndengeleko and other Southern Coastal Bantu languages. In: Svantesson J, Burenhult N, Holmer A, Karlsson A, Lundström H (eds), Special Issue on Humanities of the lesser-known: New Directions in the Description, Documentation and Typology of Endangered Languages and Musics. London: SOAS. pp 265–287.
  • Taji J. 2017. Object marking strategies in Chiyao. In: Kaji, S. (ed.), Proceedings of the 8thWorld Congress of African Linguistics, 20–24 August, Kyoto University. Tokyo: ILCAA. pp. 227–242.
  • Van der Wal J. 2009. Word order and information structure in Makhuwa-Enahara. PhD thesis, Leiden University, Netherlands.
  • Wald B. 1979. The development of the Swahili object marker: A study in the interaction of syntax and discourse. Syntax and Semantics 12: 505–524.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.