References
- Cook G. 2001. The discourse of advertising (2nd edn). London: Routledge. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203978153
- Djonov E, van Leeuwen T. 2018. Social media as semiotic technology and social practice: The case of Research Gate’s design and its potential to transform social practice. Social Semiotics 28(5): 641–664. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2018.1504715
- Finnegan R. 2002. Communicating: The multiple modes of human interconnection. New York: Routledge.
- Frith KT. 1997. Undressing the ad: Reading culture in advertising. Counterpoints 54: 1–17.
- Halliday MAK, Matthiessen CMIM. 2004. An introduction to functional grammar (3rd edn). London: Arnold.
- Hu X, Rodgers K, Lovrich NP. 2018. Public preferences regarding police Facebook posts: A macro-level analysis. Police Practice and Research 21(3): 227–245. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/15614263.2018.1531753
- Iedema R. 2003. Multimodality, resemiotization: Extending the analysis of discourse as multi-semiotic practice. Visual Communication 2(1): 29–57. https://doi.org/http://doi.org/10.1177/1470357203002001751
- Ilonga E. 2021. Language properties of online visual commercial advertisements. In: Chebanne A, Lusekelo A (eds), African languages: Linguistic, literacies, and social issues. Cape Town: The University of the Western Cape. pp. 363–382.
- Jewitt C. 2005. Multimodality, ‘reading’, and ‘writing’ for the 21st century. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education 26(3): 315–331. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01596300500200011
- Jewitt C. 2008. Multimodality and literacy in school classrooms. Review of Research in Education 32(1): 241–267. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X07310586
- Jewitt C, Henriksen B. 2016. Social semiotic multimodality. In: Klug N, Stöckl H (eds), Handbuch Sprache im multimodalen Kontext. Boston: De Gruyter. pp. 145–164. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110296099-007
- Jewitt C, Kress G, Ogborn J, Tsatsarelis C. 2001. Exploring learning through visual, actional and linguistic communication: The multimodal environment of a science classroom. Educational Review 53(1): 5–18. https://doi.org/http://doi.org/10.1080/00131910123753
- Johnston T. 1992. The realization of the linguistic metafunctions in a sign language. Social Semiotics 2(1): 1–43. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10350339209360346
- Jones LG. 2006. Ibn ‘Abbad of Ronda’s sermon on the Prophet’s birthday celebration: Preaching the Sufi and Sunni paths of Islam. Medieval Sermon Studies 50(1): 31–49. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1179/136606906X119598
- Kress G. 2011. Multimodal discourse analysis. In: Gee JP, Handford M (eds), The Routledge handbook of discourse analysis. London: Routledge. pp. 35–50.
- Kress GR, van Leeuwen T. 2006. Reading images: The grammar of visual design (2nd edn). London: Routledge. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203619728
- Ledin P, Machin D. 2019. Doing critical discourse studies with multimodality: from metafunctions to materiality. Critical Discourse Studies 16(5): 497–513. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2018.1468789
- O’Halloran KL. 2011. Multimodal discourse analysis. In: Hyland K, Paltridge B (eds), Companion to Discourse. London: Continuum. pp. 120–137.
- Owyong YSM. 2009. Clothing semiotics and the social construction of power relations. Social Semiotics 19(2): 191–211. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330902816434.
- Xu D. 2012. A social semiotic analysis of the multimodality of an advertisement. Chinese Semiotic Studies 6(1): 154–165. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1515/css-2012-0110