Exploring intrasectional variations of lexical bundles in medical research articles

References

• Al-Shujairi YB, Tan H, Abdullah AN, Nimechisalem V, Imm LG. 2020. Lexical bundles in the Discussion section moves of high impact medical research articles. Pertranika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities 28(3): 2043–2061.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkinson D. 1992. The evolution of medical research writing from 1735 to 1985: The case of the Edinburgh medical journal. Applied Linguistics 13(4): 337–374. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/13.4.337
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biber D. 2009. A corpus-driven approach to formulaic language in English: Multi-word patterns in speech and writing. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 14(3): 275–311. https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.14.3.08bib
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biber D, Finegan E. 2001. Intra-textual variation within medical research articles. In: Conrad S, Biber D (eds), Variation in English: Multi-dimensional studies. London: Longman. pp.108–123.
   Google Scholar
• Biber D. Conrad S, Cortes V. 2004. If you look at … : Lexical bundles in university teaching and textbooks. Applied Linguistics 25(3): 371–405. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/25.3.371
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biber D, Johansson S, Leech G, Conrad S, Finegan E. 1999. Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Harlow: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Bychkovska T, Lee JJ. 2017. At the same time: Lexical bundles in L1 and L2 university student argumentative writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 30: 38–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2017.10.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen YH, Baker P. 2010. Lexical bundles in L1 and L2 academic writing. Language Learning & Technology 14(2): 30–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cortes V. 2004. Lexical bundles in published and student disciplinary writing: Examples from history and biology. English for Specific Purposes 23(4): 397–423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2003.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cortes V. 2013. The purpose of this study is to: Connecting lexical bundles and moves in research article introductions. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 12(1): 33–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2012.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng LM, Liu J. 2022. Move-bundle connection in conclusion sections of research articles across disciplines. Applied Linguistics 44(3): 527–554. doi: 10.1093/applin/amac040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ElMalik AT, Nesi H. 2008. Publishing research in a second language: The case of Sudanese contributors to international medical journals. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 7(2): 87–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2008.02.007
   Google Scholar
• Esfandiari R, Barbary F. 2017. A contrastive corpus-driven study of lexical bundles between English writers and Persian writers in psychology research articles. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 29: 21–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2017.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fryer D. 2022. Engagement in medical research discourse: A multisemiotic approach to dialogic positioning. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gray B. 2015. Linguistic variation in research articles: When discipline tells only part of the story. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.71
   Google Scholar
• Hyland K. 2001. Humble servants of the discipline? Self-mention in research articles. English for Specific Purposes 20(3): 207–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(00)00012-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyland K. 2005. Stance and engagement: a model of interaction in academic discourse. Discourse Studies 7(2): 173–192. https://doi.org/10.1177/146.144.5605050365
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyland K. 2008a. Academic clusters: Text patterning in published and postgraduate writing. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 18(1): 41–62. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-4192.2008.00178.x
   Google Scholar
• Hyland K. 2008b. As can be seen: Lexical bundles and disciplinary variation. English for Specific Purposes 27(1): 4–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2007.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyland K. 2012. Bundles in academic discourse. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 32: 150–169. https://doi.org/10.1017/S026.719.0512000037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le TNP, Harrington M. 2015. Phraseology used to comment on results in the Discussion section of applied linguistics quantitative research articles. English for Specific Purposes 39: 45–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2015.03.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li LJ, Ge GC. 2009. Genre analysis: Structural and linguistic evolution of the English-medium medical research article (1985–2004). English for Specific Purposes 28(2): 93–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2008.12.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu XF, Deng JL. 2019. With the rapid development: A contrastive analysis of lexical bundles in dissertation abstracts by Chinese and L1 English doctoral students. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 39: 21–36. doi: 10.1016/j.jeap.2019.03.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marco MJL. 2000. Collocational frameworks in medical research papers: A genre based study. English for Specific Purposes 19(1): 63–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(98)00013-1
   Google Scholar
• Martínez IA. 2001. Impersonality in the research article as revealed by analysis of the transitivity structure. English for Specific Purposes 20(3): 227–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(00)00013-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nwogu KN. 1997. The medical research paper: Structure and functions. English for Specific Purposes 16(2): 119–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(97)85388-4
   Google Scholar
• Omidian T, Shahriari H, Siyanova-Chanturia A. 2018. A cross-disciplinary investigation of multi-word expressions in the moves of research article abstracts. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 36(6): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2018.08.002
   Google Scholar
• Pan F, Reppen R, Biber D. 2016. Comparing patterns of L1 versus L2 English academic professionals: lexical bundles in Telecommunications research journals. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 21: 60–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2015.11.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pérez-Llantada C. 2014. Formulaic language in L1 and L2 expert academic writing: Convergent and divergent usage. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 14: 84–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2014.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qi H, Pan F. 2020. Lexical bundle variation across moves in abstracts of medical research articles. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies 38(2): 109–128. https://doi.org/10.2989/16073.614.2020.1763814
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ren JQ. 2021. Variability and function of lexical bundles in research articles of applied linguistics and pharmaceutical sciences. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 50: 100968. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2021.100968
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saber A. 2012. Phraseological patterns in a large corpus of biomedical articles. In: Boulton A, Carter-Thomas S, Roley-Jolivet E (eds), Corpus-informed research and learning in ESP: Issues and applications. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. pp. 45–82. https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.52.03sab
   Google Scholar
• Salazar D. 2014. Lexical bundles in native and non-native scientific writing: Applying a corpus-based study to language teaching. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.65
   Google Scholar
• Simpson-Vlach R, Ellis NC. 2010. An academic formulas list: New methods in phraseology research. Applied Linguistics 31(4): 487–512. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott M. 2004. WordSmith Tools Version 4.0. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shahriari H. 2017. Comparing lexical bundles across the introduction, method and results sections of the research article. Corpora 12(1): 1–22. https://doi.org/10.3366/cor.2017.0107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi HM, Wannaruk A. 2014. Rhetorical structure of research articles in agricultural science. English Language Teaching 7(8): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v7n8p1
   Google Scholar
• Swales JM. 1990. Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Swales JM. 2004. Research genres: Explorations and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO978.113.9524827
   Google Scholar
• Verdaguer I, Laso NJ, Guzmán-González T, Salazar D, Comelles E, Castaño E, Hiferty J. 2013. SciE-Lex. A lexical database. In: Verdaguer I, Laso NJ, Salazar D (eds), Biomedical English: A corpus-based approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. pp. 21–38.
   Google Scholar
• Wright HR. 2019. Lexical bundles in stand-alone literature reviews: Sections, frequencies, and functions. English for Specific Purposes 54: 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2018.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar