Hybridisation between native Oreochromis species and introduced Nile tilapia O. niloticus in the Kafue River, Zambia

References

• Agnese J-F (ed.). 1998. Genetics and aquaculture in Africa. Actes du collogue Genetique et aquaculture en Afrique, Abidijan, April 1997. Paris: Orstom Editions.
   Google Scholar
• Allendorf FW, Leary RF, Spruell P, Wenburg KJ. 2001. The problems with hybrids: setting conservation guidelines. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 16: 613–622.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amarasinghe US, De Silva SS. 1996. Impact of Oreochromis mossambicus × O. niloticus (Pisces: Cichlidae) hybridization on population reproductive potential and long-term influence on a reservoir fishery. Fisheries Management and Ecology 3: 239–249.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson EC, Thompson EA. 2002. A model-based method for identifying species hybrids using multilocus genetic data. Genetics 160: 1217–1229.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angienda PO, Lee HJ, Elmer KR, Abila R, Waindi EN, Meyer A. 2010. Genetic structure and gene flow in an endangered native tilapia fish (Oreochromis esculentus) compared to invasive Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) in Yala swamp, East Africa. Conservation Genetics 12: 243–255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arthur RI, Lorenzen K, Homekingkeo P, Sidavong K, Sengvilaikham B, Garaway CJ. 2010. Assessing impacts of introduced aquaculture species on native fish communities: Nile tilapia and major carps in SE Asian freshwaters. Aquaculture 299: 81–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baird NA, Etter PD, Atwood TS, Currey MC, Shiver AL, Lewis ZA, Selker EU, Cresko WA, Johnson EA. 2008. Rapid SNP discovery and genetic mapping using sequenced RAD markers. PLoS ONE 3: e3376.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker CS. 2008. A truer measure of the market: the molecular ecology of fisheries and wildlife trade. Molecular Ecology 17: 3985–3998.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barton NH, Gale KS. 1990. Genetic analysis of hybrid zones. In: Harrison RG (ed.), Hybrid zones and the evolutionary process. New York: Oxford University Press. pp 13–45.
   Google Scholar
• Beveridge M, Ross LG, Kelly LA. 1994. Aquaculture and biodiversity. Ambio 23: 497–502.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bostock J, McAndrew B, Richards R, Jauncey K, Telfer T, Lorenzen K, Little D, Ross L, Handisyde N, Gatward I, Corner R. 2010. Aquaculture: global status and trends. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 365: 2897–2912.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brookfield JFY. 1996. A simple new method for estimating null allele frequency from heterozygote deficiency. Molecular Ecology 5: 453–455.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brummer EC, Barber WT, Collier SM, Cox TS, Johnson R, Murray SC, Olsen RT, Pratt RC, Thro AM. 2011. Plant breeding for harmony between agriculture and the environment. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 9: 561–568.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brummett RE, Ponzoni RW. 2009. Concepts, alternatives, and environmental considerations in the development and use of improved strains of tilapia in African aquaculture. Reviews in Fisheries Science 17: 70–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canonico GC, Arthington A, McCrary JK, Thieme ML. 2005. The effects of introduced tilapias on native biodiversity. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 15: 463–483.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D'Amato ME, Esterhuyse MM, van der Waal BCW, Brink D, Volckaert FAM. 2007. Hybridization and phylogeography of the Mozambique tilapia Oreochromis mossambicus in southern Africa evidenced by mitochondrial and microsatellite DNA genotyping. Conservation Genetics 8: 475–488.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deines AM, Bee CA, Katongo C, Jensen R, Lodge DM. 2013. The potential trade-off between artisanal fisheries production and hydroelectricity generation on the Kafue River, Zambia. Freshwater Biology 58: 640–654.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewoody J, Nason JD, Hipkins VD. 2006. Mitigating scoring errors in microsatellite data from wild populations. Molecular Ecology Notes 6: 951–957.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evanno G, Regnaut S, Goudet J. 2005. Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: a simulation study. Molecular Ecology 14: 2611–2620.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Excoffier L, Lischer HEL. 2010. Arlequin suite ver 3.5: a new series of programs to perform population genetics analyses under Linux and Windows. Molecular Ecology Resources 10: 564–567.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FAO. 2010. The state of world fisheries and aquaculture 2010. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations
   Google Scholar
• FAO. 2012a. State of the world fisheries and aquaculture 2012. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations
   Google Scholar
• FAO. 2012b. Database of introduced aquatic species. Available at www.fao.org/fishery/dias/en [accessed 2 September 2012].
   Google Scholar
• FAO. 2012c. Fisheries Global Information System (FAO-FIGIS) Available at http://www.fao.org/fishery/figis/en [accessed 13 December 2012].
   Google Scholar
• Firmat C, Alibert P, Losseau M, Baroiller JF, Schliewen UK. 2013. Successive invasion-mediated interspecific hybridizations and population structure in the endangered cichlid Oreochromis mossambicus. PLoS ONE 8: e63880.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foley JA, Ramankutty N, Brauman KA, Cassidy ES, Gerber JS, Johnston M, Mueller ND, O'Connell C, Ray DK, West PC, Balzer C, Bennett EM, Carpenter SR, Hill J, Monfreda C, Polasky S, Rockström J, Sheehan J, Siebert S, Tilman D, Zaks DPM. 2011. Solutions for a cultivated planet. Nature 478: 337–342.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fryer G, Iles TD. 1972. The cichlid fishes of the Great Lakes of Africa. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd.
   Google Scholar
• Goudet J. 2001. FSTAT, a program to estimate and test gene diversities and Fixation indices (version 2.9.3). Available at http://www2.unil.ch/popgen/softwares/fstat.htm [accessed 12 December 2012].
   Google Scholar
• Gregg RE, Howard JH, Shonhiwa F. 1998. Introgressive hybridization of tilapia in Zimbabwe. Journal of Fish Biology 52: 1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall RJ, Hastings A, Ayres DR. 2006. Explaining the explosion: modeling hybrid invasions. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 273: 1385–1389.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison RG. 1990. Hybrid zones: windows on evolutionary process. Oxford Surveys in Evolutionary Biology 7: 69–128.
   Google Scholar
• Hegarty MJ. 2012. Invasion of the hybrids. Molecular Ecology 21: 4669–4671.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hulata G, Karplus I, Harpaz S. 1995. Evaluation of some red tilapia strains for aquaculture: growth and colour segregation in hybrid progeny. Aquaculture Research 26: 765–771.
   Google Scholar
• Jamu D, Brummett R. 2004. Opportunities and challenges for African Aquaculture. In: Gupta MV, Bartley DM, Acosta BO (eds), Use of genetically improved and alien species for aquaculture and conservation of aquatic biodiversity in Africa. Penang: WorldFish Center. pp 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Josupeit H. 2010. World supply and demand of tilapia 2010. Paper presented at the Third International Technical and Trade Conference and Exposition on Tilapia, October 27–29 2010, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Available at http://www.globefish.org/world-supply-and-demand-of-tilapia.html [accessed January 2014].
   Google Scholar
• Lavergne S, Molofsky J. 2007. Increased genetic variation and evolutionary potential drive the success of an invasive grass. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 104: 3883–3888.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law R. 2000. Fishing, selection, and phenotypic evolution. ICES Journal of Marine Science 57: 659–668.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee W-J, Kocher TD. 1996. Microsatellite DNA markers for genetic mapping in Oreochromis niloticus. Journal of Fish Biology 49: 169–171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lind CE, Brummett RE, Ponzoni RW. 2012. Exploitation and conservation of fish genetic resources in Africa: issues and priorities for aquaculture development and research. Reviews in Aquaculture 4: 125–141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lövei GL, Lewinsohn TM, the Biological Invasions in Megadiverse Regions Network. 2012. Megadiverse developing countries face huge risks from invasives. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 27: 2–3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mallet J. 1995. A species definition for the modern synthesis. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 10: 294–299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moralee RD, van der Bank FH, van der Waal BCW. 2000. Biochemical genetic markers to identify hybrids between the endemic Oreochromis mossambicus and the alien species, O. niloticus (Pisces: Cichlidae). Water SA 26: 263–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muir JF, Gitonga N, Omar I, Pouomogne V, Radwan I. 2005. Hidden harvests: unlocking the potential of aquaculture in Africa. Abuja: NEPAD and The World Fish Center.
   Google Scholar
• Mwanja W, Kaufman L. 1995. A note on recent advances in the genetic characterization of Tilapia stocks in Lake Victoria region. African Journal of Tropical Hydrobiology and Fisheries 6: 51–53.
   Google Scholar
• Naylor RL, Goldburg RJ, Primavera JH, Kautsky N, Beveridge MCM, Clay J, Folke C, Lubchenco J, Mooney H, Troell M. 2000. Effect of aquaculture on world fish supplies. Nature 405: 1017–1024.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nei M, Maruyama T, Chakraborty R. 1975. The bottleneck effect and genetic variability in populations. Evolution 29: 1–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nijdam D, Rood T, Westhoek H. 2012. The price of protein: review of land use and carbon footprints from life cycle assessments of animal food products and their substitutes. Food Policy 37: 760–770.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry WL, Lodge DM, Feder JL. 2002. Importance of hybridization between indigenous and nonindigenous freshwater species: an overlooked threat to North American biodiversity. Society of Systematic Biologists 51: 255–275.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P. 2000. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155: 945–959.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhymer JM, Simberloff D. 1996. Extinction by hybridization and introgression. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 27: 83–109.
   Google Scholar
• Rice WR, Sax DF. 2005. Testing fundamental evolutionary questions at large spatial and demographic scales: species invasions as an under-appreciated tool. In: Sax DF, Stachowicz JJ, Gaines SD (eds), Species invasions: insights in ecology, evolution, and biogeography. Sunderland: Sinauer Associates. pp 291–313.
   Google Scholar
• Roman J, Darling JA. 2007. Paradox lost: genetic diversity and the success of aquatic invasions. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 22: 454–464.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saju JM, Lee W-J, Orban L. 2010. Characterization of nine novel microsatellites isolated from Mozambique tilapia, Oreochromis mossambicus. Conservation Genetics Resources 2: 287–385.
   Google Scholar
• Schwanck EJ. 1995. The introduced Oreochromis niloticus is spreading on the Kafue floodplain, Zambia. Hydrobiologia 315: 143–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scribner KT, Page KS, Bartron ML. 2001. Hybridization in freshwater fishes: a review of case studies and cytonuclear methods of biological inference. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 10: 293–323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skelton P. 2001. A complete guide to freshwater fishes of southern Africa. Cape Town: Struik.
   Google Scholar
• Skelton PH, Swartz ER. 2011. Walking the tightrope: trends in African freshwater systematic ichthyology. Journal of Fish Biology 79: 1413–1435.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trewavas E. 1983. Tilapiine fishes of the genera Sarotherodon, Oreochromis and Danakilia. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• UNESCO. 2007. A global perspective on research and development, UNESCO Institute for Statistics Fact Sheet 5: 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• van den Audenaerde DFET. 1994. Introduction of aquatic species into Zambian waters, and their importance for aquaculture and fisheries. ALCOM (Aquaculture for Local Community Development Programme) Field Document No. 24. Harare: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Available at http://www.fao.org/docrep/005/ad005e/AD005E00.htm [accessed January 2014].
   Google Scholar
• van Oosterhout C, Hutchinson WF, Wills DPM, Shipley P. 2004. Micro-Checker: software for identifying and correcting genotyping errors in microsatellite data. Molecular Ecology Notes 4: 535–538.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welcomme RL. 1966. Recent changes in the stocks of tilapia in Lake Victoria. Nature 212: 52–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar