Diatoms as water quality indicators in the upper reaches of the Great Fish River, Eastern Cape, South Africa

References

• Academy of Natural Sciences. 2011. ANSP algae image database. Available at http://diatom.acnatsci.org/AlgaeImage/SearchCriteria. asp [accessed 2010, 2011, 2012 and 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Almeida SFP. 2001. Use of diatoms for freshwater quality evaluation in Portugal. Limnetica 20: 205–213.
   Google Scholar
• Álvarez-Blanco I, Blanco S, Cejudo-Figueiras C, Bécares E. 2012. The Duero Diatom Index (DDI) for river water quality assessment in NW Spain: design and validation. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 185: 969–981. doi: 10.1007/s10661-012-2607-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ansara-Ross TM, Wepener V, Van den Brink PJ, Ross MJ. 2008. Probabilistic risk assessment of the environmental impacts of pesticides in the Crocodile (west) Marico catchment, North-West Province. Water SA 34: 637–645.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archibald REM. 1971. Diatoms from the Vaal Dam catchment area, Transvaal, South Africa. Botanica Marina 24: 17–70.
   Google Scholar
• Archibald REM. 1983. The diatoms of the Sundays and Great Fish rivers in the Eastern Cape province of South Africa. Vaduz: J Cramer.
   Google Scholar
• Bate GC, Adams JB, Van der Molen JS. 2002. Diatoms as indicators of water quality in South African river systems. WRC Report No. 814/1/02. Pretoria: Water Research Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Bate GC, Smailes PA, Adams A. 2004. A water quality index for use with diatoms in the assessment of rivers. Water SA 30: 493–498. doi: 10.4314/wsa.v30i4.5101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beltrami ME. 2010. Benthic diatoms for ecological water quality assessment in Italy, with special reference to Alpine ecoregions. PhD thesis, University of Innsbruck, Austria.
   Google Scholar
• Bere T, Mangadze T. 2014. Diatom communities in streams draining urban areas: community structure in relation to environmental variables. Tropical Ecology 55: 271–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bere T, Mangadze T, Mwedzi T. 2014. The application and testing of diatom-based indices of stream water quality in Chinhoyi town, Zimbabwe. Water SA 40: 503–512. doi: 10.4314/wsa.v40i3.14
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bere T, Phiri C, Kadye WT, Utete B. 2013. Benthic diatom assemblages in mountain streams: community structure in relation to environmental and human pressures. African Journal of Ecology 51: 625–634. doi: 10.1111/aje.12078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bere T, Tundisi JG. 2009. Weighted average regression and calibration of conductivity and pH of benthic diatom assemblages in streams influenced by urban pollution – Sao Carlos/SP Brazil. Acta Limnologica Brasil 21: 317–325.
   Google Scholar
• Besse-Lototskaya A, Verdonschot PFM, Coste M, Van de Vijver B. 2011. Evaluation of European diatom trophic indices. Ecological Indicators 11: 456–467. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2010.06.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birkett K, Gardiner S. 2005. The use of epilithic and epiphytic diatoms as indicators of organic pollution in the Cheboygan River, Cheboygan County, Michigan. University of Michigan, USA. Available at http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/handle/2027.42/55043 [accessed 23 October 2011].
   Google Scholar
• Blanco S, Bécares E. 2010. Are biotic indices sensitive to river toxicants? A comparison of metrics based on diatoms and macroinvertebrates. Chemosphere 79: 18–25. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.01.059
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blanco S, Cejudo-Figueiras C, Tudesque L, Bécares E, Hoffmann L, Ector L. 2012. Are diatom diversity indices reliable monitoring metrics? Hydrobiologia 695: 199–206. doi: 10.1007/s10750-012-1113-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bona F, Falasco E, Fassina S, Griselli B, Badino G. 2007. Characterisation of diatom assemblages in mid-altitude streams of NW Italy. Hydrobiologia 583: 265–274. doi: 10.1007/s10750-006-0537-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaïb N, Tison-Rosebery J. 2012. Water quality assessment and application of the biological diatom index in the Kebir-East wadi, Algeria. African Journal of Aquatic Science 37: 59–69. doi: 10.2989/16085914.2011.636898
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen N. 2010. The effect of increased salinity on diversity and abundance of diatoms. Pennsylvania State University, USA. Available at http://www.marcellus.psu.edu/resources/PDFs/salinity.pdf [accessed 26 October 2011].
   Google Scholar
• Dallas HF, Day JA. 2004. The effect of water quality variables on aquatic ecosystems: a review. WRC Report No. TT224/04. Cape Town: Water Research Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Davies B, Day J. 1998. Vanishing waters. Cape Town: UCT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Debenest T, Silvestre J, Coste M, Delmas F, Pinelli E. 2008. Herbicide effects on freshwater benthic diatoms: induction of nucleus alteration and silica cell wall abnormalities. Aquatic Toxicology 88: 88–94. doi: 10.1016/j.aquatox.2008.03.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de la Rey PA. 2007. Evaluation of the applicability of diatom-based indices as bioindicators of water quality in South African rivers. PhD thesis, North-West University, South Africa.
   Google Scholar
• de la Rey PA, Taylor JC, Laas A, van Rensburg L, Vosloo A. 2004. Determining the possible application value of diatoms as indicators of general water quality: a comparison with SASS 5. Water SA 30: 325–332. doi: 10.4314/wsa.v30i3.5080
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Della Bella V, Puccinelli C, Marcheggiani S, Mancini L. 2007. Benthic diatom communities and their relationship to water chemistry in wetlands of central Italy. Annales de Limnologie – International Journal of Limnology 43: 89–99. doi: 10.1051/limn/2007021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DWAF (Department of Water Affairs and Forestry). 1996. Water quality guidelines. Volume 7. Aquatic ecosystems. Pretoria: Department of Water Affairs and Forestry.
   Google Scholar
• Eassa AM. 2012. The use of diatom indices for the assessment of Shatt Al-arab River water quality. Journal of Basrah Researches (Sciences) 38: 114–124.
   Google Scholar
• Elias CL, Vieira N, Feio MJ, Almeida SFP. 2012. Can season interfere with diatom ecological quality assessment? Hydrobiologia 695: 223–232. doi: 10.1007/s10750-012-1196-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eloranta P, Soininen J. 2002. Ecological status of some Finnish rivers evaluated using benthic diatom communities. Journal of Applied Phycology 14: 1–7. doi: 10.1023/A:1015275723489
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esquius KS, Altamirano SM, Escalante AH. 2012. Abnormal forms of Cocconeis placentula (Ehrenberg) in a eutrophic shallow lake (BS. AS. Province, Argentina). In: Dos Santos Afonso M, Sanchez RMT (eds), Ciencia y tecnología ambiental: un enfoque integrador [Environmental science and technology: an integrative approach; conference proceedings], Argentina y Ambiente May 2012, Mar De Plata, Argentina. Buenos Aires: Asociación Argentina para el Progreso de las Ciencias. pp 250–255.
   Google Scholar
• Falasco E, Bona F, Badino G, Hoffmann L, Ector L. 2009a. Diatom teratological forms and environmental alterations: a review. Hydrobiologia 623: 1–35. doi: 10.1007/s10750-008-9687-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falasco E, Bona F, Ginepro M, Hlúbiková D, Hoffmann L, Ector L. 2009b. Morphological abnormalities of diatom silica walls in relation to heavy metal contamination and artificial growth conditions. Water SA 35: 595–606. doi: 10.4314/wsa.v35i5.49185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feio MJ, Almeida SF, Craveiro SC, Calado AJ. 2007. Diatoms and macroinvertebrates provide consistent and complementary information on environmental quality. Fundamental and Applied Limnology/Archiv für Hydrobiologie 169: 247–258. doi: 10.1127/1863-9135/2007/0169-0247
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaiser E, Wachnicka A, Ruiz P, Tobias F, Ross M. 2005. Diatom indicators of ecosystem change in subtropical coastal wetlands. In: Bortone SA (ed.), Estuarine indicators. CRC Marine Science Series. Boca Raton: CRC Press. pp 127–144.
   Google Scholar
• Gallo L, Battegazzore M, Corapi A, Lucadamo L. 2015. Changes in epilithic diatom communities and periphytic biomass downstream of a reservoir on a Mediterranean river (Calabria region, S Italy). Turkish Journal of Botany 39: 555–569. doi: 10.3906/bot-1403-34
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gell PA, Sluiter IR, Fluin J. 2002. Seasonal and interannual variations in diatom assemblages in Murray River connected wetlands in north-west Victoria, Australia. Marine and Freshwater Research 53: 981–992. doi: 10.1071/MF01021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giffen MH. 1966. Contributions to the diatom flora of southern Africa. II. Diatoms from Hogsback region of the Amatola mountains, Eastern Cape Province, South Africa. Nova Hedwigia 21: 123–160.
   Google Scholar
• Gomà J, Rimet F, Cambra J, Hoffmann L, Ector L. 2005. Diatom communities and water quality assessment in mountain rivers of the upper Segre Basin (la Cerdanya, Oriental Pyrenees). Hydrobiologia 551: 209–225. doi: 10.1007/s10750-005-4462-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harding WR, Archibald CGM, Taylor JC. 2005. The relevance of diatoms for water quality assessment in South Africa: a position paper. Water SA 31: 41–46. doi: 10.4314/wsa.v31i1.5119
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harding WR, Taylor JC. 2011. The South African diatom index (SADI) – a preliminary index for indicating water quality in rivers and streams in Southern Africa. WRC Report No. 1707/1/11. Pretoria: Water Research Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Hering D, Johnson RK, Buffagni A. 2006. Linking organism groups—major results and conclusions from the STAR project. In: Furse MT, Hering D, Brabec K, Buffagni A, Sandin L, Verdonschot PFM (eds), The ecological status of European rivers: evaluation and intercalibration of assessment methods. Hydrobiologia 566: 109–113.
   Google Scholar
• Imanpour NJ, Sharifinia M, Ramezanpour Z. 2013. Biodiversity of diatom population in the Masouleh stream, Guilan, Iran [in Arabic; English abstract]. Taxonomy and Biosystematics 5(15): 37–47.
   Google Scholar
• Kalyoncu H, Şerbetci B. 2013. Applicability of diatom-based water quality assessment indices in Dari stream, Isparta - Turkey. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology 7: 188–196.
   Google Scholar
• Karthick B, Taylor JC, Mahesh MK, Ramachandra TV. 2010. Protocols for collection, preservation and enumeration of diatoms from aquatic habitats for water quality monitoring in India. IUP Journal of Soil and Water Sciences 3: 25–60.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly MG, Penny CJ, Whitton BA. 1995. Comparative performance of benthic diatom indices used to assess river water quality. Hydrobiologia 302: 179–188. doi: 10.1007/BF00032108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly MG, Whitton BA. 1995. The trophic diatom index: a new index for monitoring eutrophication in rivers. Journal of Applied Phycology 7: 433–444. doi: 10.1007/BF00003802
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kneip C, Lockhart P, Voß C, Maier UG. 2007. Nitrogen fixation in eukaryotes – new models for symbiosis. BMC Evolutionary Biology 7: 55. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-7-55
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korhonen JJ, Köngäs P, Soininen J. 2013. Temporal variation of diatom assemblages in oligotrophic and eutrophic streams. European Journal of Phycology 48: 141–151. doi: 10.1080/09670262.2013.779390
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krammer K. 1997. Die cymbelloiden diatomeen. Eine monographie der weltweit bekannten taxa. Teil 1. Allgemeines und Encyonema part. Bibliotheca Diatomologica Band 36. Stuttgart: J Cramer.
   Google Scholar
• Krammer K. 2000. Diatoms of the European inland waters and comparable habitats. Volume 1. The genus Pinnularia. In: Lange-Bertalot H (ed.), Diatoms of Europe. Ruggell: ARG Gantner Verlag Kommanditgeselschaft.
   Google Scholar
• Krammer K, Lange-Bertalot H. 1987. Bacillariaceae, Epithemiaceae, Surirellaceae neue und bekannte taxa, neue kombinationen und synonyme sowie bermerkungen und erganzungen zu den Naviculaceae. Berlin, Stuttgart: J Cramer.
   Google Scholar
• Krammer K, Lange-Bertalot H. 1999a. Süßwasserflora von Mitteleuropa: Bacillariophyceae. 1 Teil: Naviculaceae (2nd edn). Berlin, Heidelberg: Elsevier Spektrum Akademischer Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Krammer K, Lange-Bertalot H. 1999b. Süßwasserflora von Mitteleuropa: Bacillariophyceae. 2 Teil: Bacillariaceae, Epithemiaceae, Surirellaceae (2nd edn). Berlin, Heidelberg: Elsevier Spektrum Akademischer Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Kriel GP. 2008. Biological indicators of water quality in an urban waterway: can diatoms reflect short-term spatial and temporal changes in water quality? MSc thesis, North-West University, South Africa.
   Google Scholar
• Lange-Bertalot H. 1993. 85 Neue Taxa und über 100 weitere neu definierte Taxa ergänzend zur Süßwasserflora von Mitteleuropa. Vol. 2/1–4. Hirschberg: J Cramer.
   Google Scholar
• Lange-Bertalot H. 1996. Inconographia diatomologica. Konigstein: Koeltz Scientific Books.
   Google Scholar
• Lavoie I, Hamilton PB, Wang YK, Dillon PJ, Campeau S. 2009. A comparison of stream bioassessment in Québec (Canada) using six European and North American diatom-based indices. Nova Hedwigia 135: 37–56.
   Google Scholar
• Lavoie I, Vincent WF, Pienitz R, Painchaud J. 2004. Benthic algae as bioindicators of agricultural pollution in the streams and rivers of southern Québec (Canada). Aquatic Ecosystem Health and Management 7: 43–58. doi: 10.1080/14634980490281236
   Google Scholar
• Lecointe C, Coste M, Prygiel J. 1993. ʻOmnidia’: Software for taxonomy, calculation of diatom indices and inventories management. Hydrobiologia 269–270: 509–513. doi: 10.1007/BF00028048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mangadze T, Bere T, Mwedzi T. 2015. Epilithic diatom flora in contrasting land-use settings in tropical streams, Manyame catchment, Zimbabwe. Hydrobiologia 753: 163–173. doi: 10.1007/s10750-015-2203-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marks JC, Lowe RL. 1993. Interactive effects of nutrient availability and light levels on the periphyton composition of a large oligotrophic lake. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 50: 1270–1278. doi: 10.1139/f93-144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martínez de Fabricius A, Maidana N, Gómez N, Sabater S. 2003. Distribution patterns of benthic diatoms in a Pampean river exposed to seasonal floods: the Cuarto River (Argentina). Biodiversity and Conservation 12: 2443–2454. doi: 10.1023/A:1025857715437
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morin S, Cordonier A, Lavoie I, Arini A, Blanco S, Duong TT, Sabater S. 2012. Consistency in diatom response to metal-contaminated environments. In: Barceló D, Kostianoy AG (eds), Emerging and priority pollutants in rivers. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. pp 117–146.
   Google Scholar
• Mucina L, Rutherford MC. 2006. The vegetation of South Africa, Lesotho and Swaziland. Pretoria: South African National Biodiversity Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Novais MH, Blanco S, Delgado C, Morais M, Hoffmann L, Ector L. 2012. Ecological assessment of Portuguese reservoirs based on littoral epilithic diatoms. Hydrobiologia 695: 265–279. doi: 10.1007/s10750-012-1197-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nowack EC, Melkonian M. 2010. Endosymbiotic associations within protists. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 365: 699–712. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2009.0188
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan Y, Stevenson RJ, Hill BH, Herlihy AT, Collins GB. 1996. Using diatoms as indicators of ecological conditions in lotic systems: a regional assessment. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 15: 481–495. doi: 10.2307/1467800
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potapova M, Charles DF. 2003. Distribution of benthic diatoms in U.S. rivers in relation to conductivity and ionic composition. Freshwater Biology 48: 1311–1328. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2427.2003.01080.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potapova M, Charles DF. 2007. Diatom metrics for monitoring eutrophication in rivers of the United States. Ecological Indicators 7: 48–70. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2005.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prygiel J, Coste M. 1993. The assessment of water quality in the Artois-Picardie water basin (France) by the use of diatom indices. Hydrobiologia 269–270: 343–349. doi: 10.1007/BF00028033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prygiel J, Coste M. 2000. Guide méthodologique pour la mise en oeuvre de l'indice biologique diatomées. Eau-Cemagref Bordeaux and Agence de l'Eau Artois-Picardi.
   Google Scholar
• Rimet F, Bouchez A. 2012. Biomonitoring river diatoms: implications of taxonomic resolution. Ecological Indicators 15: 92–99. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.09.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roubeix V, Mazzella N, Mechin B, Coste M, Delmas F. 2011. Impact of the herbicide metolachlor on river periphytic diatoms: expermimental comparison of descriptors at different biological organization levels. International Journal of Limnology 47: 1–11. doi: 10.1051/limn/2011009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Round FE. 1991. Diatoms in river water-monitoring studies. Journal of Applied Phycology 3: 129–145. doi: 10.1007/BF00003695
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salomoni SE, Rocha VL, Callegaro VL, Lobo EA. 2006. Epilithic diatoms as indicators of water quality in the Gravatai River, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. Hydrobiologia 559: 223–246. doi: 10.1007/s10750-005-9012-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slate JE, Stevenson RJ. 2007. The diatom flora of phosphorus- enriched and unenriched sites in an Everglades marsh. Diatom Research 22: 355–386. doi: 10.1080/0269249X.2007.9705721
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szczepocka E, Szulc B. 2009. The use of benthic diatoms in estimating water quality of variously polluted rivers. Oceanological and Hydrobiological Studies 38: 17–26. doi: 10.2478/v10009-009-0012-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szczepocka E, Szulc B, Szulc K, Rakowska B, Żelazna-Wieczorek J. 2014. Diatom indices in the biological assessment of the water quality, based on the example of a small lowland river. Oceanological and Hydrobiological Studies 43: 265–273. doi: 10.2478/s13545-014-0141-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor JC. 2004. The application of diatom-based pollution indices in the Vaal catchment. MSc thesis, North-West University, South Africa.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor JC, de la Rey PA, van Rensburg L. 2005. Recommendations for the collection, preparation and enumeration of diatoms from riverine habitats for water quality monitoring in South Africa. African Journal of Aquatic Science 30: 65–75. doi: 10.2989/16085910509503836
   Google Scholar
• Taylor JC, Harding WR, Archibald CGM. 2007c. A methods manual for the collection, preparation and analysis of diatom samples. WRC Report No.TT281/07. Pretoria: Water Research Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor JC, Harding WR, Archibald CGM. 2007d. An illustrated guide to some common diatom species from South Africa. WRC Report No. TT282/07. Pretoria: Water Research Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor JC, Janse van Vuuren MS, Pieterse AJH. 2007a. The application and testing of diatom-based indices in the Vaal and Wilge Rivers, South Africa. Water SA 33: 51–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor JC, Prygiel J, Vosloo A, de la Rey PA, van Rensburg L. 2007b. Can diatom-based pollution indices be used for biomonitoring in South Africa? A case study of the Crocodile west and Marico water management area. Hydrobiologia 59: 455–464. doi: 10.1007/s10750-007-0788-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ter Braak CJF, Smilauer P. 2003. Canoco for Windows, ver. 4.51. Wageningen: Plant Research International.
   Google Scholar
• Triest L, Lung'ayia H, Ndiritu G, Beyene A. 2012. Epilithic diatoms as indicators in tropical African rivers (Lake Victoria catchment). Hydrobiologia 695: 343–360. doi: 10.1007/s10750-012-1201-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trobajo R, Clavero E, Chepurnov VA, Sabbe K, Mann DG, Ishihara S, Cox EJ. 2009. Morphological, genetic and mating diversity within the widespread bioindicator Nitzschia palea (Bacillariophyceae). Phycologia 48: 443–459. doi: 10.2216/08-69.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Underwood G, Phillips J, Saunders K. 1998. Distribution of estuarine benthic diatom species along salinity and nutrient gradients. European Journal of Phycology 33: 173–183. doi: 10.1080/09670269810001736673
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urrea-Clos G, Sabater S. 2012. Identifying reference benthic diatom communities in an agricultural watershed (Guadiana River, SW Spain). Hydrobiologia 695: 171–184. doi: 10.1007/s10750-012-1202-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dam H, Mertens A, Sinkeldam J. 1994. A coded checklist and ecological indicator values of freshwater diatoms from the Netherlands. Netherlands Journal of Aquatic Ecology 28: 117–133. doi: 10.1007/BF02334251
   Google Scholar
• Vilbaste S, Truu J. 2003. Distribution of benthic diatoms in relation to environmental variables in lowland streams. Hydrobiologia 493: 81–93. doi: 10.1023/A:1025401716441
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh G. 2008. Diatom, macroinvertebrate and riparian vegetation community structure responses in agriculturally impacted rivers. Sc thesis, University of Johannesburg, South Africa.
   Google Scholar
• Walsh G, Wepener V. 2009. The influence of land use on water quality and diatom community structures in urban and agriculturally stressed rivers. Water SA 35: 579–593. doi: 10.4314/wsa.v35i5.49184
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weilhoefer CL, Pan Y. 2008. Using change-point and weighted averaging approaches to explore the relationships between common benthic diatoms and in-stream environmental variables in Mid-Atlantic highland streams, USA. Hydrobiologia 614: 259–274. doi: 10.1007/s10750-008-9511-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu JT. 1999. A generic index of diatom assemblages as bioindicators of pollution in the Keelung River of Taiwan. Hydrobiologia 397: 79–87. doi: 10.1023/A:1003694414751
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu N, Cai Q, Fohrer N. 2014. Contribution of microspatial factors to benthic diatom communities. Hydrobiologia 732: 49–60. doi: 10.1007/s10750-014-1843-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zalat A, Vildary SS. 2005. Distribution of diatom assemblages and their relationship to environmental variables in the surface sediments of three northern Egyptian lakes. Journal of Paleolimnology 34: 159–174. doi: 10.1007/s10933-005-1187-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zelinka M, Marvan P. 1961. Zur Präzisierung der biologischen Klassifikation der Reinheit fliessender Gewässer. Archiv für Hydrobiologie 57: 389–407.
   Google Scholar