Key factors that drive phytoplankton biomass and community composition in the urbanised Nahoon Estuary, South Africa

References

• Adams J, Cowie M, van Niekerk L. 2016. Assessment of completed ecological water requirements studies for South African estuaries and responses to changes in freshwater inflow. WRC Report N. KV 352/15. Pretoria: Water Research Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Adams JB, Bate GC. 1999. Estuarine microalgae. In: Allanson BR, Baird D (eds), Estuaries of South Africa. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp 91–118.
   Google Scholar
• Adams JB. 2014. A review of methods and frameworks used to determine the environmental water requirements of estuaries. Hydrological Sciences Journal 59: 451–465. doi: 10.1080/02626667.2013.816426
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alberti M, Marzluff JM. 2004. Ecological resilience in urban ecosystems: Linking urban patterns to human and ecological functions. Urban Ecosystems 7: 241–265. doi: 10.1023/B:UECO.0000044038.90173.c6
   Google Scholar
• Allanson BR, Baird D. 1999. Estuaries of South Africa. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barroso HS, Becker H, Nelo VMM. 2016. Influence of river discharge on phytoplankton structure and nutrient concentrations in four tropical semiarid estuaries. Brazilian Journal of Oceanography 64: 37–48. doi: 10.1590/S1679-87592016101406401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bate GC, Whitfield AK, Adams JB, Huizinga P, Wooldridge TH. 2002. The importance of the river-estuary interface (REI) zone in estuaries. Water SA 28: 271–279. doi: 10.4314/wsa.v28i3.4894
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bate GC, Berger MG, Campbell EE, Knoop WT. 1986. Primary production in three East London estuaries. In: Wooldridge TH (ed.), East London Programme – Final Report. Port Elizabeth: Institute for Coastal Research, University of Port Elizabeth. pp 326–330.
   Google Scholar
• Bate GC, Heelas BV. 1975. Studies on the nitrate nutrition of two indigenous Rhodesian grasses. Journal of Applied Ecology 12: 941–952. doi: 10.2307/2402100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell EE, Knoop WT, Bate GC. 1991. A comparison of phytoplankton biomass and primary production in three Eastern Cape estuaries, South Africa. South African Journal of Science 87: 259–264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Church TM. 1986. Biogeochemical factors influencing the residence time of micro-constituents in a large tidal estuary, Delaware Bay. Marine Chemistry 18: 393–406. doi: 10.1016/0304-4203(86)90020-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cloern JE, Jassby AD, Thompson JK, Hieb K. 2007. A cold phase of the East Pacific triggers new phytoplankton blooms in San Francisco Bay. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 104: 18561–18565. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0706151104
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cloern JE, Jassby AD, Schraga TS, Nejad E, Martin C. 2017. Ecosystem variability along the estuarine salinity gradient: Examples from long-term study of San Francisco Bay. Limnology and Oceanography 00: 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper JAG. 2001. Geomorphological variability among microtidal estuaries from the wave-dominated South African coast. Geomorphology 40: 99–122. doi: 10.1016/S0169-555X(01)00039-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalu T, Froneman WP, Richoux, NB. 2014. Phytoplankton community diversity along a river-estuary continuum. Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa 69: 107–116. doi: 10.1080/0035919X.2014.930074
   Google Scholar
• David SE, Chattopadhyay M, Chattopadhyay S, Jennerjahn T. 2016. Impact of human interventions on nutrient biogeochemistry in the Pamba River, Kerala, India. Science of the Total Environment 541: 1420–1430. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.09.092
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Domingues RB, Barbosa A, Galvão H. 2005. Nutrients, light and phytoplankton succession in a temperate estuary (the Guadina, south-western Iberia). Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 64: 249–260. doi: 10.1016/j.ecss.2005.02.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Domingues RB, Barbosa AB, Galvão H. 2014. River damming leads to decreased phytoplankton biomass and disappearance of cyanobacteria blooms. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 136: 129–138. doi: 10.1016/j.ecss.2013.11.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elsdon TS, de Bruin MBNA, Diepen NJ, Gillanders BM. 2009. Extensive drought negates human influence on nutrients and water quality. Science of the Total Environment 407: 3033–3043. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.01.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eyre BD. 1998. Transport, retention and transformation of material in Australian estuaries. Estuaries 21: 540–551. doi: 10.2307/1353293
   Google Scholar
• Eyre BD. 2000. Regional evaluation of nutrient transformation and phytoplankton growth in the river-dominated sub-tropical east Australian estuaries. Marine Ecology Progress Series 205: 61–83. doi: 10.3354/meps205061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geldenhuys C, Cotiyane P, Rajkaran A. 2016. Understanding the creek dynamics and environmental characteristics that determine the distribution of mangrove and salt marsh communities at Nahoon Estuary, South African Journal of Botany 107: 137–147. doi: 10.1016/j.sajb.2016.04.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haraguchi L, Carstensen J, Abreu PC, Odebrecht C. 2015. Long-term changes of the phytoplankton community and biomass in the subtropical shallow Patos Lagoon Estuary, Brazil. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 162: 76–87. doi: 10.1016/j.ecss.2015.03.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart JA, Phlips EJ, Badylak S, Dix N, Petrinec K, Mathews AL, Green W, Srifa A. 2015. Phytoplankton biomass and composition in a well-flushed, sub-tropical estuary: The contrasting effects of hydrology, nutrient loads and allochthonous influences. Marine Environmental Research 112: 9–20. doi: 10.1016/j.marenvres.2015.08.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill MP, Olckers T. 2000. Biological control initiatives against water hyacinth in South Africa: constraining factors, success and new courses of action. In: Julien MH, Hill MP, Center TD, Jianqing D (eds), Biological and Intergrated Control of Water Hyacinth, Eichhornia crassipes. Proceedings of the 2nd Meeting of the Global Working Group for the Biological and Intergrated Control of Water Hyacinth. Beijing, China, 9–12 October 2000. Australia: Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research. pp 33–38.
   Google Scholar
• Hilmer T. 1990. Factors influencing the estimation of primary production in small estuaries. PhD thesis, University of Port Elizabeth, South Africa.
   Google Scholar
• Hitchcock JN, Mitrovic SM. 2015. Highs and lows: The effect of differently sized freshwater inflows on estuarine carbon, nitrogen, phosphorus, bacteria and chlorophyll a dynamics. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 156: 71–82. doi: 10.1016/j.ecss.2014.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoppe-Speer SCL, Adams JB, Rajkaran A. 2015. Mangrove expansion and population structure at a planted site, East London, South Africa. Southern Forests 77: 1–9. doi: 10.2989/20702620.2014.1001622
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotsedi D, Adams JB, Snow GC. 2012. The response of microalgal biomass and community composition to environmental factors in the Sundays Estuary. Water SA 38: 177–190. doi: 10.4314/wsa.v38i2.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemley DA, Adams JB, Bate GC. 2016. A review of microalgae as indicators in South African estuaries. South African Journal of Botany 107: 12–20. doi: 10.1016/j.sajb.2016.04.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemley DA, Adams JB, Taljaard S, Strydom NA. 2015. Towards the classification of eutrophic condition in estuaries. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 164: 221–232. doi: 10.1016/j.ecss.2015.07.033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemley DA, Adams JB, Taljaard S. 2017. Comparative assessment of two agriculturally-influenced estuaries: Similar pressure, different response. Marine Pollution Bulletin 117: 136–147. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2017.01.059
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Momba MNB, Osode, AN, Sibewu, M. 2006. The impact of inadequate wastewater treatment on the receiving water bodies – Case study: Buffalo City and Nkonkobe Municipalities of the Eastern Cape Province. Water SA 32: 687–692.
   Google Scholar
• Nche-Fambo FA, Scharler UM, Tirok K. 2015. Resilience of estuarine phytoplankton and their temporal variability along salinity gradients during drought and hypersalinity. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 158: 40–52. doi: 10.1016/j.ecss.2015.03.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nusch EA. 1980. Comparison of different methods for chlorophyll and phaeopigment determination. Archiv für Hydrobiologie. Beiheft Ergebnise der Limnologie 14: 14–36.
   Google Scholar
• Paerl HW, Rossignol KL, Hall NS, Peierls BL, Wetz SM. 2010. Phytoplankton community indicators of short and long-term ecological change in the anthropogenically and climatically impacted Neuse River, North Carolina, USA. Estuaries and Coasts 37: 485–497. doi: 10.1007/s12237-009-9137-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parsons TR, Maita Y, Lalli CM. 1984. A manual of chemical and biological methods for seawater analysis. New York: Pergamon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Petrucio MM, Esteves FA. 2000. Uptake rates of nitrogen and phosphorus in the water by Eichhornia crassipes and Salvinia auriculata. Revista Brasileira de Biologia 60: 229–236. doi: 10.1590/S0034-71082000000200006
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pretorius LM. 2014. Spatial and temporal variability in water quality characteristics of the Swartkops Estuary. MSc thesis, Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University, South Africa.
   Google Scholar
• Pritchard DW. 1967. Observations of circulation in coastal plain estuaries. In: Lauff GH (ed.), Estuaries. Washington DC: American Association Advanced Science. pp 37–44.
   Google Scholar
• Reddering JSV. 1988. Coastal and catchment basin controls on estuary morphology of the south-eastern cape coast. South African Journal of Science 84: 154–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers HH, Davis DE. 1972. Nutrient removal by water hyacinth. Weed Science 20: 423–428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell MJ, Montagna PA, Kalke RD. 2006. The effect of freshwater inflow on the net ecosystem metabolism in Lavaca Bay, Texas. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 68: 231–244. doi: 10.1016/j.ecss.2006.02.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scharler UM, Baird D. 2005. The filtering capacity of selected Eastern Cape estuaries, South Africa. Water SA 31: 483–490.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snow GC, Adams JB, Bate GC. 2000a. Effect of river flow on estuarine microalgal biomass and distribution. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 51: 255–266. doi: 10.1006/ecss.2000.0638
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snow GC, Adams JB. 2006. Response of micro-algae in the Kromme Estuary to managed freshwater inputs. Water SA 32: 71–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snow GC, Bate GB, Adams JB. 2000b. The effects of a single freshwater release into the Kromme Estuary. 2: Microalgal response. Water SA 26: 301–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snow GC, Taljaard S. 2007. Water quality in South African temporarily open/closed estuaries: a conceptual model. African Journal of Aquatic Science 32: 99–111. doi: 10.2989/AJAS.2007.32.2.1.198
   Google Scholar
• Snow GC. 2016. Determining the health of river-dominated estuaries using microalgal biomass and community composition, South African Journal of Botany 107: 21–30. doi: 10.1016/j.sajb.2016.02.201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taljaard S, van Niekerk L, Joubert W. 2009. Extension of qualitative model on nutrient cycling and transformation to include microtidal estuaries on wave-dominated coasts: Southern hemisphere perspective. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 85: 407–421. doi: 10.1016/j.ecss.2009.09.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ter Braak CJF, Šmilauer P. 2002. CANOCO reference manual CanoDraw for Windows user’s guide: software for canonical community ordination (version 4.5). Ithaca: Microcomputer Power.
   Google Scholar
• van Niekerk L, Turpie JK. (eds) 2012. South African National Biodiversity Assessment 2011: Technical Report. Volume 3: Estuary Component. CSIR Report Number CSIR/NRE/ECOS/ ER/2011/0045/B. Stellenbosch: Council for Scientific and Industrial Research.
   Google Scholar
• Vorwerk PD, Froneman PW, Paterson AW, Strydom NA, Whitfield AK. 2008. Biological responses to a resumption in river flow in a freshwater-deprived, permanently open southern African estuary. Water SA 34: 597–604.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wetz MS, Hayes KC, Fisher KVB, Price L, Sterba-Boatwright B. 2016. Water quality dynamics in an urbanising subtropical estuary (Oso Bay, Texas). Marine Pollution Bulletin 104: 44–53. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2016.02.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitfield AK. 1992. A characterisation of South African estuaries. South African Journal of Aquatic Sciences 18: 89–103. doi: 10.1080/10183469.1992.9631327
   Google Scholar
• Wilkerson FP, Dugdale RC, Parker AE, Blaser SB, Pimenta A. 2015. Nutrient uptake and primary productivity in an urban estuary: using rate measurements to evaluate phytoplankton response to different hydrological and nutrient conditions. Aquatic Ecology 49: 211–233. doi: 10.1007/s10452-015-9516-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiseman K, Burn M, Vernon C. 1993. Nahoon (CSE 44), Qinira (CSE 45) and Gqunube (CSE 46). Report No. 441, Estuarine and Coastal Research Unit, Division of Earth, Marine and Atmospheric Science and Technology, CSIR, Stellenbosch.
   Google Scholar
• Wu G, Cao W, Huang Z, Kao CM, Chang C, Chang PC, Wang F. (2017). Decadal changes in nutrient fluxes and environmental effects in the Jiulong River Estuary. Marine Pollution Bulletin http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2017.01.071 [accessed 27 March 2017]
   Google Scholar