Effect of drift sampler exposure time and net mesh size on invertebrate drift density in the Njoro River, Kenya

References

• Aguinis H, Gottfredson RK. 2010. Best-practice recommendation for estimating interaction effects using moderated multiple regression. Journal of Organizational Behavior 31: 776–786. doi: 10.1002/job.686
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anholt BR. 1995. Density dependence resolves the stream drift paradox. Ecology 76: 2235–2239. doi: 10.2307/1941697
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Astakhov MV, Bogatov VV. 2014. Vertical redistribution of drifting benthic invertebrates in the Kedrovaya River, Primorsky Region of Russia. Open Journal of Ecology 4: 53–59. doi: 10.4236/oje.2014.42007
   Google Scholar
• Baron RM, Kenny DA. 1986. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51: 1173–1182. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Béjar M, Gibbins CN, Vericat D, Battalla RJ. 2017. Effects of suspended sediment transport on invertebrate drift. River Research and Applications 33: 1655–1666. doi: 10.1002/rra.3146
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyero L, Bosch J. 2002. Spatial and temporal variation of macroinvertebrate drift in two Neotropical streams. Biotropica 34: 567–574. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-7429.2002.tb00575.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brittain JE, Eikeland TJ. 1988. Invertebrate drift-a review. Hydrobiologia 166: 77–93. doi: 10.1007/BF00017485
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown AV, Brussock PP. 1991. Comparisons of benthic invertebrates between riffles and pools. Hydrobiologia 220: 99–108. doi: 10.1007/BF00006542
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruno MC, Maiolini B, Carolli M, Silveri L. 2010. Short time-scale impacts of hydropeaking on benthic invertebrates in an Alpine stream (Trentino, Italy). Limnologica 40: 281–290. doi: 10.1016/j.limno.2009.11.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capderrey C, Datry T, Foulquier A, Claret C, Malard F. 2013. Invertebrate distribution across nested geomorphic features in braided-river landscapes. Freshwater Science 32: 1188–1204. doi: 10.1899/12-188.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clifford 1972. A year’s study of the drifting organisms in a brown-water stream of Alberta, Canada. Canadian Journal of Zoology 50: 975–983. doi: 10.1139/z72-130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Culp JM, Scrimgeour GJ, Beers CE. 1994. The effect of sample duration on the quantification of stream drift. Freshwater Biology 31: 165–173. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2427.1994.tb00850.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Day JA, Harrison AD, de Moor IJ. 2003. Guide to the freshwater invertebrates of southern Africa. Volume 9: Diptera.WRC Report No. TT 201/02. Pretoria: Water Research Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Degani G, Herbst GN, Ortal R, Bromley HJ, Levanon D, Netzer Y, Harari N, Glazman H. 1993. Relationship between current velocity, depth and the invertebrate community in a stable river system. Hydrobiologia 263: 163–172. doi: 10.1007/BF00006267
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Moor IJ, Day JA, de Moor FC. 2003. Guide to the freshwater invertebrates of southern Africa. Volume 8: Insecta II. WRC Report No. TT 214/03, Pretoria: Water Research Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Faulkner H, Copp GH. 2001. A model for accurate drift estimation in streams. Freshwater Biology 46: 723–733. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2427.2001.00707.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrington LC. 1984. Drift dynamics of Chironomidae larvae: I. Preliminary results and discussion of importance of mesh size and level of taxonomic identification in resolving Chironomid diel drift patterns. Hydrobiologia 114: 215–227. doi: 10.1007/BF00031873
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flecker AS. 1992. Fish predation and the evolution of invertebrate drift periodicity: evidence from Neotropical streams. Ecology 73: 438–448. doi: 10.2307/1940751
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerber A, Gabriel MJM. 2002. Aquatic invertebrates of South African rivers: field guide. Pretoria: Institute for Water Quality Studies, Department of Water Affairs and Forestry.
   Google Scholar
• Ghasemi A, Zahediasl S. 2012. Normality tests for statistical analysis: a guide for non-statisticians. International Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism 10: 486–489. doi: 10.5812/ijem.3505
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gibbins CN, Vericat D, Batalla RJ. 2010. Relations between invertebrate drift and flow velocity in sand-bed and riffle habitats and the limits imposed by substrate stability and benthic density. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 29: 945–958. doi: 10.1899/09-096.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gimenez BCG, Lansac-Toh FA, Higuti J. 2015. Effect of land use on the composition, diversity and abundance of insects drifting in neotropical streams. Brazilian Journal of Biology 75: S52–S59. doi: 10.1590/1519-6984.03914
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grzybkowska M, Dukowska M, Figiel K, Szczerkowska E, Tszydel M. 2004. Dynamics of macroinvertebrate drift in a lowland river. Zoologica Poloniae 49: 111–127.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen EA, Closs GP. 2007. Temporal consistency in the long-term spatial distribution of macroinvertebrate drift along a stream reach. Hydrobiologia 575: 361–371. doi: 10.1007/s10750-006-0384-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartwell SI, Fukuyuma AK. 2015. The effects of sieve size on benthic community composition analysis. Journal of Coastal Research 31: 1531–1536. doi: 10.2112/JCOASTRES-D-14-00082.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holm S. 1979. A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics 6: 65–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hothorn T, Bretz F, Westfall P. 2008. Simultaneous inference in general parametric models. Biometric Journal 50: 346–363. doi: 10.1002/bimj.200810425
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huhta A, Muotka T, Tikkanen P. 2000. Nocturnal drift of mayfly nymphs as a post-contact anti-predator mechanism. Freshwater Biology 45: 33–42. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2427.2000.00615.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang J, Kumar R, Dahms H, Tseng L, Chen Q. 2007. Mesh size affects abundance estimates of Oithona spp. (Copepoda, Cyclopoida). Crustaceana 80: 827–837. doi: 10.1163/156854007781363169
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karanja AK, China SS, Kundu P. 1986. The influence of land use on Njoro River catchment between 1975 and 1985. In: Thomas DB, Biamah EK, Kilewe AM, Lundgren L and Mochoge BO (Eds), Proceedings of the third national workshop on soil and water conservation, 16–19 September, 1986. University of Nairobi Press, Nairobi. pp 40–49.
   Google Scholar
• Katano I, Mitsuhashi H, Doi H, Isobe Y, Oishi T. 2017. Distribution and drift dispersal dynamics of a caddisfly grazer in response to resource abundance and its ontogeny. Royal Society Open Science 4: 160732. doi: 10.1098/rsos.160732
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerby BM, Bunn SE, Hughes JM. 1995. Factors influencing invertebrate drift in small forest streams, south-eastern Queensland. Marine and Freshwater Research 46: 1101–1108. doi: 10.1071/MF9951101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy TA, Yackulic CB, Cross WF, Grams PE, Yard MD, Copp AJ. 2014. The relation between invertebrate drift and two primary controls, discharge and benthic densities, in a large regulated river. Freshwater Biology 59: 557–572. doi: 10.1111/fwb.12285
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koetsier P, Minshall WG, Robinson CT. 1996. Benthos and macroinvertebrate drift in six streams differing in alkalinity. Hydrobiologia 317: 41–49. doi: 10.1007/BF00013724
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leung ES, Rosenfeld JS, Bernhardt JR. 2009. Habitat effects on invertebrate drift in a small trout stream: implications for prey availability to drift-feeding fish. Hydrobiologia 623: 113–125. doi: 10.1007/s10750-008-9652-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathooko JM. 1995. The retention of plant coarse particulate organic matter (CPOM) at the surface of the wet-store and dry-store zones of the Njoro River, Kenya. African Journal of Ecology 33: 151–159. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2028.1995.tb00790.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathooko JM. 2000. Artificial physical disturbances on stream-bed sites of a Kenyan mountain stream: effects of inter-disturbance intervals on mayfly densities. Limnologica 30: 331–339. doi: 10.1016/S0075-9511(00)80025-0
   Google Scholar
• Mathooko JM. 2001. Disturbance of a Kenyan Rift Valley stream by the daily activities of local people and their livestock. Hydrobiologia 458: 131–139. doi: 10.1023/A:1013160918203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathooko JM, Kariuki ST. 2000. Disturbances and species distribution of the riparian vegetation of a Rift Valley stream. African Journal of Ecology 38: 123–129. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2028.2000.00225.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathooko JM, Mavuti KM. 1992. Composition and seasonality of benthic invertebrates, and drift in the Naro Moru River, Kenya. Hydrobiologia 232: 47–56. doi: 10.1007/BF00014611
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mbaka JG, M’Erimba CM, Thiongo HK, Mathooko JM. 2014. Water and habitat quality assessment in the Honi and Naro Moru Rivers, Kenya, using benthic macroinvertebrate assemblages and qualitative habitat scores. African Journal of Aquatic Science 39: 361–368. doi: 10.2989/16085914.2014.976168
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mbaka JG, M’Erimba CM, Karanja HT, Mathooko JM, Mwaniki MW. 2016. Does the exclusion of meiofauna affect the estimation of biotic indices using stream invertebrates? African Zoology 51: 91–97. doi: 10.1080/15627020.2016.1196120
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M’Erimba CM, Mathooko JM, Ouma KO. 2014. Macroinvertebrate distributions in relation to human and animal-induced physical disturbance on the sediment surface in two Kenya tropical Rift Valley streams. African Journal of Aquatic Science 39: 337–346. doi: 10.2989/16085914.2014.960790
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muehlbauer JD, Kennedy TA, Copp AJ, Sabol T. 2017. Deleterious effects of net clogging on the quantification of stream drift. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 74: 1041–1048. doi: 10.1139/cjfas-2016-0365
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller K. 1954. Investigations on the organic drift in North Swedish streams. Unpublished report, Institute of Freshwater Research, Drottningholm 34: 133–148.
   Google Scholar
• Naman SM, Rosenfeld JS, Richardson JS. 2016. Causes and consequences of invertebrate drift in running waters: from individuals to populations and trophic fluxes. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 73: 1292–1305. doi: 10.1139/cjfas-2015-0363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ormerod SJ, Jones ME, Jones MC, Phillips DR. 2004. The effects of riparian forestry on invertebrate drift and brown trout in upland streams of contrasting acidity. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 8: 578–588. doi: 10.5194/hess-8-578-2004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osano PO. 2015. Morphometric characterisation and hydrological assessments of River Njoro watershed using system for Automated Geoscientific Analysis (SAGA) and Shuttle Radar Topographic Mission (SRTM) digital elevation model. International Journal of Advances in Remote Sensing and GIS 4: 37–44.
   Google Scholar
• Pachepsky E, Lutscher F, Nisbet RM, Lewis MA. 2005. Persistence, spread and the drift paradox. Theoretical Population Biology 67: 61–73. doi: 10.1016/j.tpb.2004.09.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perić MS, Dražina T, Špoljar M, Radanović I, Primic B, Habdija I. 2014. Meiofauna constitute a considerable portion of invertebrate drift among moss-rich patches within a karst hydrosystem. Biologia 69: 363–380. doi: 10.2478/s11756-013-0323-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perić MS, Robinson CT. 2015. Spatio-temporal shifts of macroinvertebrate drift and benthos in headwaters of a retreating glacier. Hydrobiologia 751: 25–41. doi: 10.1007/s10750-014-2149-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinna M, Marini G, Mancinelli G, Basset A. 2014. Influence of sampling effort on ecological descriptors and indicators in perturbed and unperturbed conditions: A study case using benthic macroinvertebrates in Mediterranean transitional waters. Ecological Indicators 37: 27–39. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.09.038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pringle CM, Ramírez A. 1998. Use of both benthic and drift sampling techniques to assess tropical stream invertebrate communities along an altitudinal gradient, Costa Rica. Freshwater Biology 39: 359–373. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2427.1998.00311.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Development Core Team (2015). A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www. R-project.org/. [Accessed 17 May, 2017].
   Google Scholar
• Ramírez A, Pringle CM. 1998. Invertebrate drift and benthic community dynamics in a lowland neotropical stream, Costa Rica. Hydrobiologia 386: 19–26. doi: 10.1023/A:1003409927131
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shearer KA, Stark JD, Hayes JW, Young RG. 2003. Relationships between drifting and benthic invertebrates in three New Zealand rivers: implications for drift-feeding fish. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 37: 809–820. doi: 10.1080/00288330.2003.9517210
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siler ER, Wallace JB, Eggert SL. 2001. Long-term effects of resource limitation on stream invertebrate drift. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 58: 1624–1637. doi: 10.1139/f01-101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slack KV, Tilley LJ, Kennelly SS. 1991. Mesh-size effects on drift sample composition as determined with a triple-net sampler. Hydrobiologia 209: 215–226. doi: 10.1007/BF00015344
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner D, Williams DD. 2000. Invertebrate movements within a small stream: Density dependence or compensating for drift? International Review of Hydrobiology 85: 141–156. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1522-2632(200004)85:2/3<141::AID-IROH141>3.0.CO;2-P
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace JB, Webster JR. 1996. The role of macroinvertebrate in stream ecosystem function. Annual Review of Entomology 41: 115–139. doi: 10.1146/annurev.en.41.010196.000555
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waters TF. 1964. Recolonisation of denuded stream bottom areas by drift. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 93: 311–315. doi: 10.1577/1548-8659(1964)93[311:RODSBA]2.0.CO;2
   Google Scholar
• Waters TF. 1965. Interpretation of invertebrate drift in streams. Ecology 46: 327–334. doi: 10.2307/1936336
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waters TF. 1966. Production rate, population density, and drift of a stream invertebrate. Ecology 47: 595–604. doi: 10.2307/1933937
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber N, Bouwes N, Jordan C. 2017. Accounting for spatial and temporal variation in macroinvertebrate community abundances when measuring the food supply of stream salmonids. Freshwater Science 36: 364–376. doi: 10.1086/692012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams DD, Williams NE. 1993. The upstream/downstream movement paradox of lotic invertebrates: quantitative evidence from a Welsh mountain stream. Freshwater Biology 30: 199–218. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2427.1993.tb00802.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuur AF, Leno EN, Walker NJ, Saveliev AA, Smith GM. 2009. Mixed Effects Models and Extension in Ecology with R. In: Gail M, Krickeberg K, Samet J, Tsiatis A, Wong W (Eds), Statistics for biology and health. Springer Science, New York. pp 1–563.
   Google Scholar