Patterns and drivers of marine bioinvasions in eight Western Cape harbours, South Africa

References

• Arenas F, Bishop JDD, Carlton JT, Dyrynda PJ, Farnham WF, Gonzalez DJ, Jacobs MW, Lambert C, Lambert G, Nielson SE, Pederson JA, Porter JS, Ward S, Wood CA. 2006. Alien species and other notable records from a rapid assessment survey of marinas on the south coast of England. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the UK 86: 1329–1337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Awad A, Clarke C, Greyling L, Hilliard R, Polglaze J, Raaymakers S. 2003. Ballast water risk assessment, Port of Saldanha Bay, Republic of South Africa. GloBallast Monograph Series No. 13. London: International Maritime Organization.
   Google Scholar
• Bax N, Hayes K, Marshall A, Parry D, Thresher R. 2002. Man-made marinas as sheltered islands for alien marine organisms: establishment and eradication of an alien invasive marine species. In: Veitch CR, Clout MN (eds), Turning the tide: the eradication of invasive species (Proceedings of the International Conference on Eradication of Island Invasives). Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN SSC Invasive Species Specialist Group. pp 26–39.
   Google Scholar
• Bax N, Williamson A, Aguero M, Gonzalez E, Geeves W. 2003. Marine invasive alien species: a threat to global biodiversity. Marine Policy 27: 313–323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blake JA. 1996. Family Cirratulidae. In: Blake JA, Hilbig B, Scott PH (eds), Taxonomic atlas of the Santa Maria Basin and Western Santa Barbara Channel, Vol. 6. Annelida, Part 3. Santa Barbara, California: Santa Barbara Museum of Natural History. pp 263–384.
   Google Scholar
• Branch GM, Odendaal F, Robinson TB. 2008. Long-term monitoring of the arrival, expansion and effects of the alien mussel Mytilus galloprovincialis relative to wave action. Marine Ecology Progress Series 370: 171–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Branch GM, Odendaal F, Robinson TB. 2010. Competition and facilitation between the alien mussel Mytilus galloprovincialis and indigenous species: Moderation by wave action. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 383: 65–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breiman L, Friedman JH, Olshen RA, Stone CJ. 1984. Classification and regression trees. Monterey, California: Wadsworth & Brooks/ Cole Advanced Books & Software.
   Google Scholar
• Bulleri F, Airoldi L. 2005. Artificial marine structures facilitate the spread of a non-indigenous green alga, Codium fragile ssp. tomentosoides in the north Adriatic Sea. Journal of Applied Ecology 42: 1063–1072.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulleri F, Chapman MG. 2010. The introduction of coastal infrastructure as a driver of change in marine environments. Journal of Applied Ecology 47: 26–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlton JT. 1987. Patterns of transoceanic marine biological invasions in the Pacific Ocean. Bulletin of Marine Science 41: 452–465.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlton JT. 1999. The scale and ecological consequences of biological invasions in the world's oceans. In: Sandlund OT, Schei PJ, Viken A (eds), Invasive species and biodiversity management. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp 195–212.
   Google Scholar
• Coles SL, DeFelice RC, Eldredge L, Carlton JT. 1999. Historical and recent introductions of non-indigenous marine species into Pearl Harbor, Oahu, Hawaiian Islands. Marine Biology 135: 147–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis MA. 2003. Biotic globalization: does competition from introduced species threaten biodiversity? Bioscience 53: 481–489.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eldredge LG. 1994. Perspective in aquatic exotic species management in the Pacific Islands. Volume 1: Introductions of commercially significant aquatic organisms to the Pacific Islands. New Caledonia: South Pacific Commission, South Pacific Regional Environment Programme.
   Google Scholar
• Eno NC. 1996. Non-native marine species in British waters: effects and controls. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 6: 215–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faasse M, Ligthart M. 2007. The American oyster drill, Urosalpinx cinerea (Say, 1822), introduced to The Netherlands – increased risk after ban of TBT? Aquatic Invasions 2: 402–406.
   Google Scholar
• Floerl O. 2002. Intracoastal spread of fouling organisms by recreational vessels. PhD thesis, James Cook University, Townsville, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Floerl O, Inglis GJ. 2003. Boat harbour design can exacerbate hull fouling. Austral Ecology 28: 116–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Floerl O, Inglis GJ. 2005. Starting the invasion pathway: the interaction between source populations and human transport vectors. Biological Invasions 7: 589–606.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Floerl O, Inglis GJ, Hayden BJ. 2005. A risk-based predictive tool to prevent accidental introductions of nonindigenous marine species. Environmental Management 35: 765–778.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Floerl O, Wilkens S, Inglis G. 2010. Development of a template for vessel hull inspections and assessment of biosecurity risks to the Kermadec and sub-Antarctic Islands regions. NIWA report no. CHC2010-086 prepared for Department of Conservation. National Institute of Water & Atmospheric Research Ltd, Christchurch.
   Google Scholar
• Godwin LS (ed.). 2005. Hull fouling as a mechanism for marine invasive species introductions. Proceedings of a workshop on current issues and potential management strategies, 12–13 February 2004, Honolulu, Hawaii. Honolulu: Hawaii Coral Reef Initiative – Research Program.
   Google Scholar
• Griffiths CL, Hockey PAR, Van Erkom Schurink C, Le Roux PJ. 1992. Marine invasive aliens on South African shores: implications for community structure and trophic functioning. In: Payne AIL, Brink KH, Mann KH, Hilborn R (eds), Benguela trophic functioning. South African Journal of Marine Science 12: 713–722.
   Google Scholar
• Griffiths CL, Mead A, Robinson TB. 2009. A brief history of marine bio-invasions in South Africa. African Zoology 44: 241–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grosholz ED. 2002. Ecological and evolutionary consequences of coastal invasions. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 17: 22–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hampton SL, Griffiths CL. 2007. Why Carcinus maenas cannot get a grip on South Africa's wave-exposed coastline. African Journal of Marine Science 29: 123–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haupt TM, Griffiths CL, Robinson TB. 2010. Oysters as vectors of marine aliens, with notes on four introduced species associated with oyster farming in South Africa. African Zoology 45: 52–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haupt TM, Griffiths CL, Robinson TB. 2012. Intra-regional translocations of epifaunal and infaunal species associated with cultured Pacific oysters Crassostrea gigas. African Journal of Marine Science 34: 187–194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hewitt CL, Campbell ML, Thresher RE, Martin RB. 1999. Marine biological invasions of Port Phillip Bay, Victoria. Centre for Research on Introduced Marine Pests Technical Report No. 20. Hobart: CSIRO Marine Research.
   Google Scholar
• Hewitt CL, Gollasch S, Minchin D. 2009. The vessel as a vector – biofouling, ballast water and sediments. In: Rilov G, Crooks JA (eds), Biological invasions in marine ecosystems. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. pp 117–131.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchings K, Atkinson L, Clark B. 2006. Sampling and identification of marine fauna and flora in the Port of Port Elizabeth. Report prepared for National Ports Authority. Anchor Environmental Consultants CC, Cape Town.
   Google Scholar
• IMO. 1999. Anti-fouling systems moving towards the non-toxic solution. Focus on IMO. London: International Maritime Organization.
   Google Scholar
• IMO. 2001. International convention on the control of harmful anti-fouling systems on ships. London: International Maritime Organisation. Available at http://www.imo.org [accessed 18 January 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Jurk C. 2011. Fouled yachts: a vector for marine invasive alien species to South African shores? MSc thesis. University of Cape Town, South Africa.
   Google Scholar
• Lacoursière-Roussel A, Bock DG, Cristescu ME, Guichard F, Girard P, Legendre P, McKindsey CW. 2012a. Disentangling invasion processes in a dynamic shipping–boating network. Molecular Ecology 21: 4227–4241.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lacoursière-Roussel A, Forrest BM, Guichard F, Piola RF, McKindsey CW. 2012b. Modeling biofouling from boat and source characteristics: a comparative study between Canada and New Zealand. Biological Invasions 14: 2301–2314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis PN, Hewitt CL, Riddle M, McMinn A. 2003. Marine introductions in the Southern Ocean: an unrecognised hazard to biodiversity. Marine Pollution Bulletin 46: 213–223.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McQuaid KA, Griffiths CL. 2014. Alien reef-building polychaete drives long-term changes in invertebrate biomass and diversity in a small, urban estuary. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 138: 101–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mead A, Carlton JT, Griffiths CL, Rius M. 2011a. Introduced and cryptogenic marine and estuarine species of South Africa. Journal of Natural History 45: 2463–2524.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mead A, Carlton JT, Griffiths CL, Rius M. 2011b. Revealing the scale of marine bioinvasions in developing regions: a South African re-assessment. Biological Invasions 13: 1991–2008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minchin D, Gollasch S. 2003. Fouling and ships’ hulls: how changing circumstances and spawning events may result in the spread of exotic species. Biofouling: The Journal of Bioadhesion and Biofilm Research 19, S1: 111–122.
   Google Scholar
• Mineur F, Johnson MP, Maggs CA, Stegenga H. 2007. Hull fouling on commercial ships as a vector of macroalgal introduction. Marine Biology 151: 1299–1307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Picker M, Griffiths CL. 2011. Alien & invasive animals. Cape Town: Struik Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Rius M, Heasman KG, McQuaid CD. 2011. Long-term coexistence of non-indigenous species in aquaculture facilities. Marine Pollution Bulletin 62: 2395–2403.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson TB, Branch GM, Griffiths CL, Govender A, Hockey PAR. 2007a. Effects of the invasive mussel Mytilus galloprovincialis on rocky intertidal community structure in South Africa. Marine Ecology Progress Series 340: 163–171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson TB, Branch GM, Griffiths CL, Govender A. 2007b. The invasion and subsequent die-off of Mytilus galloprovincialis in Langebaan Lagoon, South Africa: effects on natural communities. Marine Biology 152: 225–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson TB, Griffiths CL, McQuaid CD, Rius M. 2005b. Marine alien species of South Africa – status and impacts. African Journal of Marine Science 27: 297–306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson TB, Griffiths CL, Tonin A, Bloomer P, Hare MP. 2005a. Naturalized populations of Crassostrea gigas along the South African coast: distribution, abundance and population structure. Journal of Shellfish Research 24: 443–450.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiz GM, Carlton JT. 2003. Invasion vectors: a conceptual framework for management. In: Ruiz GM, Carlton JT (eds), Invasive species: vectors and management strategies. Washington, DC: Island Press. pp 459–504.
   Google Scholar
• Ruiz GM, Fofonoff PW, Calton JT, Wonham MJ, Hines AH. 2000. Invasion of coastal marine communities in North America: Apparent patterns, processes, and biases. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 31: 481–531.
   Google Scholar
• Scott RJ, Griffiths CL, Robinson TB. 2012. Patterns of endemicity and range restriction among southern African coastal marine invertebrates. African Journal of Marine Science 34: 341–347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sink K, Holness S, Harris L, Majiedt P, Atkinson L, Robinson T, Kirkman S, Hutchings L, Leslie R, Lamberth S, Kerwath S, von der Heyden S, Lombard A, Attwood C, Branch G, Fairweather T, Taljaard S, Weerts, Cowley P, Awad A, Halpern B, Grantham H, Wolf T. 2012. National biodiversity assessment 2011: technical report. Volume 4: marine and coastal component. Pretoria: South African National Biodiversity Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Smith R, Bolam SG, Rees HL, Mason C. 2008. Macrofaunal recovery following TBT ban: long term recovery of subtidal macrofaunal communities in relation to declining levels of TBT contamination. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 136: 245–256.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• StatSoft, Inc. 2011. STATISTICA (data analysis software system), version 10. Available at http://www.statsoft.com.
   Google Scholar
• Thresher RE. 1999. Diversity, impacts and options for managing invasive marine species in Australian waters. Australian Journal of Environmental Management 6: 164–74.
   Google Scholar
• Wasson K, Zabin CJ, Bedinger L, Cristina Diaz M, Pearse JS. 2001. Biological invasions of estuaries without international shipping: the importance of intraregional transport. Biological Conservation 102: 143–153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilcove DS, Rothstein D, Dubow J, Phillips A, Losos E. 1998. Quantifying threats to imperiled species in the United States. BioScience 48: 607–615.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar