Willingness to pay for marine-based tourism in the Ponta do Ouro Partial Marine Reserve, Mozambique

References

• Arin T, Kramer RA. 2002. Divers' willingness to pay to visit marine sanctuaries: an exploratory study. Ocean & Coastal Management 45: 171–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arrow K, Solow R, Portney PR, Leamer EE, Radner R, Schuman H. 1993. Report of the NOAA Panel on Contingent Valuation. Federal Register 58: 4601–4614.
   Google Scholar
• Asafu-Adjaye J, Tapsuwan S. 2008. A contingent valuation study of SCUBA diving benefits: case study in Mu Ko Similan Marine National Park, Thailand. Tourism Management 29: 1122–1130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balmford A, Bruner A, Cooper P, Costanza R, Farber S, Green RE et al. 2002. Economic reasons for conserving wild nature. Science 297: 950–953.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buis ML. 2010. Stata tip 87: interpretation of interactions in nonlinear models. The Stata Journal 10: 305–308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canty A, Ripley B. 2012. Boot: bootstrap R (S-Plus) functions. R package version 1.3-7. Available at http://stat.ethz.ch/R-manual/R-devel/library/boot/html/00Index.html [accessed 12 September 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Carnie T. 2012, May 24. Mozambique harbours ill intent. The Mercury. Available at http://www.iol.co.za/mercury/mozambique-harbours-ill-intent-1.1303862 [accessed 25 May 2012].
   Google Scholar
• Carson RT. 2000. Contingent valuation: a user's guide. Environmental Science and Technology 34: 1413–1418.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carson RT, Flores NA, Meade NF. 2001. Contingent valuation: controversies and evidence. Environmental and Resource Economics 19: 173–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casey JF. 2006. Are tourists willing to pay additional fees to protect corals in Mexico. Selected works of James F Casey. Available at http://works.bepress.com/james_casey/7/ [accessed 18 May 2012].
   Google Scholar
• Celliers L, Schleyer MH. 2008. Coral community structure and risk assessment of high-latitude reefs at Sodwana Bay, South Africa. Biodiversity and Conservation 17: 3097–3117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CEPF (Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund). 2010. Ecosystem profile: Maputaland-Pondoland-Albany biodiversity hotspot. Prepared by Conservation International Southern African Hotspots Programme, South African National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria.
   Google Scholar
• Cottrell A. 2011. Regression analysis: basic concepts. Winston-Salem, North Carolina: Wake Forest University. Available at http://user.wfu.edu/cottrell/ecn215/regress.pdf [accessed 10 August 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Depondt F, Green E. 2006. Diving user fees and the financial stability of marine protected areas: opportunities and impediments. Ocean & Coastal Management 49: 188–202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixon JA, Scura LF, van't Hof T. 2000. An economic and ecological analysis of the Bonaire Marine Park. In: Cesar HSJ (ed.), Collected essays on the economics of coral reefs. Sweden: Klamar University. pp 158–165.
   Google Scholar
• Dixon JA, Sherman PB. 1991. Economics of protected areas. Ambio 20: 68–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DNAC (Direcção Nacional De Áreas De Conservaçáo). 2010. Ponta Do Ouro Partial Marine Reserve management plan, first edition. Ministry of Tourism, Maputo.
   Google Scholar
• DNAC (Direcção Nacional De Áreas De Conservaçáo). 2012. Ponta Do Ouro Partial Marine Reserve user data. Ministry of Tourism, Maputo.
   Google Scholar
• Fernihough A. 2011. Simple logit and probit marginal effects in R. UCD centre for economic research, working paper series. University College Dublin, Dublin.
   Google Scholar
• Floros C, Schleyer MH, Maggs JQ, Celliers L. 2012. Baseline assessment of high-latitude coral reef fish communities in southern Africa. African Journal of Marine Science 34: 55–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox J. 2002. Bootstrapping regression models. Appendix to: Fox J, Weisberg HS (eds), An R companion to applied regression. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin H, Kent I, Parker K, Walpole M. 1997. Tourism, conservation and sustainable development: Volume III, Komodo National Park Indonesia. Final report. Durrell Institute of Conservation Ecology, Canterbury.
   Google Scholar
• Guerreiro J, Chircop A, Dzidzornu D, Grilo C, Ribeiro R, van der Elst R, Viras A. 2011. The role of international environmental instruments in enhancing transboundary marine protected areas: an approach in East Africa. Marine Policy 35: 95–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoetker G. 2007. The use of logit and probit models in strategic management research: critical issues. Strategic Management Journal 28: 331–343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemmerly JD, Macfarlane V. 2009. The elements of a consumer-based initiative in contributing to positive environmental change: Monterey Bay Aquarium's Seafood Watch program. Zoo Biology 28: 398–411.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindberg K. 2001. Protected area visitor fees overview. Cooperative Research Centre for Sustainable Tourism, Gold Coast, Queensland.
   Google Scholar
• Lindsey G, Holmes A. 2002. Tourist support for marine protection in Nha Trang, Viet Nam. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 45: 461–480.
   Google Scholar
• McFadden D. 1974. The measurement of urban travel demand. Journal of Public Economics 3: 303–328.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell RC, Carson RT. 1989. Using surveys to value public goods: the contingent valuation method. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
   Google Scholar
• Nagler J. 1994. Interpreting probit analysis. Available at http://www.nyu.edu/classes/nagler/quant2/notes/probit1.pdf [accessed 5 August 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Pearce D, Moran D. 1994. The economic value of biodiversity. London: Earthscan Publications, Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Pereira M. 2003. Recreational SCUBA diving and reef conservation in southern Mozambique. MSc thesis, University of Natal, South Africa.
   Google Scholar
• Pereira M, Schleyer MH. 2005. A diver and diving survey in southern Mozambique. In: Souter D, Lindén O (eds), Coral reef degradation in the Indian Ocean. Status Report 2005. Sweden: Kalmar University.
   Google Scholar
• Peters H, Hawkins JP. 2009. Access to marine parks: a comparative study in willingness to pay. Ocean & Coastal Management 52: 219–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. 2013. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available at http://www.R-project.org/ [accessed 5 August 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Rowe RD, Schulze WD, Breffle WS. 1996. A test for payment card biases. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 31: 178–185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiller BR. 2003. The micro economy today. Boston: McGraw-Hill Irwin.
   Google Scholar
• Seenprachawong U. 2003. Economic valuation of coral reefs at Phi Phi Islands, Thailand. International Journal of Global Environmental Issues 3: 104–114.
   Google Scholar
• Shultz S, Pinazzo J, Cifuentes M. 1998. Opportunities and limitations of contingent valuation surveys to determine national park entrance fees: evidence from Costa Rica. Environment and Development Economics 3: 131–149.
   Google Scholar
• Spash CL. 1997. Ethics and environmental attitudes with implications for economic valuation. Journal of Environmental Management 50: 403–416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tapsuwan S, Asafu-Adjaye J. 2008. Estimating the economic benefit of SCUBA diving in the Similan Islands, Thailand. Coastal Management 36: 431–442.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thur SM. 2010. User fees as sustainable financing mechanisms for marine protected areas: an application to the Bonaire National Marine Park. Marine Policy 34: 63–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNESCO. 2008. Nomination for Ponta Do Ouro Protected Marine Area for inscription on world heritage list. Submitted by National Directorate for Culture, Ministry of Education and Culture, Mozambique, on 20 August 2008. Available at http://whc.unesco.org/en/tentativelists/5382/ [accessed 5 August 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Walpole MJ, Goodwin HJ, Ward KGR. 2001. Pricing policy for tourism in protected areas: lessons from Komodo National Park, Indonesia. Conservation Biology 15: 218–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White PCL, Jennings NV, Renwick AR, Barker NHL. 2005. Questionnaires in ecology: a review of past use and recommendations for best practice. Journal of Applied Ecology 42: 421–430.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whittington D, Pagiola S. 2012. Using contingent valuation in the design of payments for environmental services mechanisms: a review and assessment. The World Bank Research Observer 27: 261–287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WWF (World Wildlife Fund) South Africa. 2013. Marine protected areas [online]. Available at http://www.wwf.org.za/what_we_do/marine/mpas/ [accessed 5 July 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Yeo B. 2005. The recreational benefits of coral reefs: a case study of Pulau Payar Marine Park, Kedah, Malaysia. In: Ahmed M, Chong C, Cesar H (eds), Economic valuation and policy priorities for sustainable management of coral reefs. Malaysia: WorldFish Center. pp 108–117.
   Google Scholar