Potential density and tree survival: an analysis based on South African spacing studies

References

• Álvarez-González JG, Rodríguez Soalleiro R, Vega Alonso G. 1999. Elaboración de un modelo de crecimiento dinámico para rodales regulares de Pinus pinaster Ait. en Galicia. Investigación Agraria: Sistemas y Recursos Forestales 8: 319–334.
   Google Scholar
• Bredenkamp BV. 1984. The CCT concept in spacing research – a review. In: Grey DC, Schö nau APG, Schutz CJ (eds), Proceedings: symposium on site and productivity of fast growing plantations, Pretoria and Pietermaritzburg, South Africa, 30 April–11 May 1984, vol. 1. Pretoria: South African Forest Research Institute and Department of Environmental Affairs. pp 313–332.
   Google Scholar
• Bredenkamp BV. 1990. The Triple-S CCT design. In: Gadow K, Bredenkamp BV (eds), Management of Eucalyptus grandis in South Africa. Stellenbosch: Forest Mensuration and Modelling Working Group. pp 198–205.
   Google Scholar
• Bredenkamp BV, Kotze H, Kassier H. 2000. The Langepan CCT. A guide to a correlated curve trend spacing experiment in Eucalyptus grandis at Kwambonambi, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. 32 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Burgers TF.. 1976. Management graphs derived from the correlated (CCT) projects: South Africa. Forest Research Institute Bulletin 54. Pretoria: Department of Forestry.
   Google Scholar
• Clutter JL, Jones EP Jr. 1980. Prediction of growth after thinning in old-field slash pine plantations. USDA Forest Service Research Paper SE-217. Asheville: Southeastern Forest Experiment Station.
   Google Scholar
• Cox DR, Oakes D. 1984. Analysis of survival data. London: Chapman and Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Craib IJ. 1939. Thinning, pruning and management studies on the main exotic conifers grown in South Africa. Pretoria: Govt. Printer.
   Google Scholar
• Dickel M, Kotze H, Gadow K von, Zucchini W. 2010. Growth and survival of Eucalyptus grandis – a study based on modeling lifetime distributions. International Journal of Mathematical and Computational Forestry and Natural-Resource Sciences 2(2): 20–30.
   Google Scholar
• Fahrmeir L. 2007. Lebensdauer- und Ereignisanalyse. Vorlesungsskript. München: Institut für Statistik, Ludwig-Maximilians- Universität [in German].
   Google Scholar
• Gadow K von, Hui GY. 1993. Stammzahlentwicklung und potentielle Bestandesdichte bei Cunninghamia lanceolata. Centralblatt für das gesamte Forstwesen 110(2): 41–48.
   Google Scholar
• Gadow K von. 1986. Observations on self-thinning in pine plantations. South African Journal of Science 82: 364–368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gadow K von. 1987. Untersuchungen zur Konstruktion von Wuchsmodellen für schnellwüchsige Plantagenbaumarten. Forstliche Forschungsberichte, Universität München 77.
   Google Scholar
• García O. 2003. Dimensionality reduction in growth models: an example. Forest Biometry, Modelling and Information Sciences 1: 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Hilmi GF. 1957. Theoretical bio-geo physics of forest. Moscow: AN SSSR [in Russian].
   Google Scholar
• Hynynen J. 1993. Self-thinning models for even-aged stands of Pinus sylvestris, Picea abies and Betula pendula. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 8: 326–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein JP, Moeschberger ML. 1997. Survival analysis: techniques for censored and truncated data. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kouba J. 2002. Das Leben des Waldes und seine Lebensunsicherheit. Forstwissenschaftliches Centralblatt 121: 211–228 [in German, with English summary].
   Google Scholar
• Luyssaert S, Schulze ED, Börner A, Knohl A, Hessenmöller D, Law BE, Ciais P, Grace J. 2008. Oldgrowth forests as global carbon sinks. Nature 455: 213–215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh EK. 1957. Some preliminary results from O'Connor's correlated curve trend (CCT) experiments on thinning and espacements and their practical significance. Commonwealth Forestry Conference, Australia and New Zealand, 1957. Pretoria: Government Printer.
   Google Scholar
• Nilson A. 2006. Modeling dependence between the number of trees and mean tree diameter of stands, stand density and stand sparsity. In: Cieszewski CJ, Strub M (eds), Second International Conference on Forest Measurement and Quantitative Methods and Management and the 2004 Southern Mensurationists Meeting, 15–18 June 2004, Hot Springs, Arkansas. Athens: University of Georgia. pp 74–94.
   Google Scholar
• O'Connor AJ. 1935. Forest research with special reference to planting distances and thinning. Pretoria: Government Printer.
   Google Scholar
• O'Connor AJ. 1960. Thinning research. Journal of the South African Forestry Association 34: 65–88.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver CD, Larson BC. 1996. Forest stand dynamics. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Pienaar V, Shiver B. 1981. Survival functions for site-prepared slash pine plantations in the flatwoods of Georgia and northern Florida. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry 5: 59–62.
   Google Scholar
• Pretzsch H. 2001. Modellierung des Waldwachstums. Berlin: Parey Buchverlag.
   Google Scholar
• Reineke LH. 1933. Perfecting a stand density index for even-aged forests. Journal of Agricultural Research 46: 627–638.
   Google Scholar
• Shvidenko AZ, Schepaschenko DG, Nilson S, Buluy YuI. 2006. Tables and models of growth and productivity of forests of major forest forming species of northern Eurasia. Vienna: Ministry of Natural Resources, Federal Agency of Forest Management, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.
   Google Scholar
• Skovsgaard JP. 1997. Tyndingsfri drift af sitkagran. Forskningsserien 19. Hørsholm: Forskningcentret for Skov & Landskab.
   Google Scholar
• Staupendahl K. 2011. Modellierung der Überlebenswahrscheinlichkeit von Waldbeständen mithilfe der neu parametrisierten Weibull- Funktion. Forstarchiv 82: 10–19 [in German, with English summary].
   Google Scholar
• Staupendahl K, Zucchini W. 2011. Schätzung von Überlebensfunktionen der Hauptbaumarten auf der Basis von Zeitreihendaten der Rheinland-Pfälzischen Waldzustandserhebung. Allgemeine Forst- und Jagdzeitung 182(7/8): 129–145 [in German, with summaries in English and French].
   Google Scholar
• Sterba H. 1975. Assmanns Theorie der Grundflächenhaltung und die “Competition-Density-Rule” der Japaner Kira, Ando und Tadaki. Centralblatt für das gesamte Forstwesen 92: 46–62.
   Google Scholar
• van Laar A. 1982. The response of Pinus radiata to initial spacing. South African Forestry Journal 121: 52–63.
   Google Scholar
• Vanclay JK. 1995. Growth models for tropical forests: a synthesis of models and methods. Forest Science 41: 7–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weibull W. 1951. A statistical distribution of wide applicability. Journal of Applied Mechanics 18: 293–297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoda K, Kira T, Ogawa H, Hozumi K. 1963. Self thinning in overcrowded pure stands under cultivated and natural conditions. Journal of Biology, Osaka City University 14: 107–132.
   Google Scholar
• Zeide B. 1985. Tolerance and self tolerance of trees. Forest Ecology and Management 13: 149–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeide B. 1987. Analysis of the 3/2 power law of self thinning. Forest Science 33: 517–537.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeide B. 2004. How to measure stand density. Trees 19: 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar