Use of hydrogels in the planting of industrial wood plantations

References

• Abedi-Koupai J, Asadkazemi J. 2006. Effects of a hydrophilic polymer on an ornamental plant (Cupressus arizonca) under reduced irrigation regimes. Iranian Polymer Journal 15: 715–725.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agaba H, Orikiriza LJB, Esegu JFO, Obua J, Kabasa JD, Hüttermann A. 2010. Effects of hydrogel amendment to different soils on plant available water and survival of trees under drought conditions. Clean – Soil, Air, Water 38: 328–335. doi: 10.1002/clen.200900245
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Darby AM. 1996. The hydraulic properties of a sandy soil treated with gel-forming soil conditioner. Soil Technology 9: 15–28. doi: 10.1016/0933-3630(95)00030-5
   Google Scholar
• Al-Humaid AI, Moftah AE. 2007. Effects of hydrophilic polymer on the survival of buttonwood seedlings grown under drought stress. Journal of Plant Nutrition 30: 53–66. doi: 10.1080/01904160601054973
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allan R, Carlson C. 1998. Report on Trial SP96/03: an investigation into the re-establishment of severely burnt sites. ICFR Bulletin Series no. 10/98. Pietermaritzburg: Institute for Commercial Forestry Research.
   Google Scholar
• Anon. 2014. Stockosorb® 660 material safety data sheet. SDSD ID CR-166. Available at http://www.agrian.com/pdfs/Stockosorb®_660_MSDS2.pdf [accessed 15 December 2015].
   Google Scholar
• Apostol KG, Jacobs DF, Dumroese RK. 2009. Root desiccation and drought stress responses of bareroot Quercus rubra seedlings treated with a hydrophilic polymer root dip. Plant and Soil 315: 229–240. doi: 10.1007/s11104-008-9746-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azzam RAI. 1980. Agricultural polymers: polyacrylamide preparation, application and prospects in soil conditioning. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 11: 767–834. doi: 10.1080/00103628009367081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayley A. 1995. Effect of superabsorbent Stockosorb® on survival and establishment of Pinus patula seedlings. Internal trial report PP1/94. Howick: Sappi Forests Research, Shaw Research Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Beniwal RS, Hooda MS, Polle A. 2011. Amelioration of planting stress by soil amendment with a hydrogel-mycorrhiza mixture for early establishment of beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) seedlings. Annals of Forest Science 68: 803–810. doi: 10.1007/s13595-011-0077-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhardwaj AK, Shainberg I, Goldstein D, Warrington DN, Levy GJ. 2007. Water retention and hydraulic conductivity of cross-linked polyacrylamides in sandy soil. Soil Science Society of America Journal 71: 406–412. doi: 10.2136/sssaj2006.0138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boczoń A, Wróbel M, Ptach W. 2009. Effects of hydrogel application on growth of seedlings on unproductive forest areas. Ekologija 55: 9–19. doi: 10.2478/v10055-009-0002-z
   Google Scholar
• Boden DI. 1986. Use of soil additives with planting. In: ICFR Annual Research Report 1986. Pietermaritzburg: Institute for Commercial Forestry Research. pp 48–49.
   Google Scholar
• Bouranis DL, Theodoropoulos AG, Drossopoulos JB. 1995. Designing synthetic polymers as soil conditioners. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 26: 1455–1480. doi: 10.1080/00103629509369384
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowman DC, Evans RY, Paul JL. 1990. Fertilizer salts reduce hydration of polyacrylamide gels and affect physical properties of gel-amended container media. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 115: 382–386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burdett AN. 1990. Physiological processes in plantation establishment and the development of specifications for forest planting stock. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 20: 415–427. doi: 10.1139/x90-059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burdett AN, Simpson DG, Thompson CF. 1983. Root development and plantation establishment success. Plant and Soil 71: 103–110. doi: 10.1007/BF02182645
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chirino E, Vilagrosa A, Vallejo VR. 2011. Using hydrogel and clay to improve the water status of seedlings for dryland restoration. Plant and Soil 344: 99–110. doi: 10.1007/s11104-011-0730-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Close DC, Beadle CL, Brown PH. 2005. The physiological basis of containerised tree seedling ‘transplant shock’: a review. Australian Forestry 68: 112–120. doi: 10.1080/00049158.2005.10674954
   Google Scholar
• Crous JW. 2013. Effect of slash management and fertilisation on one-year growth of Eucalyptus grandis × E. urophylla in Zululand (LM0091 & LM0092). Technical Report 14/2013. Howick: Sappi Forests Research, Shaw Research Centre.
   Google Scholar
• del Campo AD, Hermoso J, Flors J, Lidón A, Mavarro-Cerrillo RM. 2011. Nursery location and potassium enrichment in Aleppo pine stock 2. Performance under real and hydrogel-mediated drought conditions. Forestry 84: 235–245. doi: 10.1093/forestry/cpr009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubrovskii SA, Afanas’eva MV, Lagutina MA, Kazanskii KS. 1990. Comprehensive characterization of superabsorbent polymer hydrogels. Polymer Bulletin 24: 107–113. doi: 10.1007/BF00298329
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ðurović N, Pivić R, Poćuća V. 2012. Effects of the application of hydrogel in different soils. Agriculture and Forestry 53: 25–34.
   Google Scholar
• du Toit B, Smith CW, Little KM, Boreham G, Pallett RN. 2010. Intensive, site-specific silviculture: manipulating resource availability at establishment for improved stand productivity. A review of South African research. Forest Ecology and Management 259: 1836–1845. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2009.07.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekebafe LO, Ogbeifun DE, Okieimen FE. 2011. Polymer applications in agriculture. Biokemistri 23: 81–89.
   Google Scholar
• Evonik Stockhausen. 2005. STOCKOSORB® 660 technical data sheet. Available at http://wwwevonik/super-absorbant/Stockosorb_660%20pdf.pdf [accessed 6 January 2016].
   Google Scholar
• Fonteno WC, Bilderback TE. 1993. Impact of hydrogel on physical properties of coarse-structured horticultural substrates. Journal of the American Society of Horticultural Science 118: 217–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frantz JM, Locke JC, Pitchay DS, Krause CR. 2005. Actual performance versus theoretical advantages of polyacrylamide hydrogel throughout bedding plant production. HortScience 40: 2040–2046.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghebru MG, du Toit ES, Steyn JM. 2007. Water and nutrient retention by AquaSoil® and Stockosorb® polymers. South African Journal of Plant and Soil 24: 32–36. doi: 10.1080/02571862.2007.10634778
   Google Scholar
• Grossnickle SC. 2005. Importance of root growth in overcoming planting stress. New Forests 30: 273–294. doi: 10.1007/s11056-004-8303-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hüttermann A, Reise K, Zommorodi M, Wang S. 1997. The use of hydrogels for the afforestation of difficult stands: water and salt stress. In: Zhou H, Weisgerber H (eds), Afforestation in semi-arid regions: findings and perspectives. Proceedings: International Symposium in the People’s Republic of China, Datong/Jinshatan, 1–6 June 1997. pp 167–174.
   Google Scholar
• Hüttermann A, Zommorodi M, Reise K. 1999. Addition of hydrogels to soil for prolonging the survival of Pinus halepensis seedlings subject to drought. Soil and Tillage Research 50: 295–304. doi: 10.1016/S0167-1987(99)00023-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• John GF. 2011. Towards improved application of super absorbent polymers in agriculture and hydrology: a cross-disciplinary approach. MSc thesis, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Lamont GP, O’Connell MA. 1987. Shelf-life of bedding plants as influenced by potting media and hydrogels. Scientia Horticulturae 31: 141–149. doi: 10.1016/0304-4238(87)90116-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landis TD, Haase DL. 2012. Application of hydrogels in the nursery and during outplanting. In: Haase DL, Pinto JR, Riley LE (tech. coords), National Proceedings: Forest and Conservation Nursery Associations – 2011. Proceedings RMRS-P-68. Fort Collins: USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. pp 53–58. Available at: http://www.fs.fed.us/rm/pubs/rmrs_p068.html
   Google Scholar
• Luo ZB, Li K, Jiang X, Polle A. 2009. Ectomycorrhizal fungus (Paxillus involutus) and hydrogels affect performance of Populus euphratica exposed to drought stress. Annals of Forest Science 66: 106–116. doi: 10.1051/forest:2008073
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magnussen S. 1986. Effects of root coating with the polymer Water Lock® on survival and growth of drought-stressed bareroot seedlings of white spruce (Picea glauca (Moench) Voss) and red pine (Pinus resinosa Ait.). Tree Planter’s Notes 37: 15–17.
   Google Scholar
• Mena-Petite, A, Ortega-Lasuen U, González-Moro MB, Lacuesta M, Muñoz-Rueda A. 2001. Storage duration and temperature effect on the functional integrity of container and bare-root Pinus radiata D. Don stock-types. Trees 15: 289–296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mikkelsen RL. 1994. Using hydrophilic polymers to control nutrient release. Fertilizer Research 38: 53–59. doi: 10.1007/BF00750062
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moslemi Z, Habibi D, Asgharzadeh A, Ardakani MR, Mohammadi A, Sakari A. 2012. Effects of super absorbent polymer and plant growth promoting rhizobacteria on yield and yield components of maize under drought stress and normal conditions. American-Eurasian Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Science 12: 358–364.
   Google Scholar
• Narjary B, Aggarwal P, Singh A, Chakraborty D, Singh R. 2012. Water availability in different soils in relation to hydrogel application. Geoderma 187–188: 94–101. doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2012.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orikiriza LJB, Agaba H, Tweheyo M, Eilu G, Kabasa JD, Hüttermann A. 2009. Amending soils with hydrogels increases the biomass of nine tree species under non-water stress conditions. Clean – Soil, Air, Water 37: 615–620. doi: 10.1002/clen.200900128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oscroft DG, Little KM, Viero PWM. 2000. The effect of a soil-amended hydrogel on the establishment of Pinus elliottii × caribaea rooted cuttings on the Zululand coastal sands. ICFR Bulletin Series no. 19/2000. Pietermaritzburg: Institute for Commercial Forestry Research.
   Google Scholar
• Pallett RN, Sale G, Morris AR. 2001. An assessment of the benefit of water and a super-absorbent hydrogel application on plant survival eight weeks after planting. Research Document 02/2011. Howick: Sappi Forests Research, Shaw Research Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Plant Health Care. 2005. Terra-Sorb®. Available at https://classygroundcovers.com/pdfs/TerraSorb_additional_info.pdf [accessed 6 January 2016].
   Google Scholar
• Ritchie GA, Landis TD. 2010. Assessing plant quality. In: Landis TD, Dumroese RK, Haase DL (eds), The container tree nursery manual. Vol. 7: Seedling processing, storage and outplanting. Agriculture Handbook 674. Washington, DC: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. pp 17–80.
   Google Scholar
• Rolando CA. 2008. The physiology of Pinus patula seedlings in response to water stress and the implications for plantation regeneration in South Africa. PhD thesis, University of KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.
   Google Scholar
• Rolando CA, Hitchins M, Olivier S. 2006. Methods to improve late season planting of Pinus patula: results up to six months after planting. ICFR Bulletin Series no. 08/2006. Pietermaritzburg: Institute for Commercial Forestry Research.
   Google Scholar
• Rowe EC, Williamson JC, Jones DL, Holliman P, Healey JR. 2005. Initial tree establishment on blocky quarry waste ameliorated with hydrogel or slate processing fines. Journal of Environmental Quality 34: 994–1003. doi: 10.2134/jeq2004.0287
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiz RF. 1999. The effect of water soil and Stockosorb® on Pinus patula seedling development. BSc(Hons) project report. Stellenbosch: Department of Silviculture, Faculty of Forestry, University of Stellenbosch.
   Google Scholar
• Sarvaš M. 2003. Effect of desiccation on the root system of Norway spruce (Picea abies [L.] Karst.) seedlings and a possibility of using hydrogel Stockosorb® for its protection. Journal of Forest Science 49: 531–536.
   Google Scholar
• Sarvaš M, Pavlenda P, Takáčová E. 2007. Effect of hydrogel application on survival and growth of pine seedlings in reclamations. Journal of Forest Science 53: 204–209.
   Google Scholar
• Savé R, Pery M, Marfà O, Serrano L. 1995. The effect of a hydrophilic polymer on plant water status and survival of transplanted pine seedlings. HortTechnology 5: 141–143.
   Google Scholar
• Šijačić-Nikolić M, Vilotić D, Milovanović J. 2011. Effect of polymers on Scots pine (Pinus silvestris L.) and Austrian pine (Pinus nigra Arn.) seedling development in afforestation. Global Journal of Biodiversity Science and Management 1: 11–18.
   Google Scholar
• Sloan JP. 1994. The use of root dips on North American conifer seedlings: a review of the literature. Tree Planter’s Notes 45: 26–31.
   Google Scholar
• Starkey TE, Enebak SA, South DB, Cross RE. 2012. Particle size and composition of polymer root gels affect loblolly pine seedling survival. Native Plants Journal 13: 19–26. doi: 10.3368/npj.13.1.19
   Google Scholar
• Starkey TE, South DB. 2009. From lifting to planting: Root dip treatments affect survival of Loblolly pine (Pinus taeda). In: Dumroese RK, Riley LE (tech. coords), National Proceedings: Forest and Conservation Nursery Associations – 2008. Proceedings RMRS-P-58. Fort Collins: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. pp 90–94.
   Google Scholar
• Theron JM. 1994a. The effect of a superabsorbent polymer on the growth of potted Pinus radiata. Wood Southern Africa and Timber Times 19(1): 14–15.
   Google Scholar
• Theron JM. 1994b. The comparison of the effectiveness of available super-absorbents on shoot and root biomass of Pinus radiata. Internal report. Stellenbosch: Faculty of Forestry, University of Stellenbosch.
   Google Scholar
• Theron JM. 1998. A comparative study of the effectiveness of different Stockosorb® products on the growth of potted Pinus radiata. Draft report. Stellenbosch: Faculty of Forestry, University of Stellenbosch.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas DS. 2008. Hydrogel applied to the root plug of subtropical eucalypt seedlings halves transplant death following planting. Forest Ecology and Management 255: 1305–1314. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2007.10.035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas DS, Heagney GA. 2011. A root drench in unsaturated hydrogel solution reduced stress in transplanted Eucalyptus pilularis cuttings but was ineffective for seedlings: a glasshouse experiment. Australian Forestry 74: 133–140. doi: 10.1080/00049158.2011.10676355
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viero PWM. 2002. The effect of a soil-amending hydrogel on Eucalyptus grandis establishment practices in the Zululand forestry region. MTech dissertation, Port Elizabeth Technikon, South Africa.
   Google Scholar
• Viero PWM, Chiswell KEA, Theron JM. 2002. The effect of soil-amended hydrogel on the establishment of a Eucalyptus grandis clone on a sandy clay loam in Zululand during winter. Southern African Forestry Journal 193: 65–75. doi: 10.1080/20702620.2002.10433519
   Google Scholar
• Viero PWM, Little KM. 2003. Influence of a hydrogel on initial eucalypt growth and root development: results from a pot trial. ICFR Bulletin Series no. 14/2003. Pietermaritzburg: Institute for Commercial Forestry Research.
   Google Scholar
• Viero PWM, Little KM. 2006. A comparison of different planting methods, including hydrogels and their effect on eucalypt survival and initial growth in South Africa. Southern African Forestry Journal 208: 5–13. doi: 10.2989/10295920609505256
   Google Scholar
• Viero PWM, Little KM, Oscroft DG. 2000. The effect of a soil-amended hydrogel on the establishment of a Eucalyptus grandis × E. camaldulensis clone grown on the sandy soils of Zululand. Southern African Forestry Journal 188: 21–28. doi: 10.1080/10295925.2000.9631266
   Google Scholar
• Viero PWM, Rolando C, Little KM. 2008. The interaction between water availability and pit size on early eucalypt survival and growth. ICFR Bulletin Series no. 10/2008. Pietermaritzburg: Institute for Commercial Forestry Research.
   Google Scholar
• Wang YT, Greg LL. 1990. Hydrophilic polymers - their response to soil amendments and effect on properties of a soilless potting mix. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 115: 943–948.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodhouse JM, Johnson MS. 1991. Effects of soluble salts and fertilizers on water storage by gelforming soil conditioners. Acta Horticulturae 294: 261–270. doi: 10.17660/ActaHortic.1991.294.28
   Google Scholar
• Yu J, Shainberg I, Yan YL, Shi JG, Levy GJ, Mamedov AI. 2011. Superabsorbents and semiarid soil properties affecting water absorption. Soil Science Society of America Journal 75: 2305–2313. doi: 10.2136/sssaj2010.0397
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu J, Shi JG, Dang PF, Mamedov AI, Shainberg I, Levy GJ. 2012. Soil and polymer properties affecting water retention by superabsorbent polymers under drying conditions. Soil Science Society of America Journal 76: 1758–1767. doi: 10.2136/sssaj2011.0387
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zohuriaan-Mehr MJ, Kabiri K. 2008. Superabsorbent polymer materials: a review. Iranian Polymer Journal 17: 451–447.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zohuriaan-Mehr MJ, Omidian H, Doroudiani S, Kabiri K. 2010. Advances in non-hygienic applications of superabsorbent hydrogel material. Journal of Materials Science 45: 5711–5735. doi: 10.1007/s10853-010-4780-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar