Students Turned Off by Turnitin? Perception of Plagiarism and Collusion by Undergraduate Bioscience Students

References

• AhluwaliaJ. (2009) Teaching a Dyslexic Student: A Personal View how Critical Incident Analysis can be used as an Effective Pedagogical Tool in Undergraduate Biosciences. Bioscience Education, 14-4.
   Google Scholar
• AshworthP., BannisterP., and ThorneP. (1997) Guilty in whose eyes? University students perceptions of cheating and plagiarism in academic work and assessment. Studies in Higher Education, 22 (2), 187-203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BadgeL. J., CannJ., A., and ScottJ. (2007) To cheat or not to cheat? A trial of the JISC plagiarism detection service with biological sciences students. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 32 (4) 1-7
   Google Scholar
• BiggsJ. (1999) Teaching for quality learning at university: what the student does. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• BloomB. S. (1956) Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals; pp. 201-207. Susan Fauer Company, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• CubberleyE. P. (2005) The History of Education. Available online through Project Gutenberg at: www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/7521 (accessed 3rd July 2010)
   Google Scholar
• DawsonM. M., and OverfieldA. J. (2006) Plagiarism: Do students know what it is? Bioscience Education E-Journal 8-1 available at www.bioscience.heacademy.ac.uk/journal/vol8/beej-8-1.aspx (accessed 3 July 2010)
   Google Scholar
• EllingtonH., and EarlS. (1996) How to plan and deliver lectures. A course booklet for the Postgraduate Certificate in Tertiary-Level Teaching (Aberdeen, The Robert Gordon University). Available online at: www.nalanda.nitc.ac.in/misc/general/ciced/Ch05.html (accessed 16 June 2010)
   Google Scholar
• FreireP. (1970) Pedagogy of the oppressed (New York, Continuum Publishing Company). Chapter 2 available at www.marxists.org/subject/education/index.htm (accessed 3rd July 2010)
   Google Scholar
• GottR., and DugganS. (2007) A framework for practical work in science and scientific literacy through argumentation. Research in Science & Technological Education, 25 (3) 271-291
   Google Scholar
• JensonJ., and De Castell. S. (2004) ‘Turn it in’: Technological challenges to academic ethics. Education, Communication and Information 4, (2-3) 311-330
   Google Scholar
• JonesE. S. (2007) Reflections on the lecture: outmoded medium or instrument of inspiration? Journal of Further and Higher Education, 31 (4) 397-406, available at http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/section?content=a782969406&fulltext=713240928 (accessed 3 July 2010)
   Google Scholar
• KolbD. (1984) Experiential Learning; experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, Prentice Hall
   Google Scholar
• LedwithA., and Risquez. A. 2008. Using anti-plagiarism software to promote academic honesty in the context of peer reviewed assignments. Studies in Higher Education 33 (4) 371-384
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LoudenW. (1991). Understanding Teaching: Continuity and Change in Teachers’ Knowledge. London, Cassell
   Google Scholar
• PalincsarA. S., and BrownA. (1984) Reciprocal Teaching of Comprehension-Fostering and Comprehension Monitoring Activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1 117-175
   Google Scholar
• PiagetJ. (1975) The development of thought: equilibration of cognitive structure. New York, Viking Press
   Google Scholar
• PinkerS. (2002) The blank slate. Penguin Books, London
   Google Scholar
• Quality Assurance Agency. September (2006) Code of practice for the assurance of academic quality and standards in higher education, Section 6: assessment of students. Available at www.qaa.ac.uk/academicinfrastructure/codeOfPractice/section6/default.asp#p15 (Accessed June 2010)
   Google Scholar
• RolfeV. (2010) Can Turnitin be used to provide instant formative feedback? British Journal of Educational Technology, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01091
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SutherlandP., and BadgerR. (2004) Lecturers’ perceptions of lectures, Journal of Further and Higher Education, 28, 277-289
   Google Scholar
• Sutherland-SmithW., and Carr. D. (2005) Turnitin.com: Teachers’ perspectives of anti-plagiarism software in raising issues of educational integrity. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice 3, (1b) 94-101
   Google Scholar
• VygotskyL. S. (1978) Mind in society: the development of psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press
   Google Scholar
• WalkerJ. (1998) Student plagiarism in universities: What are we doing about it? Higher Education Research and Development 17, (1) 89-106
   Google Scholar
• WalkerJ. (2010) Measuring plagiarism; researching what students do, not what they say they do. Studies in Higher Education 35, (1) 41-59
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WheelerG. (2009) Plagiarism in the Japanese universities: Truly a cultural matter? Journal of Second Language Writing, 18, (1) 17-29
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WoodD., BrunerJ.S., and RossG. (1976) The role of tutoring in problem solving, Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17 89-100
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ZwagermanS. (2008) The Scarlet P: Plagiarism, panopticism, and the rhetoric of academic integrity. College Composition and Communication 59 (4) 676-710
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar