Effects of knowledge, education, and experience on acceptance of first trimester screening for chromosomal anomalies

References

• Steele MW, Breg WR Jr. Chromosome analysis of human amniotic-fluid cells. Lancet. 1966;1:383–5.
   Google Scholar
• Grant SS. Prenatal genetic screening. Online J Issues Nurs. 2000;5:2.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Merkatz IR, Nitowsky HM, Macri JN, Johnson WE. An association between low maternal serum alpha-fetoprotein and fetal chromosomal abnormalities. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1984;148:886–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spencer K. Aneuploidy screening in the first trimester. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2007;145C:18–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardardottir H. Fetal nuchal translucency measurement at 11–13 weeks and risk assessment for fetal aneuploidy and cardiac anomalies. Icelandic Med J. 2001;87:415–21.
   Google Scholar
• Foundation FM. Fetal Medicine Foundation. 2009. Available online at: http://www.fetalmedicine.com (accessed October 18, 2009).
   Google Scholar
• Tiran D. NICE guideline on antenatal care: routine care for the healthy pregnant woman–recommendations on the use of complementary therapies do not promote clinical excellence. Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2005;11:127–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Geirsson RT, Gardarsdóttir G, Palsson G, Bjarnadóttir RI, Hardardóttir H. Skýrsla frá faedingaskráningunni fyrir árid 2006. [Registration of births in Iceland in 2006]. Reykjavik: Landspitali-Haskolasjukrahus [Landspitali University Hospital]. 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Kristjansdottir H. Why do pregnant women attend ultrasound screening? Icelandic Med J. 2001;87:47–50.
   Google Scholar
• Etchegary H, Potter B, Howley H, Cappelli M, Coyle D, Graham I, The influence of experiential knowledge on prenatal screening and testing decisions. Genet Test. 2008;12:115–24.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tercyak KP, Johnson SB, Roberts SF, Cruz AC. Psychological response to prenatal genetic counseling and amniocentesis. Patient Educ Couns. 2001;43:73–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browner CH, Press N. The production of authoritative knowledge in American prenatal care. Med Anthropol Q. 1996;10:141–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santalahti P, Aro AR, Hemminki E, Helenius H, Ryynanen M. On what grounds do women participate in prenatal screening? Prenat Diagn. 1998;18:153–65.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohut RJ, Dewey D, Love EJ. Women's knowledge of prenatal ultrasound and informed choice. J Genet Couns. 2002;11:265–76.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Massey-Davis L. A woman's right not to choose. Pract Midwife. 1998;1:23–5.
   Google Scholar
• Spencer K. Second trimester prenatal screening for Down's syndrome using alpha-fetoprotein and free beta hCG: a seven year review. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1999;106:1287–93.
   Google Scholar
• Skirton H, Barr O. Antenatal screening and informed choice: a cross-sectional survey of parents and professionals. Midwifery. 2009; epub ahead of print.
   Google Scholar
• Organization WH. Proposed International Guidelines on Ethical Issues in Medical Genetics and Genetic Services (Part II). World Health Organization, Human Genetics Programme. Law Hum Genome Rev. 1998:239–51.
   Google Scholar
• Ministers Co. Recommendation No. R(92)3 of the Committee of Ministers to member states on genetic testing and screening for health care purposes. J Int Bioethique. 1992;3:255–7.
   Google Scholar
• Truog RD. Is “informed right of refusal” the same as "informed consent"? J Clin Ethics. 1996;7:87–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dormandy E, Hooper R, Michie S, Marteau TM. Informed choice to undergo prenatal screening: a comparison of two hospitals conducting testing either as part of a routine visit or requiring a separate visit. J Med Screen. 2002;9:109–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dormandy E, Michie S, Hooper R, Marteau TM. Informed choice in antenatal Down syndrome screening: a cluster-randomised trial of combined versus separate visit testing. Patient Educ Couns. 2006;61:56–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green JM, Hewison J, Bekker HL, Bryant LD, Cuckle HS. Psychosocial aspects of genetic screening of pregnant women and newborns: a systematic review. Health Technol Assess. 2004;8:iii, ix–x, 1–109.
   Google Scholar
• Gekas J, Gondry J, Mazur S, Cesbron P, Thepot F. Informed consent to serum screening for Down syndrome: are women given adequate information? Prenat Diagn. 1999;19:1–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van den Berg M, Timmermans DRM, ten Kate LP, van Vugt JMG, van der Wal G. Are pregnant women making informed choices about prenatal screening? Genet Med. 2005;7:332–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekelin M, Crang-Svalenius E. Midwives' attitudes to and knowledge about a newly introduced foetal screening method. Scand J Caring Sci. 2004;18:287–93.
   Google Scholar
• Jaques AM, Bell RJ, Watson L, Halliday JL. People who influence women's decisions and preferred sources of information about prenatal testing for birth defects. Aust NZ J Obstet Gynaecol. 2004;44:233–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stapleton H, Kirkham M, Thomas G. Qualitative study of evidence based leaflets in maternity care. BMJ. 2002;324:639.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marteau TM, Dormandy E, Michie S. A measure of informed choice. Health Expect. 2001;4:99–108.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Muller MA, Bleker OP, Bonse GJ, Bilardo CM. Women's opinions on the offer and use of nuchal translucency screening for Down syndrome. Prenatal Diagnosis. 2006;26:105–11.
   Google Scholar
• Iceland S. Informational statistics. 2006. Available online at: http://hagstofan.is/ (cited August 30, 2006).
   Google Scholar
• Plan on education and science. 2004. Available online at: http://formennska.forsaetisraduneyti.is/Aaetlun/Menntir_ogvisindi (cited December 12, 2006 and January 15, 2009).
   Google Scholar
• Thornton JG, Hewison J, Lilford RJ, Vail A. A randomised trial of three methods of giving information about prenatal testing. BMJ. 1995;311:1127–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar