Antenatal care in southern Sweden: A population-based prospective study describing the diagnostic panorama of pregnancy

References

• Lindmark G, Cnattingius S. The scientific basis of antenatal care. Report from a state‐of‐the‐art conference. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1991; 70: 105–9
   Google Scholar
• Effective care in pregnancy and childbirth. Volume I: Pregnancy, I Chalmers, M Enkin, M JNC Keirse. Oxford University Press, Oxford 1989
   Google Scholar
• National Board of Health and Welfare. Modra‐ och barnhälsovärd. Förslag till principprogram. (Antenatal and child health care. Principle programme.). Socialstyrelsen, Stockholm 1979, (Socialstyrclsen redovisar 1979: 4.) In Swedish
   Google Scholar
• Hein H A. Secrets from Sweden. J Am Med Assoc 1982; 247: 985–6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamper‐Jørgensen F, Bakketeig L S, Bergsjø P, et al. Perinatal omsorg i de nordiske lande. (Perinatal care in the Nordic countries.). DIKE/Munksgaard, København 1986
   Google Scholar
• Nordisk Medicinal‐Statistisk Kommitté. Fødsler i Norden. Medicinsk fødselsregistrering 1979–1983. (Births in the Nordic countries. Registration of the outcome of pregnancy 1979–1983.). NOMESKO, Reykjavik 1987
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology. Hälsoövervakning vid normal graviditet. Linköping: Arbets‐ och referensgruppen för mödrahälsovård. 1991, In Swedish
   Google Scholar
• Håkansson A. Antenatal care in general practice in Sweden I. A descriptive study of problems, measures and outcome in a defined population. Scand J Prim Health Care 1988; 6: 137–42
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Håkansson A. Op. cit.: II. A study of work allocation between district physician and obstetrician. Scand J Prim Health Care 1988; 6: 143–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Robson J, Boomla K, Savage W. Reducing delay in booking for antenatal care. J R Coll Gen Pract 1986; 36: 274–5
   Google Scholar
• Chng P K, Hall M H, MacGillivray I. An audit of antenatal care: the value of the first antenatal visit. Br Med J 1980; 281: 1184–6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Blondel B, Pusch D, Schmidt E. Some characteristics of antenatal care in 13 European countries. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1985; 92: 565–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Marsh G N. New programme of antenatal care in general practice. Br Med J 1985; 291: 646–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hall M H, Chng P K, Mac Gillivray I. Is routine antenatal care worth while?. Lancet 1980; ii: 78–80
   Google Scholar
• Abel E L. Smoking and pregnancy. J Psychoactive Drugs 1984; 16: 327–38
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McIntosh I D. Smoking and pregnancy: I. Maternal and placental risks. Public Health Rev 1984; 12: 1–28
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McIntosh I D. Op. cit.: II. Offspring risks. Public Health Rev 1984; 12: 29–63
   Google Scholar
• McIntosh I D. Op. cit.: Attributable risks and public health implications. Can J Public Health 1984; 75: 141–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lendahls L, Liljestrand J. Smoking during pregnancy in Blekinge 1984–88. Scand J Prim Health Care 1989; 7: 189–92
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Youngblood J P. Should ultrasound be used routinely during pregnancy? An affirmative view. J Fam Pract 1989; 29: 657–60
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ewigman B G. Should ultrasound be used routinely during pregnancy? An opposing view. J Fam Pract 1989; 29: 660–4
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. Having a baby in Europe. WHO Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen 1985
   Google Scholar
• Effectiveness and satisfaction in antenatal care, M Enkin, I Chalmers. William Heinemann Medical Books Ltd, London 1982, Spastics International Medical Publications. Clinics in developmental medicine Nos 81/82
   Google Scholar
• Pregnancy care for the 1980s, L Zander, G Chamberlain. Royal Society of Medicine and Macmillan Press Ltd, London 1984
   Google Scholar
• Hall M, Macintyre S, Porter M. Antenatal care assessed. Aberdeen University Press, Aberdeen 1985
   Google Scholar
• Jacobsen G. Antenatal care in general practice, Trondheim, Norway. Scand J Prim Health Care 1989; 7: 27–32
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Berg G, Hammar M, Möller‐Nielsen J, Lindén M, Thorblad J. Low back pain during pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 1988; 71: 71–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sydsjö A, Sydsjö G, Wijma B. Hög sjukfrånvaro under graviditeten trots väl utbyggt föräldraforsäkrings‐system. Läkartidningen 1989; 86: 4141–4, In Swedish
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fricker H S, Bruppacher R, Baltzer F, Bürgi W, Stoll W, Gugler E. Schwangerschaftsverlauf in einen repräsentativen Schweizer Kollektiv (Aaraur Schwanger‐schafts‐ und Neugeborenenstudie). III. Krankheiten und Medikamente in der Schwangerschaft. Schweiz Med Wochenschr 1985; 115: 441–7, In German, English summary
   Google Scholar
• Bergsjø P, Schmidt E, Pusch D. Differences in the reported frequencies of some obstetrical interventions in Europe. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1983; 90: 628–32
   Google Scholar
• Heringa M P, Huisjes H J. Antenatal care; current practice in debate. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1988; 95: 836–40
   Google Scholar
• Spencer B, Thomas H, Morris J. A randomized controlled trial on the provision of a social support service during pregnancy: the South Manchester Family Worker Project. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1989; 96: 281–8
   Google Scholar
• Oakley A, Rajan L, Grant A. Social support and pregnancy outcome. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1990; 97: 155–62
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Porter M, Macintyre S. What is, must be best: a research note on conservative or deferential responses to antenatal care provision. Soc Sci Med 1984; 19: 1197–1200
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar