References
- Bang T F, Schei B, Halgunset J. The use of uterine curettage in diagnosis of vaginal bleeding disorders (in Norwegian). Tidsskr- Nor Laegeforen 1991; 11: 2407–9
- Hammond R H. Diagnostic role of dilatation and curettage in the management of abnormal premenopausal bleeding. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1989; 96: 496–500
- Segadal E, Iversen O E. The Isaacs cell sampler: an alternative to curettage. Br Med J 1980; 281: 364–5
- Segadal E, Iversen O E. Endoscann, a new endometrial cell sampler. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1983; 90: 266–71
- Polson D W, Morse A, Beard R W. An alternative to the diagnostic dilatation and curettage - endometrial cytology. Br Med J 1984; 288: 981–3
- Mackenzie I Z. Routine outpatient diagnostic uterine curettage wing a flexible plastic aspiration curette. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1985; 92: 1291–6
- Bistoletti P, Hjerpe A, Möllerström G. Cytological diagnosis of endometrial cancer and preinvasive endometrial lesions. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1988; 67: 343–5
- Löfgren O, Alm P, Ionescu A, Skjerris J. Uterine microcurettage with combined endometrial histopathology and cytology. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1988; 67: 401–3
- Norusis M J. SPSS/PC +. SPSS inc, Chigaco 1986
- Chambers J T, Chambers S K. Endometrial sampling. When? Where? Why? With what?. Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology 1992; 35: 28–39
- Iversen O E, Segadal E. The value of endometrial cytology. A comparative study of the Gravlee Jet-Washer, Isaacs Cell sampler. and Endoscann versus curette in 600 patients. Obstetrics and Gynecological Survey 1985; 40: 14–20
- Granberg S, Wikland M, Karlsson B, Norström A, Friberg L G. Endometrial thickness as measured by endovaginal ultrasonography for identifying endometrial abnormality. Am J Gynecol 1991; 164: 47–52
- Smith P, Bakos O, Heimer G, Ulmsten U. Transvaginal ultrasound for identifying endometrial abnormality. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1991; 70: 59–14
- Fothergill D J, Brown V A, Hill A S. Histological sampling of the endometrium - a comparison between formal curettage and the Pipelle sampler. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1992; 99: 779–80