Paracervical Block-A Viable Alternative for Labor Pain Relief?

References

• Nyirjesy 1, Hawks B L, Hebert J E, Hopwood H G, Falls HC. Hazards of the use of paracervical block anesthesia in obstetrics. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1963; 15: 231–5
   Google Scholar
• Teramo K, Widholm O. Studies of the effect of anaesthetics on foetus. Part I. The Effect of paracervical block with mepivacaine upon foetal acid-base values. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1967; vol XLVI, supplement 2
   Google Scholar
• Shnider S M, Asling J H, Holl J W, Margolis AJ. Paracervical block anesthesia in obstetrics. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1970; 15: 619–25
   Google Scholar
• Jägerhorn M. Paracervical block in obstetrics. An improved injection method. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1975; 54: 9–27
   Google Scholar
• Meiss P J, Reisner L S, Payne T F, Hobel CJ. Bupivacaine paracervical block. Obstet Gynecol 1978; 52: 545–8
   Google Scholar
• Nesheim B-I. Which local anesthetic is best suited for paracervical blocks. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1983; 62: 261–4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen F, Qvist I, Brocks V, Secher N J, Westergaard LG. Submucous paracervical blockade compared with intramuscular meperidine as analgesia during labor: a double-blind study. Obstet Gynecol 1984; 64: 724–7
   Google Scholar
• LeFevre M L. Fetal heart rate pattern and postparacervical fetal bradycardia. Obstet Gynecol 1984; 64: 343–6
   Google Scholar
• Puolakka J, Jouppila R, Jouppila P, Puukka M. Maternal and fetal effects of low-dosage bupivacaine paracervical block. J Perinat Med 1984; 12: 75–84
   Google Scholar
• Grenman S, Erkkola R, Kanto J, Scheinin M, Viinamaki O, Lindberg R. Epidural and paracervical blockades in obstetrics. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1986; 65: 699–704
   Google Scholar
• Carlsson B-M, Johansson M, Westin B. Fetal heart rate pattern before and after paracervical anesthesia. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1987; 66: 391–5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Day TW. Community use of paracervical block in labor. J Fam Pract 1989; 28: 545–50
   Google Scholar
• Gerdin E, Cnattingius S. The use of obstetric analgesia in Sweden 1983–1986. B J Obstet Gynaecol 1990; 97: 789–96
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Official Statistics of Finland. Statistics on births in Finland 1990. National Agency for Welfare and Health, Helsinki 1992
   Google Scholar
• Taylor H JC. Choice of analgesia/anaesthesia during labour and delivery. Clin Invest Med 1985; 8: 345–51
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs C P, Krischer J, Peckham B M, Sharp H, Kirschbaum TH. Obstetric anesthesia: a national survey. Anesthesiolo-gy 1986; 65: 298–306
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Reynolds F. Pain relief in labour. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1990; 97: 757–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jensen M P, Karoly P, O'Riordan EE, Bland F, Jr., Burns RS. The subjective experience of acute pain. An assessment of utility of 10 indices. Clin J Pain 1989; 5: 153–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacDonald D, Grant A, Sheridan-Pereira M, Boylan P, Chalmers I. The Dublin randomized controlled trial of in-trapartum fetal heart rate monitoring. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985; 152: 526–39
   Google Scholar
• Melzack R, Taenzer P, Feldman P, Kinch RA. Labour is still painful after prepared childbirth training. CMA Journal 1981; 125: 357–63
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan B M, Bulpitt C J, Clifton P, Lewis PJ. Effectiveness of pain relief in labour: survey of 1000 mothers. Br Med J 1982; 285: 689–90
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonica JJ. Labour pain. Textbook of pain, P D Wall, R Melzack. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh 1984; 377–92
   Google Scholar
• Lederman R P, Lederman E, Work B, McCann DS. Anxiety and epinephrine in multiparous women in labor: relationship to duration of labor and fetal heart rate pattern. Obstet Gynecol 1985; 153: 870–7
   Google Scholar
• Stewart DE. Psychiatric symptoms following attempted natural childbirth. Can Med Assoc J 1982; 127: 713–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan B M, Bulpitt C J, Clifton P, Lewis PJ. The consumers' attitude to obstetric care. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1984; 91: 624–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ranta P, Spalding M, Jouppila P. Maternal expectations and experiences of labour pain — options of 1091 Finnish parturients. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand, in press
   Google Scholar
• Boehm F H, Lf Woodruff, Growdon JH. The effect of lumbar epidural anesthesia on fetal heart rate baseline variability. Anesth Analg 1975; 54: 779–82
   Google Scholar
• Umstad M P, Ross A, Rushford D D, Permezel M. Epidural analgesia and fetal heart rate abnormalities. Aust NZ J Obstet Gynaecol 1993; 33: 269–72
   Google Scholar
• Thiery M, Vroman S. Paracervical block analgesia during labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1972; 113: 988–1036
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrie R H, Paul W L, Miller FC. Placental transfer of lidocaine following paracervical block. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1974; 120: 791–801
   Google Scholar
• Boylan P. Intrapartum fetal monitoring. Bailliere's Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology. International practice and research eds. Whittle MJ., Oxford 1987; 1: 73–95
   Google Scholar