Breech at termmode of delivery?: A register-based study

References

• Cheng M, Hannah M. Breech delivery at term: A critical review of the literature. Obstet Gynecol 1993; 82(4)605–18
   Google Scholar
• Thorpe Beeston JG, Banfield PJ, Saunders N JStG. Outcome of breech delivery at term. Br Med J 1992; 305: 746–7
   Google Scholar
• Letters to the editor. Br Med J 1992; 305: 1090–2
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Letters to the editor. Br Med J 1992; 305: 1499–500
   Google Scholar
• Wright RC. Reduction of perinatal mortality and morbidity in breech delivery through routine use of Caesarean section. Obstet Gynecol 1959; 14: 758–63
   Google Scholar
• Fischer-Rasmussen W, Trolle D. Abdominal versus vaginal delivery in breech presentation. Acta Gynecol Obstet Scand 1967; 9: 69–76, (suppl)
   Google Scholar
• Collea J, Chein V.C., Quilligàn EJ. The randomized management of term frank breech presentation: A study of 208 cases. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1980; 137: 235–44
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gimovsky ML, Wallace RL, Schifrin BS, Paul RH. Randomized management of the non-frank breech presentation at term: A preliminary report. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1983; 146: 34–40
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krebs L, Langhoff-Roos J, Fisher-Rasmussen W, Weber T. A survey of 30 departments of obstetrics in Denmark concerning management of breech delivery at term. Unpublished
   Google Scholar
• Medical Birth Statistics 1991. Sundhedsstyrelsens vitalstatistik 1993; 1: 35
   Google Scholar
• Voigt S, Weber T. Forløsning af underkropspræsentation. En retrospektiv opgørelse. Ugeskr Læger 1988; 150: 660–2
   Google Scholar
• Hvidman LE, Hansen KB, Eriksen GM, Bønnelykke B, Krag-Olsen B, Nielsen J. Fødsel med foster i underkropspræsentation. Ugeskr Læger 1989; 151: 437–40
   Google Scholar
• Lauszus FF, Petersen A, Præst J. Strategi for forløsning af underkropsfødsler. Ugeskr Læger 1992; 154: 123–6
   Google Scholar
• Nwosu ES, Walkinshaw S, Chia P, Manasse PR, Atley RD. Undiagnosed breech. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1993; 100: 531–5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fortney JA, Higgins JE, Kennedy KI, Laufe LE, Wilkens L. Delivery type and neonatal mortality among 10,749 breeches. Am J Public Health 1986; 76(8)980–5
   Google Scholar
• Øian P, Skråmm I, Hannisdal E, Bjøro K. Breech delivery: An obstetrical analysis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1988; 67: 75–9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luterkort M, Marsál K. Umbilical cord acid-base state and Apgar score in term breech neonates. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1987; 66: 57–60
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deutinger J, Beranaschek G. Vaginosonographical determination of the true conjugate and the transverse diameter of the pelvic inlet. Arch-Gynecol 1987; 240: 241–6
   Google Scholar
• Rojansky N, Tanos V, Lewin A, Weinstein D. Sonographic evaluation of fetal head extension and maternal pelvis in cases of breech presentation. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1994; 73: 607–11
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weight AR, English PT, Cameron HM, Wilsdon JB. MR Pelvimetry a practical alternative. Acta Radiol 1992; 33: 582–7
   Google Scholar
• Lilford RJ, Van Coeverden de Gropt HA, Moore PJ, Bingham P. The relative risk of caesarean section (intrapartum and elective) and vaginal delivery: A detailed analysis to exclude the effects of medical disorders and other acute pre-existing physiological disturbances. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1990; 97: 883–92
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Høgberg U. Maternal deaths related to cesarean section in Sweden 1951–1980. Doctoral Thesis 1986; 1, VII (I-VIII), Umeå, Sweden
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen TF, Hökegård KH. Caesarean section and intraoperative surgical complications. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1984; 63: 103–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pelle H, Jepsen OB, Larsen SO. Wound infection after caesarean section. Infect Control 1986; 7: 456–61
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kjer JJ, Devantier A. Ruptura uteri i Danmark i perioden 1980–1987. Ugeskr Læger 1992; 22: 1544–6
   Google Scholar
• Meehan FP, Magani IM. True rupture of the caesarean section scar (A 15-year review, 1972–1987). Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1989; 30: 129–35
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen TF, Ljungblad U, Hagberg H. Rupture and dehiscence of caesarean section scar during pregnancy and delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989; 160: 569–73
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen TF, Hagberg H, Lungblad U. Placenta previa and antepartum haemorrhage after previous cesarean section. Gynecol Obstet Invest 1989; 27: 88–90
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Taulor VM, Kramer MD, Vaughan TL, Peacock S. Placenta previa and prior caesarean delivery: How strong is the association. Obstet Gynecol 1994; 84: 55–7
   Google Scholar
• Effective care in pregnancy and childbirth, I Chalmers, M Emkin, MJNC Kirse. Oxford University Press. 1989
   Google Scholar