Perceptions and satisfaction among Norplant users in Finland

References

• Population Council. Introducing Norplant in developing countries. What NGOs, women's health advocates and the media should know about Norplant implants. The Population Council, New York 1993
   Google Scholar
• Roussel launches Norplant in UK. Scrip no. 1863. Oct. 12, 1993; 18, Anon.
   Google Scholar
• Basnayake S, Thapa S, Balogh S A. Evaluation of safety, efficacy, and acceptability of NorplantR implants in Sri Lanka. Stud Fam Plann 1988; 19: 39–47
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sujuan G, Mingun D, Yuan Y D, et al. A two-year study of acceptability, side effects, and effectiveness of NorplantR, and Norplant-2R implants in the Peoples' Republic of China. Contraception 1988; 38: 641–57
   Google Scholar
• Balogh S A, Klavon S L, Basnayake S, Puertollano N, Ramos R, Grubb G S. Bleeding patterns and acceptability among NorplantR users in two Asian countries. Contraception 1989; 39: 541–55
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kane T T, Farr G, Janowitz B. Initial acceptability of contraceptive implants in four developing contries. Int Fam Plann Pers 1990; 16: 49–54
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman M, Haffey J, Crane E, et al. Assessing the acceptability of Norplant implants in four countries: findings from focus group research. Stud Fam Plann 1990; 21: 92–103
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh K, Viegas O A, Fong Y F, Ratnam S S. Acceptability of NorplantR implants for fertility regulation in Singapore. Contraception 1992; 45: 39–47
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsson S-E, Odlind V, Johansson E DB, Sivin I. Contraception with NorplantR implants and Norplant-2R implants (two covered rods). Contraception 1988; 37: 61–73
   Google Scholar
• Sivin I. International experience with Norplant and Norplant-2 contraceptives. Stud Fam Plann 1988; 19: 81–94
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCauley A P, Geller J S. Decisions for Norplant programs. Pop Rep 1992. series K, no 4, John Hopkins University, Baltimore September, 1992; 5, Population Information Program
   Google Scholar
• Satayapan S, Kanchanasinith K, Varakamin S. Perceptions and acceptability of NorplantR implants in Thailand. Stud Fam Plann 1983; 14: 170–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darney P D, Atkinson E, Tanner S, MacPherson S, Hellerstein S, Alvarado A. Acceptance and perceptions of NorplantR among users in San Francisco, USA. Stud Fam Plann 1990; 21: 152–60
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frank M L, Poindexter A N, Johnson M L, Bateman L. Characteristics and attitudes of early contraceptive implant acceptors in Texas. Fam Plann Perspect 1992; 24: 208–13
   Google Scholar
• Cullins V E, Blumenthal P D, Remsburg R E. Preliminary experience with NorplantR in an inner city population. Contraception 1993; 47: 193–203
   Google Scholar
• Sihvo S, Ollila E, Hemminki E. Who uses Norplant - a study from Finland. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1994; 73: 476–81
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ollila E, Hemminki E, Kajesalo K. Physicians' experience with Norplant implantable contraceptives in Finland. Scand J Soc Med 1995, in press
   Google Scholar
• Crosby U D, Schwarz B E, Gluck K L, Heartwell S F. A preliminary report of Norplant implant insertions in a large urban family planning program. Contraception 1993; 48: 359–66
   Google Scholar
• Gu S J, Du M K, Zhang L D, Liu Y L, Wang S H, Sivin I. A 5-year evaluation of Norplant contraceptive implants in China. Obstet Gynecol 1994; 83: 673–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shoupe D, Ballagh S, Mishell D R. Bleeding patterns in Norplant contraceptive users. Steroid hormones and uterine bleeding, N J Alexander, C d'Arcangues. AAAS Press, Washington 1992; 49–57
   Google Scholar
• Makkonen K, Hemminki E, Tuimala R. Pros and cons of intrauterine contraception - do perceptions of users and physicians differ?. Scand J Prim Health Care 1994; 12: 190–6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• STAKES. Induced abortions in Finland until 1991, H Hämäläinen, A Rasimus, M Rimpelä. Official Statistics of Finland, Health. 1993; 3, STAKES National Research and Development Centre for Welfare and Health, Jyväskylä, Gummerus, 1993
   Google Scholar