Influence of resin cements on cuspal deflection and fracture load of endodontically-treated teeth restored with composite inlays

References

• Mondelli J, Steagall L, Ishikiriama A, De Lima Navarro MF, Soares FB. Fracture strength of human teeth with cavity preparations. J Prosthet Dent 1980;43:419–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavel TW, Kelsey PW, Blankenau RJ. An in vitro study of cuspal fracture. J Prosthet Dent 1985;53:38–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santos MJMC, Bezerra RB. Fracture resistance of maxillary premolars restored with direct and indirect adhesive techniques. J Can Dent Assoc 2005;71:585a–d.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cerutti A, Flocchini P, Madini L, Mangani F, Putignano A, Docchio F. Effects of bonded composite vs. amalgam on resistance to cuspal deflection for endodontically-treated premolar teeth. Am J Dent 2004;17:295–300.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamada Y, Tsubota Y, Fukushima S. Effect of restoration method on fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars. Int J Prosthodont 2004;17:94–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camacho GB, Gonçalves M, Nonaka T. Fracture strength of restored premolars. Am J Dent 2007;20:121–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burke FJ. Trends in indirect dentistry: 3. Luting materials. Dent Update 2005;32:257–60.
   Google Scholar
• Anusavice KJ. Phillips - Dental materials. 10th ed. Rio de Janeiro: Guanabara; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• De Munck J, Vargas M, Van Landuyt K, Hikita K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Bonding of auto-adhesive luting material to enamel and dentin. Dent Mater 2004;20:963–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abo-Hamar SE, Hiller KA, Jung H, Federlin M, Friedl KH, Schmalz G. Bond strength of a new universal self-adhesive resin luting cement to dentin and enamel. Clin Oral Invest 2005;9:161–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lührs AK, Guhr S, Günay H, Geurtsen W. Shear bond strength of self-adhesive resins compared to resin cements etch and rinse to enamel and dentin in vitro. Clin Oral Invest 2010;14:193–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang C, Degrange M. Shear bond strength of self-adhesive luting resins fixing dentine to different restorative materials. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 2010;5:593–608.
   Google Scholar
• Nakamura T, Wakabayashi K, Kinuta S, Nishida H, Miyamae M, Yatani H. Mechanical properties of new self-adhesive resin-based cement. J Prosthodont Res 2010;54:59–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González-López S, De Haro-Gasquet F, Vilchez-Dias MA, Ceballos L, Bravo M. Effect of restorative procedures and occlusal loading on cuspal deflection. Oper Dent 2006;31:33–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz RS, Robbins JW. Post placement and restoration of endodontically treated teeth: a literature review. J Endod 2004;30:289–99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jantarat J, Palamara J, Messer H. An investigation of cuspal deformation and delayed recovery after occlusal loading. J Dent 2001;29:363–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soares CJ, Martins LR, Pfeifer JM, Giannini M. Fracture resistance of teeth restored with indirect-composite and ceramic inlay systems. Quintessence Int 2004;35:281–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ausiello P, Apicella A, Davidson CL. Effect of adhesive layer properties on stress distribution in composite restorations – a 3D finite element analysis. Dent Mater 2002;18:295–303.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakaguchi RL, Brust EW, Cross M, DeLong R, Douglas WH. Independent movement of cusps during occlusal loading. Dent Mater 1991;7:186–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakabayashi N, Kojima M, Masuhara E. The promotion of adhesion by the infiltration of monomers into tooth substrate. J Biomed Mater Res 1982;16:265–73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang B, Ludwig K, Adelung R, Kern M. Micro-tensile bond strength of three luting resins to human regional dentin. Dent Mater 2006;22:45–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goracci C, Cury AH, Cantoro A, Papacchini F, Tay FR, Ferrari M. Microtensile bond strength and interfacial properties of self-etching and self-adhesive resin cements used to lute composite onlays under different seating forces. J Adhes Dent 2006;8:327–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monticelli F, Osorio R, Mazzitelli C, Ferrari M, Toledano M. Limited decalcification/diffusion of self-adhesive cements into dentin. J Dent Res 2008;87:974–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerth HUV, Dammaschke T, Züchner H, Schäfer E. Chemical analyses and bonding reaction of Relyx Unicem and Bifix composites – a comparative study. Dent Mater 2006;22:934–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hikita K, Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Ikeda T, Van Landuyt K, Maida T, et al. Bonding effectiveness of adhesive luting agents to enamel and dentin. Dent Mater 2007;23:71–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duarte S Jr, Botta AC, Meire M, Sadan A. Microtensile bond strengths and scanning electron microscopic evaluation of self-adhesive and self-etch resin cements to intact and etched enamel. J Prosthet Dent 2008;3:203–10.
   Google Scholar
• Holderegger C, Sailer I, Schuhmacher C, Schläpfer R, Hämmerle C, Fischer J. Shear bond strength of resin cements to human dentin. Dent Mater 2008;24:944–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soares CJ, Martins LR, Fonseca RB, Correr-Sobrinho L, Fernandes Neto AJ. Influence of cavity preparation design on fracture resistance of posterior leucite-reinforced ceramic restorations. J Prosthet Dent 2006;95:421–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soares PV, Santos-Filho PC, Queiroz EC, Araújo TC, Campos RE, Araújo CA, et al. Fracture resistance and stress distribution in endodontically treated maxillary premolars restored with composite resin. J Prosthodont 2007;17:114–19.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Khera SC, Goel VK, Chen RC, Gurusami SA. Parameters of MOD cavity preparations: a 3-D FEM study, Part II. Oper Dent 1991;16:43–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soares PV, Santos-Filho PC, Martins LR, Soares CJ. Influence of restorative technique on the biomechanical behaviour of endodontically treated maxillary premolars. Part I fracture resistance and fracture mode. J Prosthet Dent 2008;99:30–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin CL, Chang CH, Ko CC. Multifactorial analysis of an MOD restored human premolar using auto-mesh finite element approach. J Oral Rehabil 2001;28:576–86.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peutzfeldt A. Indirect resin and ceramic systems. Oper Dent 2001;6:153–76.
   Google Scholar
• Gracis SE, Nicholls JI, Chalupnik JD, Yuodelis RA. Shock-absorbing behavior of five restorative materials used on implants. Int J Prosthodont 1991;4:282–91.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dalpino PHP, Francischone CE, Ishikiriama A, Franco EB. Fracture resistance of teeth directly and indirectly restored with composite resin and indirectly restored with ceramic materials. Am J Dent 2002;15:389–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gale MS, Darvell BW. Thermal cycling procedures for laboratory testing of dental restorations. J Dent 1999;27:89–99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar