The bacterial adhesion on and the cytotoxicity of various dental cements used for implant-supported fixed restorations

References

• Buergers R, Hahnel S, Reischl U, Mueller R, Rosentritt M, Handel G, et al. Streptococcal adhesion to various luting systems and the role of mixing errors. Acta Odontol Scand 2009;67:139–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiessl C, Schaefer L, Winter C, Fuerst J, Rosentritt M, Zeman F, et al. Factors determining the retentiveness of luting agents used with metal- and ceramic-based implant components. Clin Oral Investig Internet 2013;17(4):1179–90.
   Google Scholar
• Mombelli A. Microbiology of the dental implant. Adv Dent Res 1993;7:202–6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Scarano A, Piattelli M, Caputi S, Favero GA, Piattelli A. Bacterial adhesion on commercially pure titanium and zirconium oxide disks: an in vivo human study. J Periodontol 2004;75:292–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elter C, Heuer W, Demling A, Hannig M, Heidenblut T, Bach FW, et al. Supra- and subgingival biofilm formation on implant abutments with different surface characteristics. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2008;23:327–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bürgers R, Gerlach T, Hahnel S, Schwarz F, Handel G, Gosau M. In vivo and in vitro biofilm formation on two different titanium implant surfaces. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010;21:156–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wadhwani C, Rapoport D, La Rosa S, Hess T, Kretschmar S. Radiographic detection and characteristic patterns of residual excess cement associated with cement-retained implant restorations: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent 2012;107:151–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auschill TM, Arweiler NB, Brecx M, Reich E, Sculean A, Netuschil L. The effect of dental restorative materials on dental biofilm. Eur J Oral Sci 2002;110:48–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takatsuka T, Konishi N, Nakabo S, Hashimoto T, Torii Y, Yoshiyama M. Adhesion in vitro of oral streptococci to porcelain, composite resin cement and human enamel. Dent Mater J 2000;19:363–72.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Busscher HJ, Rinastiti M, Siswomihardjo W, van der Mei HC. Biofilm formation on dental restorative and implant materials. J Dent Res 2010;89:657–65.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beyth N, Bahir R, Matalon S, Domb AJ, Weiss EI. Streptococcus mutans biofilm changes surface-topography of resin composites. Dent Mater 2008;24:732–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carvalho RM, Pereira JC, Yoshiyama M, Pashley DH. A review of polymerization contraction: the influence of stress development versus stress relief. Oper Dent 1996;21:17–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agar JR, Cameron SM, Hughbanks JC, Parker MH. Cement removal from restorations luted to titanium abutments with simulated subgingival margins. J Prosthet Dent 1997;78:43–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pauletto N, Lahiffe BJ, Walton JN. Complications associated with excess cement around crowns on osseointegrated implants: a clinical report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999;14:865–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang NP, Berglundh T. Periimplant diseases: where are we now?--Consensus of the Seventh European Workshop on Periodontology. J Clin Periodontol 2011;38:178–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abrahamsson I, Berglundh T, Lindhe J. Soft tissue response to plaque formation at different implant systems. A comparative study in the dog. Clin Oral Implants Res 1998;9:73–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oh TJ, Yoon J, Misch CE, Wang HL. The causes of early implant bone loss: myth or science? J Periodontol 2002;73:322–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zitzmann NU, Abrahamsson I, Berglundh T, Lindhe J. Soft tissue reactions to plaque formation at implant abutments with different surface topography. An experimental study in dogs. J Clin Periodontol 2002;29:456–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu-Yuan CD, Eganhouse KJ, Keller JC, Walters KS. Oral bacterial attachment to titanium surfaces: a scanning electron microscopy study. J Oral Implant 1995;21:207–13.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• An YH, Friedman RJ. Concise review of mechanisms of bacterial adhesion to biomaterial surfaces. J Biomed Mater Res 1998;43:338–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasperini G, Maglione M, Cocconcelli P, Simion M. In vivo early plaque formation on pure titanium and ceramic abutments: a comparative microbiological and SEM analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res 1998;9:357–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teughels W, Van Assche N, Sliepen I, Quirynen M. Effect of material characteristics and/or surface topography on biofilm development. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006;17:68–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakazato G, Tsuchiya H, Sato M, Yamauchi M. In vivo plaque formation on implant materials. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1989;4:321–6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Esposito M, Hirsch JM, Lekholm U, Thomsen P. Biological factors contributing to failures of osseointegrated oral implants. (I). Success criteria and epidemiology. Eur J Oral Sci 1998;106:527–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quirynen M, De Soete M, van Steenberghe D. Infectious risks for oral implants: a review of the literature. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002;13:1–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esposito M, Hirsch JM, Lekholm U, Thomsen P. Biological factors contributing to failures of osseointegrated oral implants. (II). Etiopathogenesis. Eur J Oral Sci 1998;106:721–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan TD, Wilson M. The effects of surface roughness and type of denture acrylic on biofilm formation by Streptococcus oralis in a constant depth film fermentor. J Appl Microbiol 2001;91:47–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nyvad B, Fejerskov O. Scanning electron microscopy of early microbial colonization of human enamel and root surfaces in vivo. Scand J Dent Res 1987;95:287–96.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Buergers R, Rosentritt M, Handel G. Bacterial adhesion of Streptococcus mutans to provisional fixed prosthodontic material. J Prosthet Dent 2007;98:461–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor RL, Verran J, Lees GC, Ward AJ. The influence of substratum topography on bacterial adhesion to polymethyl methacrylate. J Mater Sci Mater Med 1998;9:17–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quirynen M, Bollen CM. The influence of surface roughness and surface-free energy on supra- and subgingival plaque formation in man. A review of the literature. J Clin Periodontol 1995;22:1–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busscher HJ, Vanpelt AWJ, Deboer P, Dejong HP, Arends J. The effect of surface roughening of polymers on measured contact angles of liquids. Colloids Surfaces 1984;9:319–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quirynen M. The clinical meaning of the surface-roughness and the surface free-energy of intraoral hard substrate on the microbiology of the supragingival and subgingival plaque - Results of in-vitro and in-vivo experiments. J Dent 1994;22:S13–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minagi S, Miyake Y, Inagaki K, Tsuru H, Suginaka H. Hydrophobic interaction in Candida albicans and Candida tropicalis adherence to various denture base resin materials. Infect Immun 1985;47:11–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weerkamp AH, van der Mei HC, Busscher HJ. The surface free energy of oral streptococci after being coated with saliva and its relation to adhesion in the mouth. J Dent Res 1985;64:1204–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Six N, Lasfargues JJ, Goldberg M. In vivo study of the pulp reaction to Fuji IX, a glass ionomer cement. J Dent 2000;28:413–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Souza Costa CA, Hebling J, Garcia-Godoy F, Hanks CT. In vitro cytotoxicity of five glass-ionomer cements. Biomaterials 2003;24:3853–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldberg M. In vitro and in vivo studies on the toxicity of dental resin components: a review. Clin Oral Investig 2008;12:1–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferracane JL. Elution of leachable components from composites. J Oral Rehabil 1994;21:441–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmalz G. The biocompatibility of non-amalgam dental filling materials. Eur J Oral Sci 1998;106:696–706.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bürgers R, Cariaga T, Muller R, Rosentritt M, Reischl U, Handel G, et al. Effects of aging on surface properties and adhesion of Streptococcus mutans on various fissure sealants. Clin Oral Investig Internet. 2009;13(4):419–26.
   Google Scholar
• Owens DK, Wendt RC. Estimation of the surface free energy of polymers. J Appl Polym Sci 1969;13:1741–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behneke A, Behneke N, d' Hoedt B. The longitudinal clinical effectiveness of ITI solid-screw implants in partially edentulous patients: a 5-year follow-up report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000;15:633–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avivi-Arber L, Zarb GA. Clinical effectiveness of implant- supported single-tooth replacement: the Toronto Study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996;11:311–21.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Busscher HJ, Ploeg RJ, van der Mei HC. SnapShot: biofilms and biomaterials; mechanisms of medical device related infections. Biomaterials 2009;30:4247–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Busscher HJ, Bos R, Van der Mei HC. Initial microbial adhesion is a determinant for the strength of biofilm adhesion. FEMS Microbiol Lett 1995;128:229–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bundy KJ, Butler MF, Hochman RF. An investigation of the bacteriostatic properties of pure metals. J Biomed Mater Res 1980;14:653–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonhardt A, Dahlen G. Effect of titanium on selected oral bacterial species in vitro. Eur J Oral Sci 1995;103:382–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gristina AG. Biomaterial-centered infection: microbial adhesion versus tissue integration. Science 1987;237:1588–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busscher HJ, van der Mei HC, Subbiahdoss G, Jutte PC, Dungen van den JJAM, Zaat SAJ, et al. Biomaterial-associated infection: locating the finish line in the race for the surface. Sci Transl Med 2012;4:153rv10–0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gómez-Suárez C, Busscher HJ, Van der Mei HC. Analysis of bacterial detachment from substratum surfaces by the passage of air-liquid interfaces. Appl Environ Microbiol 2001;67:2531–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewhirst FE, Chen T, Izard J, Paster BJ, Tanner AC, Yu WH, et al. The human oral microbiome. J Bacteriol 2010;192:5002–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonhardt A, Renvert S, Dahlen G. Microbial findings at failing implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 1999;10:339–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subramani K, Jung RE, Molenberg A, Hammerle CH. Biofilm on dental implants: a review of the literature. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009;24:616–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reid G, Bailey RR. Biofilm infections: implications for diagnosis and treatment. N Z Med J 1996;109:41–2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hensten-Pettersen A, Helgeland K. Sensitivity of different human cell line in the biologic evaluation of dental resin-based restorative materials. Scand J Dent Res 1981;89:102–7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Costa CA, Hebling J, Hanks CT. Current status of pulp capping with dentin adhesive systems: a review. Dent Mater 2000;16:188–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ribeiro DA, Marques ME, Salvadori DM. Genotoxicity and cytotoxicity of glass ionomer cements on Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2006;17:495–500.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grivet M, Morrier JJ, Souchier C, Barsotti O. Automatic enumeration of adherent streptococci or actinomyces on dental alloy by fluorescence image analysis. J Microbiol Methods 1999;38:33–42.
   Google Scholar
• Gaines S, James TC, Folan M, Baird AW, O'Farrelly C. A novel spectrofluorometric microassay for Streptococcus mutans adherence to hydroxylapatite. J Microbiol Methods 2003;54:315–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muller R, Groger G, Hiller KA, Schmalz G, Ruhl S. Fluorescence-based bacterial overlay method for simultaneous in situ quantification of surface-attached bacteria. Appl Env Microbiol 2007;73:2653–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buergers R, Schneider-Brachert W, Hahnel S, Rosentritt M, Handel G. Streptococcal adhesion to novel low-shrink silorane-based restorative. Dent Mater 2009;25:269–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hahnel S, Rosentritt M, Burgers R, Handel G. Surface properties and in vitro Streptococcus mutans adhesion to dental resin polymers. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2008;19:2619–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gosau M, Hahnel S, Schwarz F, Gerlach T, Reichert TE, Burgers R. Effect of six different peri-implantitis disinfection methods on in vivo human oral biofilm. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010;21:866–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannig C, Hannig M, Rehmer O, Braun G, Hellwig E, Al-Ahmad A. Fluorescence microscopic visualization and quantification of initial bacterial colonization on enamel in situ. Arch Oral Biol 2007;52:1048–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruyter IE. Release of formaldehyde from denture base polymers. Acta Odontol Scand 1980;38:17–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hahnel S, Henrich A, Rosentritt M, Handel G, Burgers R. Influence of artificial ageing on surface properties and Streptococcus mutans adhesion to dental composite materials. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2010;21:823–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgers R, Hahnel S, Reichert TE, Rosentritt M, Behr M, Gerlach T, et al. Adhesion of Candida albicans to various dental implant surfaces and the influence of salivary pellicle proteins. Acta Biomater 2010;6:2307–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weerkamp AH, Uyen HM, Busscher HJ. Effect of zeta potential and surface energy on bacterial adhesion to uncoated and saliva- coated human enamel and dentin. J Dent Res 1988;67:1483–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poon CY, Bhushan B. Comparison of surface roughness measurements by stylus profiler, AFM and non-contact profiler. Wear 1995;190:76–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phan TN, Buckner T, Sheng J, Baldeck JD, Marquis RE. Physiologic actions of zinc related to inhibition of acid and alkali production by oral streptococci in suspensions and biofilms. Oral Microbiol Immunol 2004;19:31–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Imazato S, Torii Y, Takatsuka T, Inoue K, Ebi N, Ebisu S. Bactericidal effect of dentin primer containing antibacterial monomer methacryloyloxydodecylpyridinium bromide (MDPB) against bacteria in human carious dentin. J Oral Rehabil 2001;28:314–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyd D, Li H, Tanner DA, Towler MR, Wall JG. The antibacterial effects of zinc ion migration from zinc-based glass polyalkenoate cements. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2006;17:489–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbour ME, O'Sullivan DJ, Jenkinson HF, Jagger DC. The effects of polishing methods on surface morphology, roughness and bacterial colonisation of titanium abutments. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2007;18:1439–47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guertler A, Kraemer A, Roessler U, Hornhardt S, Kulka U, Moertl S, et al. The WST survival assay: an easy and reliable method to screen radiation-sensitive individuals. Radiat Prot Dosim 2011;143:487–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanislawski L, Daniau X, Lauti A, Goldberg M. Factors responsible for pulp cell cytotoxicity induced by resin- modified glass ionomer cements. J Biomed Mater Res 1999;48:277–88.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brauer DS, Gentleman E, Farrar DF, Stevens MM, Hill RG. Benefits and drawbacks of zinc in glass ionomer bone cements. Biomed Mater 2011;6:045007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva EJNL, Accorsi-Mendonca T, Almeida JFA, Ferraz CCR, Gomes BPFA, Zaia AA. Evaluation of cytotoxicity and up-regulation of gelatinases in human fibroblast cells by four root canal sealers. Int Endod J 2012;45:49–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindqvist L, Otteskog P, Eugenol Liberation from dental materials and effect on human-diploid fibroblast cells. Scand J Dent Res 1980;88:552–6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Souza PP, Aranha AM, Hebling J, Giro EM, Costa CA. In vitro cytotoxicity and in vivo biocompatibility of contemporary resin- modified glass-ionomer cements. Dent Mater 2006;22:838–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geurtsen W. Substances released from dental resin composites and glass ionomer cements. Eur J Oral Sci 1998;106:687–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson AD. Resin-modified glass-ionomer cements. Int J Prosthodont 1990;3:425–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCabe JF. Resin-modified glass-ionomers. Biomaterials 1998;19:521–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar