Influence of preparation design on fit and ceramic thickness of CEREC 3 partial ceramic crowns after cementation

References

• Fasbinder DJ. Clinical performance of chairside CAD/CAM restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 2006;137(Suppl):22–31.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Beuer F, Schweiger J, Edelhoff D. Digital dentistry: an overview of recent developments for CAD/CAM generated restorations. Br Dent J 2008;204:505–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bindl A, Mörmann WH. Clinical and SEM evaluation of all-ceramic chair-side CAD/CAM-generated partial crowns. Eur J Oral Sci 2003;111:163–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Federlin M, Schmidt S, Hiller KA, Thonemann B, Schmalz G. Partial ceramic crowns: influence of preparation design and luting material on internal adaptation. Oper Dent 2004;29:560–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molin M, Karlsson S. The fit of gold inlays and three ceramic inlay systems. A clinical and in vitro study. Acta Odontol Scand 1993;51:201–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin N, Jedynakiewicz NM. Interface dimensions of CEREC-2 MOD inlays. Dent Mater 2000;16:68–74.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kokubo Y, Ohkubo C, Tsumita M, Miyashita A, Vult von Steyern P, Fukushima S. Clinical marginal and internal gaps of Procera AllCeram crowns. J Oral Rehabil 2005;32:526–30.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sjögren G. Marginal and internal fit of four different types of ceramic inlays after luting. An in vitro study. Acta Odontol Scand 1995;53:24–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sjögren G, Hedlund SO. Filler content and gap width after luting of ceramic inlays, using the ultrasonic insertion technique and composite resin cements. An in vitro study. Acta Odontol Scand 1997;55:403–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felton DA, Kanoy BE, Bayne SC, Wirthman GP. Effect of in vivo crown margin discrepancies on periodontal health. J Prosthet Dent 1991;65:357–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kawai K, Isenberg BP, Leinfelder KF. Effect of gap dimension on composite resin cement wear. Quintessence Int 1994;25:53–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Molin MK, Karlsson SL, Kristiansen MS. Influence of film thickness on joint bend strength of a ceramic/resin composite joint. Dent Mater 1996;12:245–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mou SH, Chai T, Wang JS, Shiau YY. Influence of different convergence angles and tooth preparation heights on the internal adaptation of Cerec crowns. J Prosthet Dent 2002;87:248–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akbar JH, Petrie CS, Walker MP, Williams K, Eick JD. Marginal adaptation of Cerec 3 CAD/CAM composite crowns using two different finish line preparation designs. J Prosthodont 2006;15:155–63.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Federlin M, Sipos C, Hiller KA, Thonemann B, Schmalz G. Partial ceramic crowns. Influence of preparation design and luting material on margin integrity--a scanning electron microscopic study. Clin Oral Investig 2005;9:8–17.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Federlin M, Krifka S, Herpich M, Hiller KA, Schmalz G. Partial ceramic crowns: influence of ceramic thickness, preparation design and luting material on fracture resistance and marginal integrity in vitro. Oper Dent 2007;32:251–60.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bindl A, Mörmann WH. Marginal and internal fit of all-ceramic CAD/CAM crown-copings on chamfer preparations. J Oral Rehabil 2005;32:441–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seo DG, Yi YA, Lee Y, Roh BD. Influence of three different preparation designs on the marginal and internal gaps of CEREC3 CAD/CAM inlays. J Korean Acad Conserv Dent 2009;34:177–83.
   Google Scholar
• Reich S, Wichmann M, Nkenke E, Proeschel P. Clinical fit of all-ceramic three-unit fixed partial dentures, generated with three different CAD/CAM systems. Eur J Oral Sci 2005;113:174–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reich S, Uhlen S, Gozdowski S, Lohbauer U. Measurement of cement thickness under lithium disilicate crowns using an impression material technique. Clin Oral Investig 2011;15:521–6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McLean JW, von Fraunhofer JA. The estimation of cement film thickness by an in vivo technique. Br Dent J 1971;131:107–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakamura T, Dei N, Kojima T, Wakabayashi K. Marginal and internal fit of Cerec 3 CAD/CAM all-ceramic crowns. Int J Prosthodont 2003;16:244–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakamura T, Tanaka H, Kinuta S, Akao T, Okamoto K, Wakabayashi K, et al. In vitro study on marginal and internal fit of CAD/CAM all-ceramic crowns. Dent Mater J 2005;24:456–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seo D, Yi Y, Roh B. The effect of preparation designs on the marginal and internal gaps in Cerec3 partial ceramic crowns. J Dent 2009;37:374–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pelekanos S, Koumanou M, Koutayas SO, Zinelis S, Eliades G. Micro-CT evaluation of the marginal fit of different In-Ceram alumina copings. Eur J Esthet Dent 2009;4:278–92.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Borba M, Cesar PF, Griggs JA, Della Bona Á. Adaptation of all-ceramic fixed partial dentures. Dent Mater 2011;27:1119–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfart S, Wegner SM, Al-Halabi A, Kern M. Clinical evaluation of marginal fit of a new experimental all-ceramic system before and after cementation. Int J Prosthodont 2003;16:587–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beschnidt SM, Strub JR. Evaluation of the marginal accuracy of different all-ceramic crown systems after simulation in the artificial mouth. J Oral Rehabil 1999;26:582–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson VP, Rekow DE. Dental ceramics and the molar crown testing ground. J Appl Oral Sci 2004;12:26–36.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Inokoshi S, Van Meerbeek B, Willems G, Lambrechts P, Braem M, Vanherle G. Marginal accuracy of CAD/CAM inlays made with the original and the updated software. J Dent 1992;20:171–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mörmann WH, Schug J. Grinding precision and accuracy of fit of CEREC 2 CAD-CIM inlays. J Am Dent Assoc 1997;128:47–53.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pfeiffer J. Dental CAD/CAM technologies: the optical impression (II). Int J Comput Dent 1999;2:65–72.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Luthardt R, Weber A, Rudolph H, Schone C, Quaas S, Walter M. Design and production of dental prosthetic restorations: basic research on dental CAD/CAM technology. Int J Comput Dent 2002;5:165–76.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Silva NR, de Souza GM, Coelho PG, Stappert CF, Clark EA, Rekow ED, et al. Effect of water storage time and composite cement thickness on fatigue of a glass-ceramic trilayer system. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2008;84:117–23.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cho SH, Chang WG, Lim BS, Lee YK. Effect of die spacer thickness on shear bond strength of porcelain laminate veneers. J Prosthet Dent 2006;95:201–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Addison O, Marquis PM, Fleming GJ. Resin elasticity and the strengthening of all-ceramic restorations. J Dent Res 2007;86:519–23.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fleming GJ, Hooi P, Addison O. The influence of resin flexural modulus on the magnitude of ceramic strengthening. Dent Mater 2012;28:769–76.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Martin N, Jedynakiewicz NM. Clinical performance of CEREC ceramic inlays: a systematic review. Dent Mater 1999;15:54–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otto T, Schneider D. Long-term clinical results of chairside Cerec CAD/CAM inlays and onlays: a case series. Int J Prosthodont 2008;21:53–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmalz G, Federlin M, Reich E. Effect of dimension of luting space and luting composite on marginal adaptation of a class II ceramic inlay. J Prosthet Dent 1995;73:392–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kakaboura A, Rahiotis C, Watts D, Silikas N, Eliades G. 3D-marginal adaptation versus setting shrinkage in light-cured microhybrid resin composites. Dent Mater 2007;23:272–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sun J, Lin-Gibson S. X-ray microcomputed tomography for measuring polymerization shrinkage of polymeric dental composites. Dent Mater 2008;24:228–34.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Metzger Z, Zary R, Cohen R, Teperovich E, Paqué F. The quality of root canal preparation and root canal obturation in canals treated with rotary versus self-adjusting files: a three-dimensional micro-computed tomographic Study. J Endod 2010;36:1569–73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar